[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: 1511272514725.jpg (41 KB, 290x290)
41 KB
41 KB JPG
>Accordingly, we will find on the whole that people are sociable to the degree that they are intellectually poor and generally common. For in the world we have little more than the choice between solitude and vulgarity. The most sociable of all human beings are said to be the negroes, who indeed are intellectually inferior; according to accounts from North America in French papers. Black people, free ones and slaves altogether, shut themselves up in large numbers in the smallest space, because they cannot look often enough at their black snub-nosed faces.
OH NO NO NO NO
>>
based
>>
based
>>
>>12939869
based
>>
>>12939869
G.K. Chesterton was a fucking retard.
>>
>>12939869
And Thackeray
>>
>>12939869
Shelley and Byron were basically 68 IQ aboos.
>>
>>12939869
Mark Twain was not in the trainable bracket.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.