>its so strange how perfectly was Earth made for human life!How do you call this argument fallacy? Confusing cause and consequence? Observational bias? I encountered this so many times when talking with religiousfolk and i can explain why its stupid easily, but it feels it never gets through, so how to simply and effectively explain the faulty logic there?
>>13333519maybe god made all those empty galaxies for humans to colonize them and build forever. An endless empire of humans. No other intelligent life but us.
>>13335610>>13335610You can see god in nature. Its right in front of you. There is something we are not being told about our super ancient past. Or maybe I am wrong. who knows.
>>13333519yes
>>13335634You're certainly wrong
All this thread proves is how gay and feminine sceptics are.
We are all of common origin and ancestry from Western or Central Africa. This is scientific fact.>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_A_(Y-DNA)
Who was the greatest warrior of the 20th Century?
Dzhokhar DudayevMustafa KemalChe Guevara
Could Germany have won the Second World War if it was led by a liberal fascist regime without any of the racial autism?
>>13337652> Germany started WW2this is all so tiresome...
>>13337657>invading Poland after the west made it blatantly clear after the Czechs collapsed that any further aggression will be met by war>invade Poland>get declared on by the west>Retards years later claim the Germans didn't start WW2
>>13337657Germany was given like 6 chances to stop aping out. It is absolutely their fault. I defend ww1 Germany a lot and think the treaty of versailles was way too harsh but the Nazis were just plain retarded barbarians. Very little possible nuance here.
>>13337657>invades Poland>didn't start the warplease explain how this is possible
>>13337632Someone played too much TNO. But in all seriousness, Had Germany had a regular Fascist regime instead of full on NatSoc autism they could have had many more collaborators especially in Eastern Europe. It dosen't need to be CivNat but not as violently autistic about the exact Milometers of your nose. A more reactionary and typical Fascist Germany would have had much more success.
so why hasn't real capitalism been tried yet?
>>13337194>Lol, some of the best years of the US were under an ancap systemOnly for the pioneers, the indians didn't enjoy it so much.
>>13337693same argument people make against the confederacy: suck it, losers
>>13337409Lol implying private roads woud work with toll booths and not just gps trackers.
>>13337457>European Russia is x>Wtf no, the entirety of Russia is y
>>13337443monopolies are an artifical by-product of non-natural intellectual property laws. freedom of information encourages competition
>no you can't just follow your religion, teach it to your kids or voluntarily join it's clergy>no you can't just make what you want without the collectives agreeing to it>no your property isn't yours>yeah you will be under the tyranny of the majority in literally every area of your life>no you can't just have your own different society under our anarchy, be it an anarcho-capitalist association, a monastic society, a theonomic family, a primitivist tribe or an indigenous chiefdom, you will have to live under our perfect collective working class self-management whether you like it or notIs anarchy the most retarded, self-conflicting ideology ever? At least under anarcho-capitalism i could live my life however I want in my own property with my own family, and people would be free even to have retarded communist communes or whatever wacko shit they come up with.Normal anarchism is literally tyranny. You're either "free" from whatever hierarchy others deem unjust or you're forced to be
>>13337654>companies need to attract qualified workersNot if they buy entire counties of property.>any other little company that treats its workers decently will take all the workerd from the big enslaving corpIt's difficult for poor people to move their entire families, especially if they've been bled dry by the company that bought their county. It'll be even harder with NAP shenanigans and the risk of getting shot.You know nothing about your own ideology or even human nature. This isn't even a Leftist perspective; it's just common fucking sense.
>>13337663The wikipedia pages are just examples of major events. You should read more into the events themselves since obviously they're not going to be covered in massive detail on a wikipedia article.
>>13337664I know you're dumb and don't understand shit about all of this, but if the big bad corp bought an entire county and enslaved its population, none of that people would study, work hard, save or invest. On the other hand a smart company that competed in the market would attract qualified workers that studied a lot, work hard, save and invest. Company B would be way more productive than company A which will quickly go bankrupt. You're just too stupid to understand even the most basic economics dynamics.
>>13337674If what you're saying is true, it would be on the wiki page already, since it plays into the general political bias of that websitebut if I'm wrong, link me a source that backs up what you're saying
>>13337678>You need to study, save and invest to do hard manual laborYou are COMPLETELY retarded.>>13337683https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/matewan-massacre-century-ago-embodied-miners-struggles-70742420“The company town system was extremely oppressive," said Lou Martin, a history professor at Chatham University in Pittsburgh and a board member of the West Virginia Mine Wars Museum in Matewan. "The company owned the houses, the only store in town, ran the church and controlled every aspect of the miners’ lives.”
Did blacks and coloureds vote for it? They even won a majority in the cape>inb4 jannies delete this again1994 was 28 years ago and 28>24. Learn your math
>>13337256There was other parties during Apartheid that got seats.
>>13337296So why did whites who voted for the anti-apartheid DA suddenly flip to the party they always hated?
>>13337520>>13337256I assume its former conservative voters.They had over half the votes national party got in 1989
>>13337520Whites are cucks, it took non whites in America to push for segregation and whites are fighting back to stay integrated.
Thoughts on Christian Universalism? Can everyone be saved or is that unbiblical?
>>13337675>I cry sometimes when I think about it.cuck lolpart of the enjoyment in heaven is seeing bad people burn
>>13337675>>13337576If postmillennialism is true it's possible the "whole world" will be saved in general before the second coming, and possibly the number of saved souls during the final stretch could outnumber the damned overall in the history of humanity
>>13337691I don't think so, I think we'll be too busy enjoying spending time with Jesus and our loved ones to want to think about anyone in hell. That is, if anyone;s even left in hell by then. I think annihilation might have something to it. Sill not certain on my verdict on it yet but Im continuing to study and pray for wisdom so I can learn what i can.
>>13336335God hates sinners. He commanded His chosen people to annihilate them. >And you shall not walk in the statutes of the nation which I am casting out before you; for they commit all these things, and therefore I abhor them.
>>13337698That's a very optimistic look at it. Revelations does mention a massive multitude of saints numberless like sands in the ocean being with Jesus at his victory.You know, Dirk, you might be the only tripfag I've ever met who says anything intelligent or insightful, I respect you.
>bully!
>a challenge! i love competition!
one of the most overrated presidents in American history along with the Irish degenerate Kennedy
>>13337499based erb enjoyer.
>>13337605kys
We could do it again...Ameribros..
>>13336173you can't even run websites
>>13336173You couldn't even do it once...Ameribro
>>13336173nah you ran out of German scientists to do the work for you
>>13337358Euro cope.
>>13337378> paperclip is a conspiracy
Would the USA integrating Cuba as a state after the Spanish American war been a good idea in retrospect?Even if they held a referendum after 10 years of it being a “territory” I think they’d have voted yesCuba today would be pretty prosperous, no?
>>13337436diagnosis: stage 4 GDP brain (terminal)
>>13337431>ethnic CubansIs this like a "purebred mongrel"?
>>13337530Like someone who lived in Cuba prior to the UISA integrating Cuba as a state after the Spanish-American War, in this scenario.
>>13337365Probably not, the thing you have to remember is that for a territory to become a state it has to not only approve itself of being a state, but also get congressional approval for becoming a state which didn't exist for congress especially at the time, and who knows what sort of rebellions would pop up if the US attempted to annex cuba outright
>>13337365Cubans vote Republican more than White Catholics like the Irish, Italians or Polish Americans.
Why do the Americans suck British dick and help them constantly when their whole identity is based on rebelling against them?Even had Presidents meet with the British monarch, just seems weird
Anglo is a cultural identity, and they will always stand together.
>>13337573Anglos fought amongst themselves all the time throughout history. It's only since the 19th century that Anglo Sphere solidarity became a thing.
the american revolution was very civil as far as revolutions go
>>13337408American grievances against the British during the Revolution were economic (British monopoly on trade with the colonies, importation) and economic (taxes). They had shared cultural values, customs, and etc... The American Revolution ended most of these issues as American took a distinctly liberal bent, getting rid of nobility, embracing much more democracy than Parliament did, and limited federal government to protect individual rights and state's rights. Any further issues were basically ended after 1812 (when the issues of press gangs for the Royal Navy stopped becoming an issue).The British, for their part, figured after losing the American Revolutionary War that they only wanted the colonies as a trade partner and a market for their goods. The British Caribbean holdings (esp Jamaica) and India were especially valuable. The sugar plantations in Jamaica produced more revenue than the original 13 colonies. This meant the British, who post-Napoleon pursued a policy of neutrality and maintaining a continental balance of power, just wanted trade (whether its with the US, former enemy France, China... any market they could open up and exploit). Unlike the Americans, the British at the time didn't consider the loss of the American colonies a big loss - after all, this meant they didn't have to worry about Indian raids, or an unruly and untaxable populace. Even the War of 1812 was a sideshow to the Russian Invasion by Napoleon of 1812 and in 1815, when the War of 1812 ended, the bigger show was still Waterloo and the 100 Days.The Americans, under Washington who proclaimed neutrality, and Monroe, who proclaimed the Monroe Doctrine, also sought to be a middle man in world affairs content with manifest destiny and avoiding conflict with European powers (some exceptions like post-Civil War to bully France out of Mexico). Eventually Americans identified much more British on capitalism, democracy, free trade, and such as opposed to fascism/communism.
>>13337408The revolution was like a second or third civil war among anglos. It happened again during the American Civil War. British supporters created an entire country called Canada just to rebel against Americans. The American Revolution was the most British thing they could do.
being surrounded by chinese people i think
>>13336643Cannibalism and starvation
>>13336778China is poorer than Greece. Don't pretend it has found some sort of secret economic formula besides having a massive population.
Anything the government wants to do that is not justifiable with Marxism
>>13337485Cope
What is the theological explanation for vile/bizarre fetishes? How do I cure myself of something harmful.
>>13337483Stare into the light of Aten long enough and all your perverse desire for visual stimuli will simply fade away. You will never be tempted by porn again.
Ask God to remove it from you
If the majority of a nation's voters vote to abolish democracy is that democracy?
no that's a plebiscatory dictatorship like Napoleon III
>>13336076But if the state justifies its legetemacy by the people and rules as per the wishes of the people, it can stay a democracy. Just because republics have been found to be the best "democratic" organisation doesnt mean that all docracries have to be republics.
voting doesn't make something a democracy by default my poo color skinned friend
>>13335943Not sure
>>13335943The same way suicide is free will
