Goodbye forever, anons.
Good, maybe now I can actually do something productive instead of shitposting for hours.
GoodI have never known a UK or AUS poster who wasn't a horrific faggotWould be better if this bill castrated them all
>>96101923>protect children from legal but harmful materialI thought "harmful material" was material in which children are literally being harmed.
nooo making fun of bongs on /sp/ when England chokes is the best thing
>controlling or coercive behaviourwhat does that even mean
>>96101967Surely it is coming home any minute now
>>96101923>no more "do americans really?" threadsfeels fuckin good bros
>>96101923First, they left the EU.Then, they left the internet.What are they gonna leave next?
>>96102044Laugh while you can, we're next.
works on my machine
>>96101923>shitposting by pajeets drops 80%
>>961019234chan is already committed to removing those things. This isn't the same site it was in 2011.
>>96101945Why not just stop coming here
>>96101966That's how it starts.
>>96101923Reading (a draft of) the bill, it probably won't be too hard for hiroshimoot to comply with this and preserve UK ad/pass revenue.For example, it requires filters that can "reduce the likelihood" of encountering certain kinds of content. This could likely be complied with just by making the existing filter system slightly more user-friendly. e.g. a "reduce racism" checkbox that could filter out any posts containing the nigger word.Access to porn requires "age verification or age estimation technology". There are already various third-parties offering age verification APIs that 4chan could simply plug into. And allowance for "age estimation" implies that it doesn't need to be a bulletproof privacy-destroying measure like a passport check. Checks would only be required for red boards anyway.
>>96101945>implying vpns don't exist
>>96101966From part 3 chapter 7 of the bill as it stood on July 19th (it doesn't look like this section has been amended since):(60.2) “Content that is harmful to children” means(60.2.a) primary priority content that is harmful to children (see section 61)-- (61.2) Pornographic content, other than content within subsection (6)---- (61.6.a) [content that] consists only of text, or---- (61.6.b) consists only of text accompanied by [captions, GIFs or emoji that are not pornographic]-- (61.3) Content which encourages, promotes or provides instructions for suicide-- (61.4) Content which encourages, promotes or provides instructions for an act of deliberate self-injury-- (61.5) Content which encourages, promotes or provides instructions for an eating disorder or behaviours associated with an eating disorder-- (61.6) Content is within this subsection if it (a) consists only of text, or (b) [same nonsense as in 61.6.b]-- (61.7) In this section and section 62 “injury” includes poisoning(60.2.b) priority content that is harmful to children (see section 62)-- (62.2) Content which is abusive and which targets any of the following characteristics---- (62.2) (a) race (b) religion (c) sex (d) sexual orientation (e) disability, or (f) gender reassignment---- (62.10.a) “disability” means any physical or mental impairment---- (62.10.b) “race” includes colour, nationality, and ethnic or national origins---- (62.10.c) references to religion include references to a lack of religion---- (62.11) a person has the characteristic of gender reassignment if the person is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process for the purpose of reassigning the person’s sex by changing physiological or other attributes of sex-- (62.3) Content which incites hatred against people---- (a) of a particular race, religion, sex or sexual orientation---- (b) who have a disability, or---- (c) who have the characteristic of gender reassignment[1/2]
>>96102981 [cont.]-- (62.4) Content which encourages, promotes or provides instructions for an act of serious violence against a person-- (62.5) Bullying content---- (62.12) content may, in particular, be “bullying content” if it is content targeted against a person which------ (a) conveys a serious threat------ (b) is humiliating or degrading------ (c) forms part of a campaign of mistreatment-- (62.6) Content which---- (a) depicts real or realistic serious violence against a person---- (b) depicts the real or realistic serious injury of a person in graphic detail---- (62.13) “person” is not limited to a real person-- (62.7) Content which---- (a) depicts real or realistic serious violence against an animal---- (b) depicts the real or realistic serious injury of an animal in graphic detail---- (c) realistically depicts serious violence against a fictional creature or the serious injury of a fictional creature in graphic detail---- (62.14) “animal” is not limited to a real animal-- (62.8) Content which encourages, promotes or provides instructions for a challenge or stunt highly likely to result in serious injury to the person who does it or to someone else-- (62.9) Content which encourages a person to ingest, inject, inhale or in any other way self-administer---- (a) a physically harmful substance---- (b) a substance in such a quantity as to be physically harmful(60.2.c) content, not within paragraph (a) or (b), of a kind which presents a material risk of significant harm to an appreciable number of children in the United Kingdom-- (60.3) Content is not to be regarded as within subsection (2)(c) if the risk of harm flows from---- (a) the content’s potential financial impact---- (b) the safety or quality of goods featured in the content---- (c) the way in which a service featured in the content may be performed[2/2]
>>96102511Step 1 would be purging all loli content from the website, including most of the stuff that's allowed on blue boards. It sounds to me like the schedule 6 obligations apply globally, not just for UK visitors.Step 2 would be requiring anons to submit passport scans. You would have to purge 99% of content to make blue boards not "harmful to children", so it would apply to the entire website.These both sound like excellent ideas, not likely to fuck with the userbase or affect ad revenue at all, really.
>>961019234chan doesn't have any of those.
>>96103514It does now. Here's some extreme sexual violence which, incidentally, is also CP.
>>96103544OH MY GOD! THIS MAKES ME WANT TO SELF-HARM!
>>96101966it's whatever the fuck they want it to mean
>cyber-flashing>Cyberflashing involves sending obscene pictures to strangers online, often done through Bluetooth or AirDrop transfers between devices.kek
>>96101996yeah seems retarded think "controlling or coercive behavior" is used mostly in domestic legal cases like threatening someone so they don't do what they want or controlling what they do and see, but i have no clue on how that could be applied to interwebs
One day I'm going to steamroll the entirety of that shitty island state and turn it into Disney Universe.
>>96102073>4chan will finally cease to existi can't fucking WAIT
>>96102059The World
>>96101923Good, keeps some jeets out
>>96103001>(c) realistically depicts serious violence against a fictional creature or the serious injury of a fictional creature in graphic detaillol don't watch Jaws or King Kong
>>96101996Probably to charge people for saying dont take the vax
>deep fake porn is now illegalFucking holy lmaoGod the UK has to be the WORST "first world" set of countries on the planet
>>96101923Jimmy Saville raped kids till his death and no one there gave a shit, these fucking scum are the only nonces irl. We need to start beating the shit out of some pigs, judges and politicians in Minecraft.
But I like my motor/sp/ort and /dmp/ threads :(>>96104988>>96105051Too many docile retards to not care, they will never react to whatever magnitude a bullshit law is passed in parliament. It'd take something special; a proper miracle to get those drones to reach a breaking point
>>96101923https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBD7xF8Obl0
>>96101923>Promoting or facilitating suicidelolkys
So how fucked is all social media on the net now that this passed?
>>96102981>>96103001Yes, protect the children. And also have the NHS pump them full of sex change hormones. God save the king!
>>96101996Basically what the state does. Is he forbidding his own behavior, or not.
>>96101923its ok I only use 4channel
>>96105231>being a election touristlolyou first
>>96105572Same, same.PS: All peoples younger than 18 years old browsing this post should keep yourselves safe, friends. :: ))
>>96101923> "If there was a situation where the mitigations that the social media providers are taking are not enough, and if after further work with the regulator they still can't demonstrate that they can meet the requirements within the bill, then the conversation about technology around encryption takes place," she said.>She said further work to develop the technology was needed, but added that government-funded research had shown it was possible.Don’t worry lads the Tory tech minister has thrown a bit of money at the problem and has figured out how to break SSL encryption
>>96101923reminder to buy a UK VPS and mass report all domains without moderation (99% of the internet)pic related, it's a british man
>>96104988Even Arm didn’t want anything to do with this shithole. Only the UK could have one of the most valuable companies on the planet and lose them to burgers.
oi, you goht a loicense foh thet compyutah m8!?!
>>96101923Do they define their terms for what each of those "illegal content" categories are? Sounds like an easy way for them to just block websites they don't like arbitrary or on a technicality. Similar to what happened with Parler but this time with the government.
>>96101923>illegal immigration and people smugglingwhat? you can't show people crossing borders illegally?
>>96101923Finally the britbong scourge is dead, stay dead and stay off of 4chan trash.
Thank fucking God. Fix your fucking country then come back you license stackers.
>>96101923>cyber-flashingwat
>>96101966I'm almost certain that the pedophile posters are mostly glowies
>>96106381As if giving proper definitions would make a difference.Carte blanche to do whatever they feel like is just a "THINK OF MUH CHILDREN" away.
>>96101923>talking about illegals immigration and human trafficking is hate speech Lmao the jokes write themselves.
Is anything actually going to change? I mean how the hell can they enforce this?
>>96107134They can'tIt's just step one towards building The Great Firewall of China (UK edition)And possibly serve as a testing ground to see how the alphabet agencies can later implement a way to truly deplatform each and every single person that doesn't think 100% like the US government wants them to
>>96107134The idea seems to be that the British government wants to incentivise the vast majority of 'web service operators' to simply introduce a blanket ban on British users so that they can avoid any potential legal trouble.The larger services like Facebook and Twitter would be able to account for any increased risk by purchasing insurance and introducing verification systems.Since so much of the bill is vague and self-contradicting, VPN services could be liable for prosecution, as could Tor exit node operators.The main threat seems to be criminal liability and threat of prosecution by the British authorities. They'll probably try and levy a fine in most circumstances but I can see the Brits going for criminal prosecution against people who run sites like Kiwifarms. Whether or not this will be a success is a question for the lawyers but if your country has an extradition treaty with the UK, you might be extradited.
>300 pagesFuck do I hate law and everyone involved in it. It doesn't take one page to say no child porn. Nothing says democracy like making things as inaccessible to the average person as possible
>>96102981>references to religion include references to a lack of religionbased UK admitting atheism is a religion
Sounds like 4chan needs to step up their Tor game.
>>96107481>make 436761967946794 word long law>add in case law and commentaries>everything is written in lawyerese>takes a legal education to make sense of it all>break one of 346 subsections without even realizing it>IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE, CITIZEN, TROLOLOLOLjust
>>96107916Your problem for not going gunpowder treason again.
>>96101923See you tomorrow
>>96101923is 4chan even consider social media website?
>>96101923goodhopefully Canada and Australia are next. I will not be satisfied until the internet is free from the b*itish commonwealth
>>961019234chan is the "trany" side they won't do it.
>>96107939With all the stuff your country does, what have (You) done?
>>96102511Far easier to just block the UK at the CDN level and not worry about it. Bongs can still use a VPN if they wish.
>>96108032A much bigger gunpowder treason plot in the makings. :^)
>>96101967Probably for the best. We know what the brits get up to when they're temporarily granted a USA flag.
>>96107414>Whether or not this will be a success is a question for the lawyers but if your country has an extradition treaty with the UK, you might be extradited.Why? If running Kiwifarms is legal in the country of the Kiwifarms operator and they host nothing in the UK, why the fuck should they care? They are free to block the site themselves in their shitty islands if they want, but don't expect anyone outside your domain to give 2 fucks.
>>96108214Because no one has hit the UK with a nuke yet. That would teach them some humility.>or it would end the world, which I'm also fine with.>in any case, nuke the UK.
>>96101923I don't understand how people can stand living in such totalitarian shitholes.
>>96108274Stockholm syndrome.>captcha: JJJJJ
>>96103595
>>96103595I love sending the nikocado coinslot pic to people on the subway.
Just fuck my shit up senpai
>>96102981>-- (61.3) Content which encourages, promotes or provides instructions for suicideOh no canada.ca is banned
>>961019234channel will be fine
>>96108372>NOOOO YOU CANT HECKING LEAVE THIS SHIT CLOWN WORLD WE MADE ON YOUR OWN TERMS YOU HAVE TO BE A HECKIN SLAVERINO FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE
>>96102059/britpol/ failed with its’ Brexit campaignNow we get shit in our rivers and this
>>96108056even easier would be to just wait for the uk niggers to come arrest him (they won't).
>>96103514you've never been to /gif/ or /b/
>>96108274It's not so bad, really. We're a draconian surveillance state on paper; in reality, barely any crimes are prosecuted, so no-one cares. And the weather's nice.
>>96101923>Muslim country does mudshits thingsMore news at 10
>>961019234chan is healing
>>961019234chan and 4channel already do all of those things though, and 4channel is a sfw non-pornographic site. Also I don't think the law even applies to social media or sites that don't predominantly produce porn, so pixiv and twitter are excluded too. Basically this law is not going to achieve anything because Twitter is the #1 place where you'll be exposed to porn accidentally and this law doesn't stop that.
>>96110119>sfw non-pornographicIt has to be safe for children, not safe for work. If it's not, you need to demand age verification from all UK users.That aside, a good chunk of the content here is illegal under UK law. 4chan must either filter all the lolis out and heavily censor discussions, or geoblock the UK. Or just let the government to do it for them, I suppose.There's no reason this wouldn't apply to 4chan, pixiv or twitter. These all "have links with the United Kingom" (every website does) and none of the schedule 1 exemptions apply.
>>96110287>Or just let the government to do it for them, I suppose.Sounds like the better option.
>>96101923I'm going to miss harassing brit/pol/ :(
So how much time until this gets enforced?
>>96110470Hopefully today, I really need to get some work done.
>>96101923prison island
>>96101923nice what do i have to post to get a bong perma banned
They will delegate this to ISPs who will tell them it's unworkable
I kinda want the UK to accelerate with the whole 1984 thing just to show how bad it can get.
>>96102033It is! It is coming home!
>>96101923None of these things are on four chan though
>>96103001>-- (62.6) Content which>---- (a) depicts real or realistic serious violence against a person>---- (b) depicts the real or realistic serious injury of a person in graphic detail>---- (62.13) “person” is not limited to a real person>---- (c) realistically depicts serious violence against a fictional creature or the serious injury of a fictional creature in graphic detail>---- (62.14) “animal” is not limited to a real animalholy shit they're bringing back video nasties it's 1982 all over again
>>96103559let me tell you how
>>96108372lmao
>>96101923Are there any social media operating out of UK? Why should I care that these little bingbong stalinists are making laws they can't enforce anywhere it matters?
>>96111904same shit, different era. not much they can do with websites outside of uk. i assume sites will just start looking at how a total ban on uk visitors would hit profits and consider banning the entire country - which would be far easier than dealing with their meme laws.
>>96101923unlisted imageboards when?
>>96112003We can have our own special intranet like best korea
>>96101923Less people of color I guess to worry about
>>96112002Where are these >muh social media replies coming from? This bill applies to all websites accessible from the UK. The exemptions are very limited. It sure as fuck doesn't say "oh, no, if you're not a social media website it's all fine :^)" in there.If you don't care about the UK becoming the next China or inspiring other countries to do the same, well, more power to you, but maybe this isn't the right thread.
>>96112065>We can have our own special intranet like best koreawould have to happen in secret, and it would just be like back in the 80s and 90 with pirate radio: instead of fm radio gear its dudes climbing to tops of estates with wifi network repeaters and routing gear. uk doesn't like things involving freedom and cringes when a globohomo corporation doesn't make shekels.
All of you should kill yourselves RIGHT NOW...are the brits gone yet?>>96104691A man can dream
>>96101923>>96101949bong here though i try to act american even changing my spelling on purpose, anyway i'm still here. does 4chan even have anything on that list except the suicide/self-harm thing? it'd be shutdown for /gif/ because they love reposting that video of the guy who kys himself. but other than that i don't see 4chan breaking those rules
>>96112111>f you don't care about the UK becoming the next ChinaWell, I care in the sense that that sounds horrible for bongs.
>>96112315>not posting a madotuki pic with self-harm to make extra sure they are all gone
>>96101923>animal crueltyPets eating non goyslop food (dog/cat chow, royal canin, etc..)>weapon sellingPencils longer than 15cm
>>96109982>And the weather's nice.Only during the summer.Any other time of the year, it's fucking awful.
>>96112942I like rain and I like sun, but I hate mosquitos. What's the best country for me out of the Mediterranean?
>>96101966it's nsfw shit. funny thing is I saw porn at 7 and I turned out alright.
>>96108289>JJJJJyeah right
>>96112234Don't give them any ideas, you'll have wifi licenses in no time.
>>96102137It has always been the same. US illegal content always is removed
>>96102981>emoji mentioned in actual legislationWhat the fuck is this timeline.
>>96112647Loli/shota is "child sexual abuse". /gif/ is "extreme sexual violence". /r9k/ is "promoting or facilitating suicide". /fa/ is "promoting self-harm". /pol/ is "terrorism".
>>96112942I dunno, I think it's nice year-round. It's not too hot, not too cold, doesn't rain that much (in the south anyway).
>>96113364I'd be fine if they banned all those boards. I do occasionally visit /fa/ for the /wt/ general but I'd just bring it to /g/ like it used to be.
>>96103001>Content which>---- (a) depicts real or realistic serious violence against a person>---- (b) depicts the real or realistic serious injury of a person in graphic detailso no more Call Of Duty livestreams in UK ?
>>96114380Oh, no, it's not like that. You can have those. You just have to submit your passport to NotMossad Technologies Ltd. for age verification in order to view them.
>>96101923ukvros kysys
So is 4chan finally going to be forced to allow VPNs? Not like it's going to become any worse of a website because bots with 4chan pass are already ruining it.
>/pol/tards pushed for brexit>doom their country>kicked out from accessing 4chan tooKWAB
>>96117367/pol/ lives rent free in your head
>>96101923Good, the average IQ in 4chan will go up by an standard deviation.
>>96102137I've been here since 2006. It may not be the exact same site it used to be, but it is by no means up to the standards the UK expects, nor will it ever. The UK considers lolicon to be sexual abuse. We have loli and shota threads on /b/ all the time, including AI generated loli and shota. They are explicitly permitted within the rules on that board. The bill also requires people not to encourage self harm. This will never be implemented on 4chan. I can tell British people to kill themselves and nothing will happen. Finally, there's the ID thing. We don't even ask you for your age. We just show everyone in without telling them we allow porn on certain boards.I don't expect 4chan to do a thing. It was already illegal to distribute loli in the UK, and 4chan has existed in open mockery of this law for over a decade. They haven't blocked us yet, they probably won't do shit in the future.
>>96104691I always knew that this fucking island was a space ship!
just got cyberflashed in greggs lads
>>96120351Fuck greggs.
>>96120392are they 'avin a giggle or is that actually how britishers communicatePoe's law and all that jazz
>>96108056Plenty of Jap and us sites are still blocking euros because of gdpr/cookies nonsense. Our governments are just ruining the internet ;-;
>>96117367France and other European countries are also working on similar legislation
>>96119758>2006newfag
>>96123232This. I fucking hate living here
>>96119758The bill is focused on social media like Twitter and facebook. People go about shit posted here but honestly youll find far worse and more of it on major social media platforms. Twitter openly had pedos exchanging links to CP folders. Facebook is awash with animal abuse videos. Instagram has rampant suicide baiting shit. I remember when a bunch of faceberg jannies outed the company at just how much "harmful" content was available. They didnt even take it down, they'd leave it up "in case it harmed law enforcement investigations". Posting that shit here gets deleted and you banned. 4chan has stricter and more consistent rule enforcement than fucking multi billion dollar social media sites.
>>96102149>he doesn’t know
>>96124537Please explain
>>96125045nta but YOUAREHEREFOREVER
>>96125197Ah, forgot about that meme
>>96102110cool storynow post hand
>>96113227>Don't give them any ideas, you'll have wifi licenses in no time.it's heading that way regardless. these changes for their utopian internet will turn their experience into an ID for everything world. exploiting the plight of "children" so they can spy on everyone, even if they're using encryption - they want people to crack it for them.
>>96102073>NATO globohomo countries self-censor out of the internetFinally we're returning to form! All we need now is for the Indian subcontinent to go next
>>96107949It's a very early version of a Web 2.0 site, actually
>>96112942I've been to the UK in June. Only on the 3 sunny days did it get above 60°. The rest of the time I was there it was overcast and in the low 50s; at one point in Scotland it was 34° and raining. In June. That is not "good weather"
>>96111904It's amazing, the lengths people will go to not accept responsibility as a parent. If you don't want your kids seeing dirty shit online, just don't get them a computer. Or sit there with them as they browse.
>>96112111This is the hell you and your parents chose. I don't feel sorry for people who are made to sleep in the bed they have made. You were warned a thousand times what would happen if you threw away the ancient sacred rights your ancestors fought and died to defended for generations, and you chose not to listen. >free speech? Property rights? FUCK that! I don't wanna be responsible for my health or housing or security, somebody else should pick up the tabGG no re.
>>96113233The only content that's illegal in the US is CP and classified government documents
>>96101966surely the government will self destruct any moment.oh wait, they just imported 10,000 more raping niggers, nvm.
>>96126785Good.
>>96102981>-- (61.3) Content which encourages, promotes or provides instructions for suicideThe Ashley Book of Knots is now a banned book.
>>96108372>-- (61.7) In this section and section 62 “injury” includes poisoningSo is gov.uk, it promotes fluoridating water.
>>96101923thankfully we are safe here on 4channel!
>>96102981>>96103001Based law reader
>>96105665I would LOVE to see what happens in the UK if they mandate broken encryption, holy shit the disaster that would cause would be glorious.
>>96127690Australia already did that years ago.
>>96127902How am I not surprised that AUS would already have done this? I swear something's wrong with the water down there.
>>96101923No one gives a hollering hoot.
>4chan pass $20/year>His Majesty's Official 4chan Loicense for Britbongs £20/month (Must provide photo ID, birth certificate and non-incel sex haver certificate)
The only part of Bongolia with balls is Norn Iron
>>96104861Little boys have a right to Jurassic Park. This is fucked up.
>>96102511>it probably won't be too hard for hiroshimoot to comply with thisYou are assuming he reacts whatsoever. He hasn't done anything here in 5+ years.
>>96101923...Why did you remove items from the list? https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ae344dc8-c1da-4bee-bf2f-fcdaa15a64b2
>>96113007>lurk on 4chin>"I turned out alright"anon...
>>96101923>illegal content including: illegal immigrationWhat does that even mean? Instructions on how to not get caught? Sponsored ad campaigns that urge people to do it? Activism about legalizing already existing illegal immigrants? Fiction that depicts it? Writing something completely unrelated that gov can just slap "forbidden" into it?
the UK just wants money by fining % of the global income for not following their rules.
>>96108525/gif/ has anything that's not blacked or gay/trans threads?
I think UK should stop raping children instead of banning imaginary content
>extreme sexual violence
If 4chan bends over backwards to comply that might be what will force me off this shithole for good. No need for a permanent rangeban.
>>96101923Good, fuck bongs, next Australia
>>96101923>cyber flashingwhat's that? showing your dick on omeagle?
>4chan is now legally required to dox all the brits who say bad words on /pol/pfffAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>96101945You'll finally have time to work out how you're going to pay for your TV loiscense.
>>96101923Can't even load the image so can't say anything.Anyways this is just the beginning. 10 years from now the surface internet has been totally sanitised and commercialised. Government designed and enforced AI moderation is the next big thing.
>>96130157The towwwwwwwwn inside me
>>96107916its very funny and sad how real this is tho
>>96105414>And also have the NHS pump them full of sex change hormonesthis has been banned now afaik
>>96130374It's why civil law is fucking trash, and it's why it was forcefed to common law countries like the UK. Under common law, the only laws outside of a constitution are the precedents set by common sense. Murder is a crime because thousands of juries (comprised of common men) over hundreds of years have set the precedent that it is so. Under civil law as we are now, what is or is not a crime is decided by a politician, who writes entire bloody novels of esoterical legalese to abstractly define it in such a way the common man cannot immediately comprehend it.
>>96131136This.Laws are written in a way in Europe where it's really up for interpretation, and they make them intentionally vague so they get to decide how to enforce it. Just look at fucking GDPR.
>>96101923Can I report whores for cyberflashing?
>>96131411The law doesn't apply to women.
>wohta
>>96131442They really wrote that into the law? I get cyberflashed by e-whores all the time and being able to have them sent to jail would be a silver lining here.
>>96131466No, that's just how law enforcement works in practice.
>>96131477It's a shame people are such cucks. Imagine a world where everyone would kill at least one cop in their lifetime.
>>96101923>law to protect the children>4chanif there are any children on this site, their parents deserve the death penalty
Bong here. I am fuming. A law made by people who think the internet and social media are the same thing. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.
>>96101996so leftoid public school teachers on suicide watch?
>>96131625No one cares that you're fuming. If you want someone to care about fuming it needs to come from the House of Commons.
>>96131663Oops. That's badspeak. I'll let you sort that out.
>>96101923 (OP)"Your honor, there seems to be a contradiction in the bill. Specifically in Part 3, Chaperter 7, sub-section (62.2) article (f) and in sub-section (60.2). It purports to prohibit "content that is harmful to children" and goes on to protect an operation that mutilates, dismembers, or renders a childs genitals inoperable and permanently unusable. Now I ask you in what world is it ethical to harm a childs reproductive future merely because a child "felt like it at the time"?Thank you, your honor, for allowing me to speak and fuck niggers"
>>96131714What exactly confused you about "no one cares"?
>>96101923Been far too long since I got to post this
>>96132136Cowboy Bebop was gutter trash.Yes, that's a fact.
>>96102044>implying Europe and Asia don't existretard
