Hipsters drinking Starbucks on their MacBooks.
"Designers" who work on laptops exclusively have given us this terrible, skill lacking style. "Just use the pen tool and default swatches, get the art done so we can drink more IPAs and adjust our dilators."
>>398948talentless hacks who went to RISD, SVA, MICA, Pratt, Parsons, Chicago Institute, and any meme cali school.
the lowest scum class of people,
People who wanted to be illustrators while claiming its graphic design because VECTORS
>>398948what is actually even wrong with this? Its meant to just look at quickly while being colorful and appealing. Do you all even have a solid reason other than hurr durr soulless xDddjust one good reason that doesn't take this out of context and I'll gladly eat my ass. no experiences, no anecdotal shit, i mean a legitimate observation or analysis
>>398989not op but this is FUCKING EVERYWHEREIt just shows "I am product #761" instead of "I am THIS product". It is the basic answer to "let's appeal to a younger audience", and it is annoying
>>398989It is a drawing of a faggot with gay hair and a gay beard and gay glasses and it is meant to appeal to gay hipsters, therefore it is multilevel faggotry and that means it is gay as fuck?
>>399054yes, but also means that its quite neatly solving the problem by hitting the demographic, communicating the message and is therefore technically quite good design
>>398948the real answer is art directors who want work done quickly and fairly cheap.Im not going to spend days drawing stuff with real ink and making layered digital photo manipulations for $150 but ill sure as shit fart out some vectors for a couple hours.and y'know sometimes simple actually works best.
>>398948Why?>it's fast>it's cheap (i.e., requiring little skill or high-end software)>it's P.C. (little blobby, soullessly happy, racially-ambiguous, gender-neutral and/or childlike looking "people" pose less risk of pissing somebody off)
>>399070By your logic, not mine, rape is good design because, despite its flaws, there is a certain demographic of horny men who love rape.
Post your illustrations
>>399341Here's mine. Part of the task was having different artstyles
>>398948communists and pedophiles but I repeat myself
>>399342love the second down on the right, super expressive!
>>398977>having gripes with vectorsIt seems you're a shitter
>>399342Not much better than OP's pic. In fact it reminds me of it a whole lot. That's not necessarily meant as negative
>>398950Lmao I just spit my drink.
I makes it easier to animate in After Effects you chumps
>>398948BUCK an animation studio.
>>398948people who have tight deadlines. that's literally it. I think people read too much into this shit
I'm here to post these
I would like the build a collection if I could
I'm afraid this is all I can contribute rn
>>398989because it's fake individualism. the art says "everyone is different and that's okay" except all these companies are using the same kind of style, muting its message of individuality by turning into cookie-cutter corporate schlock. so instead of promoting good feelings with a carefree representation of human bodies, it feels forced and alien. this kind of artstyle has been popular among hispanic modern artists for a while to the point it was already played out. to see it adopted by the corpos and basically used as a vehicle for marketing long after it was culturally "done" is rather funny. nobody with a brain cell to rub against their skull is fooled.
>>398948It's trendy, it's recognizable, it can be learned fairly quickly, and it is able to convey the emotions it needs to convey. Does Picasso suck because his work isn't "realist"? As graphic design evolves as an industry, and more and more people start learning it, there's going to be basics people are going to need to fall back on - and in terms of illustration, this one isn't so bad, since it allows for consistency to be achieved across teams with multiple contributors of different skill levels. Maybe it's overused, but the style in and of itself is totally fine.>>399342Very cool work, I especially love the ones 2nd and 3rd down on the right-hand side.
>>400021>>400022>because it's fake individualism. the art says "everyone is different and that's okay" except all these companies are using the same kind of style, muting its message of individuality by turning into cookie-cutter corporate schlock. so instead of promoting good feelings with a carefree representation of human bodies, it feels forced and alien. this kind of artstyle has been popular among hispanic modern artists for a while to the point it was already played out. to see it adopted by the corpos and basically used as a vehicle for marketing long after it was culturally "done" is rather funny. nobody with a brain cell to rub against their skull is fooled.I don't think it ever posits to promote individualism; on the contrary, I think it's about how conformity comes in all shapes and sizes. (I'm actually almost selling myself against this art style, but in this case conformity = opportunities to be part of a group with shared values.) It's really not about individuality, it's kinda about promoting the opposite, in fact - the positives of group dynamics. Unlike a lot of other trends, I can't ascribe this one to any single artist or designer. I agree it might be overplayed, but I've seen worse trends.
>>399341Here's one of mine, digital illustration, part of a banner i'm working on.
>>399106this is the answer, when you pay third world compensation, you get cheap work
hey this thread got good
>>400052I love this style
>>400052Reminds me of my biology lab manual illustrations
>>399868I can't tell if this is real or not
>>398989It screams onions
>>398950Even worse is that the general population eats this shit up, which only encourages a downward spiral and in a few years corporate "art" will probably look like this.
>>400023>>398989It particularly infuriates me because of the way it goes hand in hand with modern internet companies in general.These designs always imagine a whimsical utopia where technology helps the blob people enjoy their lives more, but the practical reality is that when they crop up in the latest YouTube update, it's because Google has decided to break more features in the hopes that you'll sign up for YouTube Red.They seem to propose to you a world where companies and services are here purely to help you, when in reality they're here to make a profit - often by offering an inferior service to the one they did 5 years ago. The incongruity between the image they're trying to project and the reality underlying it is infuriating even when you set aside personal aesthetic preferences.
>>398948I'll give you a hint: He's in the picture
>>400206If "AI" ever surpasses what should be considered average skill level in a field, I feel that does not bode well.
>>399342love them all, my favorite is the one with the skulls, I love those colors cause of princess luna and it really works
>>398948shut it down!
I think it would be alright in some cases, but overuse of it made me dislike it very much. It's not a one size fits all with this thing and i wish more businesses understood that.
>>401482>backwards handsi'm assuming you made this
>>398948Designers working for their uncle's corporation.
>>398948This design originated from posters in school therapy rooms. They’re meant to make you feel warm and comfortable.
>>398950It takes more skill than you think to make something like this, the last thread about it proved that. I am annoyed by how overused this style is and I think it's a trend that will die soon.
>>399909This. I'm a staff Graphic/Motion Designer and this is literally how you best design for concepts where you're iterating both static and motion creative.
Design is becoming a hideout for people who don't have talent, they're just well connected and want a 'cool' job. Agencies are havens for people who create bad art and then use their marketing connections to sell it as brilliant design.When you see design getting simpler, more obvious, more basic, with less flair and creativity, it's not because it's the 'natural progression of visual language'. It's rich kids taking over an industry they covet and pulling up the drawbridge behind them.I'm an oldfag graphic/product designer, 15 years in the industry, and I've had enough of agencies, I work exclusively for design and art departments of companies now, because they're still actually doing graphic design. Everyone I know abandoned or was forced out of agencies by zoomers with laptops who formed cliques rather than produced work.
>>400265>These designs always imagine a whimsical utopiaDude yes, it's a business thing, of course they're gonna paint things in a good light. Of course its a profit thing. You have a point, its just that getting irritated with this artstyle is like getting mad at the hook and not the fisherman
>>400137No, Google never actually made fun of the Kenosha shootings unfortunately
>>399909except most of the shit isnt animated, it's just plastered everywhere as still images
>>401670departments aren't like that? hard to believe
>>398948What do you think the alternative to spot illustrations for tech companies such as this should be?I know some tech companies have ventured outside of this and now have went with a more hand drawn approach. (Dropbox, MailChimp etc.)
>>401641UP MY SLEEVESUP MY SLEEVESUP MY SLEEVESUP MY SLEEVES
Am ai doing it right?
Fucking mainstream media and adbertisements wamting to stay as neutral as possible
>>400052these are nice
>>401564/pol/ made hundreds of these in no time. No skill needed.
>>398948what's wrong with it?
does someone know what happened to GAG threads on pol , are they now on another board? pic related
>>398948>who decided this style was okadobe
>>402556this is a different stylethe people are similar shapes but this has more detailed shading, tends to have outlines, etc.
>>401506i agree. i didn’t hate it at first, but it’s overuse is annoying and often telling of the typical work environment from whatever corporation it comes from
>>401564i mean it takes more skill than drawing stick figures in paint, but anyone competent enough in adobe and creative software can do it pretty easily
>>398948it has a name: corporate memphishttps://www.are.na/claire-l-evans/corporate-memphis
>>402562this and boomer memphis clipart commisioned in microsoft office 200x looks like it's even drawn by people with skill in representational art.2010s webshit style has no depth because it's supposed to be drawn by hordes of browns, vaginas and art students who can't draw in perspective
>>398950People keep saying that it's easy to replicate and anyone can do it but I find it much harder than more realistic styles
>>402592hmmnot sure about this onewould it work?
>>399071>Im not going to spend days drawing stuff with real ink and making layered digital photo manipulationsCan you show an example of a time or two you actually did that, would be interested in seeing please.
>>402749why not.heres a layered digital collage/manipulation album cover I made a while back
>>402752that looks siiiiiick
>>402623Rotten while still inside the can. Of course it's gonna "pop" after so much flat design. Add a fucking shadow and suddenly you invent the third dimension.
>>403058limbs too small
this is like a parody
>>402556God, this art style takes me back and eases me into a 90’s new online-frontier and comfy virtual quaintness. Love it.
>>402596have sex dude lmao
>>403648there is huge difference in symbolic and stylization work done by someone who can or can't draw for realyou get lots of excellent illustration, icon and logo design work from poor slavic countries because they still make sure to teach that shit in art schools and universitiesi find it funny that whenever "classical" drawing skills are mentioned /gd/ seethes like no other ('U DUNT NEED THAT'), despite how much illustration gets incorporated in graphic design,literal fiverrr pajeets who bought their adobe license..
>>400282its ok. It will leave something to strive for and force artist to push boundaries. Its a vicious cycle because at one point that artwork was once considered "pushing it" then everyone copies said style, now starbucks has it on their cups. becomes corpo. cycle begins again.
>>403058where are they making these
>>403708Because it's funny?
>>403708In case you are a clueless writer from companies like VICE or Buzzfeed Media, please jump off a bridge.
>>402154search for /gag/ in the archive.
>>401768op here actually i forgot i posted this thread but i still think about it on and off i guess i cant articulate it very well but what annoys me about the style is how..soulless it is? and because it's so 'easy to decipher' and 'corporate' and 'functional' and i know it's for profit and business and pleasing the common denominator.. but who decided this is what pleases the common denominator? it's an age old question i guess but IMO i'd appreciate any brand that went balls to the wall and you know had some SOUL i guess lol. this business aint for me ig ..guess imma be a broke artist.. but it isn't impossible and it shouldn't be! but since it's all about money, is that why no one wants to take 'risks'???someone in the thread said it's cuz they were in therapy rooms and meant to make them feel warm n comfy.. i wish that's where it had stuck. cuz it feels like it had a soul there. you take it out of context and adapt it in the most fuck all ways for your business purposes .. what even is it anymore? an example of an editorial illustration i thought was interesting because it isn't clean
You cant imagine how i hate this rubbish
>>403779This is design, it's functional, it's not fine art where you huff your own farts about "soul" like the morons in this forum who think design is drawing cartoon frogs. Graphic design is overwhelmingly about commerce, and the marketing of it. If that offends your little fee fees, find another industry to pretend to be part of.
>>403795yeah but does it just have to be functional? Again I'm asking, what is 'functional' in say, branding and advertising - there are so many layers to it. You miss my point I think. Things can be functional and at the same time fun, artistic, innovative, whatever - not just laziness and carbon copies you know. But according to you, if that's all design is destined for then..yea not something I'd like to be a part of
>>403818Not him, I agree with this and IMO just like grandiose platitudes like 'less is more' can be used by lazy fucks to justify putting in the bare minimum amount of craftsmanship in anything and everything and excusing it with 'cost-optimization' and 'functionalism', so viewer can be consumed by capitalism's unrelatable ugliness which is there for only for short term profit and doesn't resonate to any sort of heritage worth giving a fuck.And then things in world get trashed, vandalized and covered in graffiti, because nobody give a fuck. Materialist definition what is lacking I guess. The evil natzees (thankgodthatwedontspeakgerman) thought that even the ruins must be beautiful, that doesn't apply with le less is moar functional crap.
>>400016Wtf is this shit haha
This is a great thread.
>>403838>Teenage autistic spergingYou must be exhausting to deal with in real life.
>>399929Partially right. It's not just capitalism - it's PC culture. This style is light, fluffy, inoffensive, racially ambiguous, gender-ambiguous, and lacking in individuality. Every person is a flesh-colored blob of anatomical nightmare fuel.
>>403708who is the hacker 4chan