Is it ethical to prohibit drugs to stop the spread of addiction if it means infringing on human freedom? Is it ethical to limit choice and thus limit freedom? I have 2 friends, one is an ultra furry faggot thats always high on PCP. My other friend is your regular fiscal conservative. The former argues that its evil to limit others and enforce your will upon them, basically making them slaves or robots. The latter says its for their own good.Who do I support here? I myself hate fiscal conservatives but I also hate fags. But I grew up with them? Is making me choose between them ethical? Is making a choice also not a form of evil here?
>>15629867prohibit Jews from existing.
>>15629867You should side with the furry.Your fiscal conservative friend sounds like a crypto-fascist
>>15629867obviously both of these are legit concerns and there's no way to settle it one way or another decisively. in each case you'll just have to evaluate the specific harms and risks associated weighted against the principle of individual liberty.
>>15629879>>15629867Furry faggot is right. There is no such thing as their own good; their own good is my own good. Though in truth, the end game is Conservative is a advanced slave state for minority, while the end goal of furry faggot is primitive anarchy for majority. Either way, the world is fucked. They keep each other in check really, so the answer is both.
>>15629867>Is it ethical to prohibit drugs to stop the spread of addiction if it means infringing on human freedom?Yes. Hyper-individualistic liberalism is functionally identical to anarchy.
>>15629867>ultra furry faggot thats always high on PCPyou should make out
