File: 1692823789376334.gif (65 KB, 200x200)

65 KB GIF

I don't use twitter tho, so sucks to be them

>>96081993
that would be great because it would kill the platform

He is not wrong. Making payment mandatory is the only way to protect you from bots in the coming future.

4chan will have that same problem

>>96081993
owari da

>>96082108
way ahead of you

>>96082108
>Rich people with bots are unaffected
>Poor people are deplatformed
Was this intended?

>>96082183
Rich people do not run bot farms. Those who run it cannot afford to pay 8$ a month per bot, and have 100K bots

>muh bots
Literally every change he's done was to stop "muh bots" and it hasn't achieved anything. He's doing this because Twitter is financially moribund and nothing will ever make it lucrative.

>>96082197
NGOs and financially backed institutions hire bot farms. So yes rich people like the ADL run bots you dumb nigger

>>96081993
Does he think that making Twitter bot-free would make it a money printer? Or what else is his plan?

>>96082267
Elon's plan was
1) Buy Twitter
2) Rebrand it X
3) ???
4) Now X is a wildly successful brand, and everyone who laughed in his face about his previous project also called X is now spinning in their grave probably

>>96082108
you're assuming the state wants media unbottable. evidence points to the opposite - the common user wants to interact with humans, not bots, while the powerful want to use bots to drown out any unapproved communication.

so, useful forums require either resisting or evading state interference. musk is failing at both, though he seems to be starting to understand the nature of the problem.

>>96082267
>Does he think that making Twitter bot-free would make it a money printer?
Yes because advertisers aren't coming back yet and he has no other way to make money on there
>Or what else is his plan?
There is no plan, he got screwed over with the 40 billion dollar buyout and is fucked

>>96082267
Elon's next big move is to ban all trannies

File: 1199694195306.gif (92 KB, 334x232)

92 KB GIF

>>96082108
>will have
wrong tense lol

>>96082197
God you’re stupid as dirt
Why would I want to be “protected,” against my will, from bots and morons exposing themselves outright

>lock down site so you can't browse without logging in
>charge everyone
>no one buys, because all the posts that would make people bother browsing mostly come from normal users who can no longer post
>entire platform userbase shrinks to less than 1% and is nothing but marketting shills and boring normalfags

>>96082309
>you're assuming the state wants media unbottable
I didn't assume anything. I merely state that prevention of bots without paid accounts will be impossible. That's all.

>>96082346
true, but it will get worse

>>96082348
<sigh>

>>96082365
Not even the dumbest normalfag trusts giving Elon their credit card since they don't like him now

>>96082381
a funny thing about LLMs is that they're very good at detecting things generated by LLMs

set a thief to catch a thief

>>96081993
Finally, free speech at last!

so uh bros, where are we moving after X gets shut down?

>>96082424
is it free speech when i broadcast white noise to keep you quiet?

if it is, what value does it have?

>>96082444
Wherever whores go

>>96081993
Source or BTFO

>>96082381
There will still be bots, just less of them.

>>96082108
But how much payment? And why monthly? Just charge $1 to $3 for an account and delete bot accounts so they have to keep paying.
$1 is basically nothing to me I could easily pay just to see what something is, knowing there's a good chance I'll never use it again, but for others especially in 3rd world maybe it's more significant. Which makes it even better, so they shouldn't get a discount.

>>96082413
Eventually even this test will fail. It is a matter of time.

>>96082474
Of course there will be. They can be totally eradicated, but what's important is to remove the possibility of bot armies

>>96082448
There’s no real free speech. You just choose between different compromises.

>>96082496
There will still be bot armies because any organization can field one. You may see less Poojeets but it wouldn't matter because they'll still find ways. He hasn't done anything to even stop botting and all it did was drive everyone away. Bots are an excuse to how bankrupt it is becoming

>>96082108
but I like arguing with bots

>>96082496
>Eventually even this test will fail. It is a matter of time.
there are no signs that it will, nor any theoretical grounding for such an assumption.

This is a real "piss on my leg and tell me it's raining" situation. But I don't know why anyone thinks that bots are incapable of paying money. Has he seen "verified" accounts?

>>96082496
Already failed for LLMs trying to detect faked exams.

>>96082488
The price is something more complicated to calculate, but with the right internal data it can be calculated quite well. Musk chose $8 even though I wouldnt be surprised if he increases to $10, maybe even $15, once the site becomes more profitable

>>96082524
Unlikely, but not impossible, I guess

>>96082532
Dont worry, you will have your local ones

>>96082535
Seeing the evolution of chatbots it is a logical assumption that even a 4 year old could make

>>96082566
Exactly

>>96082588
>Musk chose $8 even though I wouldnt be surprised if he increases to $10, maybe even $15, once the site becomes more profitable
It never will. Thats the point

>every alternative is going to be full of "banned for misgendering" moderation
guess it's time to start using Gab again

>>96082598
It already is. Just not too much.

>>96082588
>once the site becomes more profitable
Or profitable at all

>>96082606
Elon has literally admitted that Twitter’s ad revenue is down 50% and cash flow is negative, two months ago. It still is if he's crying about the ADL and visiting Israel to whore himself out

>>96082606
Musk has been whining all year that twitter is losing money and may go bankrupt. It’s not easy for it to be profitable because he loaded the company up with debt.

>>96081993
if that happens I'ma have just use trannydon or even threads fuck this south African jew

>>96082637
>>96082609
>>96082653
True that it has been not-profitable for a long time. Right before the whole ADL thing I saw him saying that they were very close to profitability, but then the ADL did his thing.

In any case, seeing how he has run Tesla and SpaceX, I have zero doubt that he will find a way to make it profitable.

>>96082656
>mastodon
Full of tyrannical rules by leftist troons. Use Pleroma or Misskey, two of the compatible alternatives. They tend to attract saner individuals and as a bonus have better features.

I don't care about Twitter.

>>96082767
>Right before the whole ADL thing I saw him saying that they were very close to profitability
Elon has said this throughout the year, he's lying
>but then the ADL did his thing
As much as the ADL are pieces of shit who definitely contribute to shafting him, it's also that Twitter is a government operation and theyre not funding him after the purchase

>>96082108
This is literally the exact opposite since it only promotes people to use them more since more money can be made from them. Musks paid service on twitter only caused an even larger influx of bots to be more

>just id people
Even more retarded. Ways you can get around it and it then becomes even more profitable to bot

>>96082767
>I have zero doubt that he will find a way to make it profitable.
Musks Twitter reign has been an unmitigated disaster from the start. Musk performs well when he has an engineering business to run, but the twitter buyout was pure autistic egomania. He simply does not know what he’s doing and is too narcissistic to accept he may have made some big mistakes and should be open to advise. I expect him to either completely run it into bankruptcy to sell it or both.

>>96082656
>>96082790
What the hell are you talking about? Mastodon isn't Reddit, it's not a singular "thing". It's a collection of things, and if you don't like one you can go to another. I'm pretty sure there are plenty of Mastodon instances available where it's allowed to seethe about "leftist troons" all day.

>>96081993
maybe he was just trying to impress king jew?

Sounds like an easy way out for me, not like I use the platform for a bit of fanart and even that is just dwindling

>>96082844
He likely just clicked on the default mastodon.social server, and seen the featured /leftypol/ posts and thought thats all it was

File: 1538256805312.jpg (244 KB, 904x573)

244 KB JPG

>>96082108
For foreChin it did the opposite though, pass allows you to use proxy, have lower cooldowns, bypass captcha. All of which enabled things like the Seychelles meme.
And then for Twitter: what stops me from using my paid account to bypass rate limitation, spam follow people, post my ad in comments under the most trending tweets? Oh I get banned? maybe it's lucrative enough for me to just make another burner account, rinse and repeat.
>>96082220
This was my first thought; he's got a 40 billion hole in his pocket, I don't see how he's ever going to recuperate those losses. Even if he manages to turn X into an all-in-one platform in the future... I don't know. If it's a long game plan for the next 5-10 years, I find it risky. For some reason, I think of social media as very volatile although evidence suggests otherwise.
Also, Twitter started with such a bad/negative reputation; seems almost impossible to remove the bad stench associated with it.

>>96082800
>Twitter is a government operation
Twitter WAS a government operation


>>96082828
>it only promotes people to use them more since more money can be made from them

To make money on X you have to have a lot of engagement, which is hard/impossible for a bot to generate. And if a AI bot could reach the point of actually generating content that produces engagement... I guess that makes it a good bot? But that is not the case for the majority of bots, which are directed to scams or ideology campaining

>>96082828
>Musks paid service on twitter only caused an even larger influx of bots to be more
This is plain false. Ask any user in X and they will tell you how much better the bot problem has become.

>>96082834
> I expect him to either completely run it into bankruptcy to sell it or both.
You are saying the same thing that everyone has said about every single company/tech he has invested in. Every time everyone has been wrong. I will give him the benefit of the doubt.

>>96082834
>an unmitigated disaster from the start
why?

>>96082834
>too narcissistic to accept he may have made some big mistakes
he has openly said this in interviews. Quote: "If I'm so smart, why did I pay so much for Twitter?"

Subscriptions never bothered botters in online games, what makes them think that will stop bot farms in social media?!

>>96082914
Individual bot accounts are not the issue. Bot armies are the issue.

>>96082304
his last project called X was paypal which made him a billionaire btw

>>96082834
the problem is that twitter was never a good engineering business and had no engineering culture. he has had to build one and it will not happen overnight.

>>96082914
>he's got a 40 billion hole in his pocket, I don't see how he's ever going to recuperate those losses
The issue with Elon and "X" is that not only did he get a multi billion loan to buy Twitter after their execs shafted him with the purchase thanks to his stupidity, but that Twitter was entirely reliant on government/corporate funding to work. Twitter functioned as it did because, despite being a shit hole, they were given financial backing to sustain it as they were struggling financially nearly forever.

When Elon bought the site, those advertisers and NGOs fled so he was left with worse financial decline, so he did checkmark P2P, which was a total flop as barely anyone purchases it. The changes that have downgraded the site such as the Rate Limits are also likely due to cutbacks. He also tried to woo the advertisers back by hiring that WEF woman but she's a placeholder and a bimbo, and they're still not returning. There is also the fact that Elon hasn't saved free speech if the bans are still going as it were before and that the algorithm has also been messed up since he hired Pajeet coders who don't know what they're doing. His all-in-one platform can't work either in the West because it's not as centralized like China with apps.

So left with even worse financial costs than before, he'll start charging, he's considered it before but he was told to not do it but with Twitter still in the gutter, he might do it anyways. Watching Twitter crash and burn has been great

>>96082267
crashing this plane

>>96082309
most people are scared of "bots". But bots can be useful, i want bots interacting with internet ads and wasting resources of the marketing team

File: this society is obsessed (...).jpg (645 KB, 2000x2000)

645 KB JPG

>>96082365
I think most Twitter/X users know the writing on the wall time ago and now they are screenshot every post. Since Mr. Musk got twitter, the entire internet become "Twitter/X Screenshots"
It also has to deal with the fact that most screenshots exist because no the content but rather for the person who tweeted, but they know the average joe is too lazy for login in yeah, another social media that harvest data,

The current twitter payouts are one gigantic ponzi scheme that won't last either as people continue to cheat engagement metrics via things like bot farms. Twitter is pretty fucked, monetizing it is probably the only way to save it from going under but that also kills it. Don't think there's any winning here for Musk.

>>96081993
I would love if he did that. It want to see twitter being deleted.

>>96084259
He could start banning anyone using the platform that isn't a white adult heterosexual male
It wouldn't save it, but might as well go out with a bang and not a whimper

>>96081993
>speaks to a jew
>instantly wants more money

Part of me thinks this is just another of his ploys to get the screechers to finally leave Twitter like when he talked about getting rid of blocking previous.

>>96081993
>According to Musk, X has 550 million monthly active users, who create 100 million-200 million posts daily
Doubt.

File: capthca.png (12 KB, 368x100)

12 KB PNG

>>96082108
If only there was a way to validate human-ness with every post...

>>96081993
already debunked by community notes on X

>>96082153
yep but everyone replied you.

>>96081993
People will just migrate to one of the twitter clones and Twitter will die. The saddest part is he thinks he can monetize it when the whole thing is so rudimentary essentially any country or company can create a clone.

>>96082183
Yep, he's setting up twitter for another 2016 disinformation campaign for his conservative and russian buddies while profiting on top of it

>we did it, we solved the bot problem everyone!
>anyway we need your money to stop the bots now
what?

>>96082331
That's half his userbase thoughever

>>96081993
Didn't they just like two weeks ago add a system where in order to pay for Twitter you have to give a photo of your driver's license to some random Israeli company? So he wants to force the entirety of Twitter to dox themselves to Israeli glowies after installing a WEF executive as CEO? And this is the le based nazi meme guy /pol/ likes?

>>96082937
>To make money on X you have to have a lot of engagement
Retard detected. Bots don't make money from musks retard engagement pay service, they make it from the multitude of other means that bots have always made money on. The amount of ideology bots are a tiny minority of bots that are on social media sites.

>Ask any user in X and they will tell you how much better the bot problem has become
Anyone who actually uses twitter would tell you actually the problem has only increased since he started using bots as an excuse. There is more bots than ever, especially in comment sections

>>96081993
>>96082108
It totally worked for WoW and FF14.

>>96085353
Those are enjoyable experiences. Well WoW is anyway.

>>96082108
embrace the bots you have no choice
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSwxnFSn3GQ

https://techcrunch.com/2023/09/18/elon-musk-says-x-will-charge-users-a-small-monthly-payment-to-use-its-service/
source since op is gay.

>>96081993
literal who?

>>96081993
we already have a bot recognition tool it is called say NIGGER

>>96081993
The more I hear about this hilarious trainwreck, the more certain I am that he bought Twitter so he could control an arm of the global narrative. And he's tearing it all down in a petulant tantrum after the whole thing blew up in his face.

>>96081993
Good. I would love for internet addicted blacks and trannies to be forced to pay.
I am a lurker anyway

>>96081993
In other words, he can't get rid of the bots now because Twitter would be empty, but if people pay they will be happy it's empty and nobody will complain... is that what I'm understanding or am I just a schizo?

>>96082197
ShareBlue (now the American Independent) spent millions on bots during the 2016 election season.

>>96085273
He's clearly willing to fuck over the users.

>>96085327
Why wouldn't /pol/ like that, though?
Twittertards deserve to eat shit.

>>96082488
The price should be higher to filter out poorfags.

>>96085557
Yeah, it's also a protection against ChatGPT datamining. GPL+NIGGER license too.

>>96085941
Because a lot of them are Twitter addicts themselves.

>>96085151
fag detected

>>96082844
If you are in a Pleroma or Misskey instance, can you acess Mastodon instances?

>>96082844
mastodon has a built in blacklist

>>96086522
Misskey cannot see Mastodon and vice versa

https://techcrunch.com/2023/09/15/x-launches-account-verification-based-on-government-id/

Everyone will just move to something else if push comes to shove.

the fact that twitter was valued at $40 billion is literally fucking insane. elon got conned out of ~$39 billion dollars.

it is MAYBE worth ~500 million. the site has never made ANY MONEY ever. it was riding by with low interest rates and tons of borrowing the entire time.

most of its users are bots. it only made money before by selling user information and advertising and that was not even close to keeping it afloat back then.

>>96086717
I would give my first born to be a fly on the wall during the conversation where Elon got convinced to buy Twitter, it must have been some wild shit

>>96081993
>making people pay to train his AI model for him
I'm starting to think Elon is smarter than I used to give him credit for

>>96086754
>convinced
>implying
Hopefully he goes through with the lawsuit retardation, maybe then some of the talks will be made public.

>>96081993
Paying for the privilege for unmoderated bots and abusive new accounts to call you a faggot in every post you make. Genius!

>>96086717
About 1/8th its valuation was literally just its brand.

>>96086754
He must've thought he could own Twitter easily before realizing the value was completely worthless but by that point the board got him by the balls

The directors must be retiring in the Caribbean after that

>>96081993
He could probably get away with this if X was already a ubiquitous "everything app" the same way WeChat is in chinkland. Instead, the retard is going to kill off his entire userbase before he even gets close to achieving that.

so when elon bought twitter he paid $44 billion (and was forced to buy it).

it is just so unbelievable that it was supposedly worth that much. how could a company be valued at $44 billion when it supposedly only brought in millions of net profit. like literally how. this shit is all smoke and mirrors, just like when theranos was supposedly worth billions and 1 wallstreet journal article came out saying it is actually worthless because they dont even have a working product and then the next week it went from being worth billions to being worth nothing.

twitter is probably worth 1 billion MAX. but $44 billion? gtfo

>>96086889
He also got a loan from Saudis to smooth the deal. He's going to get his limbs cut off if it goes bankrupt

File: 1695091302662.jpg (3.11 MB, 3988x5102)

3.11 MB JPG

>>96081993
>make xitter p2p
Elon isn't thaaaat retarded, right?
>>96086577
They can
t. follows and interacts with misskey users from a mastodon account
>>96082844
There are, not my cup of tea but they do exist, top right on picrel.

>>96081993
>Unity users get raped by Riccitiello and Musk all in the same month
holy kek

>>96086889
He overpaid for it dude, it's why Twitter forced him to buy. Legally had to because it was in shareholders interest.

>>96086939
what's this got to do with Unity you faggot?

>>96082844
>>96086932
Those "based" instances are all pleroma basically. Mastadon instances attract troons and leftists and leftist troons. I don't know why, there's nothing inherent in it besides having less features than the other GNU social stuff.

>>96081993
>telling this to mr top nosebergsteinwitz
i believe this is what they call banter

File: 1695093556016257.jpg (481 KB, 2990x2917)

481 KB JPG

>>96081993
>x is subscription only
>but you can pay with x coin
>by viewing this page you're already mining it

>>96087338
>there's nothing inherent in it
I only use it for chinese cartoons artists and amateur photographers. I guess it's cool if you want a sekrit club were you make the rules.
>>96087396
so, like gbp? (good boy™ points)

I will uninstall Twitter if he tries to make me pay and I've been there since 2010. Danbooru and 4chan will be the only thing I browse if this happens.

>>96086843
Just like Tesla!

This completely worked for App.net

>>96082108
>muh bots!!
nigger... if you're going to MAKE me pay you better fix your shitty ass site

>>96085151
go to /pol/ you conspiratard

>>96086932
>>96087338
I love how at first they screeched at mastadon for being for pedos until elon fucked over their place now they want to run to that very same site

>>96087444
>uninstall
Mobilefag detected.

>>96081993
If they charge to use it as an influencer or to make posts, then go ahead, it would actually filter all the retards and bots that plague that site. As long as I can keep browsing game news and see what my favorite loli artists post, I'm good.

PAY UP XITTERS
HAHHAAHHAAHA

>>96082108
4chan already has multiple bots on /k/ and /pol/. The only reason some organizations havent completely ruined the site is because its a largely meaningless site with little to no influence. The gaming of X however is more lucrative to bots. Political or financial bots are huge in the world. All platforms have them. Youtube/fagbook/reddit niggers/etc. They've been flooded with bots for years and will only get worse without verification cost.

>>96082183
>noooo i cant aford an arbitrary 1-3 dollars per month
>if you can afford it, it means you're rich.

>>96082108
the people who would push bots have more money than us to pay for them to shitpost

>>96081993
>>96082108
>what is captcha
>what is requiring email confirmation
>what is requiring phone number confirmation
Elon Musk is a dumb nigger

>>96086998
Where do you think they advertise their janky Patreon asset flips?

>>96081993
There's no fucking way he actually bought Twitter to "save" it the way he claims. This is way too many obviously stupid decisions in a row to make consecutively without thinking about it. He's a retard, but he's not that much of a fucking retard. This is deliberate and coordinated, he's actively destroying that website out of malice for whatever reason. Probably because his estranged daughter is trans and he blames Twitter for poisoning her with "the woke mind virus." This whole thing is just him throwing a tantrum because his daughter is a tranny most likely.

>>96081993
i mainly use twitter for porn. easy to scroll plenty of accounts posting all kinds of shit.

But I will be quitting twitter if the paywall comes up because of 2 reasons.
1) I don't pay for porn.
2) Why would I say yes to a platform where I am paying to write BS (twitter is mostly top of the head content) to a captive audience and still get spammed by corpo accounts?

Musk is much much smarter than I and I'm sure he'll make this into a worthy company soon. But I'm going to dip as soon as the paywall gets implemented.

>>96085151
Absolute retard take

>>96082197
Every AI Company that harvests the web is running bot farms

>>96087883
None of the above actually works, they just make life slightly more inconvenient for the people running the bots.

File: 1676119589209019.jpg (29 KB, 450x600)

29 KB JPG

>>96081993
A bucks or two per month won't hurt.

>>96087883
>captcha
defeated by AI... chance uses an AI to automatically solve captchas in one second
>email
easy to automatically create a new email
>phone numbers
useless in light of free sms websites using real phone numbers

why is he talking with king of Israel?

>>96081993
> pays users cash
> demands subs
is Elon retarded?

>>96086717
It was never valued at $40B by anyone but Elon. The market price when he bought it was $22B. He paid nearly double for some reason, it was assumed he did this to complete the buyout quickly but who really knows.

>>96082108
> he thinks bot owners can't buy subscriptions
being free or subscription based changes nothing, corporate cum guzzling whore. bots continue to exist. bots aren't elon's problem, it's the billions of dollars of debt he inherited and lack of advertisers.

>>96082108
>Making payment mandatory is the only way to protect you from bots in the coming future.
Paying won't stop bots, employees actively stopping bots will. Except the NSA employed by twitter are behind many of those said bots, so why would they stop them. Making all users pay is merely a cash grab, completely irrelevant to the bot issue.

>>96089973
yes. this was well established back in the 1990s.

>>96090011
I unironically believe, bots will end up being a large portion of the paying users. There won't be as many bots, but there will be a smaller number that work harder to appear credible. Combine that with the exodus of users who aren't willing to pay for a shitty version of 4chan.

>>96088036
he's billions of dollars in debt and has a lot of foreign money tied up into a sinking ship, whos investors were told would be profitable. elon is in panic mode in order to give a return for his investor's cash. that's about it.

>>96090044
it's what happened when he introduced paying for verification. bots getting around with verified is pretty fuckin funny. also stupid.

>>96090067
Exactly. Anyone who can justify paying for about farm can afford to pay for a few verified accounts too.

i just started to use twitter lol

>>96090044
>Combine that with the exodus of users who aren't willing to pay for a shitty version of 4chan.
Kek, you're fucking delusional. Twitter is bar none the best news outlet in existence. There's no competition. None. Especially if you're into things from a variety of different fields. My feed includes things like news on animation and news on the most recent rulings by my domestic constitutional and high courts. Stop comparing Twitter to 4shit lmao. 4shit is a shit posting website exclusively. Twitter has actual value even if you ignore all the comments. I'd personally pay for the centralized news service as is, assuming all the sources stick around as well, of course.

It's pretty clear that you don't even get what Twitter is, so refrain from talking about it, you fucking ape.

File: uegh.jpg (52 KB, 600x600)

52 KB JPG

>>96081993
not really surprised since x is going on its downfall state (obviously)

might wanna delete my account later.

>>96090470
Thanks for the blogpost. Very interesting. This really needed to be said. Good thing the internet allows anybody to contribute their piece. Can you repost this on X so I can share and like it?

>>96090427
I've been using twitter for about 8 years, and mostly as a news source aggregator like you describe. I didn't stop using it when musk took over, not did i plan to. But over time I just found it was getting impossible to just read stuff i was subscribing to and instead endless retarded rage bate ends up be promoted everywhere, not least from Elon himself.

I just read the news sources i liked directly now or use youtube. Anyone who only posted on twitter who i liked i can do without, it's not worth putting up with the platform. These issues weren't started by musk btw, twitter was always a bit shit this way and i might have stopped using it eventually anyways, but Musk really went full stream on doubling down on everything i hate about it.

Twitter never made much profit even before musk, and musk himself says it's in the shit. So they are going to need some kind of miracle for things to turn around for them.

>>96089383
>>96089293
ok but payment won't work either. Bot farms will just take this into account when charging their fees

if Threads STILL fucks this up after Musk basically hands them the twitter userbase on a silver platter, Zuck should just resign

>>96090502
If all you wanna see are things you know you're interested in, e.g. accounts you follow, you can limit the feed to only seeing those. If, of course, you don't follow anyone but rely on the Twitter algorithm to do the work for you, then that's something that has never worked to begin with. I genuinely don't get this doomsayer shit. Just curate the accounts you wanna follow (which you should have done a long time ago) and look at the follow feed exclusively. Woah, no promotions, no Musk posts, no nothing. At worst the people youve currated share shit you aren't interested in, but that's not something the platform can be blamed for.

>>96090517
Yep.
There really is no stopping bots. The only way to have any hope of doing so is to step up your moderation game and have humans (possibly with the assistance of automated tooling) to help weed them out, but we all know Musk's feelings on that subject.

It's possible to detect bots, especially the easy type of clickbait / hashtag squatting bots that are prevalent on X (formerly, Twitter).

Paying won't make them go away though.

>>96090565
>no TweetDeck
Absolute pain in the ass without it.

>>96081993
based pay up twitter tards

>>96090592
This, it's a huge pain in the ass without this. I've increased my use of lists instead now. I hope Musk doesn't have another idiot moment and decides to remove them too.

>>96090565
>If all you wanna see are things you know you're interested in, e.g. accounts you follow, you can limit the feed to only seeing those
Yes, and that's exactly how i used twitter for years. But eventually retarded retweets end up showing up. You might follow someone you like for tech, but eventual they will retweet a response to some unbelievable retarded rage bate thread, and the more people you follow the harder it is to avoid this. It's an innate problem with twitter as a news aggregator. Twitter is a good place to find news, but it's also a moshpit hellscape of narcissistic who love hearing their own voice and are addicted to attention by millions of anonymous retards. In that sense twitter resembled 4chan as being overrun with the most retarded discourses humanly conceivable.

It's not as easy to just find and read curated news courses i like directly, but i find it's worth the effort.

>I genuinely don't get this doomsayer shit.
The doomsayer shit has nothing to do with me and people like me leaving twitter. I hate it for reasons that were always there, and just got moderately worse when musk took over. People are doomsaying twitter because it is objectively failing according to Elon himself, and it's hard to see from here how he can ever turn it around.

>>96082309
>you're assuming the state wants media unbottable.
define "state" also anon ... >polposter
>evidence points to the opposite - the common user wants to interact with humans, not bots, while the powerful want to use bots to drown out any unapproved communication.
the latter is true, and they did it with humans before, it's called The Astroturfing which is basically what they do to fake engagement on just about anything including products, artists (music industry), they astroturf hence shit like "Tay Tay" is still relevant despite me never having heard any good song out of her in about half a decade now. same shit all over again, billboard 100 is mostly astroturfed but in reality the top 100 is so different if you go to spotify and deezer.

>>96081993
>>96082108
This is VERY feasible if X decides to btfo PayPal once and for all, which means X becomes a human-centric verified-platform devoid of bots.
in Elon's leadership I think twitter went for the better. though there's still problems, massive datamining schemes is rampant which are being done by bots using stability AI to generate images which I found out someone was making these female accounts which had AI hands (it's slightly accurate but not so much to me) and AI captions (text stuff in background is unreadable). they also DM people and ask for their info. it's kinda rampant right now, just made an account a month ago and now had these poser people DM me asking for my info immediately after "following" them back (you can't dm people who don't follow you kek)

>>96090642
In all honesty this sounds like a problem on your end, not one the platform suffers from inherent. If someone retweets shit you quite literally have 4 options to deal with it

1) unfollow the person
2) turn off retweets for them
3) block the account they retweeted
4) simply don't pay attention to the retweet you have no interest in

If you can't solve this problem despite the options provided to you, then, quite frankly, it's not the platform that's the problem but your inability to click shit and your clear lack of self-restraint. Nobody forces you to look at the retweeted rage thread and whatnot. You're just consciously choosing to do so to have something to complain about. That, again, is not on the platform. It's on it's mentally ill userbase. A userbase that's incapable of "moving on" cause, as you've said yourself, they are too high on hearing themselves talk. You're virtually the same. But instead of complaining on Twitter you do so on 4chan cause you don't even have enough balls to do it on the platform whose dynamics annoy you. It's not hard to ignore/block shit you have no interest in.

>>96087444
I uninstalled in April kek. I want to thank Elon and every other retard running social media these days for making the sites so bad my hate for greed kicks in and I slice another piece of my internet addiction off. Happened with YouTube too, idk wtf happened to them. Just completely a shithole now.

>>96090730
>Well like.. just do all this extra shit to work around it.
Or I can just not use it, which i find much easier. The fact that I was to do all this work just to make it tolerable is exactly why I don't use it. I don't need a news aggregator, they are not that useful to me in the first place. I'd rather use something like substack at this point, but even then it's easier just having a list of decent sites to read stories directly from instead of counting on people to aggregate them for me.

>That, again, is not on the platform. It's on it's mentally ill userbase.
I'm not sure what your point is. That's a perfectly good reason for me not to use it. If it doesn't bother you or twitter provides enough value to put up with the downsides then good for you. For me I doesn't suit me. To each their own.

>>96089654
What's the problem with it?

File: 1695092001862577.jpg (50 KB, 749x757)

50 KB JPG

>>96081993
>tfw switched to nitter
Once the paywall goes up I'll stop browsing entirely, there's nothing of value there.

Can anyone tell me why I should not use nitter?

I was in the process of building a following (artist), not sure where I should go in the future.

>>96090427
I use:
/pol/
Discord newsgroups
Google News
An RSS feed
& get better than I'd get from Twitter.

https://webkit.org/blog/14445/webkit-features-in-safari-17-0/

Safari 17.0 adds support for AV1 video on devices with hardware decoding support, like iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max.

FAGGOT ELON, AV1 AND AVIF SUPPORT IN TWITTER WHEN? NO I WILL NOT CALL IT X

>>96082108
I prefer arguing with bots than with NPCs. A bot at least keeps some consistency, while an NPC changes his opinion between sentences if it benefits him.

>>96090785
>all this extra shit to work around it
EXTRA
SHIT

Holy fuck lmao, it's 2-3 clicks that take less than 5 seconds assuming a first world internet connection. You've wasted more time in this thread than it would have taken you (accumulated) to filter out all the shitty retweets you've seen since Musk took over.

>>96090549
if facebook didn't have instagram and whatsapp the story would be much different. threads can exist or not, makes no difference.

>>96090879
Yes, and why would i use a service that I consider to be worse than simply not using it? I don't understand the defensiveness. It's like your outraged to meet someone who isn't a contented twitter user.

4chan is garbage too. I only come here once in a blue moon. In the very rare occasion it's an interesting place to catch perspectives on developing stories I wouldn't struggle to find else where. 90% it ends up being a time waster. Perhaps that offends you too or something, who knows.

>>96090896
AFAIK to this day they still haven't figured how to profit from Whatsapp. It's just a cash shredder right now. And Instagram's reign has been threatened pretty strongly by the growth of Tik Tok. They'd be retarded not to capitalize on this and really make Threads THE twatter replacement

>>96090820
>/pol/
>Discord
kys

>>96082365
I only started browsing since his takeover

it's ok, nice way to get news and updates, but no way in hell am I ever paying for it

>>96090913
Because you pretty much stated, or at least thoroughly implied, that you stopped using Twitter because of the "unwanted content" that was thrown your way
>Yes, and that's exactly how i used twitter for years. But eventually retarded retweets end up showing up. You might follow someone you like for tech, but eventual they will retweet a response to some unbelievable retarded rage bate thread, and the more people you follow the harder it is to avoid this.
So I listed the various approaches you could have chosen to deal with the problem you've outlined above. It's fine if you're too lazy to utilize them. That's your decision to make. But I find it incredibly silly to blame the platform for it.

>>96085918
$8/mo already filters out like 95% of the entire planet lol

File: 1689992132225005.jpg (36 KB, 425x430)

36 KB JPG

>>96085273
>thoughever
Can't tell if ESL or a modern Shakespeare

>>96090939
Yeah yeah faggot, keep raging.

>>96090427
Twitter is worse than a tabloid when it comes to news.
I dont understand you twitter users. Do you like to be lied to?

>>96090820
Kinda doubt that these account for anything that's even remotely "person". May as well just follow some Reuters RSS feed. I mean sure, if you wanna argue that using various different platforms provides MORE NEWS then there's no way to really argue that. It's obviously true kek.

>>96090002
He was forced into it

first he autistically bragged he'd buy the company out, then he made a bunch of statements in public basically cementing it, then he realized 40 billion dollars is a fuckload and even if he's rich he's being taken for a ride, so he tried to back out, and then he got sued for trying to renege on the buyout and was put in a position where he either goes through with it voluntarily, or gets fucked by some judge for being a dumbfuck and forced to go through with it.

This is what happens when you let your mouth run instead of actually thinking about what you're saying

>>96090976
I think they do. And the journotards love their Twitter readers who they can sensationalize to directly in their faux-relatable way, promoting articles written by their friends or themselves.

>>96090939
I use /pol/ (while ignoring glowies), telegram and rss feeds for news.
And all of those sources are more trustworthy and lie less (or get pointed out when they lie immediately) than whatever mainstream bullshit you follow on twitter.

>>96090976
Stop associating [news] with [happenings that are political]. There is news that isn't political or at least not politically charged. Do you think the official Twitter account of a constitutional court will publish lies? All they do is post links to the most recent verdict so you don't have to constantly check the page.

>>96091007
What kind of telegrams?

>>96090962
And yes, and instead of doing the list of things you listed I could just not use twitter which is the option I'm happier with. It didn't even blame twitter for anything, I just explained why I don't personally like it. I don't judge anyone who thinks it's great.

Accusing my of being lazy acknowledges that it is work I need to do to put up with the platforms issues for me. It's like saying there's no reason i should stop eating at the restaurant i stopped going to because of the hair in my food because i could easily pick it out and I didn't pick it out due to laziness. I simply chose to eat in a better restraint where I didn't have to do that. If you prefer the food in that restaurant and don't mind the hair, that's fine.

>>96091007
Twitter also has a growing problem with their community notes fact checking

started out great for the first month or so but at this point its completely botted to hell by special interests and is constantly used to mislead and lie just like every other "fact checker" I've ever seen.

Right now 2/3 of the community notes I see should've had the person writing it permabanned from community notes, in a year or so that shit will be no different than CNN "fact checks"

>>96084699
Is this bait? There are automatic captcha solvers and they're so lightweight that they can run in your browser as js.

>>96090990
>then he made a bunch of statements in public basically cementing it
What cemented it was signing a legally binding purchase agreement under delaware law. For all reasonable meanings of the term, he completes the purchase here. It was only after this he started chimping out trying to back out of it, even though he was extremely commited to the price he agreed to.

>>96091007
>I use /pol/ (while ignoring glowies)
a cesspit of boomers (actual boomers not 30 yo boomers), retards and underage suburban white kids. Moot should've killed it instead of being such a cuck.
> telegram
literally saudi spyware
> And all of those sources are more trustworthy and lie less (or get pointed out when they lie immediately) than whatever mainstream bullshit you follow on twitter.
I just use RSS feeds thoughever, I don't need anything more for news. Twitter is for dog and cat videos and porn.

>>96091082
>a cesspit of boomers (actual boomers not 30 yo boomers), retards and underage suburban white kids. Moot should've killed it instead of being such a cuck.
The majority of /pol/'s userbase are brownoids who worship the white man. I guess you covered that under 'retards', though.

>>96091010
>Do you think the official Twitter account of a constitutional court will publish lies
Our constitutional court made two tweets in the last four years. The US supreme court made no tweets in the past three years. Both of which are automated reposts from their websites.

Why would you use the cesspool twitter for that? Just use an RSS feed. Then you can get those news without having to go to a cancerous web platform that has (and always had) the worst interface imaginable and only allows 200 character postings.
Since you can't summarize a verdict in 200 letters, you will have to follow their link anyway.

>>96091125
And its still more reliable than any twitter new aggregators or MSM (pro tip: they are all brownoids as well, or post-wall women).
Especially because lies get pointed out super fast. Meanwhile twitter actively tries to drown out correcting replies, and have only the approval at the top. And MSM websites closed their comment sections years ago (i wonder why?). And twitter actively promots bait headlines, because you can only write a small amount of characters.

Twitter is for people who enjoy to be lied too.

>>96091017
Currently only one that people set up i personally met at a anti-CoViD lockdown protest.

I used to follow one newsaggregator on telegram, till it openly and blantly lied (which was within the first two days), comments pointing it out and it just continuing as if nothing happened, with no correction.
I then found out that this newsaggregator is also using twitter, which immediately made it obvious why they saw no problem in lying.
I should have done my job and first checked if they have a twitter account.
If somehing posts news and is on twitter, you have a 100% chance of it lying to you. Doesn't matter which bias or which political direction they apparently represent.

>>96091082
>literally saudi spyware
You're gonna freak when you hear about Twitter then. Guess who finances elons loans.

>>96091242
yeah but I don't use twitter for ""private"" chats. I don't care that saudis know what I laugh at and jerk off to. Telegram pretends to be like Signal lol

>>96081993
>implying (((those))) who control the bots can't afford the small monthly fee
lol...the value of social engineering is worth it for (((them)))

He should do a Sam Altman and make it so users who upload their ID get paid some garbage crypto. 20m people lined up to get their irises scanned for $10 worth of his worldcoin crypto. Imagine how many will do it for Elon Xcoin.

>>96091031
>community notes
I don't know if it is botted, or if it is full with people who just upvote funny gotcha-moments, without caring about its correctness.
The average twitter user is so brainfucked, that you can't tell the difference between bots and legit people. It might have just taken a while till they discovered that he can also do community notes.

>>96091176
>Our constitutional court
Did it ever occur to you that the people you're talking to may not be from the US?

>>96091281
>Signal
you mean that glowy app that wants to sell you its crypto currency and wants to be western WeeChat?

If there's money to be made paywall won't stop bots.

>>96091321
That's why i said mine AND the US court.
The one from my country is inactive, the one from the US is too.
Now can you please tell me why a 200 character limit headline of a court decision on a cancer platform with a shit interface is better than just following their RSS feed?

>formerly known as Twitter
killing a brand with a snap of a finger. fuck saudis

>>96084699
>he still manually solves the captcha
kek

>>96091343
1) not all courts have RSS feeds
2) I follow a dozen courts' accounts, including more local ones

Don't ask me why they have Twitter accounts. But they do. Besides, what part of "variety of interests" don't you people get? Are you just genetically wired to ignore parts of a post that don't suit you persoal narrative?

>>96091389
It's the South African that has an obsession with the letter X

>>96085941
>Why wouldn't /pol/ like that, though?
>Twittertards deserve to eat shit.
/pol/ is very concerned that this might damage their fav billionaire... they don't realise that billionaires aren't impacted in the same way average people are, money is just a construct for them

>>96091389
The brand value of Twitter was a negative, anon.
Not a single person on this world (besides maybe mentally ill women in their 40s) associates anything positive with the brand name "Twitter".
Meanwhile a one-letter brand name is aggressively neutral. Which he needs, if he wants to offer other services under the same name.

>>96091440
It's not about associating it with anything, it's about it being recognisable by people.

>>96091440
You're an out of touch linux tier grognard desu senpai

>>96091416
>not all courts have RSS feeds
That's why all RSS readers that matter have some form of scrapping built in.
Also just write to them and complain about it. They are funded by your taxpayer money, surely they can spend those 5 minutes to setup a feed.
Having your jurisdictional system on twitter is a problem anyway, they shouldn't even be on that platform, expecially when they are not from the USA.

Imagine having to go to a website from a country from the other side of the world to get updates of your own court system.

File: Screenshot_5.png (74 KB, 539x472)

74 KB PNG

>>96091440
>Meanwhile a one-letter brand name is aggressively neutral
You're aggressively retarded

>>96091452
>any press is good press
Only applies if nobody knows you.
Being unknown is worse than being known for being crap. But being known for being good is even better.

You know twitter. And everybody who knows twitter now knows X and recognizes it.
That box is already checked.
The negative image associated with Twitter is only a liability now.
If the normiest normie associates twitter negatively. If you say:
>look, i found this on twitter
his attention will be even less than if you just say
>i found this on the internet

I know that some mentally ill people are very attached to the bird. But those schizos will use X anyway. They are not the target group.

>>96091466
thanks for reposting a
>haha, look, X looks like it would be porn! XD
meme, now more people know about it, without it being associated negatively.

>>96091501
People still call it twitter, you can rename it to whatever you want and in people's mind it will still be twitter. That's how strong brand name is.

>>96091466
>>96091440
The problem with 'X' isn't even the tone / neutrality of it. It's that it's unfucking Googleable and that's a terrible thing to do to your brand.

>>96091466
Thanks for posting a screencap of this comedic X account. Haha, Jesse McLaren is so funny.
I will now follow him on that funny platform :D
He even has that blue checkmark. I want that too, do you know how to get it?

>>96091466
That is funny.
I will install the X app from the appstore to check out if its true.

File: 1682452585130.png (326 KB, 1574x1349)

326 KB PNG

>>96091514
The media calls them X (formerly twitter) and are already dropping the formerly.
All the established mentally ill twitter users are MSM following drones, therefor they will call it X in the foreseeable future.

You do say Kyiv, right?

>>96091510
except righties cant decide if pron is good and is being censored by the evil left, or is le bad be being pushed be evil leftist agendas to weaken men.

>>96081993
>no link
Faggot.

>>96087883
>>what is captcha
doesnt require you to submit personal information
>>what is requiring email confirmation
doesnt require you to submit personal information
>>what is requiring phone number confirmation
doesnt require you to submit personal information (unless you live in a police state country where you need id to buy a sim)

>>96091575
>The media calls them X (formerly twitter)
Now they just have to change that Twitter bird icon

>>96091575
The actual website is still twitter.com, and "twitter" and "tweets" are still all over the website. It's a cluster fuck.

>>96091607
Except if you click the share button to copy a link that now uses x.com which redirects to twitter.com.

You'd think they'd go the other way round and start redirecting twitter.com to x.com

>>96091576
Righties don't use X (formerly Twitter).
Which makes them inherently superior to you. You seeth about a namechange of a platform that you claim you left months ago.

>>96091607
Weird, in this >>96091466 funny X screencap, i clearly see the X in the top right.
Whenever a MSM outlet embeds a Xeet, it says X.

I bet the Japanese artists I follow on X (formerly Twitter) would pay up, those fucking consoomers
That's a bummer, I'd make it a point to only talk politics to other people if they're within punching distance so I was able to ignore those kinds of people pre-Musk but it's pretty unavoidable now
Both sides fucking left right whatever are shitting up the place and the "algorithm" has been boosting all their ragebait tweets when I simply do not care about them

File: 1679337624386.png (112 KB, 929x1018)

112 KB PNG

Dear twitter roasties,
we all know that you are mentally ill followers of the herd.
Your resistance is futil. Your media calls it X, which means that you will call it X. The brainwashing that you enjoy so much, on the platform of mass-media, that actively lies to know, with your knowledge, will make you redefine words in your head.
2 +2 = 5

>>96081993
Elon Musk is a dumb nigger

>>96091661
>belittles Twitter roasties for being sheeple
>posts on 4channel.org
Ironic.

>>96091654
Of course they will. I mostly use Twitter for Japanese stuff cause that's where all of them post. Like, all of them. Directors, artists, politicians, you name it. Without Twitter Nip communication would be severely crippled.

>>96091654
Yeah the Japs are the kind of cucks who would totally pay. They're utter pushovers, their culture has instilled that in them

File: 602.jpg (155 KB, 1011x1247)

155 KB JPG

>>96081993
>source?
>this was revealed to me in a dream
lmao yet another Q-tier stupidity but this time from leftoids

>>96091689
>>96091705
>>96091716
Low IQ leftoid shitskins.

File: 1676969181758.png (186 KB, 318x380)

186 KB PNG

>>96091705
You literally accepted an unannounced renaming of a whole capital city of a country, simply because the Associatel Press updated their guidelines that all massmedia follows.
You never even realized it, you just accepted that the name is now different and pretended that it was always the case.

2 + 2 = 5
Kiev = Kyiv
Twitter = X

Have fun, you mentally ill piece of shit. You enjoyed your fake news and brainwashing so much. Now it is doing something that you don't like, and you can't resist it. You even repost X screencaps with the X logo. And you still keep using the platform.

>>96091749
Based and X-checked.

>>96091518
>It's that it's unfucking Googleable
i never, not even once, entered the term "twitter" into the google search, and i still always get results from them.

File: HXcrINDhjV.jpg (161 KB, 721x1100)

161 KB JPG

>>96082233
shut up twerp

>>96091329
Signal wants to be WeChat? You do know what WeChat is right?
I've also been using it instead of sms for 3 years and haven't seen shit about cryptocurrency by them so must not be pushing it that hard.

>>96092443
Your ignorance doesn't make it better, it makes it worse. It means that you don't know anything about the platform you claim to be superior.
https://support.signal.org/hc/en-us/articles/360057625692-In-app-Payments

Will people flee to mastodon or what? My guess is they will pay for it anyway.

>>96092489
I'm not fleeing anywhere. I'll stop using it.

The next best option is Threads, but meh.

I'll end up living like a man from 1925.

>subscription platform (X, autodesk plan, photoshopcc)
>on top of my internet subscription
>on top of my SIM subscription
>on top of my phone subscription payment
holy fuck is this the "nu" internet and it's peak?
I think internet peaked in 2008 when I only had to pay for my device and maybe go to a cafe with free wifi, and access forums and boards without having to associate my "phone number" (this is why I keep getting phone calls from scammers, my phone number is "publicized").
now I'd have to pay just to log in on top of all the bloat? come on now. this planet is kinda fucking MID.

>>96092568
I stopped using twitter earlier this year. Used to use it fairly intensively. I don't miss it.

>>96092472
The best thing about the Signal Crypto Scam is that MobileCoin is pre-mined.
Meaning that all Mobile Coins that are and will ever be in circulation, are owned by the central authority of the founders. It's one of the largest Crypto Scams to date, with $ 12 billion of value.
https://mobilecoin.com/
>Secure and encrypted to the highest standard
That marketing sentence alone should make one doubt.

Signal users deserve to be ripped-off equally to Twitter users. I am not shedding a single tear.

File: file.png (1.76 MB, 1080x1568)

1.76 MB PNG

>>96092352

>>96091394
I still manually solve the captcha on kurobaex because I refuse to pay for a captcha solver.

>>96081993
>>96082108
This is another step towards digital ID. They will use 'muh bots' as the problem and implement paid subscriptions as the solution. A year or two later, they will present digital ID and people will cheer as it means no longer having to pay for websites.

>>96091749
I think misinformation is worst that bots

>>96093163
i pay a jeet from fiver to watch my screen on teamviewer and solve captures on my behalf, best fiver i've ever spent

File: Elon Musk Globohomo.jpg (126 KB, 766x1024)

126 KB JPG

>>96081993
Daily reminder that Elon Musk is not your friend and he is as globohomo as it gets. He is in bed it every single globohomo government on earth. From anti-whites EU kikes to China, from Warlords in Africa to Israel (and its colonies).
He is also in bed with the democrats, he sucked Obama's dick during his 2 terms, he only hates the Joe Biden administration because they favored other car manufactures before Elon,

>>96081993
>turn into paid service
>botters hack paid users and use their accounts
doesnt change anything

>>96093637
Then how do you explain all the advertisers deserting twitter?

>>96082448
back to pixiv, finally

>>96093688
>Then how do you explain all the advertisers deserting twitter?
Negotiating tactics. Just like with the "adpocalypse" on youtube, advertisers pretend to be outrageous over some bullshit, threatens to pull out, youtube/twitter offer a better deal, they go back and pretend it never happens. Free good PR + better deal at the end.

>>96082981
>His project
>Paypal
Love how you got brainwashed by him, zoomie

>>96093688
That's like asking why Trotsky jews and Zionist jews disagree with each other in some aspects.

Most advertisers that abandoned twitter are car brands, btw.
Which makes sense, because Elon is their competition. Why would VW advertise on a Tesla run platform?
In fact, the one time i had the pleasure of visiting twitter without an ad blocker years ago, i only got car advertisements.

>>96090814
Most of the nitter instances I used before don't work anymore for me, I always get a "user / tweet not found".
>>96092472
>>96092677
lmao honestly I didn't know about this (I only used signal for calling family and stuff), what's with messaging apps trying to push crypto? I guess I should finally move to self-hosted matrix.

>>96081993
NIGGER WHERE IS THE SOURCE

>>96086932
Most of the frontends used by these sites are awful

>>96081993
>formerly known as Twitter
Weird, when I go to twitter.com it still shows up
Musk man seriously couldn't even be bothered to switch domains?
>switching domains is dumb and impractical
So is switching your iconic company name to a single letter, deal with it

File: 1688473933484773.jpg (714 KB, 900x2475)

714 KB JPG

>>96093147
AI text attempts are frightening

>>96093147
>our sage
She knows better

File: IMG_1626.gif (1.41 MB, 288x198)

1.41 MB GIF

>>96091394
>manually solving the captcha

>>96098666
>>96093163
>>96091394
Poorfags

>>96082267
its the 4chan strategy, make the bots pay and scare away all the real users in the process

i don't pay for content
i shitpost on 4chan and fap to onlyfans leaks

>>96092328
Because it's a well established brand with good SEO. If Google 'X' you get all sorts of results. You get the Wikipedia entry for the latin character X, you get the X-Men, you get all sorts of results that have nothing to do with X (formerly, Twitter)

>>96093637
In all honesty, the statement that a world government is required is true. IF we deem that CLIMATE CHANGE is the big problem to deal with, then that problem can not be dealt with by individual states. You need an international body to regulate reform. So the claim itself isn't "globohomo", it's the only solution to the problem assuming it really is THE PROBLEM to solve. You can't solve climate change if every country does its own thing.

>>96098835
dont forget the x files

File: global warming.jpg (115 KB, 750x498)

115 KB JPG

>>96099037
Global warming is fake

based elon destroying twitter

>>96099383
not anon, but you can't deny carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere isn't rising far beyond historic levels.
You realize that the US burns 369 million gallons of gas a day?
I personally think the ice age being due is the main reason why carbon / methane isn't having that much of an effect on temperatures, it probably would be better if the world got warmer, not colder, even if it means more desertification / new york being flooded.

>>96099383
That's beyond the point.

>>96081993
No, they won't. People are already leaving, and this will just make that situation worse. People will migrate to something else (probably something made by Facebook).

>>96082108
Nigger you're the only bot on this platform. Fuck off.

>>96099741
no f u

File: global warming activist2.jpg (109 KB, 835x960)

109 KB JPG

>>96099680
CO2 is plant food.
Global warming is a hoax.

>>96099941
Ok so we agree on something, great.
more carbon dioxide.
Is it good or bad? who knows, it's good for plants, I agree!

>>96099941
>McDonald's is people food. Obesity is a hoax.
Wind farms are based, by the way, even though they suck dick as a main energy source.

>>96098488
HIMPONE! HUMMMENI!!

File: global warming activist.jpg (77 KB, 828x770)

77 KB JPG

>>96100049
You will never be a woman.

File: ywnbaw.png (398 KB, 1726x950)

398 KB PNG

>>96100078

>>96098703
I'm just not gonna pay for something when I know it exists for free somewhere.

File: global warming hoax statu(...).jpg (294 KB, 1150x1799)

294 KB JPG

>>96100088
You have no womb, you have no ovaries, you have no eggs.

>>96100113
Good, I'm glad to be a man (male)

File: global warming plymouth rock.jpg (127 KB, 635x948)

127 KB JPG

>>96100141
You are a homosexual man twisted by drugs and surgery into a crude mockery of nature’s perfection.

>>96100113
Thank god for that.

File: global warmin glacier 2020.png (2.93 MB, 1284x2778)

2.93 MB PNG

>>96100168
All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted.

he wont because he knows that user activity will be 99.9% less then
just trying to distract that him and zuck never did their MMA match like they said they would

>>96100281
Skibidi is peak boomer kino thoughever

>>96086754
jack dorsey brainwashed musk.
if you dont believe it, read the leaked chat messages between them

this is garbage

>>96082108
People will just pay to verify bot accounts like it already happens.

>>96082053
Based

>>96082108
yes daddy elon has onlu the best of interests for you

>>96082413
No retard they literally aren't. Go paste anything you want into ZeroGPT and watch it fail.