[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/k/ - Weapons


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




File: download (9).jpg (10 KB, 244x207)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
It won't do much, will piss the entire world off incl their only remaining allies, and will get NATO raping their conscripts harder than their own officers in any kind of response incl possible direct conventional intervention in the war at minimum. If monkey goes full retard and drops a strategic nuke on a city no matter how small it's over for Russia as a country literally forever.

Would be better to just take the loss and still exist as an actual somewhat sovereign nation state with a (barely) functional military than the other options. Even Kim Jong Un isn't this retarded and he wants his peasants to pay him in actual shit now.
>>
>>55289798
Why do retards keep saying "tactical nuke" as if there is a special class of nuke regarded as "tactical"? It won't do much besides annoy me.
>>
>>55289798
The only ones constantly pushing for nukes are shills like yourself.
I hope one day you get your wish.
>>
>>55289825
Because low yield warheads attached to high precision delivery systems have a completely different use profile to very high yield warheads
>>
>>55289868
>i am a retard
Yeah I know but why are you retard?
>>
>>55289798
They're going to go full Belka once Ukraine stars pushing into Russia
>>
File: 1646415178884.jpg (438 KB, 2048x1488)
438 KB
438 KB JPG
>>55289798
>Why do the vatniks want to use tactical nukes in an offensive war?
because that's the only thought which can make their schizo gnome king at least semi-hard
he really wants to go in the history as a strong leader who ordered a nuclear strike, and he'll find a way
>>
>>55289961
>>55289868
Samefagging because I forgot to mention Russia does not have low yield nukes (because their missiles suck dick and they need beeg bomba explosion to hit shit) nor do they have "high precision delivery systems". MUH 50 GORRILLION MEGATON NUKE is cope for being unable to hit their target directly so they settle for an indirect and dirty bomb.
>>
>>55289825
Because there is such a thing: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_nuclear_weapon
>>
The US declared it'd use nukes in a first strike in Europe, oh, about 50-60 years ago.

You dumb faggots.
>>
Does Russia even have tactical nukes?
>>
>>55290099
Yes. They have them for the Tochka MLRS.

But keep in mind that a lot of them might not work at this point.
>>
>>55290299
How many of them could be towed out by tractors?
What are the odds of deployed nukes being captured by the Ukrainian farmers?
>>
>>55289798
Using tactical nukes will be the historical admission of what we already knew, that Russia has been incapable since 1970 from keeping up with the West in terms of military technology and quality of their army, also, it will automatically make them an international pariah as neither China nor India would want to deal with an state which first launched an offensive war and then, when losing to a "second rate non-state" started using nukes, allowing them a final excuse to give Putin the cold shoulder, I suspect even the likes of North Korea and Iran wouldn't want any relation with Putin, they won't be able to sell the lie that their nuclear programs are purely defensive. In fact, supporting him will give the west an excellent excuse to start "preventive" wars to dismantle both regimes once and for all.
>>
>>55289798
>Asking why Russia is using tactical nook.
It's because of Tactical Flex.
>>
Nook is The Final Cope
It's an admission that they can't win against a poorer smaller neighbor and changing the rules to claim they won
>>
>>55289868
>>55289825

It's Russia itself doing it. Russia 1 keeps on talking about how it's going to use "tactical nukes" for blatantly strategic purposes. See e.g. https://twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/status/1573107219633438721

There was one where they were even more explicit with glassing the UK with "tactical nukes" but can't find it atm.
>>
>>55289798
Because they're still thinking they have the edge over the West in barbarism. They think the West would not take the escalation ladder to its logical conclusion and annihilate them first because it would make past historic mass-killings look like a summer picnic... and we're supposedly too soft for that.
>>
>>55289798
Wonderwaffle
>>
>>55289798
>want to keep new territories
>unlikely to win the war
>use nukes
>ukraine backs down
>russia keeps new territories
>>
>>55289798
Purely because they are pathetic, evil scum who are influenced only by the Devil.
>>
>>55289798
They've tried everything else.

also they don't want to, they accomplish nothing they can't achieve by conventional means, they're just chest-pounding and hoping someone will cave..
>>
>>55289798
Didnt the americans use it on iraq tho
>>
>>55293795
No
>>
File: 1649267038083.jpg (128 KB, 821x473)
128 KB
128 KB JPG
>>55293757
>ukraine backs down
Heh. Saw a interview with the ukranian head of intelligence. On the subject of NOOOKS he smirked how it will not save the vatnik asses since it will only harden ukranian resolve of expelling the invaders and open the gates of unlimited assistance to them, free to hit the vatnik trash where it really hurts. This was the guy who reformed the agency which went off to remove nearly all vatnik assets and sabouters on week one.
>>
>>55289798
We have never claimed this, its is all NATO propaganda to encourage there civilians to support Banderite Kiev regime.
>>
>>55293757
>use nukes
>only hardens ukrainian resolve, and opens russian nuclear plants and nuclear missle silos for "smoker operations"
>>
>>55293915
Russians are threatening nukes right from the start, and their state media are casually joking about nuking Paris long before that.
It really showcases how weak and desperate they are… and how conceited and arrogant.
>>
>>55293935
>>55293894
i think they'll be smart and surrender. getting your country depopulated aint worth two breakaway regions the size of belgium.
>>
>>55293943
Only western state media claims such, I see no such on local medias
>>
>>55293958
Its not a matter of land. It is a matter of killing russia permanently using any methods available.
>>
>>55293970
>Subtle nuke tsunami webm request
>>
>>55291325
This. Using nukes in a purely offensive manner is a no-no and only undermines the prospects of long-term survival of the shithole dictatorships of the world, as NATO would have an excellent reason, and popular support to boot, to go on a spree of dismantling dictatorships worldwide. Monke is fucking retarded, suffers from severe tunnel-vision and is incapable of grasping the bigger picture.
>>
>>55293958
They’ll be back for the rest.Their goals are obviously maximalist.
>>
>>55289825
have you seen a normal nuke? Cant go door breaching with that.
Tactical nukes come with shorter stocks, foregrips and binary triggers



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.