Why even live
>>49208164reduce the throttle before punching out
>Missile behind you>Pop canopy>Canopy gets sucked through engine>Glass hits the missile behind you at a thousand MPH>Crisis averted
ywn eject downwards out of your Tu-22 on the ground.
>>49208335think it was the TU-22M that does that
>>49208387No, those eject upwards. They’re apparently not zero-zero though
>>49208164Cirrus Vision edition
>>49209350Man that sucks
>>49208190There has to be a fuel cutoff before the chair pops
My fav. Pretty comfy to eject, you even want to pull the lever during the flight.
>>49209350>while on the ground>insufficient altitudeyou don't say
Do smoothbrains not understand that the power ejection seats have is stronger than the vacuum created by the jet engine. Another thing, if ejecting at high or even low subsonic speeds doesnt slam the pilot into the vertical stabilizer, what makes you think a jet engine intake can instantly suck an ejecting pilot into the intake in a fraction of a second like a cartoon.
>>49210442It's all fun and games until your arm gets crushed in the clamshell
>>49208335also early Starfighters.
>>49210601see "zero-zero", dumbass.
>>49210442>falling to earth big smile on your face...come on parachute when you gonna open up
>>49208164Gemini had pyrotechnic ejection seats and a pure oxygen atmosphere. It was also the sonly design Nasa listened to the pilots for.It was somehow more dangerous than Voskhod which didn't have a launch escape system at all.
>>49210442Have your arms and legs cutSomething so retarded than even armatards, I mean russians, didn't thought about
>>49208335>ywn invert your Starfighter and then eject into the ground
How about punching out and skipping across the water?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43kzjFne_XQ
>>49209350Immagine losing pilot and highly trained crew to something like that
>>49209350Cockpit orgy ends in faggy disaster
>>49210442Eject over Barent seaMini submersible. No engine. Die with crabs
>land on carrier>nose gear trunion fails>nose gear punches up into the cockpit>sets off the ejection seat>get ejected sideways into the side a parked plane>die
>>49215326>pure oxygen>pyrotechnic escape system
>>49216482>Die with crabsI think the pilot already had crabs tho......
>>49208335Damn that’s a milf of a plane desu
>>49217114Vostok was originally designed the same way (with an ejection seat), they changed to a mixed atmosphere after V. Bondarenko died in a fire during training. It took Nasa the Apollo 1 fire to change as well.
>>49215326I think it was the space shuttles Columbia and Enterprise that were both initially fitted with ejection seats for just two crew members. Dangerous and mostly worthless. They pinned them after only a few missions. Then completely removed them after 50 or so missions.
>>49217381>The first two shuttles, Enterprise and Columbia, were built with ejection seats. It was only these two that were planned to be flown with a crew of two. Subsequent shuttles were built only for missions with a crew of more than two, including seats in the lower deck, and ejection seat options were deemed to be infeasible, so Challenger, Discovery, Atlantis, and Endeavour were built with no ejection seats.It wasn't like they were designed for the pilots to punch out and leave the rest of the crew to die.
That's completely absurd. Here lemme give you a lesson on the laws of phy