>himars?>not my problem
>>59593626Sometimes you get lucky and the thing still drives, I wouldn't want to be the infantry in it though.
>>59593626Who the fuck is in those civvie cars?!
>>59593626>Oh no!We need to send bigger rockets! The mobiks are getting imune (((
>>59593626That looks more like a regular arty shell with a proximity fuse.
>>59593717It's HIMARs anon don't cope please.
Not even HIMARS you dumb russian dog
>>59593773Everything is HIMARS.You could drop an 81mm shell on them and they'd still call it HIMARS.
>>59593717>>59593773You have to smooth out your brain, and think like a russian. That was a nazi himars
>>59593829It's pretty cool that due to spotter drones we get to actually see what kills all those vehicles. No more every crew claiming they knocked out a Tiger like in WW2
>>59593626It's like a deer taking off after taking an arrow to the heart. It's dead, it just hasn't accepted it yet.
>>59593945Vehicles don't work like thatThe radar is probably fucked but I'd be curious as to how the rest is damaged.
>>59594024The crew is probably riddled with holes and bleeding out
>>59593761>>59593829HIMARS have noticeably more shrapnels, all this thing kicks up is dust on the dirt roads.
>>59594153HIMARS come in two varieties, regular explosion and spicy tungsten ballsOP isn't a HIMARS, just saying not every hit from them has the shitloads of balls
>>59594251I wonder if they've gotten any DPICM GMLRS
>>59593626I like how the litmus test that Russia vehicles survived is that they don't catastrophically explode into a million pieces.
>shoot guy 10 times>he doesn't explode>see, he is fine xaxaxaxaxaa it's only 10 small holes xaxaxaxax he is fine ))))))))
>>59594275Doubtful, all M30 was apparently converted into M31 Unitary, and only around 4000 were produced in the first place. For comparison, the army got its 50,000th GMLRS round in 2021.Unless you mean M26, but that's not GMLRS. The same guy that campaigned for DPICM 155mm is also campaigning for M26 though, so we may see it in the future.
>>59594323reminds me of that image of impact from a rocket posted by vatniks where the area behind it was completely unharmed
>weapons identification then>well you can see by the pattern of dispersal of the Tungsten Alloy Internal Nucleus Trajectory (abbreviated as TAINT) that this could have been an GBU-69 or possibly an M-8008135 using a Fragmentation Armor Reducing Discarder with a Super Heated Internal Diameter (known as the FARD&SHID warhead) manufactured by British weapons manufacturer Colonial Union New Technology>weapons identification now>FUCKKK ITS A HIMARS RUUUUUUUUUN
>>59593761Isn't it likely to be himars because of the range of the strike?
>>59593814IT'S A HIMARSSSSRUNNN!(i didn't have the tiger one)
>>59597663And where exactly do we have that information?
>>59593626Oh look, this thread again.>miss
>>59594481kek i laughed
>>59598122Someone needs to make one with chad running away from a frag grenade or mortar round, shouting about how it's HIMARS
>>59593626>posts a video of anti-air failing at anti-air>thinks it's a windude
>>59594024Actually, that isn't entirely uncommon, my last two cars that have been losses suffered their fatal wounds then bled out over the course of a day>car 1, college beater>have to slam on brakes>feel a weird lurch, steering seems slightly off>figure I messed up the alignment>over next couple hours, steering gets worse>eventually I'm holding wheel halfway left to go straight>get home and investigate underside>realize the frame itself has split>car 2>hit deer>hood and grill seem messed up, but no damage otherwise>drive to work, drive home>next day take it to a shop>as I pull in, notice engine temp rising>get out, radiator is gushing fluid>won't hold liquid for more than a minute or soBoth cars worked for a while before the damage they suffered manifested in a total loss
>>59598194civi cars driving by?
>>59601304>have car with bad timing chain>runs for a month before I scrap it and get a new oneMachines are pretty durable
So you're telling me an anti-air radar was engaged by enemy munitions, exited the battlefield under it's own power, leaving a giant hole in the air defense network, and somehow this is a dunk on the weapon system used to hit it, because it wasn't an instant kill?That radar system and it's crew were rendered combat ineffective and have to retreat to the rear before they can even begin to understand what just happened to them, and what they have to do to get it running again.This leaves an insanely huge hole in an air defense network, it means the enemies can now strike that area for potentially hours, or even days risk free, and it means that you'll have to redeploy a radar system from somewhere else on the battlefield.
>>59601376>have a radar system with a thousand holes in it's dish>can't see fucking shit>at least it's still spinning
>>59593697even in a warzone you still need to be at work annon
>>59601420Looks to me like a TOR/SA-15 so we're talking a TELAR. That area's SHORAD just got badly degraded
>>59594314Wouldn't it be fun if even their radars done that?
>>59601439The difference is unlike Russia I can replace my broken equipment