[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1694811580145527.png (87 KB, 441x603)
87 KB
87 KB PNG
what's the point of being a creative anymore when it's just a matter of time before AI creates work that rivals the greats, and do it thousands of time per minute
>>
>/lit/ - artificial intelligence
>>
>>22506577
AGI doesn't even exist yet and OP already gave up. NGMI
>>
>>22506577
It's still made by AI. Just words predicted after another. I'd still put more value to something thought up by and written by a human. Sure I might enjoy AI's writing more but would I wouldn't value it the same. Also I doubt that we'll ever get master piece out of an AI without some serious editoral work put into it.
>>
>>22506577
Because you can be creative in the world.
AI is confined to digital spaces, it wil take ages before AI can create fysical art.
It will only hurt the industrialized art industry, spewing out worthless art and saturate the market.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.