be honest with me /his/. which is more based. celibacy, or marriage?
>>8787271celibacy is gay. marriage today is now gay. I could not be happier.
>>8787271To use the term according to its traditional and proper definition, celibacy requires much discipline for most people undertaking it as a lifestyle. Chastity is a very similar concept, although it tends to relate to allowing marriage, with the continuation of chastity within the boundaries of marriage, not only in the unmarried state.
>>8787282Brought to you by: AIDS
>>8787306How do you get AIDS from gay ass celibacy?
seriously, what the fuck was he thinking?
>>8787046Uggghh, what could have been
>>8786893That the Anglos would have the forsight to realize that the white race needed unity or would end up in today's 2020 as a doomed people.
>>8786893>the virgin ad*Lf>the chad hugh dennis
He looks like a better-bejawed version of a Turk I once knew, who worked in a hotel in his homeland and ended up so depressed by the 7-day weeks and 20 hour shifts that he killed himself and his family by driving their car off a cliff
>>8787046>Hess believed that the Egyptians could accomplish nothing on their ownI know the obvious first response is 'muh pyramids' but if you're talking of 19th century Egyptians he's bang on the money
How can people deny the holocaust when this exists?
>>8774686It wasn't even written down until several generations after the life of Jesus.
>>8772670Tfw no Dutch >>8772676Jew Dad
>>8779337What bits were written in ballpoint pen?
>>8772670idk, drawings of your beloved daughter barefoot, pregnant, and surrounded by older, grizzled, unkempt, foreign men, all armed to the teeth with high powered rifles would be a disquieting sight for any father, even if said daughter hadn't been murdered in the most brutal way imaginable
>>8772676Careful anon you're scaring the retards who can't look up basic facts.
It has to be more than the US sending a few troops in one time in the 90s yet the US are blamed as usual for its condition. What did Somalia look like anciently? How did it get to the state it's in?
Siad Barre was a wrecker for jew globohomo
>>8785119While I could see this being the case for the Djibouti and Kenyan parts, you can't handwave away the Ethiopian border as being entirely on the hands of Europeans.
>>8784978>Socialist government>Government is crap>Socialist government dissolved. >Power Vacuum>Now a Feudal Ancap state.To be fair, they were doing pretty well for themselves as boatjackers.
>>8784978I'm guessing it's because they're at the entrance/exit to the Suez canal, and if the US can't control them, then better have them non functioning.
>>8785119Those aren't actual ethnic groups, they're clans. All of them speak the Somali language.
Nazism and Fascism as a whole is a variation of communism. Lets look at the similarities:- Both Authoritarian- Both Totalitarian- Both have a dictator who is worshipped- Both started from Anti-Semites (Marx was a self hating jew, communism is anti semetic)- Both hate free capitalism - Nazism is state capitalist, which was the USSR’s economic model before trying to achieve “full communism”- Both are european models- Support collective ownership
>>8787159this is honest genuine retardation
>>8787187>All commie regimes were authoritarian and totalitarian. It's certainly not true that all commie regimes were authoritarian and totalitarian. Even the USSR wasn't particularly totalitarian after Stalin's death, although it remained deeply authoritarian. And even if you think that all communist regimes have been authoritarian - which may or may not be true - it would not mean that all communist regimes must necessarily be authoritarian.>Communism is inherently anti semetic, as Marx was.Now that's just a stupid thing to say
>>8787279not an argument
>>8787270Whoa there gonna need a source on that bitI'm not doubting it, it's just very interesting.
>>8787289Its the work of someone who has an hilariously basic level understanding of history or either political system. Clearly the product of american ignorance.
How did American police get so powerful? Is it like this in other places?They get away with almost anything. This guy shot a white dude as he was crying in the floor for no reason.I work for a city and it boggles my mind how their union is so powerful that they can block or demand huge raises for shit like GPS in cars to prove they are working.We have an actual law that regular people can't flag traffic. Businesses have to pay cops $80 an hour to sit with their lights on on their phones.We can't even fire the bad ones because the unions get to appeal at the state level and reverse firings.I know just under 10% of our force is currently indicted too. Lot's of domestic abuse they don't get punished for.
>>8787175Tell us some stories, former cop anon.>>8787164Prior to incorporation doctrine it absolutely was.
>>8787139True. There was also the anti-drug initiative in the 80s. But I think 9/11 is when we start seeing the nationwide escalation of force and every damn local police force decked out in tactical gear. Also qualified immunity didn't really get going until the mid 2000s as well, I believe.
>>8787175thisblue line is also shielded from any accountability
>>8785566Urbanization and it's consequent increase in population density leads to lower social trust. This breakdown of the social fabric is exacerbated by increased ethnic diversity. This by itself is a problem, but when those same areas also have strict gun control and self-defense laws, you have a scenario where the police are overzealous, due to their monopoly on force, excessive size and scope of authority and the fact that they are policing violent, tribalistic people that are at each other's throats and unable to take care of problem in-house.
went full shizo after 911
what are the best and most comprehensive books on british history starting from the earliest point?
The Peter Ackroyd ones are pretty good. I've read 25% of one of them.
the english and their history
>>8786900David humes is still the gold standard.
>>8786900I recommend antique 1800s through early 20th century historical texts, sold in complete sets of volumes if you are able to buy them that way.
were thracians/dacians just "uncivilized" greeks?
>>8778732So many people itt who only have surface knowledge of the subject seem to think that all Thracian tribes had the exactly identity
>>8778732they were proto greeks
>>8785836no you're retarded. like those black people claiming black is automatically a higher moral authority
>>8782087>Romanians are literally Romanised Dacians.Tell me what the Romanian word for "yes" is, I dare you.
>>8783530>kek, do you think the average american knows anything about the celts of the sarmatians?Generally, Americans and Europeans are vaguely aware of what more modern Celtic identities are supposed to comprise, such as the Irish and the Scottish, and maybe the Welsh, perhaps a little less likely the Bretons. About the earliest Celtic related historical chapter most people may be able to know is something about the life of Saint Patrick, also called Patricius during his lifetime, who famously introduced the Irish to Christianity. A lot of people seem to erroneously believe or speculate that Patrick was an Englishman, even if his genetics may not have been much different at all from current Englishmen living in northwestern England, though Patrick did not subscribe to an Angle/English identity, but a Briton/Welsh one, still with lingering Roman influences, despite the departure of Roman control of the province of Britannia in the early 5th century AD.
>tfw you're on the right side of history
>>8783712That is my goal
>>8785827>history books-books>history books about the history of history books
>>8785827don't care queer
>>8785827It's not that simple, and Napoleon himself is a prime example of it.
>>8783425Ah a fellow ethnonationalist
Does evil really exist? or are 'evil acts' just a result of an absence of empathy?
>>8786529are instincts objective or subjective?
>>8785462there's only stupidity and pain to push you out of dis comfort zone.
>>8787200That's because killing randomly is a waste of resources. It creates feuds and conflict that disturb. But in Roman society you could kill your wife for cheating, in German society you could pay blood money.
>>8787257would*
>>8787257>That's because killing randomly is a waste of resourcesso what? if morality is subjective i have no reason to care at all
Has there ever been a worse period in history for dating than right now?
>>8787167Well considering how something like half of all men in prehistory never had children, and throughout history men of influence managed to have entire harams of women who only the sired children with, I'd say it's always been skewed towards masculine, powerful men.
>>8787167The only people that "dated" for most of history were rich fucks. For most of the average populace (working class) life was tough and short, working hours were long and the work arduous and dangerous. Dating literally didn't exist until about 1930.
>>8787167maybe if you weren't such a pussy whining about "oh dating is so hard nowadays!" you would actually have some quality women showing interest in you. stop being a coward and make it happen. you're probably not worth a virgin's hand in marriage to begin with. how about you fix that before you go whining about whamman
>>8787167yes, no more young wives, most girls aren’t virgins, etc
>>8787228>not caring about the familial ties between farms that might make the differences between famine and prosperitynever gonna make it, serf.
would you kill a baby? a baby Hitler, for example?
>>87786111. Time travel is impossible2. Even if I was somehow put in this impossible scenario I wouldn't do anything because it risks creating a time paradox and potentially killing me3. Even if what I did in the impossible time travel scenario wouldn't affect me personally I still would not kill baby Hitler. Because what this question is really asking at it's core from a philosophical stand point is "can you solve problems with destruction?" and in my opinion the answer is "not really". It is easy to destroy, to kill. It is much harder to create, to cultivate and grow. I would not kill baby Hitler. I would if given time enough become his step father and raise him properly, I would encourage his artistic interests instead of shunning them. I would instill proper values into him that he missed out on with the early death of his real father. In time perhaps he would take a different path in life, perhaps it wouldn't even matter. Maybe without Hitler someone even worse takes his place, but the important thing is to try to make things better when we can. In our world today I think there is too much destruction, too much coldness towards each other, and not enough decency in how we treat each other.
would kill baby Mussolini
>>8786034Fine
>>8778611Lol no, without him my parents wouldn't have been able to migrate to a weakened first-world country.Also he's just a babu, you'd be pretty fucked in the head to wanna do that.
>>8786034this post made my day
What country has the most unbanterable history/past?Swiss?Luxembourgians?
>>8784828>the swiss
>>8784842*ahem*cuckstamp*dabs*
>>8784895I can see what you mean with the post right below you
>>8786440everyone wants to be white
>>8786453t. seething wog>>8786491>>8786962swiss are rich and white and therefore unbanteralbecompare this to say the brits,who are poor and subhuman trash on the whole. swiss and norwegians are unmoggable
"the fellow made his way through the Costco aisle brandishing a sword and thrusting it into the air, chanting, "vive la revolucion," when he made his way to dairy he seized upon a display of ostrich eggs and began to abuse them with his member by tapping (redacted) until the outer shell cracked apart and then moving onto the next.the fellow was clad in bright blue pantaloons, a bright white short-sleeved shirt and was of a jaundiced color of complexion. to reporters, "i am homer simpson," he had claimed (sources are still investigating this claim). panicked looters began to flee the scene when it was revealed that he had carried with him in his (redacted) 12lbs of C4.the man was later identified as a member of the treasury department."
sorry forgot to post link to news site i pulled this fromwill fix laterOP
>Sacred Harp singing is a tradition of sacred choral music that originated in New England and was later perpetuated and carried on in the American South of the United States. The name is derived from The Sacred Harp, a ubiquitous and historically important tunebook printed in shape notes. The work was first published in 1844 and has reappeared in multiple editions ever since. Sacred Harp music represents one branch of an older tradition of American music that developed over the period 1770 to 1820 from roots in New England, with a significant, related development under the influence of "revival" services around the 1840s. This music was included in, and became profoundly associated with, books using the shape note style of notation popular in America in the 18th and early 19th centuries.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOQYfrAHrm0
https://youtu.be/HKkPObsteSMI love the bass singer doing a doo wop style walking bass line
https://youtu.be/dTGpyzJUCNIAlabama Sacred Harp Singers “Rocky Road” These older recordings have smaller groups and don’t have the wall of sound like with modern congregations but they’re probably the earliest recorded Sacred Harp singing.
