>>13319664Not Einstein surely.
>>13319698Not really, he was a midwit surroundy by very smart folk.
>>13319664Absolutely not schiz- i mean scientists
>>13319664Either Leonard da Vinci or Carl Gustav Jung
Einstein having his name become synonymous with genius and grouped with Mozart, Michelangelo, Plato, Beethoven, Descartes etc has to be the most insane cultural phenomenon in the sciences and letters.
>>13319664Most of them were pseuds
>>13319895Plato is overrated.
>>13319664von Neumann and it's not even close. A polymath at a time when hyperspecialization already started becoming the only viable option.
>>13320017Imagine the sheer expanse of his mind
>>13319711>surrounded by very smart folkWho exactly do you mean?
>>13319664Da Vinci then Mozart in terms of pure unbridled talent, like God reaaaaally favored themEinstein is a deeply intuitive and creative genius and Newton was a precursor but most of the shit he's done would've been found later on
>>13320070>but most of the shit he's done would've been found later onthat does for everything that has ever been discovered
>>13319664Surely everyone will agree on my N. Isaac
>>13319895Plato was the cancer that started killing philosophy
>>13320073Not really for Einstein