How did the Nazis go from treating Slavs as the peak subhumans to regarding them as one of the purest whites on the planet?
>>10842944they didn’t dehumanize slavs just stop
>>10842944Nazis were braindead retards then and still are today
>>10842944they realized that Slavs are purest Aryans
>>10842944the nazis who thought slavs were subhuman lost a war to the slavs.Slavic nazis aren't the same people, but they've probably decided some neighbour of theirs is. Once the slavic nazis lose a war to some other subhumans, those subhumans will carry the autism forward for another generation
>>10842944>How did the Nazis go from treating Slavs as the peak subhumans to regarding them as one of the purest whites on the planet?They did not, feel free to provide evidence that they did.>>10843009How so? or do you just expect that we take your word for granted?
>>10843238OP literally has a photo of a Nazi publication titled “Subhuman” in German with Red Army soldiers in the backgroundAlso the Germans really didn’t care about the sovereignty of Slavic nations... Poland, Czechoslovakia, USSR. Also how brutally they treated Soviet POWs vs Western Allied POWs. I think the evidence speaks for itself
>>10842947>literally wanted to genocide every single Pole
>>10843256>OP literally has a photo of a Nazi publication titled “Subhuman” in German with Red Army soldiers in the backgroundI mean the part of>>10843238>to regarding them as one of the purest whites on the planet?Where was the NSDAP has made a U turn in their feelings about the Slavs?
>>10843464NSDAP doesn’t exist anymore you silly goose. OP is talking about neo-nazis
>>10843469>OP is talking about neo-nazisDo you mean American Skinheads? Well the Answer would be a simply one.They are Americans, Egocentrism and dilettantism are part of their National curriculum.
>>10842944Neo nazis are Americans. American dont think in terms of "Germanic" and "Slavic", but "white".
>>10842944>"The subhuman" in Nazi propaganda, 1938>Der untermensch booklet was published in 1942
>all these slavshits thinking nazis loved them
>>10843073So this is how they reproduce...fascinating
>>10843803Yeah, I noticed that too, there are conflicting dates all over the internet. One tweet (sic) says 1935. Not sure which date is accurate though, and it doesn't really make a difference I think. In fact, it would make more sense that a book like that would be published earlier during Nazi rule rather than when the war had already started for years
>>10843803Another spanish meme says 1930
>>10842947>being this retardedgo back to /pol/