Why is Dunkirk considered a big victory for the British when it’s just them running away?
>>10237787It depends. What’s their Haplogroup?
>>10237787The Germans letting the British retreat symbolises the german-anglo white consciousness and how even at the heart of a war that chivalry continues
>>10237787Yeah I'm sure she said "white boys" and that that wasn't something you added yourself. Also there are niggers waiting for boats as well.
>>10237928The Germans were the ones who destroyed chivalry.
>>10237933https://mobile.twitter.com/vildechayeh/status/1348983629502947328Why do you insist on being ignorant? Is it because it makes all of your positions look bad?
>>10237928>chivalryIf the germans knew what was coming, the anglos would've been massacred.
>>10237928Nah Hitler was just a strategic retard
>>10237787Because their army wasn't lost, and the boys got sent home. It could've been worse.
Why are these faggots always pretending their kids spontaneously come up with these snarky remarks that perfectly align with their own opinions?
>>10237787They bravely ran away. Bravely ran away away
>>10238950Doesn't sound political to me, sounds like a 14-year-old who doesn't get a movie that was made for more grown-up peopleIt's funny because it's hilariously reductive
>>10237787Nobody considers it a victory in the sense of winning a fight. It was a very well executed fighting retreat and strategic withdrawal done on a logistical shoestring in the face of what seemed at the time to be an overwhelming military juggernaut, which is why it's been so publicized and praised through the decades.
>>10237787Because they were not totally annihilated?
>>10237787It was a victory in that the army survived.
>>10237787One of Britain's greatest wins, one they still crow about to this day, was one where 99% of the work was done by the weather. Another of their greatest wins had the Prussians do most of the actual work. What I'm saying is sasuga Albion.
>>10238986The same Perfidioids who crow about Dunkirk as a brilliant fighting retreat then turn around go "LOL WARSHINGTON JUST RAN AWAY M8".
Successfully (to an extent) concluding a difficult military maneuver has its merits. It's not as glorious as victory, but leagues better than your army getting captured/wiped out.
>>10237928Pretty sure 16k Frenchies died in a week to slow down the German advance and prevent them from reaching Dunkirk before the Anglos had left
>>10237787>Why is Dunkirk considered a big victoryIt's another episode of "retard does not watch the movie but chooses to be triggered by it so that he can feel righteous about being bitchy on the internet"
>>10239420Pretty sure 300k frenchies surrendered instead of fighting to save france
>>10237787Probably because it allowed them to fight another day since the German army failed to destroy a significant portion of the British army
>>10237928>Germans outrun their own supplies (again)>French army physically stops German soldiers from advancing further>Germans fail to close the pocket on time and their /pol/ incel Stans continue parroting the world's most blatant schoolboy cope excuse for the next 70 years
it's considered a victory because the Germans should have been able to capture the British forces at Dunkirk. Their failure to do so was a huge relief for the british. It gave the British hope that the bulk of the British troops escaped the continent to fight another day. but it obviously wasn't a victory like the Soviet victory at Stalingrad. Still, it was a victory.
>>10237787Unironically massive British copeIts been allowed to continue since the Brits won that war eventually
Rebecca Vilkomerson is the Executive Director of Jewish Voice for Peace
>>10240529Does France produce no actors? Why can't Hollywood just make movies starring the French?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2v03mizxU4
>>10240753They did cause the Red army 3 million casualties in 1945
>>10239307not really, as nobody in england cares about george wahsington
>>10237787>It's just a bunch of white boys dying for the Jews.Worst mistake in History.
>>10237787>Why is Dunkirk considered a big victory for the British when it’s just them running away?Because that's how it was framed for wartime propaganda purposes and since we never left 1945 people are still regurgitating that shit same that all the other war propaganda lies that they were fed during the war.
>>10239307bizarre post, what is wrong with americoids?
>>10238972it is but we can both pick up on the hidden social subtlety of malicious intent within it by specifically phrasing it as white boys
>>10242067>implying it's not the other way aroundThe Jew bows to the superior capacity for betrayal and destruction demonstrated by the Englishman
>>10237928Up until 1941 Hitler was convinced UK would accept a peace treaty. Not annihilating them in Dunkirk was a show of good will
>>10237787Just Anglo things, you can't understand
>>10237928REAP THE WHIRLWIND
>>10239420>other people do the hard work>Anglos take the creditSasuga
>>10237787>Germans corner BEF of ~300k and remaining Frenchies thinking "this is where it will end, we got 'em">300k British soldiers and some Frenchies escape in safety across the channel>get redeployed in North Africa and start shit>1944 they straight up invade backTell me all about how this was a great loss for Britain. What did Britain lose? Her continental colony of France for 4 years?
>>10242447Many such cases
>>10242413Funny how Britain won both of those
>>10240753The Germans had 11 million allied prisoners doing forced labor for them
>>10242525If jews were so high IQ why were they so easily turned into subservient slaves?
>>10237998That was the French. War was never the same after the revolution.
>>10241102>misattributed quote>no real point to makeI mean this should be reportable for spam.
>>10242260Was that his actual thinking? Because I always wondered how the fuck he could allow Dunkirk.
>If a European territorial policy was only possible against Russia in alliance with England, conversely, a policy of colonies and world trade was conceivable only against England and in alliance with Russia. But then we had dauntlessly to draw the consequences and, above all, abandon Austria in all haste>But we did not think of concluding an alliance with Russia against England, any more than with England against Russia, for in both cases the end would have been war, and to prevent this we decided in favour of a policy of commerce and industry. In the 'peaceful economic' conquest of the world we possessed a recipe which was expected to break the neck of the former policy of violence once and for all. Occasionally, perhaps, we were not quite sure of ourselves, particularly when time to time threats came over from England; therefore, we decided to build a fleet, though not to attack and destroy England, but for the 'defence' of our old friend 'world peace' and 'peaceful' conquest of the world. Consequently, it was kept on a somewhat more modest scale in all respects, not only in number but also in tonnage of the individual ships as well as in armament, so as in the final analysis to let our 'peaceful' intentions shine through after all
>>10242654>The talk about the 'peaceful economic' conquest of the world was possibly the greatest nonsense which has ever been exalted to be a guiding principle of state policy. What made this nonsense even worse was that its proponents did not hesitate to call upon England as a crown witness for the possibility of such an achievement. The crimes of our academic doctrine and conception of history in this connection can scarcely be made good and are only a striking proof of how many people there are who 'learn' history without understanding or even comprehending it. England, in particular, should have been recognised as the striking refutation of this theory; for no people has ever with greater brutality better prepared its economic conquests with the sword, and later ruthlessly defended them, than the English nation>Is it not positively the distinguishing feature of British statesmanship to draw economic acquisitions from political strength, and at once to recast every gain in economic strength into political power? And what an error to believe that England is personally too much of a 'coward' to stake her own blood for her economic policy! The fact that the English people posessed no 'people's army' in no way proved the contrary'; for what matters is not the momentary military form of the fighting forces, but rather the will and determination to risk those which do exist. England has always possessed whatever armament she happened to need. She always fought with the weapons which success demanded. She fought with mercenaries as long as mercenaries sufficed; but she reached down into the precious blood of the whole nation when only such a sacrifice could bring victory; but the determination for victory, the tenacity and ruthless pursuit of this struggle, remained unchanged
>>10242661>In Germany, however, the school, the press, and comic magazines cultivated a conception of the Englishman's character, and almost more so of his Empire, which inevitably led to one the most insidious delusions; for gradually everyone was infected by this nonsense, and the consequence was an underestimation for which we would have to pay most bitterly. This falsification went so deep that people became convinced that in the Englishman they faced a businessman as shrewd as personally he was unbelievably cowardly. The fact that a world empire the size of the British could not be put together by mere subterfuge and swindling was unfortunately something that never even occurred to our exalted professors of academic science. The few who raised a voice of warning were ignored or killed by silence. I remember well my comrades' look of astonishment when we faced the Tommies in person at Flanders. After the very first days of battle the conviction dawned on them that these Scotsmen did not exactly jibe with the pictures they had seen fit to give us in the comic magazines and press dispatches. It was then that I began my first reflections about the importance of the form of propaganda
>>10242260why couldnt he just capture and then release them
>>10238027We know the retard claimed her daughter said that and that she gave an eloquent speech about Trump's abuse of the authority of his office and lack of decorum, and we know she claims everyone on the bus stood up and clapped. But she's a lying cunt, is the point.
>>10237787because without what happenned ,thousand of soldiers would have been killed or get jailed and it would be a huge loss of manpower and moral.Also something as always not showed and mentionned is the heroic resistance of few regiments of french soldiers ,entrenched and surrounded who permited to gain precious hours by making germans struggling with them.Without these french ,its most likely dunkirk would have been a huge fest of british blood on beaches .
>>10242475>Britain wonAmerica and Soviets won* bong land came out of the war crippled and it's empire in ruins
The incident involved many thousands of British patiently waiting in line which is a cornerstone of their cultural identity.
Because saving 300k troops is a big deal and perhaps the most important part of Britain not making peace with Germany in 1940-41.
>>10243498Britain “won” insofar as it came out the best out of all the European countries. their biggest problems was learning to cope with ceding authority to the USA, who had a foreign policy 95% in line with the UK anyways. The UK went from having one reliable ally in 1940 after the fall of France (Canada) to being one of the Big Three in 1945. The USSR and USA were always gonna be superpowers when they came out of their self-imposed isolations.
>>10244110The Brits wouldn't have peaced anyways, but those 300k troops were seen as crucial to the defence of the German amphibious assault they expected to be fighting shortly. The British didn’t realize that the Germutts had nothing to contest naval superiority with and were in a far worse position with air superiority as well, as evidenced during the Battle of Britain. The true victory in Dunkirk was a moral victory after the rapid fall of France making every Brit demoralized. Having to surrender 300k POW’s would have sucked, but they would have continued the war.
>>10241133A WWII movie from france would be as much coping historical revisionist propaganda as one from the USA, maybe even worse.
>>10237787Wow, nonwhites really just don't get things do they? I mean I've seen this irl but it just kinds clicked for me now.
>>10237787Oh, but how they managed to run away!
>>10237787about 80% of notable events in british history are copes.>get invaded by the dutch>Muh glorious revolution
Flee in less than 2 days without a fight.> HeroesGet run over for two months.>Surrender Monkeys
>>10240454>the Brits won that war
>>10240454The didn't win the war, they just happened to be on the winning side, like Poland or Romania.
>>10244800>They didn't win the war, british tanks and bombs in Dresden mean nothing!
>>10244811Winning a war means you attack military targets, not civilian ones.
>>10244521>Britain “won” insofar as it came out the best out of all the European countries. their biggest problems was learning to cope with ceding authority to the USA>Britain>ceding authoritybong delusion is always amusing
>>10244630>>get invaded by the dutch>>Muh glorious revolutionWe invited them, so it wasn't an invasion.
>>10244816Civilian population is a military target when they produce weapons and eventually get drafted. We should've killed every G*rman male child in '18
>>10242260The bongs would be more willing to accept a peace treaty with 300 thousand of their own held as hostages.
>>10240413>>Germans outrun their own supplies (again)Nonsense. German units were ready to take the port from the Western side which was only lightly defended then. Hitler just fucked up and told them to stop and when the attack was resumed days later defenses had been prepared.
>>10237787Dunkirk is considered a victory for perfidious angloïds because their escape caused the death of thousands of French soldiers.Not only do anglos pertain the myth that French people surrender when they ran away first, but they even make movies in which French soldiers are cowards even though they sacrificed themselves to save the worthless anglos.Angloïds consider a victory to destroy the reputation and lives of French people
>>10244888Holy based trips of truth
>>10242654Is this Kaiser Willy
>>10244829>We invited them, so it wasn't an invasion.
>>10244834>>10244974Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler
>>10237787>Dunkirk considered a big victory for the British when it’s just them running awayits propaganda, they lost badly and were given mercy and peace offering by Adolph.The rest are lies and idiocies.
>>10245028>>10244829>>10244630Yes, it was an invasion, but by no means was it some sort of conquest where they installed a hated foreign king.
>>10237787It's the best possible interpretation of an extremely dire situation. The Brits are very good at that. It's the 'always look on the bright side of life' approach to war. Would it make more sense to you if the Brits were crying about the loss of France and their own immanent invasion instead of smiling about the successful evacuation of their troops? It's not that hard to understand.
>>10245248So it was consensual rape? >"One way or another, we're going to stick a phallus up your behind, so you may as well enjoy it."
>>10245511The power of /his/tardation
>>10244834Fascinating. He had the exact insight into why Germany had lost WW1, then went on to make almost the same mistake again: underestimating Britain's resolve to fight in 1939.Incidentally, the Japanese made exactly the same mistake about the Americans in WW2 - they started believing their own propaganda and became convinced that the American was essentially a businessman who had no stomach for serious warfare, and that they only had to present America with a war that would be expensive and America would back down.
>>10244630>>10244829>>10245028>>10245248The Glorious Revolution was even less an invasion than the Anschluss in 1938
>>10244630>all notable events are military historyThis is your brain on grug
>>10245664The Glorious Revolution was far more of a political event than a military event. There were only a couple skirmishes before James fled to France.
>>10245028Tell me all about how Britain became a Dutch colony and how the Dutch founded the greatest empire in history
>>10245265>that picThe absolute amount of wishful thinking
>>10245678>a Dutch colony
>>10245749>piss off literally everyone that isn’t Irish, French, or a catholic absolute monarchist >get deposed
>>10245640I don't think Hitler really believed the UK would fold because of a lack of will to continue. I think it's that he sincerely overestimated the appeal of anti-communism to the British government (outside the Cliveden Set). It's as if he were always perplexed that the Brits weren't fighting the Russians instead.
>>10245678>every war ends with losing side becoming winner's colony
>>10242413Your right, if only Britain was as successful as the other allies in the war. Like France, Poland, Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Greece, Yugoslavia. Who all bravely lost the war. While the cowardly British continued to fight.
>>10242124I wear the white boy badge with pride. We're taking back these hurtful phrases.
>>10245677>The Glorious Revolution was far more of a political event>(((apoliticalevent)))
>>10244871lolno, not to mention the german troops were at their limit, running on meth and caffeine pills
>>10237928>letting the British retreat
>>10245685Yeah they were in no position to even dream about invading the british isles, sure the airforce was in a good position, at the start, but the naval assets were terribly outmatched and outgunned the the marine didn't even have the crafts to land troops, or the ships to transport them and turns out the channel isn't easy to just run across, even with the americans who had been doing nothing but amphibious landings in the pacific it took a lot of planning. Not to mention the place was mined to hell and back.
>>10239033This. It was a logistical feat that allowed the pre war army to survive and form the allow bigge forces to build up.
>>10245265They shouldn't have made nice, and just finished off the cucks, who would have surrendered quicker than France.
>>10240498it's not even funny anymore
>>102448881/3 of those evacuated at dunkirk were french
>>10237787>Rebecca Vilkomerson>Former executive director of Jewish Voice for Peace.we should have left them to rot
>>10237787"He who fights and runs away lives to fight another day"Dunkirk in Britain isn't considered a huge victory, it's considered a lucky escape and a symbol of british unity (with the requisitioning of civillian vessels being used for the evacuation), that's it.
>>10237787>Why is Dunkirk considered a big victory for the BritishMeanwhile, in primary sources:>Churchill: "Make no mistake, what happened here is a colossal military disaster..."Who are you quoting?
>>10244888The French are presented as heroes in the film Dunkirk though, holding the line and acting with incredible bravery and stoicism.
>>10245265>invade in fucking doverIt's a literal cliff faceGod Nazis were fucking retarded.
>>10245028Yes? It's pretty rare that you invade a country in a glorious war only to be completely shackled by said countries existing legal institutions, all of which you are keeping, and expanding limits on your own power, if we compare it to actual wars of conquest, like the Norman conquest, the comparison is absurd, William totally upended te existing political order, William, on the other hand, barely did a thing, the glrious revolution has far more in common with a coup than a serious war.
>>10237928Such a meme answer. Germans let them retreat because they didn’t want to risk panzer divisions charging in without infantry support. If they did, Rommel would’ve got his ass handed before he even step his boots into North Africa
>>10250626Nobody. This board is full of people who not only think that everything the English say is false, and that they endlessly lie to create an unfair positive image of themselves amongst other peoples, but also that they are unique in this.
>>10244630The Dutch never invaded Britain thoughYou fell at the first hurdle
>>10240529Dunkirk was actually good though, and Nolan is a conservative or so it seems.