https://twitter.com/Pinsky/status/1660973228641353730imagine celebrating this, you literally just became more obsolete, object selection was bad enough, now you don't really need much "skills" to do anything.
doesnt matter when all my clients send pictures in shitty quality
Making the job easier is never a bad thing specially relating to editing and art, the only people who get mad are those getting caught up to or idiots that don't understand that technology just works like that and it's not a new thing
>>444819good lord. why the reductionist take?!historically speaking there have been technologies that enhanced the workers abilities and there have been technologies that outcompeted workers abilities.the first category over all lead to a rise in demand for labour and therefore to a rise in wages, while the second category lead to abundance of workers, that always results in shift of power towards capitalists.what you are talking about is one side of a multisided complex (coin). just stfu or at least act like this topic would be so easy, you pea brain
>>444820*or at least stop acting like it would be easy...duh
>It's literally a tutorial on how to erase people from photos Soviet style.Now in under 30 seconds!
>>444807It's awesome because it makes stuff people previously could do easier. If you couldn't extend mountains, or branches, or water, a table, etc, then you sucked at photoshop. This tool's not doing anything I couldn't previously do.But it is making it quicker and easier. Also, the way designers are panicking over AI just highlights how immature and insecure most people in the field actually are. It's not a threat to you.
>>444820But it's not outcompeting workers, you need to edit AI results to actually have the desired product in case of commercialization which is the point I'm making, and you do have to meet a certain level of skill to be able to patch AI images
>>444819yeah lets make the job so easy that the employer doesn't need you, it's not a bad thing.
>>444829>It's awesome because it makes stuff people previously could do easier. If you couldn't extend mountains, or branches, or water, a table, etc, then you sucked at photoshop. This tool's not doing anything I couldn't previously do.uh yeah that's the point. now it's so easy anyone can do it, which means your job requires less skill and more people can do it.
>>444807its not even new, broand it aint that greatbut you keep on using it please
>>444861/yawnSounds like a you problem
>>444861Literally everyone could always do all jobs.I didn't want to spoil it for you, but other people are actually just people like you and me.
>>444879obviously, but the easier something is to do, the more worthless it is as a career. It's called a low barrier to entry.
>>444860>>444861If it's so easy anyone can do it you shouldn't be getting paid, change careers, don't impede progress. Or maybe try being creative with it? There are a lot of things you can do with art.
>>444910Yes, extending a table or branches became easier. Things however that would have taken $100 in stock images and 20 hours now only takes 5 hours. Not many people were willing to pay $1000 for a jpeg. Maybe $250 though.
>>444872that's a an everyone in the creative field problem you shill faggot
>>445003lol, not even remotely. Only people panicking are panicking because they weren't capable of doing what AI fill does without it.
>>445022doesn't even make sense retard.
None of the reeeing over this would exist if it wasn't AI. Content aware fill didn't destroy the photography industry.
