[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

[Advertise on 4chan]


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1604600642684.png (912 KB, 930x445)
912 KB
912 KB PNG
Why can't you rape the women of your enemies during wartime?
It strikes fear in the population of the enemy and keeps your men's needs fulfilled?
>>
Because the central point of the Hague/Geneva conventions is the distinction between civilians and soldiers. To make wars shorter and not bloodier than necessary, international law forbids you to target civilians for the actions of soldiers.
>>
>>9867743
because your armies can quickly descend into marauding bands the moment they no longer have the opportunity to satisfy their every whim by force?

The bigger the standing armies compared to civilian population, the more resources you need to deal with them in peacetime and the harder it is to integrate them back into normal life so they wouldnt disrupt the status quo.

Plus, you dont set a precedent and promises "we wont rape you if you dont rape us" kinda work under the threat that those who break it are free game.
>>
Because they are people too, bruh.
>>
>>9867743
Because it's pathetic and evil.
>>
>>9867777
Why?
>>
>>9867743
>"Oh no no no! This one dick went inside my hole without my consent, i want to die!"
>>
>>9867767
They’re not entitled to anything because they’re “people”. There’s no such thing as international “law”.
>>
Who said you can’t? Some jewish pencilneck in Geneva? Lol.
Good luck enforcing that when Russia, China and Germany actually start to consolidate their power.
>>
Because one man with a raped family is a fanatical soldier waiting to be given a chance for revenge, and in most cases their male relatives will also be on their way to get revenge, whether its driving a truck full of explosives into a platoon of guys or tossing a grenade at a checkpoint through a crowd. Theres a reason why you never see young men crying about people committing war crimes on their people on television, they are either dead or going to die trying to kill the people that did it. Its better to have your guys act civilized and hire prostitutes/masturbate than let them create enemies of the civilians.

TLDR: raping women randomly will cause men who would otherwise not fight you to come and fight you.
>>
>>9867830
>germany
>consolidating power
Lmao, you are either misinformed or a delusional germ. At this point I would be more worried of france deciding to do more than fuck around in irrelevant african nations than Germany doing anything other than whine and pretend broomsticks are guns when they play army.
>>
Becuz it's illegal under sharia law. You still keep a good moral code no matter if you're in war or not.
>>
>>9867743
Because it completely destroys any civilian support or indifference an army could ever had.

Even the fucking Japanese recognised that.
>>
>>9867830
Germany will be Macron's treasury safe and nothing more
>>
>>9867943
3... 2... 1...
>>
>>9867930
Kek, very true.

>>9867951
>Even the fucking Japanese recognised that.
when?
>>
>>9867813
Unironically yes
>>
>>9867951
Around about August/September of 1945 they all of a sudden became good boys
>>
>>9867743
Rape has been common during warfare though
>>
>>9867743
it's kinda mean to the women
spreads STDs
creates unwanted children
>>
>>9867743
Weak armies tend to do the raping because they the high command can't control their troops.
>>
>>9867813
You’ve never had sex before
>>
>>9867743
Women are the spoils of war. You are entitled to enjoy your enemy's women.
>>
>>9867762

Except, you know. Carpet bombing is okay because reasons.
>>
>>9868330
>>9867830
>>9867819
>>9867787
>>9867743

Virgins - you probably wouldn't even be able to get it up if the opportunity presented itself, that's assuming you would even be allowed into the military (in civilized countries, personality-disordered turds like you are screened out before they even get to basic training.)
>>
>>9867743
You can. You just can't brag and boast about it, because our war marketing is becoming more sophisticated as the challenge of pacifist marketing also grows stronger.
>>
>>9868343
But in the past men who were willing to rape and do just about anything were favored for the military.
Only when the average civilian was introduced, did the military become more moral.
It's an undeniable historical fact and men could be coerced to go to war for war brides, if there are not enough women around. Don't know why you are so mad.
>>
>>9868374
>t.neocon Evola-reading precocious boomer
Nobody wants to die for Haliburton shareholders, Chinese oil and Israeli bragging rights anymore.
>>
>>9868376
welfare state and tinder has made marriage obselete
>>
>>9868376
Because we kinda need more complex soldiers nowadays than a marauding band of lunatics.

Also, nowadays, extra lasers and drones piloted by some geek in an office have proven themselves way more useful than unstable meathead, comparatevly.
>>
>>9868394
Those are a lot of assumptions man. I would assume that somebody like you, so quick to anger and indignation, would have developed the ability to differentiate between what should be and what it is. Just to survive in your daily life without sperging everytime that somebody analyzes the motives of your political opponents.
>>
>>9868343
>personality-disordered turds
you mean the average soldier during pre modern times? one of the major incentives of war is the opportunity to rape, yes, rape is perfectly normal human behaviour
>>
>>9868487
>rape is perfectly normal human behaviour
Just read The Human Being Manual and couldn't find that part
>>
>>9868339
If you carpet bomb a population center full of civies, then you are committing a war crime
>>
>>9867743
Because the goals and justifications of war changed significantly during the 20th century.

Wartime rape is fine if you're fighting a war of territorial conquest and intend to enslave/exterminate the enemy population, but it's pretty counterproductive if you want to win the hearts and minds of the people so you can install a friendly liberal-democratic government.
>>
>>9868404
>more useful than unstable meathead, comparatevly
t. knows nothing about war
A nerd on a computer 500 miles away can't patrol a street or raid a house or interrogate a hostage or hold a corner.
Wars are fought with bodies not machines.
>>
>>9868574
it's not an either/or thing, dude.
Of course you need soldiers to capture, shoot and hold turf, but you can pick the ones that are good at doing everything you just said, and skip the retards that are hard to control.
>>
>>9868487
War always happened, yes, but murderhobos that rape everything they see get a bad rep in records.

Which is why turks or soviets get showcased as rapists, even if allies, nazis, crusaders, hungarians, americans etc. might have ocasionally gangbanged some peasant chick, too.
>>
>>9868619
*rape always happened

Also, that applies to everything.
"Requisitioning" some farm animals or grain or whatever was an expected tactic, stealing everything that wasnt bolted down, and burning down everything that was got you a harsh image to your neighbouring states.
>>
>>9868619
What matters is also who controls the narrative. The Germans raped the shit out of eastern European women and the highest punishment a soldier would see for it was for miscegenation. But after WW2 it wasn't in the interest of the western narrative to paint the German army (rather than the SS and the NSDAP) as villains.
>>
>>9868673
The german army is a good example.
The nazis were the ultimate bad guys, but people focus on other war crimes.

Even the SS, while portraited as absolutely inhuman killers that can't do 2 steps without bayonneting a jewish baby or whatever, don't get the rapist meme that much.

Or Assad and the rebels.
Both do fucked up shit, but you don't hear them raping people for sport, even though they get plenty of acusations. ISIS however...
>>
>>9868637
burning down stuff for the kicks is retarded but people raped all the time which was the original point. nowadays we just have access to lot of coom due to birth control (and porn) but back then pussy was highly regulated and rape would mean easy access to a cheap fuck. avg man married in his late 20's, a 1/5 of them never. back then no marriage = no pussy
>>
>>9867743
Who would rape an ugly, shitty nigger?
>>
>>9868720
prostitution was almost universally legal but idk if that was exactly cheap
>>
This is how you create a cornered rat, and a cornered rat is a very dangerous animal
>>
>>9868376
Even in the past armies which descended into prolonged periods of looting and rape were seen as shameful upon their nations and generals. I say prolonged because some fuckwit states sanctioned looting and even limited rape, such barbaric states included ottomans
>>
>>9868761
not to forget sexual slavery which big especially outside of christian europe, basically institutionalized rapery
>>
>>9868720
It happened, but it's the difference between "my brother got caught in the crossfire and got killed, or a breakaway squad killed him" and "the army massacred civilians left and right".

One was a bad thing that tragically happens in war, other was being scum.
So yeah, not quite normal.
>>
>>9868374
Whats it like to rape the women of your enemies during wartime?
>>
>>9868203
When the IJA got booted out of whatever shithole they were fighting in by insurgent militias backed by an industrialized foreign army
>>
>>9868339
If you're in a firefight in a building and a family in the basement gets killed in the crossfire, its neither murder nor a war crime
>>
>>9868808
when you read about how the Romans killed all the Etruscan men and enslaved their wives and kids, what do you think happened to all the women in captivity?
>>
>>9868818
Yes, but did they recognize that already during WW2 in terms of effectively stopping that?
Or did they recognize that after WW2?
>>
Rape the women in front of the male family members, it will show them shows in charge.
>>
>>9868277
>>9868203
The whole comfort women system was expended because Japanese soldiers raped too many chinks that’s like basic history
>>
>>9868962
they were prostitutes
>>
>>9867762
So raping enemy soldiers is fine?
>>
>>9867743
because they’ll rape your people even harder if they ever push you back
>>
>>9867743
>It strikes fear in the population of the enemy
Because this doesn't work. It just pisses your enemy off and radicalizes them to a point where they don't care about themselves, they only care about killing you, or your family, or someone that vaguely looks like you.

Mass bombing campaigns throughout contemporary wars have shown this. Wanton drone strikes in the Middle East didn't make the locals submit to the US, instead it placed them in the perfect state of mind for recruitment by nefarious organisations.
If you started raping and abusing the population even more severely, they would view the conflict as an existential struggle on their behalf and then everyone that can walk would be there to resist you.

Also, there's a clear narrative when wars are conducted by Western countries and that usually involves them being seen as a liberator or benevolent interventionist. Mass rape doesn't aid in that cause.
>>
>>9869082
How did the mongols get away with it then?
>>
>>9867743
>keeps your men's needs fulfilled
That's what the new recruits are for.
>>
>>9869108
Because they had the balls to go full bore with the raping. You can't win with just a little bit of rape; you need to rape your enemies out of existence.
>>
>>9869058
so what?
>>
File: 1604074422745.jpg (47 KB, 600x600)
47 KB
47 KB JPG
>>9867743
idk ask the germans they did some memes in the east and the soviet soldires kindly repaid the favours
>>
>>9869108
because they either left your city completely untouched or wiped it off the face of the earth, you either had little reason for vengeance since all that has happened is you now pay taxes to the khan instead of the shah (and usually less plus the benefits of the silk road) or.. you simply did not exist to wreak vengeance, unless of course you were among the minority of artisans whom they spared and took with them, in which case you probably have autism and don't mind that Chad recklessly charged the mongols only to be filled full of arrows while Stacy was raped then murdered
>>
God, I would love to rape Afghan women.
>>
>>9869180
why?
>>
>>9869108
Because the fundamental nature of war was different back then. Weapons and armor were extremely expensive and required dedicated training to use effectively. The modern national identity had yet to form and those feelings of existential annihilation either wouldn't have existed or would have taken on a different tone.

We live in a world right now where a young man can be an effective combatant simply by driving a car full of explosives at an enemy.
The terrorist forces and extremist militia that can form now, under years of occupation and abuse, don't require high levels of training except among their elite. They simply require complete dedication and a hatred for the enemy, which is easily fermented through abusing the population.

Years ago, I watched a video on Peshmerga forces fighting ISIS and their local leader had remarked on the difficulty of dealing with suicide bombers. It's a terrifying form of resistance that blurs the line between citizen and combatant. It's hard to fight against effectively and it places a great deal of psychological stress on the soldiers.

During the Mongol invasions, there was little access to second-hand weaponry or explosives for the average population. There weren't large international extremist groups organizing ground-up resistance either.
>>
It's bad for discipline and morale.
Soldiers and women should be prevented from mixing.
>>
>>9869188
cause they're hot?
>>
>>9869230
are they?
>>
File: 1585798291830.png (2.46 MB, 1200x1200)
2.46 MB
2.46 MB PNG
>>9869240
oh yeah
>>
>>9869240
They're like a sweet mix of Persian and Slavic, they are hot.
>>
>>9867813
Based?
>>
90% of women to some degree fantasize about forced sex
>>
>>9867830
>Germany
>howmanytimesdowehavetoteachyouoldman
>>
>>9867743
>your men's needs
>needs
Pretty sure you don't need to have sex you freako
>>
>>9867743
I suspect this is how germans thought in the eastern front.
>>
File: Meet-the-Spartans-2008-3.jpg (799 KB, 1920x1038)
799 KB
799 KB JPG
>>9869203
>Soldiers and women should be prevented from mixing.
Agreed.
>>
literally because of japan and russia in WW2 raping literally anything that had a pulse. it grossed out US leaders (mainly because they were opposed to race mixing) so they included this in the hague/geneva etc.
>>
File: if OP were a girl.gif (912 KB, 500x281)
912 KB
912 KB GIF
>it's another "people with autism spectrum disorder don't understand the concept of empathy" thread
>>
>>9869580
that movie was pure cancer
>>
>>9867743
It's the only way incels like you could ever get laid, so I oppose it on principle.
>>
>>9870108
most rape is done by minorities anyways, you'd screw over your cuddly brown teddy bears a lot more
>>
>>9868542
Go every major country in WW2 committed war crimes... I get it but let's be pragmatic. Its only bad and not based if you lose. The winner really does create the post war narrative. Nagasaki and Hiroshima aren't seen a war crimes by most people. However every little crime Germans ever committed was eviiiil.

As long as you win there's nothing you can do wrong in war. Unless your nation is full of treacherous globalist cucks who hate themselves.
>>
>>9867743
Because women are the most sacred resource of mankind.
>>
>>9871039
no
>>
>>9868312
Your single mother is the only women you talk to. She raised you into a beta provider.
>>
>>9871105
Yes. You need women for the next generation. Without them you die out.
>>
>>9871210
They make up 50% of the human population, and are just as necessary for the continuation of the human race as the other half. The most sacred resource is water.
>>
>>9871848
Except women are incubaters its more costly for them when it come to reproduction while men are more disposable.
>>
>>9871933
Yeah, when you're talking about an efficiently-managed tribe of 500 or so people, sure. Doesn't really scale when you hit 7 billion people, with the vast majority being monogamous.
>>
>>9871990
Womem are still a hot commodity because men want to fuck them and the only way to have kids/start a family is with a woman.
>>
>>9871990
>>9872135
Also this
>>9867575
>>
>>9872135
>Womem are still a hot commodity because men want to fuck them and the only way to have kids/start a family is with a woman.
...And vice versa. Have you ever seen the state of things in the ghettoes? It'll change your perspective of things.
>>
The feeling of it is that this shit embarrasses usa officers but its not like that everywhere. You can indeed kill people and rape their women and execute prisoners for fun in other armies.
>>
>>9869032
No, that's torture of POWs, which is also a war crime, for a different reason. Torturing and massacring POWs is a war crime because if a besieged division knows that it will be tortured or killed after capture, they will fight till death even if it's obvious it's going to lose the battle, which leads to a lot of deaths on both sides that change nothing. The guys who wrote international humanitarian law asked themselves "given that there's a war, how can we avoid pointless deaths?" And forbidding the torture and killing of POWs is one of the answers.
>>
>>9872182
Women are fine sharing ome guy who can fuck all the women, it doesnt work the other way.
>>
>>9872206
>Women are fine sharing ome guy who can fuck all the women
Not only have you never been to the ghetto, I'm almost entirely certain you've never met a woman.
>>
>>9872384
In the ghetto they all fuck tryone
>>
>>9872425
>Implying Tyrone is one guy
>>
>>9867743
Because that's no good
>>
>>9867925
Machiavelli already addressed and came up for the solution to that, you have to wipe out the entire extended family to remove the possibility for reprisal. Never leave alive anyone that could come after you one day for what you did.
>>
>>9872445
...Or you could just avoid that fight and get back to carpet-bombing cities for vague reasons.
>>
It's unironically because of the Golden Rule and how much that has influenced warfare in western nations. In the east what tended to happen was they fully expected the other side to do that so there was no reason for them to not do it.
>>
>>9869108
Because almost no one could stop them. That's the thing, you can do whatever you want if you have enough military might that the other side can't resist you, especially if you're the kind of nation known for killing down to the last man.
>>
>>9872436
Of course there is more than one tyrone but not every nigga can be tyrone
>>
>>9869199
Let's be completely fair here, there wouldn't be a problem with suicide bombers or knowing where the enemy is if it was a war of extermination like the mongols fought. Especially against nations that can't muster true industrial might to resist it.
>>
>>9872471
>t.Doesn't understand the dynamics of the ghetto.
Anon, don't project your weak incelshit onto other groups. It's gross.
>>
>>9872450
No guarantee, you need to send in troops after and personally wipe out the survivors to make sure.
>>
Who says you can't? Name a US soldier charged with war crimes for being one of the many that committed mass rape during Vietnam. The thing is as long as your nation is powerful, concepts like war crimes don't apply to you. It purely exists as a form of victor's justice to punish the defeated.
>>
>>9872486
>T. White boy who thinks he understands the ghetto because he listens to ra

LMAO
>>
>>9872495
Well the colonel in charge of My Lai was put in prison but that was the most egregious, open and shut case of war crimes being committed in the entire war.
>>
>>9872499
>This weak shit.
Remember when I said, "don't project your weak incelshit onto other groups"? That's what I meant.
>>
>>9872510
When all know that every bitch in the ghetto wants to fuck the biggest gorilla giga nigger on the football or basketball team selling dope while call other incels on 4chan
>>
>>9867743
Because it's cowardly, and wicked.
>>
>>9872518
>t."White boy who thinks he understands the ghetto because he listens to rap"
>>
>>9867743
>Why can't you rape the women of your enemies during wartime?
>It strikes fear in the population of the enemy and keeps your men's needs fulfilled?
Is this guy deliberately trying to make people are or from /pol/ can't believe that we think the Nazis did and imperialism did was entirely acceptable the Westin Society crybabies now for not seeing it as necessary or some kind of psychopath?
>>
>>9872724
Rewrite that entire post.
>>
>>9872724
>>9872764
Is this person being a Troll?Does this person what the atrocities committed by Nazis and imperialist such as rape?Or is this person just a psychopath?
>>
>>9867743
Becuz Venereal disease & AIDS
That is also the fact that rapin' women or men is known to make Soldiers weak, disorderly, reluctant or worst of all sympathetic towards the enemy.
Why would you risk your life and do what is needed to be done or return to that bitchass anal-as-fuck military regime when you can have sex?
It is one of the problems that arose with the Afghan/Iraqi occupation.
US Soldiers would occupy the area and clear it off hostiles, designate a 'brothel' area, then gather all the young attractive females and force them to service the men
>>
>>9872789
I can understand it now. Thanks. 50/50 he's either trolling or lonely. Can't tell which. Maybe a 1% chance he legitimately just doesn't know the answer. (In war, the less enemies you have, the better things will be for you.)
>>
>>9867763
It also tends to give soldiers unnecessary guilt & PTSD.
Not to mention making your dudes believe that they are not the good guys.
Once that happens, their voice of reason will turn against them.
Subliminal thoughts tellling them, "I don't deserve to live", "I am scum." or "They (The enemy) are right in killing us, we deserve it, everything."
These thoughts can prove lethal in the midst of combat
>>
>>9872797
>worst of all sympathetic towards the enemy.
I know why countries would not it want this to happen but I don't get how raping people can turn into sympathy towards them. The Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan did rape all the time.
>>
>>9872814
Does this remind anyone else about why the Nazis started using industrial machines instead of telling people themselves?Because I swear as soon as I was done reading it bad for exactly what I was thinking about.
>>
>>9870361
>but let's be pragmatic
And let's be pedantic. Donitz wasn't charged with unrestricted submarine warfare because the Allies did it too.
>>
>>9872860
>>9870361
Did you ever heard of the Geneva conventions the Nazis chose to completely ignore anything in it. Also Nazi Germany and its allies committed significantly more war crimes on a regular basis and Britain and its allies did. especially if you consider the fact that the Soviet Union was originally Germany's allies.Also as much as people love to complain about the two bombs being serious war crimes the Japanese were bombing cities any way they can long before and we're basically going to lose for years before Germany was knocked out and even after the two nukes king of Japan I needed to basically do a coup against the military to stop World War II.
>>
>>9872898
This is your brain on jewish education
>>
>>9872838
To be fair, the taking of Human life on an industrial scale is directly inspired by the US Eugenics program back then,
which aimed to and largely succeded in ridding America of the weak, the deviant, the poor and ethnic minorities
>>
>>9872965
>largely succeded

Proof?
>>
>>9872978
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics_in_the_United_States

What remained of the Amerindians were virtually wiped out and their cultures too.
The Black community ceased to expand and the proportion of Black in US Demographics did not increase till this very day.
Latinos were then sterilised en mass, even in the overseas territory of Puerto Rico, preventing the swamping of wetbacks then.

Undesirables, genetically defective individuals as well as the mentally unwell were also sterilised.
The Mentally-unwell were also lobotomized en mass to remove any threat they pose.
And this carried onto the 70s
>>
>>9872821
It is kinda like Reverse Stockholm syndrome.
Just like how people can grow to care for their pets, Male Soldiers can grow fond of their female captives.
In fact, if the war drags long enough, male soldiers would even start families in the war zone.
>>
File: 3000.jpg (1.18 MB, 3000x2000)
1.18 MB
1.18 MB JPG
>>9873027
Then why are there so many mentally ill, drug addicts, meth heads and hobos in the US?
>>
>>9873057
Blame the CIA & FBI for starting and propagating the crack epidemic in the 80s, as well as the Prison-industrial complex
>>
File: 329483482482422.png (87 KB, 498x254)
87 KB
87 KB PNG
>>9872838
I had an old 70s era booklet of my grandfather's that quoted from the Nazis about how one of the generals was saying he was breaking his men by forcing them to do mass killing and that himmler got fucked up seeing some evidence of it.

While that whole idea that something like 90% of soldiers in WW2 intentionally aim to miss the enemy is prob false, it's definitely true that you need to condition man to be a ruthless killing machine. And you can't turn it off leading to:

>>9872797
Don't forget that nothing stays in Vegas when it comes to military service. We see the policies behind special force doorkicking shit and the wannabes of it influence our law enforcement into wanting to larp as cawadooty. Let's just let our soldiers rape and pillage and treat the enemy, I mean the civilian populace, as sport.

Then let's watch them come back, become cops and FBI/DEA/ATF and delineate themselves from other citizens I mean Civilians. I wonder what'll happen.
>>
You're trying to set up loyal puppet states in most contemporary wars (at least, those western countries fight in) and raping local women is a great rallying flag for sparking resistance. Factions with different war aims, even today, often don't abide by that norm.
>>
>>9873163
Indeed, it is kinda sad to see those with conscience drink their lives away while those without it thrive.
Gee... they ain't kidding when they said our system is tailor-made for sociopaths
>>
>>9873057
Let me introduce you to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico%E2%80%93United_States_border
>>
>>9869032
>>9872193
historically, did gay soldiers ever rape POWs my dudes?
>>
>>9873267
Not only gay dudes but straight dudes too when there is no cooch
If there is no POW to rape, they rape other soldiers to assert dominance.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/rape-wartime-vietnam/
>>
>>9873163
>Don't forget that nothing stays in Vegas when it comes to military service. We see the policies behind special force doorkicking shit and the wannabes of it influence our law enforcement into wanting to larp as cawadooty. Let's just let our soldiers rape and pillage and treat the enemy, I mean the civilian populace, as sport.
>Then let's watch them come back, become cops and FBI/DEA/ATF and delineate themselves from other citizens I mean Civilians. I wonder what'll happen.

Isn't that the intention all along?
>>
>>9873267
Read about the Turks in WW1
>>
File: fuck you.jpg (205 KB, 1280x1032)
205 KB
205 KB JPG
This is a bait thread full of idiots.
Rape is wrong, prove me wrong.
I'll read your braindead responses but don't expect me to reply to you.
>>
>>9873524
Rape is good
Women enjoy being raped
>>
>>9867830
>Germany

They ain't never coming back, chap. Get over them.
>>
>>9867743
Why are you asking weighted negative questions here, moron?

I stopped in to say that in one of those war strat books, maybe Bear Went over the Mountain, troops kept a enemy woman shackled up for newcomers to ease their nerves with before battle.
>>
1. Geneva convention
2. If your soldiers get rapey, your country's image will be ruined. You'll become "that rapist country" and then other nations will be less likely to trust you and trade with you, less tourism, less foreign investment, less international aid, you name it.
>>
File: walter U.jpg (135 KB, 614x498)
135 KB
135 KB JPG
>>9868673
>The Germans raped the shit out of eastern European women
Unproven

>the highest punishment a soldier would see for it was for miscegenation
Wrong, we do know of convictions for rape by military courts on the Eastern front, e.g. pic
>>
>>9873267
Bulgarian soldiers raped young serbian boys in the Serbo-Bulgarian war. They made them march home with no pants and shoes too.
>>
>>9868867
A revenge for the what etruscans did to Latins before
>>
>>9867743
yeah, you can, but you were so preoccupied with whether or not you could that you didn't stop to think if you should
>>
>>9872965
>>9873027
>>9873057
Very interesting, didn't know that. Wonder how the demographics would have looked like today if that hadn't been the case.
>>
>>9874662
If Black Americans had been treated as they were in 1630 going forwards, and assuming race never came to mean anything in America, they'd look much like the current Italians, but associate more directly with Nigerians and Brazilians.
>>
>>9867743
They do get raped?
>>
>>9867743

you will die a virgin
>>
>>9871144
Is this your selfie?
>>
>>9873606
*women and men
>>
War crimes are for losers.
>>
>>9873524
Once you remove the violence it is just sex.
>>
Wars would just become one big rape contest.
>>
>>9872193
>war crime
Gay and cuck pilled
>>
>>9869163
This image is disturbing
>>
>>9876198
How does Belle Delphine's bathwater taste, simp?
>>
>>9867762
Why not just ban war?
>>
>>9867819
How about this then if you start acting like that they have a right to send terrorists to your country and blow up hospitals and shit. You don't want to break the rules of war because then everyone will commit atrocities on you. Look at Germany, they raped and slaughtered Russians and when the Russians pushed them back they got mass raped and killed.
>>
But anon imagine the boys who were raped during wars and it got covered up, imagine those cute arab boys just bending over for big white soldier cock.
>>
>>9867743
My great great grandpa in Ireland witnessed the girl he lived next to getting gangraped by black and tans. In response he and the other local guys got a bunch of rifles and ambushed the regiment in a canyon. They killed them all and he fled the country and ended up in the new world. If they acted like humans they wouldn't have needed to be put down.
>>
>>9878868
Google jackrolling, gangrape is a literal sport for blacks.
>>
File: 1606083147430m.jpg (79 KB, 1024x664)
79 KB
79 KB JPG
>>9867762
But civilians are still capable of committing acts of resistance. Your conventions are all well and good when you're sipping tea in Geneva, but in a real country in a real war, there can be no distinction. A civilian might take up arms against you. Even if you can't prove they've done so it's still a possibility. And taking action against them often leads to more partisan activity. To make wars shorter and less bloody, it makes more sense to remove all restrictions on military activity so soldiers can do whatever is necessary to win.
>>
>>9867743
Seems like if it’s a combatant, then logically rape is fair game... I mean, you are after all trying to kill one another. Better than getting fucking beheaded or some shit.
>>
>>9868940
You mean what the French did to their African slaves? (alongside being faggots are raping the men too) That worked out real well in Haiti
>>
>>9869108
You mean the guys China is systematically erasing the culture of and who lost the majority of their people and useful land too? You don't think their current treatment has ANYTHING to do with the Chinese being angry? Also the Russians mass raped them during the cold war which probably also had something to do with that. Might not come soon but racial memory is a bitch.
>>
>>9878872
He's talking about British Paramilitaries in Ireland you retarded mutt.
>>
>>9867743
For some reason, no official body sees sex as a 'need' anymore.
>>
>>9874662
>like today if that hadn't been the case.
Probably 80% Majority White (Not Mexican or Slav White), with token minority Blacks and less spics
>>
>>9867743
mens become weaker/distracted
breeds mutts who hate you
gives away winner genetics to foreign tribe
>>
>be russians
>kill millions of your young population to every bullet the nazis shoot
>kill the nazis young men population in return
>rape their woman so they quickly recover the lost population and now teach the bastard son of Dimitri Gayslav that he is a full blooded german and how he must hate Russians for the rest of his life
>>
>>9872505
Also got released a year after he was imprisoned
>>
>>9867762
based
>>
>>9867951
(coughnankingcough)
>>
>>9879225
The Germans supposedly raped 10 million women from the east, so they are even.
>>
File: 1603615619772.jpg (125 KB, 850x478)
125 KB
125 KB JPG
>When Yugoslav politician Milovan Djilas complained about rapes in Yugoslavia, Stalin reportedly stated that he should "understand it if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometres through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle." On another occasion, when told that Red Army soldiers sexually maltreated German refugees, he reportedly said: "We lecture our soldiers too much; let them have their initiative."
vgh I wish Stalin was my commander in chief
>>
>>9878884
>To make wars shorter and less bloody, it makes more sense to remove all restrictions on military activity
Obviously not because removing all restrictions means Alexander III in Tyre or Timur in Delhi. The Geneva powers wanted to avoid that, and replace the decades-long horrors of the Napoleonic wars with short conflicts between gentlemen that would be decided in a decisive battle, like Sedan or Königgrätz. Also they wanted to avoid stupid, pointless deaths of wounded soldiers like those at Solferino, since a disarmed wounded soldier can't participate in battle and isn't dangerous for your army, so leaving him to die is another death in war that could have been prevented at zero risk.
>>
>>9867743
It's only "appropriate" in gruesome wars where you're trying to destroy and annihilate the other group. If you allow it in normal wars, it really hurts your reputation. You want your soldiers to be seen positively, as liberators, not as looting rapists. Otherwise, you'll build up long-term bad blood between you and the enemy. This hurts the chance of future alliances, including installing puppet rulers, and your only chance to rule the region is to genocide the populace. It's very messy. Not something you'd do if you're just fighting over trading rights to the East Indies.
>>
>>9867743
Because your armies get used to it and when they return at the end of the war and get demobbed, they continue the practice on your own population. Ok, if your civilisation is ok with constant rape of it's wives and daughters, but not good if they dont.
>>
rape has been so common throughout the history of war that its the rule, not the exception
>>
>>9880521
These same people also argued just having blimps fly over and bomb everyone's cities at the start of the war before the armies even meet on the battlefield so that there's an immediate ceasefire. Literally a 100% civilians killed vs soldiers killed scenario.
>>
>>9867743
Consider the following my dude. Rape was such an ingrained part of human culture during out long darkness back in the hunter gatherer days that women tend to, statistically, have more orgasms during rape rather than in modern monogamous marriages. Disregard modernity, think of the past and drawn your own conclusions.
>>
>>9867743
Because then your soldiers become nothing but coomers waiting for the next fix in the form of raep. They also get heavy zinc depletion thus lowering their T levels.
>>
>>9878691
Never tasted it
I can tell you what my gf’s pee tastes like
>>
>>9881693
Nice sources bro
>>
>>9881740
Sex actually increases testoserone
>>
>>9867743
(Fertile) Women are and have always been a resource.
Doesn't really matter how you acquire them,
While (young)men are an expendable commodity.
>>
>>9867743
So Sherman was right?
>>
>>9882773
How do you think grugg had sex?
>>
>>9882988
Like anyone else?
>>
File: 1605761808379.webm (751 KB, 640x480)
751 KB
751 KB WEBM
>>9883467
>>
>>9867743
It's a total distraction to the soldiers. Looting and raping becomes the #1 priority instead of accomplishing meaningful strategic objectives. You see this in ancient warfare a lot.
>>
>>9883496
Proof?
>>
>>9883496
Do you think this is more likely to happen in a modern urban area where no one knows each other and people are atomised and isolated from each other or in a small grug tribe?
>>
>>9883521
Its an actual footage of caveman grugg getting some pussy.
>>9883527
Yep, except the beating up part, women trade sex for safety and food. Grugg would most certainly do this to some bitch he has never seen.
Rape as the people have established is part of war, when men wont be faced in a trial for their actions. They can do whatever they want.
So I don't see what's so hard to believe. Caveman grugg most certanly raped women, killed men and ate lots of meat and any berries he sees.
>>
>>9883621
Thats footage of a modern man beating and raping a woman, hardly proof.
>>
>>9883621
>when men wont be faced in a trial for their actions.

But they will face anger from the females family members, father, brothers and other male members of the tribe you retard.
>>
>>9883651
And by anger i mean deadly revenge.
>>
>>9883651
Too bad in tribal society nobody knows who the father of who is. So that doesn't work and what are going to do? So they wont have sex with grugg, even tho he provides them safety and food? Ye, no.
>>9883644
This man is much smarter and educated than grugg ever was, and he still rapes. Do you think grugg 500k years ago wouldnt rape a woman?
>>
>>9883651
Also grug wouldnt like it if another grug raped his wife/mother of his children.
>>
>>9883687
>Too bad in tribal society nobody knows who the father of who is.

Proof?
>>
>>9883695
grugg hasnt invented marriage yet
>>9883716
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_promiscuity
>>
>>9883918
>implying grug has perfect agency

Perfect agency is godhood. It is to be able to kill a man and face no consequences. It is to take any woman you want as your woman, regardless her wants or the wants of the other people interested in how her sexual resources are used (her family, her friends, her society, the other men with claims on her).
>>
>>9867743
normalfags are moralfags, and guess who makes up the majority of the serving popullation fellow psychoofag.
>>
>>9872445
>Going up to every person you meet and ask if they're related to so-and-so
Sounds tedious and counter-productive at best.
>>
>>9867830
>Germany
>consolidating power
Germans are the ones getting raped now and its only going to get worse when the next wave of refugees hit



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.