Is this loss?
>>446877Trannies Suck My Cock
>>446877US and China are going to start world war 3 over this company.
>>446877Why is the TSMC logo so ugly?
>>447019it's way above your headit gathers the same level of rigorous discipline and excellence that put together the nasa apollo missionstick to your "career" of "designing" things that "matter" by dragging and dropping mostly premade pictures around in a 20$ month subscription image editor while thinking of yourself as "culturally-and-artistically-educated urban white collar professional"
>>447019it has sovl and it's not corporate shit
>>447077it's a corporation though
>>447019i miss when shit looked like this
it does not need to look modern since the company has no direct access to consumers but only big corporations.
>>447746You can make your logo as ugly as you want if you've got a monopoly
>>446877fixed it for you ;)
>>446892i wonder why it was never reconsidered to just nuke china during the sino-soviet split
>>447745Why would you ever
>>450160it has a certain aesthetic to it. earnest appreciation for math and technology.
>>447019>>450160I bet you like the new minecraft textures over the old programmer art
>>446877It's not a consumer facing company. It make sense to the people that are in the industry
>>448989Because the chinese had nukes of their own, so it would be a catastrophic mutual lossEven that border skirmish they had over the river islands terrified both sides, since neither could see the top of the escalation ladder they would be climbing had it sparked a hot war.as a rule, "Escalation spiral" is the watchword for "why didn't x do y" during the cold war