Long range fighter-bomber BTFO chinesium PLAFF
>>56896007The Chinese will easily detect the cheese-flavored dust that falls off of that Dorito.
>>56896007>"Aurora in flight!"
>Stealth (Radar, IR, visual)>VisualIs active camo finally coming?
>>56896007>Stealth (radar, IR, visual) what the fuck? do they expect NGADs to have cloaking tech?
>>56896492>Lockhart reveals the NGAD>there’s nothing there>it decloaks
>>56896007>1000nm+it looks like this generation's F-111Blet's hope the programme doesn't suffer the same fate
big flying dorito with payload drones... we Tyrian now
>>56896007that NGAD is from the concept art. the leaked photo is more like a super-sized YF-23 built around next gen variable bypass engines. it's a 2 seater plane, but the RIO has a separate cockpit with very little canopy area, most likely using AR.
>>56896721Leaked photo?
>>56896007>active camo>IR/thermal stealth>radar stealth>1000m rangeDamn the chinks are fucked. It's like Gulf War 2.0 all over again.
>>56896007>future>glass cokpitDid they hear about lasers?
>>56896007>Cost per plane: $300M
>>56897016Ah yes, Sprey-posting at its finest.
>>56896007So thats the end of Supercruise? It went the same way as Mach 2 aircraft?
>>56896502I half expected that for B-21 lol
>>568968001000+ nautical miles. nearly 2000km
>>56896800>>1000mProud result of american education
Um Manta chads? FB-22 Bros? did we win?
>>56896007Is that the Su-75 Checkmate?
>>56897016>we will surely have to buy as many F-35s as we did P-51sIt took me a while to figure out just why this graph is so retarded
>>56896007>1000+ nanometer that isnt a big radius
>>56897016who cares when the government can print unlimited billions lets goooo
>>56896502Too much Kino for me to handle
>>56896007>NIGADIsn't that a little racist
>>56896492>>56896502This is the first time I've ever seen it! Optical camouflage!?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIufHZ24wNo&list=PLLrug9JZTq63sgfuqWKC-N8w9CAAOFH35&index=21
>>56896007>Uber expensive "6th gen" NGAD>1800km+ combat range>Chinese J-20, "copy" of the F-22 and F-35>2000km+ combat range (5500km with external fuel tanksAmeribros I don't feel so good
>>56896496lol the F-22 already has cloaking, they just aren't allowed to use it in demonstrations, obviously.
>>56899951>>56896492>>56896502It's nothing new, you can already buy "invisibility panels" right now on the internet: https://youtu.be/qAriX1ebx3I
>>56900041>stealth>external fuel tanksThere is a reason why China is a joke and can't even take on Taiwan
>>56899318>At $300m each, despite being 13% of the defense budget...Ngad plz, no hard r, no racism
>>56896502Instant nut
so the dorito we've been seeing for years on random conspiracy websites is actually the NGAD? thing's been flying for awhile.
>>56896800The Chinese dragon stands ready…
>>56900041>2000km+ combat range (5500km with external fuel tanksProof?
>>56901914chinese media claims it's true so obviously, it is.You don't think they'd pull a russia and LIE about the capabilities of their technology grossly overstating the actual performance...do you?
>>56896007>Stealth>VisualIt has cloaking? I thought Romulan tech wasn't for export?
>>56897296yeah I thought the meme would be either invisible bomber or they already had it in flight overhead but it's so quiet and stealthy no one notices before it performs a perfect vertical landing near the crowd
>>56901984NGAD won't be exported, so it's fine.
>>56901827>using that image without saying ”based Chinks”This is ban-worthy
>>56896020They’re lactose intolerant though.
>>56901948N-no. CCP always right, comrade!
>>56902019Based chinsects! Praise Chiner for building of grorious J-20 Smoking Dragon!
>>56897286Not likely, the implication I got from that pic is that sixth-gen is building up on top of fifth-gen, like all generations before it, so Supercruise is assumed. I'm pretty sure NGAD will have sensor fusion.Stealth is mentioned twice, true, but with the addition of IR and Visual stealth, which wasn't a focus of fitfh-gen. It's likely that NGAD will have Supercruise due to range requirements alone. It drastically increases efficiency.
>>56902052IR "stealth" was most definitely considered - and implemented - on both the F-22, and F35.
>>56902236
>>56899951It’s glowing and translucent… Like some kind of jellyfish!
I’m curious about visual stealth. Will they use some kind of active camo or whatnot, or do they just mean that removing the vertical stabilizers will make it smaller visually? Active camo isn’t that hard to make by itself but I don’t see how do you do it while still having radar absorbent coatings. But maybe they developed some new coating that overcomes this, who nows,
