[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

[Advertise on 4chan]

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]

Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here.

[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: 20180601233156_1.jpg (340 KB, 1366x768)
340 KB
340 KB JPG
was it basically the chinks version of the hre? how did their feudalism compare to europe's?
It was a civil war. Although nominally still under the Emperor, the Emperor no longer held power and various Daimyo began predating each other. There are no accurate comparisons with Europe.
The real Japanese are the Ainu. The feminine manlets from the southern islands are Korean mutts whose culture was copied from China.
The Chinese have the same opinion of every single foreign country and always have - inferior to China, and utterly irrelevant because China is the only country on earth that matters.
Japan's style of feudalism changed quite a bit with the times, going from pretty restricted social mobility to basically none after the end of the sengoku period. Before that, you could become a bushi if you were a good enough soldier for your lord (and kissed his ass enough, presumably).
Farmers were technically above craftsmen and merchants in the social order but that was really just lip service - I'm sure those farmers tending the rice fields in villages they weren't even allowed to leave because they're the property of their lord felt much better knowing they were the social superiors of the rich ass merchants and blacksmiths living in towns and cities.
feudal japan is kino

File: mozi.jpg (34 KB, 450x662)
34 KB
>Mozi views aesthetics as nearly useless. Unlike Confucius, he holds a distinctive repulsion to any development in ritual music and the fine arts. Mozi takes some whole chapters named "Against Music" (非樂) to discuss this. Though he mentions that he does enjoy and recognize what is pleasant, he sees them of no utilization in terms of governing, or of the benefit of common people. Instead, since development of music involves man's power, it reduces production of food; furthermore, appreciation of music results in less time for administrative works. This overdevelopment eventually results in shortage of food, as well as anarchy. This is because manpower will be diverted from agriculture and other fundamental works towards ostentations. Civilians will eventually imitate the ruler's lusts, making the situation worse.
17 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
Autistic people love music actually.

File: chad_legalist.jpg (332 KB, 2018x1024)
332 KB
332 KB JPG
bug mentality
>negative emotions
No such thing
Thank you.

4 replies omitted. Click here to view.
trichinosis is common ailment of poor cooking conditions for pork such as wood fires and given the only effective treatment would have been constant liquid uptake until it passed......in a fucking desert where you probably have to put in hard labor at a well for each cup.... makes perfect sense to just swear off pork altogether.
But ajonus vonderplaanitz said trichinosis is good for you
why big nose tribe cut off part of loins?
likely same reason as puritan burger tribe, to prevent sexual pleasure.

File: c046600[1].jpg (29 KB, 411x480)
29 KB
Is he single-handily responsible for the social, cultural and even demographic transformation of Canada from the late 20th century?

How did Canadians choose to elect (and Americans tolerate) such a guy with well-known Communist sympathies?
11 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
he was based and dabbed on Fr*nchoids
This is completely true. If you look at the most recent canadian election results, you can see that Justin Trudeau got his (minority LOL) off of Toronto, Montreal, and the maritimes. He pretty much lost everything west except for a few ridings in the major cities
I never got the 'rosbif' epithet. What, are you complimenting them at their skills at cooking meat? Same thing with 'frog' - frog is tasty.
osti de tete carree ferme ta crisse de yeule
diriger vers toi, espece de vicieux batard d'anglo a crisse

File: 20201130_203548.jpg (141 KB, 1080x576)
141 KB
141 KB JPG
How can Arabs look like this? Was it Germanic/crusader genes?
22 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
There are no "iberians" either, this word just describe Arab rapebabies, Black rapebabies, and germanic rapebabies.
File: 1606564344051.png (373 KB, 1597x486)
373 KB
373 KB PNG
>the vast majority of the population doesn't exist only the tiny bits of admixture that need a DNA test just to detect exist
Imagine being this butthurt
Lol haploautists are such genuine losers
File: unnamed.jpg (44 KB, 512x372)
44 KB
Why should I cope? It's not my grandmother who got gangraped by Arabs and Blacks.

Is this what celtics would have looked like?
Gauls where described as being mostly blonde so no, this is not what the average Celt would have looked like.
Thats bell beaker phenotype (they eneded adopting celtic culture)

File: CSA_states.png (58 KB, 1513x983)
58 KB
>"state's rights"
>use the federal government to expand the vile institution of slavery
>"state's rights"
>use the federal government to force Northerners to be complicit in the preservation of the vile institution of slavery
>"state's rights"
>found a new country to enshrine their vile institution of slavery forever
>"state's rights"
>CSA was the most intrusive government in the history of the continental US
Why do people defend this violent, immoral, hypocritical region?
302 replies and 47 images omitted. Click here to view.
He was literally pushed to run for president by abolitionists
He was a compromise candidate between moderate and radical factions in the Republican Party.
Contain it so that free states would outnumber slave states to the point of being able to pass a constitutional amendment banning slavery.
They ran him as a moderate but he obviously was not. That still happens today
He supported the Corwin Amendment

File: 00.jpg (29 KB, 415x500)
29 KB
Talleyrand or Metternich? Who does /his/ prefer?
3 replies omitted. Click here to view.
Metternich, based servant of the Emperor and therefore Europe as a whole. Trying to save it.
File: Gosling Laughing.gif (1.98 MB, 190x190)
1.98 MB
1.98 MB GIF
>Saving Europe
Maybe he didn't, what do you think of it?
In December 1808 an apparently warm and public rapprochment between Talleyrand and Fouché, the Minister of Police, who had previously been widely accepted as being Talleyrand's bitter political adversary, caused Napoleon to conclude that there was some sort of a plot being hatched by the two powerful men.
In late January 1809 Napoleon returned from Spain where he had been busy leading armies and, at a meeting of the privy council a few days later, delivered an half-hour long torrent of fulsome and extravagant abuse at Talleyrand. The intensity of the Emperors invective may have been somewhat provoked by the apparent impassivity with which Talleyrand received it. It seems that as the abuse was continued, in the presence of the most senior officers of the state, Napoleon depicted Talleyrand himself as being nothing but so much 'dung in a silk stocking" and brought up allegations that Talleyrand's wife was unfaithful.

Most observers thought that the Emperor's behaviour had been notably undignified. As the meeting dispersed Talleyrand is recorded as having said to a colleague 'What a pity that such a great man should be so ill-bred.'

File: Spain flag.png (7 KB, 400x267)
7 KB
It's not even made up.

>Quiepo de Llano spoke multiple times over the radio warning that "immodest" women with Republican sympathies would be raped by his Moorish troops. Near Seville, Nationalist soldiers raped a truckload of female prisoners, threw their bodies down a well, and paraded around town with their rifles draped with their victim's underwear. These rapes were not the result of soldiers disobeying orders, but official Nationalist policies, with officers specifically choosing Moors to be the primary perpetrators

>This practice of using Moroccan Foreign Legion members to rape local women was a carryover from Spanish military actions in their colonial possessions.

>German soldiers offering Nationalists support during the Civil War would sometimes delight in taking photographs of violence committed by Spanish Moroccan Legionaries against women, including the removal of women's breasts. Despite Franco's attempts to intervene to stop this behavior, it continued.

>Foreign Affairs magazine in October 1942 said of Francoist commanders, "They never denied that they had promised white women to the Moors when they entered Madrid. Sitting with the officers on a camp bivouac, I overheard them discussing the collusion of that promise; only some argued that a woman was still Spanish despite her "red" ideas. This practice was not denied either by El Mizzian, the only Moroccan officer of the Spanish army.


Why are fascists such cucks?
131 replies and 33 images omitted. Click here to view.
Unfathomably based. Commies deserve to be raped by a pack of niggers, and that's exactly what happened.
I'm sure rape is very exciting when you have an adrenaline rush from combat and get into a frenzy, and haven't had sex for a long time. Obviously a normal guy going about his day wouldn't be interested in raping, any more than he would be in killing.
Put yourself in their shoes

They aren’t coomed in months because they can’t get private time to jerk off and are scared of being killed

Then these sexy women who you have been told are your enemy keep wiggling their butts and boobs at you

How could they NOT rape them?
there are pyriamids in the sudan tho?
Spanish Republicans propagated a fake democracy that would've made Spain a communist satellite state. Spain would've been Stalin's.

They were not his country-women.

What is the identity of the shell shocked soldier?
17 replies and 4 images omitted. Click here to view.
I'm saying Sam Hughes had a marked disdain for "professional soldiers" and considered them mostly career bar-flies. He was adamant he could raise a volunteer-civilian army equal to any professional army on the western front, and he was right.
Well that is extremely ironic considering he was a career soldier. Now I don't know all that much about the Canadian experience in the war and this civilian army, I can only assume they did as well as every other civilian army put into the field in WW1 in that they were devastated. My original comment is more a reference to those conscripted during the war. Anyone already in the service had better training to start off with and possibly some experience.
He only served in the South African war and was a noted hot-head and a pain in the ass to the British.


>I can only assume they did as well as every other civilian army put into the field in WW1 in that they were devastated.
The CEF had their loses like everyone else, but at no point where they ever devastated and are arguably one of the only elite formations on the western front.
Well snap, maybe I need to workshop my theory a bit more. perhaps the professional/conscript isn't that much of a factor in WW1 trauma.
private dimwit

File: Hitler.jpg (163 KB, 440x340)
163 KB
163 KB JPG
>National ""Socialists""
>Gets supported by Krupps
>Ban labour unions
>Put socialists and communists in concentration camps
>Attacks the USSR
35 replies and 7 images omitted. Click here to view.
Now I'm off to bed.
>praised the Bolsheviks.
Because he saw the destruction of tradition and order as a good first step, but he also sympathized with nationalism and rejected Marxism, ultimately he would have come into conflict with an expansive USSR.
>well what is fascism?
palingenetic ultranationalism
> Is it just nationalist populism?
No because you need the "rebirth" aspect, the idea that you are creating a new system and wiping away the mistakes of the past.
>Is Khmer fascist?
You could certainly make a case for it, one of the key aspects of the Khmer Rouge was Khmer ultranationalism
Hitler read Uncle Tom's Cabin?
Damn, I'm really curious about his views on it
>>Marx was wrong about how Capital is class conscious
Kinda. It was Germans who sent Lenin to Russia.
if worker conditions were so bad from day one, WTF do you think the total war speech was about in 1943?

File: cathpepe.jpg (7 KB, 181x250)
7 KB
Did the Jews who died on the Holocoaster go to Heaven?
yes and live as holocaust survivors in america
No, if you deny Christ, you're going to Hell.
No Jew ever went to heaven.

Did abo's ever win any wars, battles or form any sizeable ressistance against euros like the native americans did?
11 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
He is wrong but the thing is even if they weren't pacifists, primitive warfare was more of a dick measuring contest where two tribes throw some some stuff at each other before having a brief quarrel. You don't get massive bloodbaths and sackings of cities like you do in civilized regions.
Wasn't like the biggest abo group 30-50 people? How could they possibly mount a resistance, I don't criticize the abos for not building societies ( Australia pre-contact had no capacity for a sedentary civilization on the scale of even a Brozen age civilization ), but they were probably the most like primitive humans out of any population, only from being restricted to hunting gathering with desert soil.
>hunting gathering
they definitely farmed plants and animals too.
Pretty much this >>9935695
this is a good example - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalkatungu#The_massacre_at_Battle_Hill
There could have been, but the tribes were too divided by bad blood between them to organize any mass resistance.

File: Ireland_(MODIS).jpg (2.61 MB, 1600x2200)
2.61 MB
2.61 MB JPG
i was talking to my family over thanksgiving and it turns out my town has a long history of animosity towards micks, i myself unknowingly bullied kids who were actually micks. was it because they were papists and because of the troubles and shit? i am in the us south
66 replies and 5 images omitted. Click here to view.
I didn't forget that. It was the King of Leinster who requested they aid him; he promised them land and marriage to his daughter (illegal in Irish law) in return for military support for his run against Ruaidrí Ua Conchobair, the High King. They then began campaigns of their own until Henry II's intervention.
>[citation needed]
No, you're the one that needs to provide one. You literally said that your argument is based on you believing it.
>They come together against common foes
No, they didn't. Many Irish lords worked together with the Norsemen, including the King of Leinster, the head of the Uí Fidgenti and numerous others. Famously during the Battle of Clontarf, Brian had many Norsemen on his side too.

I might hurt to hear this but your vision of medieval Ireland is completely flawed. The concept of an Irish Nation first arrived in the late 1700s, created by Protestants in Belfast. Irish people before that were of course a collective people sharing a culture/language/code of law, but they absolutely were not united politically or part of some big "unit" together. It simply is not true and the burden of proof is on you if you wish to challenge that.
>No, you're the one that needs to provide one. You literally said that your argument is based on you believing it.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine_Years%27_War_(Ireland) 2. at least i can admit to an opinion unlike you who is claming fact 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_King_of_Ireland although these kings never truly ruled Ireland but they prove that irish people did see them selfs as a people.
>No, they didn't.
1. nine year war 2. Irish Rebellion of 1641 3. the defeat of the viking settlers and yes there is well documented evidence to support viking mercenary's helping clan lords but not settlers and ultimately the settlers where driven off
>The concept of an Irish Nation first arrived in the late 1700s
clearly wrong if thats true that how do you enplane even just the Irish Rebellion of 1641. i honestly just want to hear where the fuck you got 18th century from i know there was a lot going on then like wolfe tone be how can you not know about earlier examples.
>Nine Years War
The Nine Years war had Irish lords siding with England too.
>The existence of High Kings prove the Irish saw themselves as a people
No, it proves that the role of High King existed but that it was almost entirely ceremonial-again, seeing as it was often rotated between families to stop anyone getting too powerful. The High Kingship actually argues *against* what you're saying.
>Nine Year War
See above; it had Irish lords fighting for England too.
The 1641 Rebellion was not a separatist one and most of the leaders were Royalists-supporters of English rule.
>Defeat of Viking settlers
They were assimilated. Hiberno-Norse lords simply became more independent lords in Ireland. They were not at any stage driven off.
>Clearly wrong, explain 1641
1641 was an attempted coup d'etat of the Dublin authorities to secure the privileges of the Catholic nobility. They were loyal to the English crown and trying to gain the graces from the King. There was no concept of an Irish nation outside of the context of the Kingdom of Ireland at the time.

>where you got 18th century from

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>The Nine Years war had Irish lords siding with England too.
of course it did this doesn't prove anything tho as these loads may have still seen the Irish people as a collective wile also believing English rule would be beneficial.
>it was almost entirely ceremonial-again
as i said these kings never truly ruled Ireland but there needs to be an "Ireland" for them to be a high "king" of. this would not be possible if it was JUST an island of fight clans they clearly seen a connection that linked them together as a people.
>the leaders were Royalists-supporters of English rule
the Rebellion of 1641 was a Rebellion ageist English rule & Protestants plane and simple many Irish men died fighting British red coats there is not any way you can spin this around
>They were assimilated
yes but only after be defeated by a collective effort ageist them by clan lords if this had not happened Ireland my well have been Scandinavian by now
>1641 was an attempted coup d'etat of the Dublin authorities to secure the privileges of the Catholic nobility.
1641 was an unorganized semi nation wide Rebellion not just Dublin and it was an attempt to bring more power Catholicism and Irish nationalism.
>They were loyal to the English crown
they where catholic the crown was Protestant.
>conceived the idea of an independent Irish nation
Wolfe Tone conceived the idea of United Irishmen witch was a society of revolutionarys not an idea of Irish nation if anything it shows how many people already believed Ireland to be a nation.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
File: irish 3.png (25 KB, 679x162)
25 KB

File: image(1).png (78 KB, 1200x1200)
78 KB
They were right and you can't prove me wrong yankee scum. SIC SIMPER TYRANUS
38 replies and 14 images omitted. Click here to view.
What's their long-term plan for the blacks, then? They couldn't be slaves forever. Most of the western world had already banned slavery, and the freemen population was continuing to grow. How would the Confederacy continue to survive through the 1900s, with ideologically opposed neighbors to the north and south, and across the ocean?
anon, what the fuck is this
annie frub
File: 1504901126514.jpg (1.21 MB, 1072x4616)
1.21 MB
1.21 MB JPG

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.