IIT we post historical structures destroyed by Commies
>>9938058not a building but just as great of a loss imo
>>9938063>Commies with a god complex thinking they can control nature Every time
Let’s settle the """Jewish (((Question))) once and for all.Go!>>9936201Maybe that’s why>The Eternal Jew>Eternal>Jewhttps://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/netanyahu-absolves-hitler-of-guilt-1.5411578
>Hegelian Dialectic applied to Itself, TwiceSee?4D Chess!
>A Jew, holding out his hand to White Nationalists
>>9937851Just read this and be liberated
>I am Walt Disney, and I'm here to ask you a question.>Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow?>'No!' says the man in Washington, 'It belongs to the poor.'>'No!' says the man in the Vatican, 'It belongs to God.'>'No!' says the man in Moscow, 'It belongs to everyone.'>I rejected those answers; instead, I chose something different.>I chose the impossible. I chose... EPCOT.>A city where the artist would not fear the censor.>Where the scientist would not be bound by petty morality.>Where the great would not be constrained by the small!>And with the sweat of your brow, EPCOT can become your city as well.
>>9938007Don't start playing mr. smartass, Libertairians are massivly retarded, just not AS retarded as ancaps. You know, marxists (another type of retarded half-breeds) at least pretend to read books, libertairians just base their entire ideology on memes.
>>9938023>can't even spell "libertarian"
>>9938027English isnt my native language, also nice refutal nigger.
>>9938032That which is asserted without an argument can be dismissed without an argument.
>>9938049Libertarians litterally get their entire ideology from memes, you haven't refuted this at all. God you people are retarded, lolberts deserve to be thrown out of helicopters.
Why do Jews never talk about the times the Muslims protected them from Christian persecution like in medieval Spain?
Christianity is actually true and righteous so obviously Jews and Muslims would unite against them.
>>9937923>more than 2000 years ago I wasn't that Khazars lived in the Middle East back then.
>>9937923They do, particularly when they are trying to import another 40,000 Somalians to my neighborhood to fill their slumlord rentals with
Hellas=Birthplace of Western civilizationEverything started there, we may have improved on it, but Greece is the mother of the west.
>>9937255*Crete
>>9937240Greece was never part of the West, Greece was its own civilization. The West had its roots from the establishment of the Germanic kingdoms in western Europe and kickstarted officially by Charlemagne.Greece belongs to the Hellenic civilization, which started from Ancient Greece and continued through the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantine Empire was in constant odds with the West, and it was this conflict which shaped Western Europe as we know it. By the time the Byzantine Empire fell, the Hellenic civilization fell hostage to the Turks, and only managed to restore itself in 1821 (although with Russian and Western help). The West has nothing to do with Greece other than fancying its ancient history (and only one part of it, in one specific area), and the only reason Greece turns to the West is because of its Philleline's stance. Consider that while the westerner adores Athens and Sparta, if you were to ask a Greek which ancient state was more significant he would answer Macedonia and which historically Greek city was greatest he would say Constantinople.
>>9937240That would be Sumer actually Or Egypt
>>9937890Byzantine scholars fleeing from Constantinople kick-started the Renaissance and a Byzantine Princess initiated the Ottonian Renaissance before that. The western/Germanic Europe always admired the Greco-Roman world and struggled to model itself after it, even if they were at odds with each other in many occasions. Dismissing the connection between Greece and western Europe just because of some cultural differences is false.
>>9937240every civilised man knows it was troy and the greeks destroyed it out of spite, trust me, i was there
Why didn't pagans fight back against their forced Christianisation, if we suppose that something like that actually happened? Christians defended their faith with their lives and resisted paganism so furiously that they actually won in the end. Yet pagans abandoned their gods quite immediately after the appearance of Christianity. Usually the neopagans give excuses like "dude their king told them to" or something along the lines but that doesn't really explain the total lack of even the tiniest resistance. It looks to me that people never had any actual faith in pagan gods, they viewed it more as children bedtime stories and they naturally converted to a religion that made more sense when they were given the chance.
>>9937636Because p*ganism was faggot shit and they were all too happy to drop it.Nowadays kids who hate their parents pretend to like it to piss them off, just the same way white girls will date a nig to piss of their parents.
>>9937636Because people didn't take their faith so seriously as the abrahamites do. It's akin to a totalitarian ideology that takes over all other aspects of life. People were still practicing their old rites and continue to do so in some places.
>>9937636Fun fact, many of the pagans were actually Arian Christians so it was harder for missionaries to convert them to a non heretical version of Christianity.Read this book, it actually provides great insight on the early history of the church.
>>9937857No, you are a poorly catechized Christian with no understanding of Christian theology and probably primitive as hell too. You are not doing any kind resistance though, you accept Christianity just fine, you just don't understand it. When the next priest arrives at your village 100 later he'll explain to you why you don't need to sacrifice animals to Christ. You'll stop doing it for a while but maybe your grandchildren will start sacrificing goats again until the next priest comes. Finally, you'll drop the practice altogether. Which brings us back to the first question: why didn't the pagans resist Christianisation like the Christians did with paganism?
>>9937636Europe was Christianised by the Church, not protestants, so, despite what tuetons would try to tell you, there wasn't forced Christianisations en masse. Most of blood spilled during that era was one of Christian Martyrs. But that blood is seed of the Church as saying goes. And pagans converted. Because Church was civilisational powerhouse, and when active higher civilisation meets pasive lower one, there is magnetism of the populance towards it. As barbarians in times ancient wanted to live under laws of Rome, so the pagans wanted to live under sweet yoke of Church. As sainted apologist, from Justin to Aquinas, would tell you, to live as Christian is to live virtuosly, to live more human, and thus to live deeply happy life.
Post benevolent dictators
>>9937358how so? he would have handed it off to his kid and it would have continued
>>9935567Same dude. But i remember distinctly my teacher telling us they got gaddafi and we celebrated for some reason...and i asked, why do we celebrate like this, was he not a person who did good and bad? it was like i murdered a baby or something. Or maybe its because i was the class Muslim, who knows.
>>9935721>>9935844>>9936027>>9936073>>9937975Reading up on him he seems kinda based, provided education, farming, was building a canal to irrigate the desert, did they seriously kill him because he refused to bow to international banking and they wanted his oil
>>9935721Please tell me you didn’t fall for the whole “Assad gassed his own people” story then.
>>9938040at first i didn't care, thought it was just another middle easterners shoot eachother over minor conflicting opinions or another uprising against someone because he idk says no to the gays or whatever, but in a weird way thanks to seeing pro assad videos in a lot of war threads led me to read up on the guy and he seems okay honestly, besides who could be evil if they have such a banger https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgiyWGyJcIc
How is pre-Columbian civilization (Inca, Maya, Aztec) compare to old world bronze age civilization ( new kingdom, Assyria, Babylonia)? I mean in several aspects like military, social structure, science, Architecture, etc.if Aztec and Inca suddenly transfer near to 1000BC Mesopotamia, what would happen?
>>9938029No horses means they get wrekt
Why do soldiers rape women in pretty much every war in history?Are men inherently evil?
>>9936758I like you and I want you. We can do it the easy way or the hard way. The choice is yours.
>>9936387>>9936411>>9936424>>9936454>>9936466>>9936471>>9936543>>9936644>>9936816>>9937196>Why do soldiers rape women in pretty much every war in history?because men know women get orgasms during rapes and men live to give orgasms to women, free of charge
>>9937497>You are a woman or a eunuch, as such you could never understand
>>9936785Stop trolling tranny
>>9937497fucking based lol
Who was in the wrong here?
>>9938020It’s a religious war to the Israelis. To the Palestinians it can be seen as a religious war, but mostly a war for the survival of their nation.
>>9938020the anglos
What did late 18th century American men in the West do with their time off from work..? I want to emulate them.
>>9937120>>9937205
>>9937254Sounds like a good time to me
>>9937203>There were a lot of magazines and dime novels depicting western life and things started to get really meta as cowboys learned how to act like cowboys were supposed to act from print media.kek
>>9937534There was a lot of it by the latter half of the 19th century, but even before that there were popular books recounting the adventures of frontier heroes like Davy Crockett that were total bunk. I just read an account of Kit Carson trying to track down a woman captured by Indians but when they raided their camp he found her dead, and among the looted white people’s stuff was a book recounting the fictional heroic deeds of “Kit Carson”. It really shook him up that he didn’t save her but the book depicted this hero effortlessly slaying Injuns.
I'd like to emulate what they did in the late 18th century.
Who invented """"marital rape""""?
>>9937827Meme doesn’t fit. A cuck would have a heart attack if you suggested men are entitled to their wives.
me
>>9937827>>9937827>>they pushed laws in the 80’s saying men aren’t even entitled to their wives pussy anymore, killing over 2,000 years of western tradition and despoiling 70% of the reason we marry
>>9937700Rapists.
>>9937835he's falseflagging
Is it possible to purchase a country and rule over it? Has this ever happened?
>>9936836I always wonder why trump hasn't done this already. Like holy shit hiring a private militia and outfitting them whilst developing poor person access to farms and other shit in somewhere like south sudan is entirely possible, and he could leave the US without admitting defeat. Maybe pol would move to south sudan and larp in his militia idk
>>9936836King Leopold II used a private company to establish a colony in the congo. Other kinda similar stuff like the United States purchasing the virgin islands.
>>9936952They really wanted Native American land.
>>9936836google didius julianus
>>9936836People do it all the time in democracies just indirectly
>>9937922what the fuck is a "common era"?
>>9937942we could've been in 2065 VGH
>>9937988The current one.
>>9937922BCE was created by atheist seething that Christianity is one of the fundamental stones of the western civilisation and modern civilisation in generalImagine coping so hard that you still count time after the birth of Christ but refuse to acknowledge it
>>9937922I litterally do not care because I'm not an Anglo, hard-time leftists in my country still say 'before Christ' because theyre not as mentally-ill as Anglo leftists.
Will scholarship ever be able to strip itself from so much pride and be humble enough to acknowledge that our modern sense of morality comes almost entirely from Christianity? Or is it too arrogant to give Christianity the colossal merit it deserves?https://historyforatheists.com/2020/01/tom-holland-dominion/
>>9937453No need to be meta about our morals, no? If we are judging then it follows that we are using our western-Christian values to determine rightness. Who is to say that modern Christianity doesn't have debts to European thinkers? They do, obviously. The catechisms are proof enough of this. That the Bible can be interpreted by Europeans implies in some way an ability to discern and debate moral lessons from it. It's not that scholarship is not indebted to Christian methods of morality, so much as their analysis of the bible has diminished. No good could come of that. Leadership within religious institutions determines the scope of scholarship in which they're willing to engage. Input from a secular institution would only complicate this, even challenge it. So scholarship does acknowledge, though mostly through implicit understanding, its debt to the bible. It maintains its distance because nothing good could come of the intermingling of the two. Perhaps another 3,000 branches of protestant theology would be all we had to look forward to.
>>9937780>hey is it okay if we enslave these slavs>christians: sure! let's do it en masse>hey is it okay if we enslave these africans>christians: sure! let's do it en masse>hey is it okay if we enslave these south americans>christians: sure! let's do it en masse>b-b-b-b-but some a christian guy said slavery was bad once, that means christianity good!
>>9937453Any honest intellectuals would admit it. There's even someone like Nitzsche who deliberately criticized Christianity because he saw it as the hidden dogma of Western morality.
>>9937915>hey is it okay if we enslave these slavs>women: sure! let's do it en masse>hey is it okay if we enslave these africans>women: sure! let's do it en masse>hey is it okay if we enslave these south americans>women: sure! let's do it en masse>b-b-b-b-but some weomen said slavery was bad once, that means women good!This is how retarded you are
>>9937453Is it any good? He peaked with Millennium. Dynasty was awful.
