[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/gd/ - Graphic Design

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Additional supported file types are: PDF
  • There are 49 posters in this thread.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]



File: 1591647156364.png (195 KB, 1200x600)
195 KB
195 KB PNG
Be honest.
>>
File: x1.png (43 KB, 1200x600)
43 KB
43 KB PNG
>>389659
Chrome by far. The Mozilla could be viewed as a fox falling or being hit by a ball and it would look awful in negative or black&white. the Microsoft Edge has some amateurish angles and weird shapes and I bet is going to be redesigned again in a couple of years. Brave's one again looks awful on negative or small sizes.
>>
chrome
>>
Edge - it has a better outline that most of the other ones. Also, it's simple enough to just be nice to look at. If Firefox had a simpler outline I'd like it more.
>>
>>389665
>and it would look awful in negative or black&white
Why does that matter for a browser icon? It's meant to be used on color screens, so its design should be judged in that context.
>>
Fire fox, siento que es más colorido y original.
>>
File: UNAM.jpg (53 KB, 528x505)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>389676
Not really, they are big brands, chances are the logos are going to be used on a million different things. plus they probably would also want to do advertisement and branding. what would they do if they or someone else wants to put the logo on a dark background? would they leave the face white? it would stand out too much.

I have my pc and phone on dark mode and some logos and icons look awful. I've seen lots of people having to cut out the logo to make it work on those icons sets that people make. something like pic related would be way more flexible and ideal.
>>
>>389665
>adding in extra lines for chrome in b/w but not the other logos
topkek
Good thing you weren't biased at least...
>>
None of them to be honest. They all look boring and basic.
>>
>>389721
then, which is the less worse?
>>
>>389665
Brave's icon depicts a lion, a traditional symbol of bravery.
Edge's icon looks like a wave, which is a clear allusion to "surfing the web".
Firefox's icon depicts, well, a fire fox.
Chrome's icon means ???
>>
>>389659
Edge looks like one of those free logo templates
>>
>>389736
>thinking a big brand logo has to mean something
>>
>>389794
>implying logos shouldn't be meaningful
>>
>>389820
They don't have to, they just have to form an identity
>>
>>389736
Green for dirt, red for fire, yellow for air, blue for water.

Jk, I have no idea
>>
File: F.webm (334 KB, 1280x720)
334 KB
334 KB WEBM
they already rebranded it again
>>
>>389826
Not just for looks, though.
>>
>>389849
It's the firefox umbrella branding, the browser kept the purple dot.

https://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/new_logos_for_firefox_by_ramotion_and_in_house.php
>>
>>389659
Edge is far better than the other ones.
>surf the web
>Looks like a wave
>E for Edge browser
>>
>>389659
Is it bad that I like em all?
>>
File: 1592434460705.png (237 KB, 500x500)
237 KB
237 KB PNG
>>389659
>>
>>390291
you're just wrong
>>
File: firefox_9u423u528572853.png (254 KB, 1200x1200)
254 KB
254 KB PNG
>>389659
I preferred this firefox logo
>>
>>389659
Edge looks nice
Brave is a squinty lion
FF is okay but not great
Chrome looks like a camera eye, which is fitting but not something users want in a browser
>>
>>389849
My favorite part of the animation is the ending where they take the original Firefox logo and try to flush it down a toilet which forms the new logo
>>
OG firefox logo is godlike. The rest are shit tier.
>>
>>389659
Edge because of its gradients and depth, when compared to how boring Chrome is.
>>
>>389736
I didn't get the wave connotation until you mentioned it and honestly I probably won't remember it afterwards.
>>
>>390300
>Chrome looks like a camera eye
Mind blown t.b.h.
>>
Chrome. Iconic as hell.
>Brave's just ugly.
>New Edge is kind of uninspired, brings nothing to mind.
>Firefox's logo has potential but has been flattened and minimalist'd down to basically nothing
>>
File: PicsArt_06-22-10.07.50.jpg (162 KB, 1920x1080)
162 KB
162 KB JPG
What about /g/ approved browsers?
>>
Edge is best
>>
>>389736
Chrome icon has the Google colors, retard, which amazingly are recognizable by people immediatly. It doesn't want to remind you to a concept, but a brand. And it works.
>>
>>389659
Easy. Just ask yourself which one of those is easier to be drawn by children or retards.
>>
File: Salford_City_FC_Logo.png (14 KB, 250x400)
14 KB
14 KB PNG
Here is your Brave logo, kid.
>>
Only giga normies use chrome
>>
>>390291
BASED, SO BASED
>>
Edge and Firefox look good together.
Also the new FF logo is sweet. Maybe the old one had soul, but it isn't really that cool anymore.
>>
>>389659

Wait, since when has edge's icon looked like that? Mine looks like internet explorer.
>>
>>391035
Edge with Chromium I think
>>
All of them besides chrome look second rate
>>
>>389659
firefox
>>
>>389864
Agreed
>>
>>389659
Firefox: good gradient work and represents a flame very well.
>>
>>389864
>surf the web
It's 2020 nobody know what surfing the web is so it doesn't really make it an effective browser logo
>>
>>389659
Firefox
>>
>>391470
Why?
>>
>>390291
fuck off. fuck you and die. it looks like an HD remaster of 2005 word clipart
>>
firefox's logo has had good evolution over the years which is something i can't say for chrome. brave looks like it was made by a pakistani dude on fiver for $3
>>
>>389659
currently using edge, performs better than chrome, at least on my laptop
>>
>>391502
seethe harder
>>
>>389736
Colors i guess, which is the first thing you think when you picture the Google brand in your head
>>
>>390647
I only know Vivaldi. The others are...?
>>
>>391581
Waterfox, IceCat, Iridium and Pale Moon
basically all obscure /g/ meme browsers
>>
File: 1591741106512.png (39 KB, 1200x600)
39 KB
39 KB PNG
>>389665
Here you go, you shill. "Chrome by far" my ass. I don't really care that you're expressing your opinion but that image is annoying, especially that you went out of the way to fix the Chrome logo.
>>
>>389676
>looks at twitter where all the biggest organizations are making their logos black and white
>looks back to this thread
Hmm I dunno
>>
>>389659
Firefox, looks cute.
>>
>>391636
Shut the fuck up tranny. The new fox looks like shit
>>
>>389659
Internet Explorer 5.
>>
Gonna have to go with chrome here.
>>
None of them are great, but edge is an abomination. I don't think the designer even knows what negative space is. He saw one fibonacci sequence and went, "done".

I'd say firefox if I had to pick.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.