[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

[Advertise on 4chan]

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]

Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!

Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here.

[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: Geisha_Kyoto_Gion.jpg (626 KB, 912x1000)
626 KB
626 KB JPG
If you read Homer in translation, you're a fucking butt-munching pleb and you should leave this board forever. There, just fixed /lit/.
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
The name "Homer" is a translation.
If you read Homer at all you're a pseud. Listening to him recited orally from someone who has memorized him from a long line of storytellers is the only true way to understand him.
If you read ANYTHING you are a fucking pleb.
Why would I read a book by a Simpsons character?

File: kim_saul.jpg (154 KB, 1200x645)
154 KB
154 KB JPG
What's your favorite romance novel?
11 replies omitted. Click here to view.
I'm sure it's rarer but it's also difficult to find good romance novels.
Katawa Shoujo by Hacker known as 4chan
Ada or Ardor by Nabokov
there's romance in most of the /lit/ top 100, but I do read some romance genre lit at times.

File: Helen_of_Troy.jpg (1.61 MB, 1055x2171)
1.61 MB
1.61 MB JPG
Is it possible to write erotica that is also great literature?

I say absolutely not. It's possible to write erotica that is great at BEING erotica, but in becoming so, it will not be great literature.

Orson Welles in this video makes a really good point. He's talking about cinema but I think it applies equally well to literature:


Welles is saying that you can only make a "masterpiece of pornography," but not a masterpiece that is itself pornographic, because the goals of pornography and the goals of cinematic art are fundamentally different. I think he is correct, and I think the same applies to literature. You can, to quote Welles, "get as dirty as you want." You can depict sex, you can describe the bodies of women, and so on. But it's not going to be erotica, because the entire point of erotica is to get you so horny that you jerk off. And the point of something trying to be great literature is to communicate truths, to express something fundamental about whatever it is you are writing about, be it beauty, be it God, be it the nature of war, or anything. And writing in such a way as to get someone horny enough to fap is going to make them incapable of receiving such truths given the nature of the state someone gets in when they get that horny.

You can, as Welles says, make really, really good pornography. A "masterpiece of pornography." This is true for erotica as well. You can write things that are really, really good at making people horny. But they won't be great literature. They'll be great porn, but not great literature. The two are fundamentally different categories and cannot mix.

5 replies omitted. Click here to view.
File: dog.jpg (22 KB, 346x387)
22 KB
this is all based on authors intent which is a reductive way of thinking. Why? Because why limit categorically a written piece as not literature? Porn is porn and literature is literature, but strictly claiming that porn can not be analyzed on the level of a piece of literary work is limiting.

Personally, I think art should be separate from authors intent. Intent is a useful tool, but it should not be the decisive factor on what a piece of work IS. I think that good literature can come from anywhere even if its unintended to be so.
Your requirement for "the entire work" makes your conjecture tautological, since you classify only things dedicated solely to onanistic stimulation as erotica.
>Is it possible to write erotica that is also great literature?
What is ‘erotica’ and how is it differentiated from literature that is erotic — for instance the Song of Songs, or the poems of Theognis, Catullus or Petrarch?
Because I say so.

File: VoldemortHeadshot_DHP1.png (3.58 MB, 1200x1600)
3.58 MB
3.58 MB PNG
Why didn't Voldemort just make his horcruxes something indestructible, or at least something functionally so, like a mote of dust or the Earth itself or a children's hospital or a digital file that he could just copy ad infinitum giving him an infinite supply of horcuxes. This seems like a massive oversight by Rowling.
28 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
The main story takes place in the 90s, Harry was born in 1980, there were no digital files like that.

This. The main point was not to make something no one could find and be indestructible, the point is to have something only your allies could find and use them to ressurect you.

Also >>18213887
A fun thing to remember is that Voldemort invented the magical process to regain a human body at the end of book 4. Ergo, prior to him no one who created a horror thtoughout history has ever fully come back. Thier fractured soul piece is forced to wander the earth.
Voldemort has a very easily readable laundry list of personality traits that are essential to understanding his behavior. 2 of which are his tendency to hoard 'trophies' of his crimes because he is insecure and wants reaffirmation of his greatness and dominance, and absurdly high gradiosity for himself.

The dude's not otherwise stupid, he's generally a few steps ahead of everyone else and is coolly calculating. But his insane ego very seriously makes him make dumbfuck decisions occasionally.

It's not enough for him to put his soul in any random thing and hide it any random place. He wants granduer. He literally, unironically thinks he is sacred and basically a god. He refuses to place his own sacred soul in anything normal. One of the locations for a horcrux of his was the area where he first learned he could talk to snakes and where he did his first serious crime by mentally traumatizing two children. It's strategically idiotic because someone could AND DID research his past and search that location. But he does things like thing because he's obsessed with his own greatness and it makes him blind.
Le plot holes #gotem!! Epic take down.
read hpmor

File: index.jpg (555 KB, 1396x1024)
555 KB
555 KB JPG
I'm looking for novels in the Middle Ages and these two called my attention. Which one would you suggest to a person who knows nothing about the period?
9 replies omitted. Click here to view.
File: images[1].png (6 KB, 294x171)
6 KB
For the first half, Baudolino is a humorous but grounded story of the middle ages. Then it goes off the rails and becomes a story about what people in the middle ages thought was far to the east. Monsters, Prester John, etc.
Both parts are great.
Thank you. I watched a video about it and the girl said the same thing.
Tirant lo Blanc was written at the end of the Middle Ages while Eco's work is contemporary historical fiction. Can't really compare the two.
It's also never clear if the narrator, Baudolio, is bullshitting about everything or not, so maybe it's a fantasy novel, maybe it isn't. (one of the novel's main THEMES is ambiguity)

I have the same edition, and my MAJOR GRIPE is this: the novel takes place during the 4th Crusade (1204), but the cover art comes from a fresco made by Pietro Della Francesca in 1466, and depicts contemporaneous fashion in clothing and armor.
...it's really good, you'll like it.

I want to learn about the lives of the saints.
I am not so much interested in the religious aspect of their lives, simply their biographies.
For example, I learned about Saint Clement (Pope Clement I) who was killed in 99 AD when he had a chain attached to an anchor tied around his and was thrown into the sea.
A big book of biographies of remarkable saints would be a dream come true. Considering there are thousands of them, it’s hard to find ones with interesting stories without sifting through a lot of ones with little to no info
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
The Golden Legend by Jacobus de Voragine
Most saints/martyrs probably never existed/were never martyred. Most of the "persecutions" also never happened.
I also don't think there exist many non-religious hagiography books.
Interesting thread btw, good luck with your quest
The Saints Collection, by Catholic Way Publishing, available on libgen. It has 2k+ saints' lives in it. Some hagiographies are shorter, some are longer. It also has a "reading list" to give you either 1 saint a day or a few saints a day.
Butler's Lives of Saints is a classic.
If you want Protestant saints who got persecuted by Catholics, then get Foxe's Martyrs
File: 1613264457239.png (319 KB, 500x543)
319 KB
319 KB PNG
>Saint Clement (Pope Clement I) who was killed in 99 AD when he had a chain attached to an anchor tied around his and was thrown into the sea.

tied around his what?

File: wittgenstein.jpg (27 KB, 405x563)
27 KB
What do you think of Wittgenstein's private language argument and its implication in epistemology?
I’m retarded
it spawned an entirely new field of philosophy involving language
pretty nice, and I can imagine how it loosely resembles autoencoders (neural net stuff) but it's just part of the story
> I can imagine how it loosely resembles autoencoders (neural net stuff)

Wittgenstein denied that a private language was possible. The weights in an autoencoder seem a lot like a private language since they're totally fucking meaningless outside that specific neural net.
How can he slap?

File: The rightous mind .jpg (101 KB, 882x1360)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
Rationalists Silenced
New Atheists destroyed
Incest haters absolutely BFTO.

File: russel1.jpg (5 KB, 202x249)
5 KB
"Love is wise, hatred is foolish." I guess that makes 4chan a pretty foolish place.
31 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
Take your meds. Or check your eyes.
righteous anger is basically the only form of real hate there is. it's righteous for someone, whether valid or not, and so your point is meaningless.
P then Q ; yet p = not P
Love is wise, hatred is foolish. A fine quote from a man who slept with his friend’s wives.
File: 1620632746494.gif (1.95 MB, 314x235)
1.95 MB
1.95 MB GIF

File: p07dn7q5.jpg (125 KB, 976x549)
125 KB
125 KB JPG
>The air has changed, and we breathe in deeply a spring laden and filled with seed. Cries rise up on every side. Who shouts? It is we who shout -- the living, the dead, and the unborn. But at once we are crushed by fear, and we fall silent.
> And then we forget -- out of laziness, out of habit, out of cowardice. But suddenly the Cry tears at our entrails once more, like an eagle.
>For the Cry is not outside us, it does not come from a great distance that we may escape it. It sits in the center of our hearts, and cries out.

I want to read the words of people who have shared the experience of losing the cry of God. People like Fernando Pessoa, in his poems or in the Book of Disquiet. People who hear the unabated shriek of life like a deceitful whisper that makes their skin crawl away from their flesh and makes their organs shrink into themselves like wounded animals.
Sunday sermons of Fr. Hunolt SJ PBUH
>The truth is that there is really no "profane realm" that could in any way be opposed to a "sacred realm"; there is only a "profane point of view", which is really none other than the point of view of ignorance.
File: s-l500.jpg (39 KB, 305x500)
39 KB
I'm sure /lit/ hates this book but it fits
Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but this one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those things which are before, I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.

File: 1619414046514.png (3.14 MB, 1600x900)
3.14 MB
3.14 MB PNG
Are these the best editions I can get if I want to read Lattimore's translation of Homer?
11 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
File: 1604100328982.png (32 KB, 153x305)
32 KB
I considered it while I was searching the archives for general ideas about translations.

is that the cover they use now? Ive ignored it because bookdepository is using a different cover for it.
does anyone know much about Lattimore's other translations? I just picked up a copy of his Aeschylus
I like his Pindar, much more than the Homer actually
File: 81SOC-7LC6L.jpg (464 KB, 1572x2491)
464 KB
464 KB JPG
>is that the cover they use now?
Yes they are pretty nice aesthetically.


Those are wonderful.
Thanks I'll get these instead but shipping kinda hurts.
>30usd shipping

Thank you

File: 68022_preview.jpg (110 KB, 581x600)
110 KB
110 KB JPG
What are some novels in which the protagonist ultimately finds redemption and salvation in God, no matter his transgressions?
Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy
crime and punishment

Anyone know anything about this? Any value?
2 replies omitted. Click here to view.
This, if you want the good stuff read the Thrawn trilogy
Thrawn is the shittiest set of SW-EU I have ever read!! I’m mystified at all the times people keep recommending it. It’s got concepts and characters introduced and absolute boredom is all that happens.
ok thanks buttercuck, what's a good one then?
I liked the Tales from Jabba’s Palace, Mos Eisly, and Bounty Hunters, best.
There’s one I think it’s called Jedi Academy trilogy. A lot more lively.
Only thing that ever came close to the films was some of the comic books that were set a thousand years or so before the republic age.

Courtship of Princess Leia was okay too I guess
thanks m8 I'll take a look

File: lev.jpg (22 KB, 363x500)
22 KB
Who are some obscure but /lit/ philosophers?
30 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
>Basedow, unfortunately, was not disposed by nature or habit to succeed in an employment which required the greatest regularity, patience and attention

oh yeah
literally one of the most famous German philosophers of the twentieth century
not only is he not a philosopher, but he's one of the most famous historians of all time
most if the rest of your list is very well known too
File: post singularity.jpg (460 KB, 1196x752)
460 KB
460 KB JPG
He wasn't an atheist


Make a bunch of shirtless videos and blog posts on philosophical topics

File: suicide note condensed.jpg (942 KB, 999x3158)
942 KB
942 KB JPG
Mitchell Heisman

File: hanussen_hitler.jpg (71 KB, 998x508)
71 KB

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.