The South did NOT have better generals
>”heh, nothing personnel, Lee” Based OP
>>15673549FUCK, forgot pic
>>15673398No serious historian agrees with you
What do (You) think abaut him and his content?
>>15672938its not a knock, I think hes great, but I like others too
Good channelUnironic jewI've thought of signin up in his job applications but now he's hired people WAY above my skill level.
>>15672929>pax tubeWas that he the tradcath weeb?
>>15672906>Zionist>LibertarianYeah...
>>15673519>>15673153>Is a jew>looks like a spic>libertarianWtf? Do we....
Is it true northern Italians are genetically different from southern Italians?
>>15672484This
>The Norman conquest of southern Italy caused the Norman Kingdom of Sicily to be created in 1130, with Palermo as capital, 70 years after the initial Norman invasion and 40 after the conquest of the last town, Noto in 1091, and would last until 1198. Nowadays it is in north-west Sicily, around Palermo and Trapani, that Norman Y-DNA is common, with 15% to 20% of the lineages belonging to haplogroup I. The North African male contribution to Sicily was estimated between 0% and 7.5%.Overall, the estimated Southern Balkan and Western European paternal contributions in Sicily are about 63% and 26% respectively.>A 2015 genetic study of six small mountain villages in eastern Lazio and one mountain community in nearby western Abruzzo found some genetic similarities between these communities and Near Eastern populations, mainly in the male genetic pool. The Y haplogroup Q, common in Western Asia and Central Asia, was also found among this sample population, suggesting that in the past could have hosted a settlement from Central Asia. Also, it is about 0.6% in continental Italy, but it rises to 2.5% (6/236) in Sicily, where it reaches 16.7% (3/18) in Mazara del Vallo region, followed by 7.1% (2/28) in Ragusa, 3.6% in Sciacca, and 3.7% in Belvedere Marittimo.>In two villages in Lazio and Abruzzo (Cappadocia and Vallepietra), I1 is the most common Y-DNA, recorded at levels 35% and 28%. In Sicily, further migrations from the Vandals and Saracens have only slightly affected the ethnic composition of the Sicilian people. However, specifically Greek genetic legacy is estimated at 37% in Sicily
>>15673536Cute femboy hands, from Milan perchance?
>>15673555bari
>>15673536What's the ratio of negroids to whites now in Italy? 1/2, 1/3? The land is lost unless it's purged, but that won't happen. You'd be better off abandoning it to ruin in their hands and fortifying a bulwark closer to most pure remaining place. But good luck, those places where the blood is most pure have been the most targeted for negroid relocation in the last 20 years. It's nearly all lost to ruin now.
Why does this fact make Atheists mald so hard?
>>15673515It's fallacious circular reasoning, he refuses to engage with the matter on any level out of principle, so the matters seems concluded and sealed up to him.
>>15673515what a midwit take holy shit>>15673521this
>>15673515so did he molest tolkien's son or not
>>15673515It's actually incredible how bad he is, both in this quote and in general. Mere Christianity is all like this, the main takeaway from that book is that Christians must be really dumb and naive.Chesterton intellectually mogs him really, really hard. Stop shilling CS Lewis and shill Chesterton instead. Orthodoxy is a great book.
I’ve heard William lane Craig use this argument. If everything is due to chance, even if things must be this way due to physical necessity, that physical necessity still exists by random chance, thus, how could chance and randomness lead to truth?
Hitler made some good points about the Jews.
>>15668155There's nothing in the Talmud that says to hate gentiles, and German Jews at this point didn't even read the Talmud
>>15667440And then he went ahead and killed millions of europeans while barely touching jews, sure
how can you be a gods chosen person without a god? you will lie cheat and steal at every given moment to prove he exist and that he chose you.
>>15667614>nazi rhetoric is now communist Smartest filipino
Bump
Is this really how mixed/half blacks were treated in Nazi Germany?
>>15673429The "Rheinland Bastard" kids were sterilized by the government, but by and large the NSDAP had no real concrete policies towards black people because there simply weren't enough in Europe for anyone to even think about the topic. Demographically invisible minorites= non-threatDemographically and politically visible minorities = treated as a threatThat's how it always goes for discrimination. American Southerners in tbe Segregation era used to think Arabs and Indians were quirky and interesting, even if their skin was dark as fuck, but that doesn't mean they would have been okay with a LOT of Arabs and Indians in their community.
>>15673470note that the mixed race Rhine babies were also the descendants of French soldiers, they had nicer attitudes towards blacks from the former German coloniesstill not great, we're still talking about early 20th century Euros in an explicitly racist movement, but less harsh than a lot of people would imagine. Their real concerns were with Slavs and Jews, not Blacks.
>>15673429It depended A LOT on who were your parents. There were for example 1/4 Blacks who were part of the German Red Cross.>>15673434Only the so called "Rhineland bastards".
>>15673429>when /pol/yps find out that the actual Nazis weren't American style skinhead white supremacists
>>15673500Considering the slavrape made the rhinebastards look like a joke and jews were turning germany into a shithole he had plenty of reasons to hate them
Couple of days ago I made this thread >>15665004 I went to sleep, and by the time I saw the responses the thread had already been archived.Apologies; yet I'd still like to respond:>>15665573>That's the abridged version right?Yes, it's the abridged version with over 800 pages. Idk if that fact affects the quality of the work.>>15665640>reddit fedora shitHow so?>>15665929>I found the abridged version at a thrift store for like 4 bucks IIRC. That's a bargain! (depending on its state) It cost me 14€ brand new.
>>15672519>Yes, it's the abridged version with over 800 pages. Idk if that fact affects the quality of the work.What do you think? Just read a modern book I'd you are so impatient
>>15672663>What do you think?I think the book would trim out the fat and preserve the essential points.>Just read a modern bookAny recommendations?
>>15672921I also recommend the abridged War and Peace.
>>15672921The main point of reading Gibbon is his extremely good written English (in literary terms, Decline and Fall is a masterpiece), in addition to his dutiful recounting of primary sources. These are the two things you'd lose in an abridged version. His own interpretations are probably the weakest bit of his work
>>15672556Am I one if I see Sulla's war as the better comparison? I never liked muh Rome empire end as a bad thing, Rome became too big and globalhomo, and Sulla was the point it went bad. Even the empire, with all the evil regicide and pointless wars, in my eyes show that Rome has transformed into something terrible.
Why didn't they just make the slaves do all the fighting?
>>15671403>give slaves guns>they shoot you
>>15671602Just give the gun wielding ones better living conditions, it worked for the JANNYssaries.
>>15671413>>15671430>>15671602Janissaries were slaves in the Ottoman Empire who fought for it though.
most retarded question i've seen on this board
>>15671456Someone should have told Johnny Reb that lmao
are whites just depigmented arabs?
>>15672884Imagine being nordic, yet looking like the average american.
>>15673052>>15672955kys rusnigger
>>15673410That's what the average nord looks like when they haven't mixed with either celts or meds
>>15673373Spoken like a true mbuti farmnigger longhouse ape
kekJohnny Somali is literally darktroon
In United States v. Place (1983) the Supreme Court ruled that using drug-sniffing dogs did not infringe on the 4th Amendment. A suspected drug dealer named Raymond Place was caught with cocaine in his luggage at Miami International Airport on August 17, 1979 while attempting to get on a flight to New York City. Airport security suspected something was amiss and summoned DEA agents to the scene. Place gave them his driver's license when asked but would not let them search his luggage. The agents announced that they were going to impound the suitcases and get a search warrant for them. They used a drug-sniffing police dog to detect narcotics inside. As it was the weekend, the DEA agents had to wait until next Monday to get a search warrant. Inside were 1,125 grams of cocaine. Place was arrested for possession and attempted distribution of a controlled substance.Place argued that his 4th Amendment rights were violated. The US District Court in Miami disagreed and said the police had reasonable suspicion to search his luggage. He later pled guilty and was sentenced to three years in prison. The case was appealed and the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the search of his luggage violated the precedent set down in Terry v. Ohio (1968). The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.
The Court ruled unanimously that use of drug-sniffing dogs in a public place did not constitute unreasonable search and seizure. Justice O'Connor wrote the majority opinion for the case. She said however that detaining someone's belongings while waiting for a police dog to arrive was unreasonable search and seizure. A mere sniff of a suitcase did not necessitate opening luggage or expose anything inside to public view. However, even though the DEA agents did not "search" Place's luggage when they subjected it to the dog sniff, their seizure of the luggage was unreasonable because it exceeded the limits of a Terry-type investigative stop. The length of time the agents had possession of Place's luggage was too great--90 minutes before the dog sniff had been conducted. Also, the agents knew what time Place's plane was scheduled to land at LaGuardia, and thus had ample time to arrange their investigation accordingly, so that taking his luggage from LaGuardia to Kennedy airports should not have been necessary. Thus, the seizure of Place's luggage was unreasonable in this case.Justice Brennan concurred and agreed with the 2nd Circuit that the scope of the agents' seizure of Place's luggage was unreasonable. Furthermore, Brennan noted that while Terry v. Ohio may authorize seizures of personal effects incident to a lawful seizure of the person, nothing in the Terry line of cases authorizes the police to seize personal property, such as luggage, independent of the seizure of the person. For Brennan, it was therefore unnecessary for the Court to decide whether the dog sniff constitutes a "search" under the 4th Amendment. It was Brennan's view that dog sniffs can reveal more information than just the presence or absence of narcotics, and therefore constituted a "search." But Brennan did not feel that this case was an appropriate vehicle for the Court to decide how to handle dog sniffs under the 4th Amendment.
Justice Blackmun also felt that this case was not appropriate for deciding the status of dog sniffs under the 4th Amendment. For one thing, Blackmun observed, Place had not raised the issue in either the district court or the 2nd Circuit. For another, Blackmun agreed with Brennan that it was not necessary to decide whether a dog sniff is a "search" in order to decide the case, because the seizure of Place's luggage was unreasonable in any event.The decision was the first case to uphold the constitutionality of police use of drug-sniffing dogs, and the Court would revisit the decision several times in the following decades. In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), the Court held that it did not violate the 4th Amendment to use a drug-detection dog during a legal traffic stop, as long as it did not unreasonably prolong the duration of it. In Florida v. Jardines (2013), the Court held that the police may not bring a police dog to the front door of a private residence without reasonable suspicion, but upheld that police dogs are generally accurate enough of the time for evidence gathered from them to stand in court (Florida v. Harris).
>>15672761If this was Miami in the 70s probably half the people at the airport had coke in their luggage.
>>15673531>probablyYou misspelled ‘definitely’
The liberals caring about the people at the lower end of the totem pole made quite a bit of sense for a time. Things like caring for the poor or the homeless would be examples. But then comes modern progressivism. Things like homosexual marriage, transgender rights, abortion rights, the Black Lives Matter movement, and unquestioning support for muslim immigration become the biggest aspects for liberals. How did this change occur? Many people will point to the Frankfurt school as the origin but I am unsure about that. As the Frankfurt school focused heavily on commercialization in a capitalist society. I am not as aware of them promoting ideas we see now in modern progressivism. The authoritarian personality was written, but it was about fascism, not progressivism.
>>15673473In the United States the majority of women oppose abortion.
>>15673507uh yeah Anon we know the USA is in the same league as countries such as Bolivia, Nigeria, India, and other lands of superstitious brownoids who believe God will kill them for sin or whatever
>>15673473Women are also more liekly than men to oppose abortion. This is in stark contrast to the idea that politics is best seen through a struggle of self interest. It does make sense when you realize mothers are more likely to understand the moral weight of abortion than men are. https://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist/2014/apr/30/why-are-women-more-opposed-to-abortion
>>15673512I don’t see your point. You try to argue that morality is just cold self interest and then equate america with savage moral systems. Like if you don’t believe in morality I don’t see how you can say anything
>>15673512And so are we supposed to believe then that the superior way of seeing life as where nothing matters and that morality is just self interest and so there is nothing that is immoral or moral as metaphysical truths? Wow. Sounds heckin Reddit AF
The way this series is able to recreate historical cities in immaculate detail is incredible
>>15671780Baghdad looks to shitty and desert, I don't like it
>>15671780>shilling on this board out of all placedo you get paid?
>>15671780No it does not, it uses architectural styles that were not from the time or location they're trying to depict. But you can't tell the difference so enjoy your goyslop anyways
>>15672553>Baghdad looks to shitty and desertESLsisters.....
What's so special about beans?
>>15673175Beans, beans, good for your heart, the more ya eat, the more ya fart!
>>15673175Farts were a lot's of fun back then.
Did the Anglo-French have a chance of defeating the Axis in 1939 without USA?
On paper yes. Overwhelmingly yes.People also often forget that 1939 Germany was still much much weaker than 1914 Germany.French main battle tank was much stronger than German main battle tank.Hitler knew the longer he waits, the more Germany will lose its rarmanent advantage over the western powers, the more armament industry will suffer from blockade while the allied armanent industry increases.Halder wanted the safe approach, to attack with the bulk of the force through Belgium and slowly advance inch by inch. Hitler wanted the campaign to end immediately and gambled everything on a single move that could either make or break Germany.
Yes. If it wasn't americans with tanks and planes it would be millions upon millions of indians washing up on the normandy shores years after years untill eventually the germans run out of bullets from fighting two fronts that just never stop soaking bullets.The population advantage is just too stark for germany to win a long war
>>15673428If Germany fails to break through the French lines, then Norway would likely become the main battleground.This is because if the Allies manage to secure Norway, it will starve Germany of iron.Besides, Norway would be the most optimal battleground because 1. It ensures the war doesnt take place near France2. Germany is forced to fight overseas which is a much greater disadvantage for Germany than for the allies3. The Allies only need to occupy the northern half of Norway to achieve their objective4. Because its technically an overseas campaign, logistics would limit the number of soldiers, meaning less casualties, something the western allies desperately sought.5. Once Germany runs out of iron, she cant wage offensive war, and when she cant wage offensive war, the allies merely need to sit down and wait for naval blockade to starve her of food and oil without risking any costly campaign to reach Berlin.It is no wonder that the allies tried to bait Germany into attacking Norway in 1940 with the Altmark incident. It was a perfect scenario.On paper....
>>15673412But the french and Anglos are and were led by strangers, both genetically and spiritually, and they make us all lose everything so fucking bad, what is the strenght in all this judeo-friendly shitfest?We all laughed at the Chinese for being dominated by the mongols.
>>15673478The mongols won. Germany didn't.
could this be why there are greater genetic differences between individuals of the same ethnicity than there is genetic variation between ethnicities?
>>15672230you know some human couples can't conceive right? even though both of them are fertile and can conceive with other partners, and no this isnt based on their racelook up "immunological incompatibility" if you want to learn more
>>15672305aparently it also has to do with conservation efforts, it's easier to get money for your program if you're trying to conserve a species instead of a type or subspecies
>>15672301the very stats you cited suggest a majority of black people do not think that wayit sucks to be judged for what someone else did just because you kind of look like them. Be part of the solution not part of the problem.
>>15672301*black USAians
>>15671814>there are greater genetic differences between individuals of the same ethnicity than there is genetic variation between ethnicitiesThat's true for Africans and not so true for the other races. There's also evidence of non trivial levels of archaic introgression among Africans alone. And also some trivial amounts if introgression among non Africans with less distant branches from the primary line.
