Why isn't there even one good programming language
because you havent made it yet
>>93664718What's wrong with C?
>>93664718Rust is good
Binary is good.
>>93664718I made my own because of this. My language is fucking awesome.
>>93664718Rust and Python are both pretty beautiful and Ruby isn't horrible. That being said, JavaScript, Perl, C, and really anything else is hideous - GoLang's := for variables was enough for me to never learn it.
>>93664831What's wrong with C????What's NOT wrong with C? Ever heard of PL/I? Infinitely superior to C in every way, also much older than it. And yet C was still made, a slow as fuck piece of buggy shit that took another 5 years to be fast enough to write an OS in, despite the burrows and multics haven't had no such problems because they weren't built on garbage tech made by incompetent fucks.
>>93665104which language did you write it in though
>>93665082"binary" isn't a language. What most people refer to as "binary" is, in fact, machine code. And while most modern machine code IS binary, and DOES run on binary computers, ternary (base-3) machine code exists and was the basis for historical computers such as the Setun, Setun-70, and the QTC-1.
>>93665142x86_64 assembler language using nasm.
>>93665191based. post language
>>93665198No, you can't have my language. It's mine!The source is on github, but you'll never find it.
You must have never used Rust for you to say that anon.
>>93665465>>93664933> rustbrb when my program is done compiling, it's been only two days now. I used all of the 50000 features the language offers.
>>93665626Interesting. Cargo seems pretty great, too. Is it worth switching from C++ to Rust?
Literally just make one yourself, it's fucking easy.
>>93665649if there is an existing "big" project then no. If you're making a new one or only parts of the existing project then maybe yes. Why don't you try to do a couple simple projects in rust like linked list and a multi-threaded web server?
>>93664718I've got one. C#. It's so good you will never think about language again.
>>93664718TypeScript has no flaws
>>936651326/10 bait
>>93665342I found your language some time ago, it's overrated if you ask me
>>93665183What you are referring to as machine code is, in fact, electrons, or as I've recently taken to calling it, electrons represented by machine code. Machine code is not a language in itself, but rather another representation of a fully functioning system that harnesses electrons. Electrons become instrumental through the incorporation of low-level devices, motherboard buses, and vital system components, forming a complete OS as defined by machine code.
>>93664718Have you tried Rust? like all politics and seething aside its a great language imo
CLOJURE
Swift exists
>>93669329based and redpilled CHUDClojure > all other languagesPower of Lisp with collaborating, alive library programmers.
>>93664718Scheme
>>93665104based. what features does it have?
>>93664718unironically python
because different use cases exist you empty brained frog
>>93673088having macros and a good syntax is independent of the use case
>>93673217what good syntax is literally depends on the use case and these two things aren't the only important features in a programming language are they now
>>93665082for me, it's trinary
There are plenty.With the 2 VERY IMPORTANT stipulations:>there will be some things you don't like>there will be some things that are different than what you're used toPeople get filtered by these things, and immediately drop a new language with the slightest bump.You see it OVER AND OVER again with C/C++ people especially.
>>93664718Learn C, Python, Haskell, & Golang... maybe Rust and you're done
>>93665649Rust is pretty much a saner, stricter modern C++ imo. I think that a lot of the modern C++ tools are good in theory, but in practice it makes the language so complex that it's debatably better off not having them in the first place. Rust has most of those features builti-in. I personally prefer C/old C++, but if you want to use more modern features Rust is great imo
>>93673266macros is maybe not an essential feature in specialized or domain specific languages but it is in general purpose languages imo. for the good syntax I was implying having macros and a minimally descent syntax (what Lisp doesn't have), and pattern matching is arguably syntactic sugar
>>93664718S O O N ™OON™
>>93673266>these two things aren't the only important features in a programming languagelet me guess, fancy types?
>>93664718I like C and Typescript. But I hate python, sadly it is everywhere.
>>93664718?
>>93664718Java :^)
>>93665105Python is nice but super slow and packaging / environment is terrible.
>>93664831boomer lang: deprecated edition
Because you're a CIA glownigger
PHP does the job easily and without problems
javascript
>>93664718i like perl
accept the C# superiority
rust is pretty good tbqh
Take the curry flavoured pill
>>93664718What are you talking about? Plenty of good programming languages.
>52 replies>no mention of Zig
>>93679758name one
>>93681968easy
What happened to Julia? Is she dead?
>>93664718elixir is the better rubyfuck python
>>93664718Define "good" you whiny little faggot.
>>93682315no pattern matching
>>93683884It means perfect for us lesser people, but emo frogman will never call anything that. It should be possible to do everything. It should have every feature any other language has. It should be a compilable scripting language that's write once run anywhere. A statically typed dynamic language with machine language performance. It should have the best frameworks and modules, and super popular, but also niche so he can say he has something better than anyone else.This, of course, is just a small fragment of the requirements for a mere "good" language.
>>93682362https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7U3wmUCe8Q
>>93664718If you don't like C, Lisp, Forth or ML.DIY
