Who is being targeted by the omnipresent code of conduct?Do people really behave so poorly they need an explicit CoC?
White men. People need to remain civil but this is about pronoun and ideology enforcement.
>>96086686>Do people really behave so poorly they need an explicit CoC?No. This is ridiculous. Software has been getting written for decades without any codes of conduct. Codes of conduct are about control, so that, for example, the Hyprland guy can get run out of his own project and replaced with someone friendlier to FAGMAN interests.
>>96086686People now demand to know the reason they were ousted from a community or project. Just like forum rules, there are CoCs.
>>96088651I'm not a man im non binary sometimes I get a lil emotional you know
Trolls who are clearly a net negative to theproject and troll apologists who question why you've banned someone who has technically not broken any rule.A CoC shouldn't be necessary, but some people just abuse the lack of any rule to misbehave.
>>96089014A CoC isn't necessary if the creator accept his position of self appointed dictator. Someone is being annoying? Just remove them you don't need to justify your actions.
>>96089129This. Every well-functioning organization operates as a monarchy. CoCks are only a pretext to invite token tranny commissar freeloaders.
>>96089129sure, but those trolls will then on 3rd party platforms misrepresent what you have banned them for and try to make you out as the one who is misbehaving. If they are dedicated, it can easily cause a lot of unnecessary work for you to clear up the situation and defend yourself aganst these allegations. With clear rules you are not arbitrarily banning someone because you are some power-hungry dictator.
>>96089377>on 3rd party platforms misrepresent what you have banned them for and try to make you out as the one who is misbehavingA code of conduct does literally nothing to prevent this.
>>96086686So, what is your first day interacting with human beings like?
>>96089283Is this why everything crashes and is so bloated/unoptimized?
>>96086686I guess it depends on the code or conduct but a lot of them are just "be professional", so I guess unprofessional people are targeted.>Do people really behave so poorly they need an explicit CoC?Yeah. Sometimes it's just a "why not" thing or making the rules explicit before something happens, but people do behave poorly online so they make sense.
>>96086686>Do people really behave so poorly they need an explicit CoC?yes it turns out most people act like complete retards unless theyre given preschool level rules on how to act
>>96089387Makes it easier for others to get why they were banned
>>96090223No, explaining why someone was banned makes it easier for others to understand why someone was banned. Having a long list of vague rules makes it harder.
>>96086686I am gay myself and dating a tranny. I am extremely leftist. But god damn it the CoC drama is bullshit. I don’t want or need code to have one. I don’t wanna be forced to check who invented or contributed a language constantly to see if they are “ideologically pure” still or if I need to disavow or drop the language. I don’t wanna be branded a bigot just because I code in a specific language or use a specific software. I don’t wanna care about who contributed what Rust crates! I don’t care if people at Suckless are edgy! Goddamn. I literally do not care what views some rando on Github has offering me that software for free. People screaming for a CoC need to shut up. Just code and contribute instead of making it about yourself. They can’t misgender your ass if you keep it neutral and just use a username with no info attached. As it should be
>>96090413This basically. Troons on their own are fine. I'll talk to them and whatnot. The SJWs need to fuck off and stop shitting up people's projects.
>>96089014>>96089283This kind of behavior is straight out of published sabotage manuals.
>>96090282You point to the specific rule lol
>>96090548Troons are the definition of what makes a space non-safe though. When they are present in a project, it's basically a "whatever you say or do can and will be used against you even if you didn't mean it like that" situation.
>>96090413>as a black man
>>96090413Either act professional or go your separate way. It's not that hard.
>>96090664Why can't you just explain it like an adult...>lolOh.
>>96090738You really need further explaininf than "you explain by pointing to a specific rule they've broken"? I'm not trying to be mean but are you mentally hadicapped?
>>96086686>be DHH>Own the company that created and solely maintains some OSS app>Implement CoC because muh social something>Get BTFO'ed by CoC
>>96086686its a legal way to filter anything except leftoid troons
>>96089435no, thats pajeets
>>96090761If there's no reason for banning someone, then why is he getting banned?
>>96090699True, but there is a minority who are tolerable. The troon to sjw correlation is very high.
>>96090858I just told you to point to a specific RULE THEY'VE BROKEN. Where did you get the idea there was no reason for banning someone?
>>96090933So if there's a reason, why can't you articulate that reason?
>>96090995It's been a while since I've met someone retarded enough to make me laugh but what exactly do you think it is when you point to a specific rule that they've broken? What could be clearer than pointing to the specific rule they've broken and that they got the ban for? I'm guessing you've been in that situation and now you're angry that you were banned without reason and "nobody even told me why" kek
CoC is just a short hand for "do not help us at all" I like being lazy so I love it. Also maybe humanity has reached a level of population tooo high.... if we were to cut technology, billions will die... which of course is a good thing.
>>96086686It's an excuse to remove "problematic" people when there isn't a valid reason to do so.Not anyone specific, just whoever the obligatory minority dislikes.
CoC is the most useless thing ever, some text isnt going to change behavior of anyone, people dont even read EULA or TOS. What matters is how discussion is moderated and guess what? you dont need some text by mentally ill egoistical tranny for that
>>96089377> With clear rules you are not arbitrarily banning someone because you are some power-hungry dictator.This discussion has sprouted up on a known hate forum, so I’m going to be closing this thread.
>>96090664>rule: don’t be mean Banned for disagreement.
CoC is FOSS’s biggest issue. Trannies ruin everything
>>96091049>he didn’t read the rule about not replying to trolls Sorry chud, you’re banned. Read the rules.
I read Drew DeWhatever's drama post about Hyperland or whatever it's called. It actually made me want to install it. Liberal salt is delicious. In the end I didn't install anything because Gayland. Maybe in another 15 years.
I've never been involved in a project but can't you just start your own project and only allow people you want to have any input into it? I know this isn't possible in a large company
>>96092994I think discrimination of a protected class is illegal or something. You can't say no to a woman, just because she's a woman. Same with gays, etc. Crazy.
>>96092994>can't you just start your own projectNobody's going to jump on a bandwagon if it already has mental illness on display from the outset, so the only way COCsuckers will get to exercise their petty tyranny is by taking over an already established project.
autists are the only victims of coc, since they can't grasp why spicy talk and political discourse in a public forum is a bad idea. a normal person has a filter.
>>96093345I don't care about politics, but it should be reasonable to tell a tranny to go fuck himself when he starts seething about inclusive language without getting canceled.
>>96086686Its a religion to oust political opposition within the organization led by DEI mandates. If someone doesn't accept the diversity, equity and inclusion, they're outcasted as evil.
you guys acting like trannies are the reason there are CoCs and if I ever have a community I'll set up a CoC to avoid trolls like Izzy muerte and other community leeches / freeloaders.
A CoC is a critical security vulnerability. It creates an attack vector for those who weaponize language to dominate those who are weak to that kind of attack. You shoud avoid this vulnerability at all costs.
>>96093345>a normal person has a filter.Exactly. A COC is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
>>96093569in my project both of you would be banned for being autistic retards.
>>96090574Movie Theater Patrons: To ruin everyone’s time at the movies (without a cell phone, that is) bring in a paper bag filled with two or three dozen large moths. Open the bag and set it in an empty section of the theater. “The moths will fly out and climb into the projector beam, so that the film will be obscured by fluttering shadows.”
>>96092908>>96092923>they would be puzzled why they were banned even though straight up toldBizarre