[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: P1010015.jpg (404 KB, 612x936)
404 KB
404 KB JPG
>Women get the right to vote
>Encourage their cucked husbands and churches to lobby to ban alcohol, destroying centuries old American drinking traditions overnight, also creating a surge in organized crime
>Turn American into a police state which spies and oppresses its citizens, bans guns and leads to a bloated welfare state
Nothing positive has come out of the 19th amendment.
>>
>>15896981
>a system fails if half the population participates
Damn, pretty shitty system then.
>>
>>15897016
I have a theory that aspies are just nobles who hate interacting with peasants.
>>
>>15896981
For me? Its little pet.
>>
>>15897030
For you it will be pedo jail and then eternal lake of fire
>>
>>15897030
Baseado
>>
>>15897016
>you have to be my slave and like it
Cry harder.
>>
>>15897038
ₒₕ ₙₒ ₙₒₜ ₜₕₑ ₘₐ9ᵢ꜀ ₗₐᵥₐ
>>
OP neglected to mention the worst thing about prohibition: it is the reason we have a permanent federal income tax. There never used to be such a thing, instead the US taxed a variety of different goods. Fully 1/3 of the US federal budget was derived from the sale of alcohol, before it was banned.

So how do you think the prohibitionists got them to accept banning the source of a huge part of the budget? They proposed a permanent income tax. Oh they said it would only apply to the richest people, that most of the population would never pay it! Yet here we are. And when they repealed prohibition, did they repeal the income tax? Nope.

Thanks prohibition!
>>
>>15897004
South Korea will be gone in one hundred years, 0.8 birthrate...what a great success! Also, look up paradox of declining female happiness
>>
>>15897067
>it is the reason we have a permanent federal income tax
prohibitionist moralist will never touch this.
Best thing about the moralists is that they can not debate.
>>
>>15897004
>Damn, pretty shitty half of the population then
ftfy
>>
>>15897004
In an ideal society there would be a group of like 5-6 people who are very obviously in change of everything with no ambiguity or behind the curtain shenanigans.
>>
>>15897038
>15 is pedo
Americans are completely conditioned cattle one way or another
>>
>>15896981
>>15897067
Prohibition worked. It was put into place because America was a country of drunkards. Women cared so much about it because their husbands would come home drunk and violent. People got into workplace accidents do to drinking while working. By the time Prohibition ended, alcoholism didn't go back to being as bad as it was before Prohibition.
>>
>>15897080
How is no Koreans a bad thing?
>>
>>15897004
Women were never meant to be executives
They are the legislation of the human race whose main function is to legislate genetics by selecting which men get to reproduce
it is utterly repugnant to allow women into the executive sphere of human sociology, in the same way in which it is repugnant for men to rape women.
Women voting is them raping society.
>>
>>15897286
>By the time Prohibition endehd, alcoholism didn't go back to being as bad as it was before Prohibition.
>Source: I made it up
>>
>>15897038
seethe more old hag
>>
>>15897004
You're right. You need way less people directly participating
>>
>>15897578
interesting way to word this. Did you get that concept of executive/legislative relation to gender/sex from anywhere?
>>
>>15897578
>by selecting which men get to reproduce
This is a blatant meme. Most societies have never given women that choice, it's always been up to her father and other family members.
>>
>>15899100
Veto power for the most part. Observe the Amish; while they're a cult; they're probably the best proxy for white culture in the 1800s. Yes, fathers have veto power; but practically the women can choose whichever Amish man they want.
Only certain strains of flabby rich people would arrange marriages; also in the modern day the Middle East and India; and they're DEFINITELY genetically fit, right?
>>
>>15899031
No.
It's simply obvious.
Women have had at least EQUAL power as men for all of civilization. But it was domestic and not intermingled with executive world of men.
Only in modern times have women overpowered the "male race" in the executive sphere.
>>
>>15897578
>by selecting which men get to reproduce
That never happened before no fault divorce and the sexual revolution in the 20th century. Historically women were literally sold off to their future husbands by their parents.
>>
>>15899166
>Historically women were literally sold off to their future husbands by their parents.
you have no fucking clue what a dowry is you stupid nigger.
you have no inheritance in my civilization.
just because YOU cant get pussy doesn't mean we should inbreed to death like retarded pajeets.
>>
>>15897568
>all Koreans live in South Korea
>>
>>15897028
>A toaster fails if i stick a fork instead of toast
Damn, pretty shitty toaster then
>>
>>15899130
>Veto power for the most part
Also choosing power. If the father wanted his daughter to marry someone she was going to.
>but practically the women can choose whichever Amish man they want.
Even if this is the case, how many of them remain single forever? The "genetically fit" ones according to you may get scooped up early but the vast majority still go on to reproduce.
>Only certain strains of flabby rich people would arrange marriages
Arranged marriages were done by all castes of people
>also in the modern day the Middle East and India; and they're DEFINITELY genetically fit, right?
Of course they are. Brown =/= not genetically fit. And in instances where they aren't genetically fit (compared to Europeans) it has nothing to do with women but their geographic and social environment (such as low IQ because they don't have cold winters)
>>
>>15899188
you dont get it
women literally sniff* out which men are the exact genetic "fit" for them
You may not consciously think about pheromones, and neither do women; but they constantly bombard the senses.
It's not simply which men are "best"
Women have "evolved" (if you want to call it that) mechanisms which preserve the genetic fitness of a tribe.

>Brown =/= not genetically fit.
not my argument, retard; they have the highest rates of birth defects in the world.

Anyways; if your theory were to be true; why does the Bible, for instance, describe the vast majority of marriages occurring in it as consensual between man and woman?
Why, anecdotally, did all my great-grandparents (and some of them I've personally met) before the sexual revolution, date/court one another without any duress?
Is your problem that you simply have no family to tell you the stories of the past? So you simply can't know what the past was like?
>>
>>15897221
i saw someone on reddit saying 19 is underage, it is literally over for Amerimutts since the prohibition era.
>>
>>15899208
>you dont get it
No you don't get it. You're just a simp faggot.
>women literally sniff* out which men are the exact genetic "fit" for them
That's not how any of this works retard. There's no such thing as an "exact genetic fit" and even if there was it would take a genome test to figure it out, no natural mechanism could precisely determine it. There is a range of what's genetically best (not to closely related but also not to distantly related) but it's just that, a range, not an exact fit. And women don't even follow it a lot of the time either.
>they have the highest rates of birth defects in the world.
And wtf does that have to do with their marriage practices? Those are also some of the most polluted areas of the world, I would venture to say that has 1000x more to do with it than anything related to marriage.
>why does the Bible, for instance, describe the vast majority of marriages occurring in it as consensual between man and woman?
Because the woman hating her husband doesn't make for a good story.
>>
>>15899251
a semantic little queer aren't you?
whatever man.
I'll let you be weak.

>You're just a simp faggot.

>"If women are attracted to you, you're a simp"
:^)
>>
>>15899280
Yes
If you measure your worth by what women think, you are a simp
>And wtf does that have to do with their marriage practices?
It has to do with inbreeding and cousin marriages; not arranged marriages
>>
>>15899299
>If you measure your worth by what women think, you are a simp
who is doing that here?
the guy getting mad at me for saying "women had a say in their mate" is clearly a beta bitch.
Basically always men who argue for forced marriage are gigantic wimps who would have no other way of finding a mate.
It's not "what women think" it's "REPRODUCTION"
idgaf what women "think" lol. you'll notice that successful men never do. I'm saying that women (and men to a degree) make their mating choices on a primal level; and not even by "thought"

>It has to do with inbreeding and cousin marriages; not arranged marriages
those are synonymous
that is why consanguinity is as high as 50% in
many parts of the Middle East/Africa/India.
This is also why they have low IQs
>>
>>15899280
>a semantic little queer aren't you?
The point is that the range has to do with genetic similarity, not fitness retard. The range isn't about who has a better jawline or something but about who might give you a retarded kid because you're too genetically similar.
>>"If women are attracted to you, you're a simp"
No, you're simp faggot because you admit that women shouldn't participate in government (which is true) but you still want to placate them by saying they can choose genetic fitness when in reality they can't even do that. Also what >>15899299 said, you put too much value on women's opinions.
>>
>>15899319
I hope she sees this
>>
>>15899328
>The range isn't about who has a better jawline or something but about who might give you a retarded kid because you're too genetically similar.
correct, you idiot. do you think that you're not agreeing with me here?
Do you just not know what "fitness" means in an evolutionary sense?
>>
>century old drinking tradition
Prohibitionism has been popular in the US since colonial times. Sects like Baptism and Mormons still discourage excessive drinking.
But hey, papist revisionism just sounds cooler I guess.
>>
>>15899328
Women are attracted to height and antisocial low IQ mattoids
>>
>>15899334
>correct, you idiot. do you think that you're not agreeing with me here?
Genetic similarity and fitness are two different things retard. Two cousins can both be very genetically fit but they shouldn't reproduce because they're too closely related, that's what the optimal genetic range is about. And in another instance, a subsaharan African may be very genetically fit for his environment while a Chinese woman is very genetically fit for her environment, but they shouldn't reproduce because they're too genetically distant.

And you ignore the part about how women disregard both genetic fitness and distance all the time.
>>
>>15899368
Also Asians are one of the highest IQ races; but most women are not attracted to Asian men
>>
>>15899379
Women are attracted to men who have a decent chance of being able to kill other men with their bare hands
This is the secret.
>>
File: FIbSej0VEAkIa8T.jpg (50 KB, 512x599)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>15897038
The age of consent in Brazil is 14 :)
>>
>>15899386
That’s an adult women
The problem I have with pedophiles is that they want to have sex with children who haven’t gone through puberty.
Every retarded discussion on this website I’ve seen is about arbitrary numbers.
Anecdotally, many 14 year olds I’ve met were grown women. However, I didn’t see a girlfriend of mine for 2 years, when I reconnected when she was 16 she grew a beautiful hourglass figure, big tits, and her voice dropped
Then again I’m not a pedophile, so maybe that description makes you faggots want to vomit
So all in all some 14 year olds aren’t “fully” mature but they’re the exception.
>>
>>15899208
>Women have "evolved" (if you want to call it that) mechanisms which preserve the genetic fitness of a tribe.

Kek im autist and loser yet women want to fuck me because i got good looks. Explain that Mr. Science
>>
>>15899393
Just because a 14/16 year old has an adult body that doesn't make them less children anon, they are still learning about life and themselves

Im all for loving teenagers but let's not pretend that the hebephile fruit didn't fall off the pedophile tree
>>
>>15899421
Used to be that older teenaged men married younger teenaged women
My comments reflect the ideal.
We live in a fucked up society.
>>
>>15899363
In colonial days Americans would drink an average of 7 barrels of cider per year, not too mention English ales and rum/whisky on top of that. The German immigrants brought their traditions of lagers to the US as well prohibition wiped out all of that overnight, the cider industry never recovered and 100% of American beers were shit until Jimbo Carter (a Baptist, mind you) legalized homebrewing and craft brewing. Cocktail culture only survived thanks to speakeasies during Prohibition.
>>
File: lf.jpg (355 KB, 1920x1404)
355 KB
355 KB JPG
>>15899385
So they are stupid and can't select properly since they don't care for IQ
This fat guy's invention killed thousands of manly tribal warriors
>>
>>15900191
obviously modernity throws many wrenches into the equation.
but most men arent at risk for getting machine gunned
not at the moment, at least
>>
File: glock40.jpg (3.27 MB, 3264x2448)
3.27 MB
3.27 MB JPG
>>15900201
>most men arent at risk for getting machine gunned
not a machine gun but lots of men die from pic rel
>>
>>15900230
objectively a skill issue in these sorts of engagements though
>>
>>15900245
So being intelligent enough to stay out of trouble is more important than being strong
Women btfo again
>>
>>15897004
It was litteraly designed to exclude women from day 1.
>>
>>15900191
Arguably da joos are another example
>Inbred
>Ugly
>Neurotic
>Allegedly ruling over the superior vrill alpha chads through cratfyness
>>
>>15900261
?
Women dont need you to PROVE you're capable; they only need to believe it.
You dont have to get in gunfights for women to like you.

Disclaimer; women on the pill do NOT demonstrate normal mating preferences. Women naturally want to fuck and DO settle.
>>
>>15899208
Men can rape women, women can't do shit physically since half of them can't move properly during menstruation.
>>
>>15900305
>Women's job is to select men
>They select them for dumb reasons
>It does not matter because you if don't fit said criteria you can just trick them
Further evidence we should disregard their dumb preferences
>>
>>15900316
...Yes?
historically the "patriarchy" has had severe penalties on men for doing this.
>>
>>15900339
Because it was disrespecting another man's property
>>
>>15900339
It had severe punishments on illegal rape but not legal rape. Historically you could walk up to a father, give him a bag of gold coins, and walk off with his daughter.
>>
File: Patagon biscuiti.jpg (46 KB, 326x504)
46 KB
46 KB JPG
>>15900289
Women also care too much about height
The tallest peoples in history were all losers or at best irrelevant
>Bosniaks
>Patagonians
>Nilotes
>>
>>15900191
>This fat guy's invention killed thousands of manly tribal warriors
Now post a picture of him as a young man.

I can assure you, with absolute certainty, that the vast majority of men who used those guns to kill thousands of "manly tribal warriors", could and did in fact kill other men with their bare hands when circumstances called them to.
>>
>>15896981
Don't forget federal income tax.
then you watch modern historians look at prohibition and gleefully state
>see the constitution immutable, you can change whenever you want, isn't that great :)
>>
>>15897578
To be fair I don’t even think they should be entrusted even with that, have you seen what men they choose to reproduce with? It’s abysmal. Usually they’re idiotic loudmouths.
>>
>>15899212
Reddit is not the place to seek out moral truth
>>
>>15899368
This is true which is why they shouldn’t have the ability to choose in the first place.
>>
>>15900376
The more you understand how illogical and stupid women are the better off you are. Also, most of the great men of history were below average.
>>
>>15900484
>It's all because of birth control broooooo. Before birth control women picked perfect mates.
>>
File: young_hiram.jpg (15 KB, 254x272)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
>>15900412
Still fat, with negative canthalt tilt and bad jawlin
>the vast majority of men who used those guns to kill thousands of "manly tribal warriors", could and did in fact kill other men with their bare hands when circumstances called them to.
I'd say the majority never killed anyone in peacetime; and most of them would have carried guns in case they had to
Even honor duels usually involved swords or pistols
>>
>>15897221
How many Americans do you know irl?
>>
>>15900484
Maybe “supreme gentlemen” aren’t what men are supposed to be
>>
>>15900511
No, that’s been long before birth control as well
>>
>>15900530
Men should be able to be whatever they want to be, man was created before woman, woman is his eternal indentured servant.
>>
>>15900495
The most sucessful ethnics groups were average or short
Being short is generally not an issue; which exception of extremely short peoples like pygmies (Those were primitive too)
>>
>>15900530
Yeah men are supposed to be low IQ violent psychopath criminals, because those are the people that get the most pussy
>>
>>15900553
All of you beta faggots on this website glorify bloodthirsty warriors and conquerors (see: Indo-Aryans et al)
And you get angry for some reason when you learn that women are attracted to bloodthirsty warriors and conquerors?does this make sense?
It all adds up to me…
>>
>>15900615
You can be a blood thirsty warrior while still having your women in line, see Islam you simp faggot.
>>
>>15900615
It is almost like this is an anonymous imageboard and you might be talking to different people
>>
>>15900620
Did you not see my first post in this thread you retard?
Do you think I’m advocating feminism you doofus??
>>
>>15900635
>Do you think I’m advocating feminism you doofus??
Giving women a choice in mate section is inherently feminist, so yes you are.
>>
>>15900659
Lmfao
So you think because you have enough gelt you deserve pussy?
You want a prostitute for a wife?
I’m sorry that no woman has ever chosen you bro but all that means is that you are no better than a feeble merchant
They don’t reject you because you’re too intelligent, it’s because you’re too weak; and at any time you can decide to become strong
>>
>merchants.. le bad
Merchants run the world while warriors are cannon fodder who get their legs blown off
>>
>>15900689
Have you considered you can be a warrior without fighting/dying for Israel?
There’s things called boxing gyms… there’s weightlifting
You can eat red meat and eggs instead of takis…
>>
>>15900674
Weren't you just going on and on about genetic fitness? You can't "decide" to be genetically fit. I understand why you have the opinions you do, but they aren't historically true nor good for society. You're still a feminist at heart.
>>
>>15900714
You can decide to be better than you are, dumbass
You are a plastic being with a certain genetic potential
>>
>>15897004
Democracy is a cancer, yes
>>
>Turn American into a police state which spies and oppresses its citizens, bans guns and leads to a bloated welfare state
Far left movement in disguise.
>>
>>15900696
>>15900719
>If I just workout women will like me, right???? What do you mean they only curly haired tiktok pretty boys??????
You still have the brain parasite of feminism. Women should workout for me.
>>
>>15900779
They like me and I am 5’8” (white) and 200 lbs (fit)
Also 6”+ dick (this may be a key factor??)
King of manlets, but women irl (I guess you have to actually talk to irl people to figure this out) like me.
You just have to not be a wimp. I’m guessing you’re a manlet. If they call you short it’s just a shit-test, idiot. You’re supposed to say “how did you know???” Or “you just now noticed?”

Who am I kidding? I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess you were raised by a single mother? I had a dad. Maybe that’s all you need to have this magical “confidence” of which I speak.
>>
>>15900816
>Akshually genetics does not matter
>Just fake it till you make it
So women don't select you for being genetically fit and you were wrong
>>
>>15900824
Being short seems to be my only negative at a glance.
If they're not on BC and they hear my voice/see my body/smell my pheromones they love me
btw dating apps are for the status-seeking hormonally fucked women.
>>
>>15900816
>It's all about confidence bro
kys, and my original point about genetics still stands
>>
>>15900851
your genetics basically manifest as confidence
the strength of your psyche is genetic
>>
>>15900674
>>15900696
>>15900719
These manosphere faux-chads are beyond pathetic
>thinks dowry indicates female-choice, when it's not universal, paid mostly to the family, and sometimes by the bride's family to the groom's
>thinks women pick their own mates, and on superficial categories
>doesn't understand arranged marriage or that the average man can overpower almost all women
>doesn't understand even a weak man can overpower a huge chunk of women
>shows inner feminist and cucked attitude by idealizing female-driven choice
>thinks a woman not picking you for sex is just the man's fault (literally the ultimate cuck attitude: your own woman fucking other men is your own fault for not being better)
Call it the cuckoldosphere. But continue taking advice gurus and grifters, many of which are literally cuckolds or childless copers who feel honored to date aged party sluts.
You're basically the same as a black-pilled incel type, except you don't fully accept genetic determinism, and applaud female choice because you think you excel in this made-up circus show.
>>
>>15900858
You just said it was about having a dad lol
>>
>>15900867
having an intact family rather than having a retarded whore mother is probably a function of genetics.
>>
>>15900858
This is an advanced cope, I've never heard this one before.
>>
>>15900884
>the brain is not a physical part of the person
k
>>
>>15900874
>Women will select men who don't take care of their kids
Women btfo yet again
>>
>>15900890
Your genetics manifest as your physical body retard, talking about confidence and psyche are copes.
>>
>>15897067
The Soviet Union and Russian Empire both collapsed in part due to alcohol bans.
>>
>>15897286
Men were drinking because their work was painful as was fighting in WW1.
>>
>>15897004
Being back selective enfranchisement.
Letting all men vote was a mistake in and of itself let alone the average women.

Men with land, skills, actual education, or another similar form of genuine value should be the only ones with influence over how society is governed.

>b-but you wouldn't be able to vote either!!!

good. I'm willing to give up my literally meaningless vote for a better system because whatever effect I could theoretically have is completely drowned out by millions of retards
>>
>>15899475
1. Citation needed
>The German immigrants brought their traditions of lagers to the US
You say that like it’s a good thing.
>>
>>15901065
Industrial warfare necessitates massive bodies of people for war.
You will need to mobilize many men for war, you can't just give voting to skilled men with education and so on. Because they wont be enough for any real war.
>>
>>15901218
Promise them guaranteed wives after service and you’ll mobilize them. Just don’t backpedal on the deal and you should be alright.
>>
>>15900553
Correct. That’s why they should have no choice.
>>
>>15901310
Most dictatorships had huge armies anyway
>>
>>15896981
>>Women get the right to vote
They only got it because the cucks in charge let them
>inb4 muh protests
>inb4 muh half assed bombing campaign
Around the same time there were multiple deadlier anarchist bombings but anarchism went nowhere since the establishment was not interested
The idea that feminists (Or any other minority group) scared everyone into submission through ''struggle'' is a revisionist fantasy
>>
File: womyn cindarella.jpg (43 KB, 500x357)
43 KB
43 KB JPG
>>15897004
>>a system fails if half the population participates
>Damn, pretty shitty system then

If half the population has the mentality of children, then yes.
>>
>>15902212
>If half the population has the mentality of children, then yes.
Who? men? The incels in this thread bring down the average male IQ by at least 20 points.
>>
>>15897004
>Damn, pretty shitty system then.
Unironically yes. It also fails when the other half *does not* buy into it.
>>
>>15899363
>papist revisionism
You know Lutherans also opposed Prohibition, right?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.