What the fuck is this even supposed to be?also what style would you call this. It's giving a Touchstone Pictures vibe, but I can't pinpoint it
>>438379also why do brand logos get cheaper the more big the group
>>438379its a bottle that is labeled
>>438384i don't see it bro... seems like some high-society insider nihilism where they just slap a cheap logo because they know the masses are too slept to notice..
>>438379Google picasso butt
>>438385of course you dont see itthink about that.
>>438385in your defense tho, th cheap imitation metal and slight coca cola references are pretty lame one liners. i guess it also vaguely looks like a hip and a womans crotch. its not nihilism, its just the worst of juvenile obscurantism. but for real, its just a cropped shoulder and neck of a wine bottle.
>>438413Think about the fact you can't comprehend what i just said, you blind autist.I think that's they're fault as designers, not getting their point across because it's too niche and abstract. Trust me dude. You're not me.
>>438384I see it now that you say it, still unnessesary. Shadows are still too vague.
>>438414Why do you think logos tend to look cheaper the more "big fish" the brand gets?
>>438455id argue only certain types of 'big fish' brands do this. real quality brands understand design. but big fish slap a celebrity name on a bottle - thats like and investment crew who dont give a fuck and make shit like Trump covering everything in gold. same thing.
>>438379Post modernist wine bottle. I call it>Pizza-gate