If Springfield Inc. were actually any good at grifting, instead of releasing an ugly bullpup nobody wants, why don't they make a nice scaled-down M1A-L as a more upscale competitor to the smelly Mini-14 for the California elite?
>>51656301They already make a short m14. It’s garbage, because real fuckin NATO is pointless in a sub 16” barrel.
>>51656301>Scaled-down M1ASo a Mini-14? Or a SOCOM? The 16in M1A is not that big of a rifle. >>51656321Wrong. Depending on which particular ammo you rock, it’s still going to stay above 2500fps even at 13in, and the few hundred fps loss from 18-13in isn’t that big of a deal. This isn’t 55gr 5.56, it doesn’t rely solely on velocity to pp slap out to a good distance. The big issue will be the fireball and concussion. And don’t even get me started on how most min/maxing spergs greatly overestimate both the engagement distances that would be the norm in their poopoopeepee boogaloo fantasy and their ability to engage at said distances.
>>51656321CAG, SEALs and Rangers were regularly spotted running SCAR-H variants with 13" barrels and suppressors throughout Iraq and Afghanistan. Like >>51657171 said, a 308 out of a 13" is still moving above 2500 fps which is about the same speed a 8mm Mauser out of a 24" K98. Plenty of killing power out to 600-700 yards.