[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.




File: tp-link-archer-c7.jpg (58 KB, 1000x1000)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
>TP-Link Archer A7/C7
Qualcomm, check.
16/128, check
802.11ac, check
LAN LEDs, check
USB port for extroot, check

However, the King can not handle NAT-ing full-speed symmetric gigabit fiber. Who's the new king?

Preference for under $100 and readily available in the U.S.
>>
File: hap ax3.png (315 KB, 564x758)
315 KB
315 KB PNG
>>88743984
This will be the new king soon.
>>
>>88744145
Looks really nice. MikroTik makes rock solid hardware. Any ETA on the release date?
>>
>>88744145
that's an access point.
>>
>>88744330
OpenWRT turns mere access points and range extenders into routers.
>Verification not required.
>>
>>88743984
>sub 1GHz CPU (single core lol?)
lolno
>>
>>88743984
Nigger, put that bitch into AP mode and use a pfSense router.
>>
>>88744477
Basically none of them are supported by OpenWRT. You list a ton of Broadcoms, for example.

>>88744500
It still can't do more than 300 mbps over wifi.
>>
File: IMG_20220922_025728.jpg (292 KB, 1080x1990)
292 KB
292 KB JPG
>>88743984
the king is a 10$ shitbox running full openwrt
pic related
>>
>>88744547
>It still can't do more than 300 mbps over wifi.
>wifi

Pathetic
>>
>>88744477
i'm curious how that's measured
>>
>>88744547
They exist, can't be arsed to look them up. The point is archer A7 is the equivalent of a $20 wallmart smartphone in terms of how low it can keep overall wifi latency. Really shitty routers like this tend to give you picrel performance when more than 1 person is connected.

GOD FORBID you're doing anything else than AP mode.
>>
>>88744587
It was probably measured over stock firmware which means
>opinion discarded
>>
>>88744587
AFAIK it's legit because all the low end trash has complains of wifi latency jumping all over the place like >>88744593
>>
>>88744593
>>88744611
Again, stock firmware is trash and those measurements should be discarded. My C7 with OpenWRT does not exhibit that behavior.
>>
>>88744645
Stock has the HIGHEST latency reduction because of proper hardware acceleration. Open sores firmware probably doesn't have good hardware acceleration (ie see piss poor hardware acceleration on linux distros).
>>
>>88744719
>probably
t. has never actually tried flashing OpenWRT
>>
>>88744719
hey kid...
nice bait
(.jpg)
>>
>>88744749
>>88744750
Why do you think 99% of android phones run google's android OS? If open sores wasn't so outrageously dogshit at hardware acceleration we would see ubutu/arch lite being a serious thread to google's android OS. I'm just putting 2+2 here together.
>>
>>88744843
You have no first hand experience with OpenWRT and you try to speculate based on a completely different ecosystem. >>>/g/sqt/
>>
>>88743984
What, can't afford an Asus router powerful enough to be it's own functional modern computer?
>>
File: fascinating-02rp9a.jpg (28 KB, 600x452)
28 KB
28 KB JPG
>>88744843
i actually can't wait to read your next post. keep going.
>>
>>88744864
>>88744904
Open sores isn't very good with hardware acceleration. Wifi routers don't have the best CPUs, you can literally find ARM's ~2010's IP being used in these things. Hell even the $300+ gay men wifi routers have A53s in the spec sheet. I'm not joking, look it up.
>>
>>88744864
SOME openwrt have hardware access and some do not, some dont even reach the dev time to do it. Some openwrt are not much more than stock firmware with bells and whistles.

Some openwrt break not-so-trivial things like the 2.4Ghz modem, and I've seen that first hand.
>>
>>88743984
>under $100
>can handle NAT-ing full-speed gigabit
It doesn't exist

https://forum.openwrt.org/t/so-you-have-500mbps-1gbps-fiber-and-need-a-router-read-this-first/90305
>>
>>88744547
>300mbps
>WiFi
Nigger get a cable, WiFi is meant for mobile devices, not for real work.
>>
>>88745004
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/ipq806x-nss-build-netgear-r7800-tp-link-c2600-linksys-ea8500/82525
My Netgear R7800 can do it no problem.
>>
>>88745007
2x2 mimo (very common) 5GHz on 160MHz channel mode can get pretty close to 1Gbps with LoS. Obviously you're not going to get that 3 rooms down the hall but being able to move your laptop/phone around in the same room while things transfer without worrying about cables is pretty fucking convenient.
>>
>>88745046
This. Of course stationary devices like desktops and TVs should be wired to save limited spectrum but there is no reason to not want a MU-MIMO in your OpenWRT router.
>>
File: ugly ass.jpg (26 KB, 450x450)
26 KB
26 KB JPG
>>88743984
>NAT-ing
What do you mean by that?

Guess we're gonna need "gaymer" routers too now.
>>
>>88744145
Why would you install openWRT when this already comes with RouterOS and does more.
>>
>>88746093
My thoughts exactly, I suppose some of these people don't realize that they don't belong in here.
>>
File: filename_3.300x200!m.jpg (7 KB, 300x200)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
shut up, just shut the fuck up
>>
>>88746093
>>88746116
Because you can't easily hack RouterOS as it does expose native Linux interfaces not MikroTik shims. My OpenWRT router is also my Windows KM server - it's easy to do there; how easy it is on RouterOS? How many years did you have to wait for WireGuard (never mind that, OpenVPN UDP)?
It's simply a different experience.
>>
>>88746177
>My OpenWRT router is also my Windows KM server
>not activating once with HWID
RouterOS might be a little to much for someone like you.
>>
>>88746208
You can't activate server SKUs with HWID, retard.
>>
>>88743984
it has a slow cpu and thus slow speed.
>>
>>88746906
Yeah. What's better? There are good GL-iNET routers but they are not easily available here
>>
>>88746093
maybe i dont want to be in the worlds largest botnet?
>>
>>88743984
>Qualcomm
gross
>>
>>88747227
What's the alternative? Broadcom with closed drivers? MediaTek's mediashit?
>>
>>88743984
what the fuck do I get for openwrt if I just want a good wifi chip and could give less of a shit about the CPU? one of those new $100 AX routers?
>>
File: nanopi_r5s.png (252 KB, 500x500)
252 KB
252 KB PNG
>Blob free bootloader and firmware
>Immune to speculative execution attacks (Meltdown & Spectre)
>2x2.5Gbe ports 1x1Gbe wan port
>4GBs RAM, USB-C PD, m.2 NVMe, 2x USB-A, hdmi
Step aside /g/ents
The pure software freedom option has arrived
>>
>>88747907
i tried mt76 and it still is not as good as ath10k
For $100 I would get a used R7800
>>
>>88749286

Can it run pfsense/opnsense? No? Irrelevant trash.
>>
>>88744572
which shitbox? I need a new router for openwrt
>>
File: 1650582898493.png (182 KB, 450x234)
182 KB
182 KB PNG
>>88750651
bumping, I need something too
also, is there one that supports fiber input directly like the one from my isp?
I'm a little retarded so tell me if I'm asking for something dumb
>>
>>88744288
In November probably.
>>88744330
Incorrect. It can be an access point as well. But if you want it can be a CPE, PTP Bridge or even a Home Mesh.

Even their "access points" like cAP ac can be used as a router.
>>88746093
Exactly. You won't because there's no need. Even though it is possible I was just mocking faggot OP.
>>
File: Banana pi 751.jpg (81 KB, 750x243)
81 KB
81 KB JPG
All I need.
>>
>>88749286
Except the ethernet ports are chinkoid quality and tend to break from the smallest electrical interference.

Use at your own risk.
>>
>>88749286
>no wifi
Inb4 some inane argument on how you don't need Wifi.
>>
>>88754273
wifi is great.
>>
>>88751511
>I was just pretending to be retarded
>>
>>88743984
>buying an off the shelf consumer router
ishiggydiggy.
Buy an old workstation and an Intel nic, do it yourself.
>>
>>88746177
>My OpenWRT router is also my Windows KM server
how to?
>>
>>88757249
https://github.com/cokebar/openwrt-vlmcsd
>>
File: crotchonfire.jpg (52 KB, 704x528)
52 KB
52 KB JPG
What are the good chip manufacturers nowadays? I'm so out of date with this networking shit and I just have a plain ass WRT1200AC but I've been told Marvell is shit or whatever.
>>
>>88754273
when you buy something like that to use as a router you probably also buy a separate switch and access points
>>
>>88757665
are there any [dis]advantages of using this and not kms_vl_all, other than
>this does not require installation on client
>this obviously only works when you are connected to network where the service is ran
>>
File: opnsense.jpg (94 KB, 1843x804)
94 KB
94 KB JPG
ive switched to a PC with opnsense from a router with ddwrt and the response times and performance is huge. my router will just do AP duty from now on. my electricity cost are low so idk.
>>
>>88759269
Welcome to the promised land, brother. It will never be as good as enterprise network applications but it beats the piss out of consumer routers
>>
>>88759233
Security: you can audit the code. kms_vl_all and similar tools have binary blobs.
Also if you use KMS servers make sure to gpedit.msc and Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> Windows Components -> Software Protection Platform -> Turn off KMS Client Online AVS Validation -> Enabled.
>>
>>88759269
>>88759681
Which wireless devices do you use as APs for you PC routers? Will your standard Atheros PCIe card be good enough?
>>
>>88759808
>Turn off KMS Client Online AVS Validation
i know that win10 has that shit, do new office also have that?
>>
>>88759824
I use my A7 in AP mode, wifi isn't a huge priority in my lan.
>>
>>88759824
i just used my old router, and configured it as an AP. the Router functioning as AP is connected via ethernet to my OPNsense router. im not using a PCIe wireless card for now. I would suggest using any of the cards that work with pfsense.
https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/wireless/hardware.html
>>
File: Grafana-OPNsense.png (637 KB, 1888x2734)
637 KB
637 KB PNG
>>88759681
thanks, i got the recommend from some of the old heads in the router general threads. Next im about to setup a these fancy dashboards.
>>
>>88743984
I didn't realize how bad my router was until I upgraded to pic in OP.
>>
File: 1648061624153.jpg (49 KB, 800x800)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
>>88744145
*blocks your path*
>>
File: file.png (83 KB, 1665x795)
83 KB
83 KB PNG
Xiaomi Router 4A Gigabit Edition literally bang for buck

>>88760876

Based and with Common Sense

Xiaomi Router 4A Gigabit Edition running on OpenWRT + Adblocker + Wireguard VPN never better
Top of the range specs and bang for the buck for just 17$
>>
File: 1657409390299.png (53 KB, 987x601)
53 KB
53 KB PNG
>>88761070
This one costed me $70 and supports WiFi 6.
>>
>>88761070
>mediatek
lmao
>>
>>88761205
as much as i hate Mediatek as a cpu for phones it works wonders in Network chips also its fully supported by Linux Kernel as early as 5.2 and i get blazing performance from it with no downtimes been using it for 2 and a half years now with 0 issues, for the money i gave it simply can outperform even similar specced higher priced routers soo...
>>
>>88743984
>TP-Link Archer A7/C7
Gargoyle?
>>
>>88761205
MediaTek has the only full chain open source router SoC + managed switch. These companies all have different divisions making their own choices for different markets.
>>
File: luci.png (8 KB, 764x341)
8 KB
8 KB PNG
>>88761070
Name of the luci theme?
>>
>>88746093
You need to register an account to use RouterOS.
>>
>>88762576
Argon Theme

https://github.com/jerrykuku/luci-theme-argon
>>
>>88762683
>It is strongly recommended to use the Chrome browser.
Into the trash it goes. But thanks anyways.
>>
>>88746093
blyahh nothing more disgusting and full of bugs than MikroTik Router with RouterOS in my place they are used a lot but i dispise them for the inconvinience and shitty UI even terminal sucks on it OpenWRT makes it brand new through and gives new meaning to it so in short suck on it RouterShit OS there i said it i couldnt endure it anymore in my previous jobs
>>
>>88762715
you can use ungoogled Chromium is privacy is an issue it works wonders and ive been a die hard fan of gecko engine but after seeing blink engine in its pure form i just couldnt resist the speed and the use
>>
>>88762751
MikroTik has rock solid hardware though
>>
>>88761070
>>88761169
https://openwrt.org/inbox/toh/xiaomi/xiaomi_mi_router_4a_gigabit_edition
>Xiaomi is currently shipping Mi Router 4A Gigabit Edition devices without proper shielding since 2020. Be aware that those might cause problems due to radio interferance.

https://openwrt.org/toh/xiaomi/ax3200
Can you post some wifi performance screenshots? Does MU-MIMO actually work?

>>88762639
What are you talking about? To buy RouterOS for your x86 PC? Yes. To use it on your hAP AC router or whatnot? Definitely not.
>>
>>88761169
>>88761070
>cheap chinkshit backdoored garbage

>>88765028
Oh how surprising, a cheap chinese radio built completely wrong on purpose.
>>
>>88765697
Is the conclusion really that Archer is the king after all those years?
>>
>>88743984
Isn't CFW dead thanks to FCC fuckery and lazy manufacturers locking down router firmware?
Moreover, isn't 5GHz fucked on most NICs thanks to a lack of drivers?
>>88744330
APs and routers are arbitrary labels. If the thing has 2 NICs, you can turn it into a router.
>>88744611
Stock firmware is often shit
t. used a wdr-4300 and the thing would crash periodically until I put openwrt on it.
>>
>>88767160
>CFW dead because FCC
If none of you maggots tried to increase the signal power of your wifi
>>
>>88757821
They only saying that because the old WRT Router is using broadcom chips.
>>
Can't I just turn any computer into a router? Why would I buy some "premium" bullshit like this?
>>
>>88767268
Yeah you need a Network Interface Card though.
>>
>>88767268
If you want small form-factor and modest power consumption it gets very expensive very fast.
>>
>>88747153
Upgrade your RouterOS
>>
>>88767268
running a laptop or desktop computer as a router will cost you $200+ a year in electricity. compared to an off the shelf router which would be under $20 a year.
>>
>>88767306
would a RPi work? assuming only WiFi for devices
>>
Can I join?

2x R619AC (ipq40xx 896MHz OC)
one acts as a router, AP, dhcp, recursive dns server, adblock, firewall logging all types of network shit
another one acts as a dumb AP (most services disabled) and houses an nvme drive on it. runs Samba, DLNA, and Transmission.
>>
>>88767227
desu, its not because of that. its because of ath9k patches that allowed you to do wifi on non-wifi frequencies ;)
>>
>>88770025
Yeah but that still doesn't excuse taking them taking the lazy way out. The ability to install FW that doesn't suck donkey dick is a selling point for soho routers. CFW is also important for security given how often routers are unsafe out of factory and end up exposing the inner network or being turned into botnet clients.
>>
>>88771200
yup youre very right about that.
>>
>>88743984
D-link DIR-885L
>>
File: TF33.png (175 KB, 540x323)
175 KB
175 KB PNG
>>88770009
>P&W R619AC
Is it Pratt&Whitney?
>>
>>88770025
>>88771200
>ath9k patches that allowed you to do wifi on non-wifi frequencies
But that's only useful for doing mesh between two routers with such custom firmware right? If my AP starts broadcasting on custom frequencies my phone will just ignore that
>>
>>88743984
>OpenWRT
The advantages over dd wrt?
>>
>>88773276
Much higher developer activity:
https://github.com/mirror/dd-wrt/commits/master
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commits/master
>>
Since this is kind of a router thread, can you anons recommend me a couple of not terribly expensive routers that can handle at least 100mbit VPN connection without choking the CPU? Preferably both Wireguard and OpenVPN.
Third-party firmware support isn't a must but it'd nice to have alternative firmwares.
I was looking at Asus TUF AX5400 since it has Merlin support but apparently for good VPN speed you need a CPU with hardware accelerated encryption or something and this router doesn't have it? I've zero clue about router CPUs and finding VPN benchmarks for routers is near impossible and only available for a small number of models (usually high-end).
>>
>>88773350
Is there any hardware acceleration for WireGuard's ChaCha20, apart from Intel QAT in their Xeons?
>>
>>88773424
No idea honestly, as I said I know absolutely nothing about router (or mobile for that matter) CPUs. HWA may be more of a requirement for OpenVPN then.
>>
Looking up spend a max of $500 on an opnsense machine with 2.5gb capability - just a router; I have switches and access points already. Should I go with one of those fanless AliExpress boxes that are getting popular, DIY? Looking for input.
>>
>>88746093
I'd install literally anything just so I wouldn't have to use RouterOS
>>
>>88773148
idk but here

https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/12d33d388c52565803a746586426bed3d3fcc941
>>
>>88773196
yup exactly that. and its not just 80211s, any 802.11 connection can be done. back then it was mostly done with IBSS or Client/AP+WDS/4MAC
>>
>>88744477
How do I perform this test on my router?
>>
>>88773196
theres also those people who just removes DFS

(5250 - 5330 @ 80), (24), DFS, AUTO-BW
(5250 - 5330 @ 80), (24), AUTO-BW

some people cant wait a minute or hates DFS events.
>>
>>88773196
good thing some places do still have them
http://cyber-place.ru/showthread.php?t=2657
>>
>>88774780
What can I read that will convince me of this?
I like playing with openwrt but after deploying and configuring RouterOS devices for nearly a decade at my job I've come to really love how the CLI and Web interfaces are laid out. Plus the only stability issues I've ever had were ancient units installed before my time.
>>
>>88775296
>What can I read that will convince me of this?
I don't understand what you're asking of me.
>>
>>88751425
>is there one that supports fiber input directly
it does not exist sadly.
>>
with no dog in this fight, I saw a mi-router 4a as a suggestion. Is that solid to start with, coming form fairly ancient Wi-Fi
>>
>>88743984
based, I bought one of these as well for openwrt
>>
>>88773601
You need a PCI NIC with 2.5Gb ports and a PC that won't choke. The PC itself doesn't need to be anything special. You can achieve quality routing on some fairly ancient hardware.
The NIC capable of what you want will probably be the most expensive part of the entire machine if you're willing to use any old case and guts. Any quad core 2.5+Ghz made in the last 10 years, 8GB of RAM, and a SATA SSD is going to be plenty. You can get old office machines in this spec for $200 nowadays.
>>
>>88773424
Not seeing anything in their docs mentioning it. The idea of ChaCha20 is it's easy to implement with basic SIMD instructions on almost any arch so you don't need special crypto accelerators.
>>
>>88765028
Shit well maybe I don’t want a 4a then. Honestly I just need something flashable to get me down the road a few years until I buy a home and build out something better. Just confused as to what I should get.
>>
alright threads been up for 3 days. just come to a conclusion already /g/. which is the best router setup
>>
>>88779196
seconding this question
>>
>>88779196
ive literally been asking for months what router to get for openwrt where performance isn't halved over stock and nobody can give me a concrete answer.
>>
>>88779196
>>88780692
>>88781004
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/88622650/#q88649134
>>
>>88776085
Really? That's a shame if so. I need one too.
Is it just too early for the software or is it a case of "we're not messing with this hardware"?
>>
>>88781200
>https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/88622650/#q88649134
Whats the beginner vs pro difference though
>>
>>88781200
same question in that thread lol
no one says “go get an x”
ffs this place
>>
>>88782183
Networking can be complex or it can be as simple as plugging in a cable. It depends on what you want to do. To learn the difference read more about network security and understand what the operating systems offer. All of the information is out there.

>>88782196
How do you expect anyone to know what you want when you provide no info? If you want the basics then it's not hard to search for what you want. But you sound like you're searching for something specific while also keeping it a secret as to what you actually want.
>>
File: 1643626666488.png (15 KB, 460x134)
15 KB
15 KB PNG
>>88765028
>Can you post some wifi performance screenshots?
Pic related, using WiFi 6 with Intel AX200 controller. The AP is in another room, approximately 5 meters away. With a wired connection I get 900/900.

>Does MU-MIMO actually work?
I tried running speedtest on my laptop (WiFi 5 only) at the same time, got the following results: 445.1 + 114.81 download, 533.63 + 159.29 upload.
>>
File: 1640482806661.png (17 KB, 448x143)
17 KB
17 KB PNG
>>88782413
>>88765028
This one is from the WiFi 5 laptop, with nothing else stressing the network.
>>
>>88743984
Why should install OpenWRT and not keep the stock firmware on my router?
>>
>>88782758
Is it too dificult for you to compare the features of each and then decide on what you prefer? If so, just stick with what you have.
>>
>>88782334
bro i just want the top from bottom experience, ill figure it out from there, just tell me what to get even if its ''complicated'' lmao.
>>
>>88782824
Alright, then get a FortiGate. Have fun.
>>
File: 1643558310092.jpg (1.38 MB, 1772x1927)
1.38 MB
1.38 MB JPG
I think used Aruba stuff is the best desu
>>
>>88782856
this sounds like a troll though
>>
>>88783476
Too bad you didn't specify what you want, right? There are a lot of options out there.
>>
>>88783476
Absolutely not. Some solid gear.
I’d like set it and forget it but something like an FG 90 is a good one
Coupled with an Aruba 2930F you’re set
thing is, I don’t want a pro rack at home. I’m replacing stuff from 2012 but last thing I want to do isndick around with switches when not at work. Guess that’s too much to ask for
>>
>>88762069
what model?
>>
>>88783497
define what I want though. what are my options? i'm used to already knowing what my options are but the enterprise world is just too damn big. from small businesses, to big military applications, i just want the best of the best dammit
>>
>>88783545
what's the downside of a pro rack o.O
>>
>>88783638
>define what I want though
Are you fucking with me? How should I know what you want? I don't know what speeds you need and I don't know what security measures you need.

>what are my options?
Try a search engine...
>>
>>88782334
fair enough. Should I just get a fortigate, an Aruba switch and some 513/515 APs? Really don’t want to spend that much, would prefer to keep it under 600$ I don’t need pro in the home, was hoping to avoid it actually. Custom firmware is fine, wireless coverage and vlans are a must
>>
>>88783652
at the moment space. I need a short term fix until I have a bigger place
Nothing wrong in theory tho
>>
>>88783678
all the speeds. all the security measures bar getting rid of my isp.
>>
>>88783710
Anon, if you are not hardcore into networking don't get a FortiGate.

You can get great security from pfSense or OPNsense which are free. You just need to buy the hardware. You can get decent hardware that can handle speeds you need and draws little voltage if you just search. I was lucky enough to get a netgate 4100 for free from work. It's overkill for my home network. Personally, I prefer pfSense mainly because it has pfBlockerNG.

You can also find decent managed or unmanaged switches for cheap if you just search. This shouldn't be particularly important for home networks. Making sure it handles the throughput you need is the most important aspect.

As far as access points. I used to have a UniFi AP AC PRO but recently switched to a EAP660 HD because it doesn't force you to make an account and use their controller to access it.

Just try to figure out what you want to achieve and then do your research.
>>
>>88783550
mt7621 / 7905
>>
>>88784150
that's ARM though, I'll be more interested when it's RISC-V
>>
>>88784010
looking at solutions that are router and AP is mediatek any good? I’m weighing options between separate components (and PoE APs) and aio
>>
File: 1612092834732.jpg (34 KB, 375x375)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
>>88743984
I haven't tried OpenWRT on mine yet, but I can tell you that the increased speeds and slightly longer range over my old RT-N66U aren't worth the god-awful stability. I have to reboot the damn thing almost every day because the 2.4Ghz band becomes unstable.
>>
>>88775069
does this leave visible wifi signature? i.e. would 802.11d broadcasts/spectrum management fields betray that I'm not using DFS?
>>
>>88743984
alright bros. right now im a complete basedchugging networklet. i even use my ISP's modem and router (they're separate) and configure them through their provided mobile app because they got rid of the web interface. well I'm done being a cuck.

how do i become an absolute networkchad? what kind of hardware do i need to acquire? what kind of software do i need to use? spoonfeed me pls senpais
>>
>>88749286
Looks interesting. Why isn't the WAN port more than 2.5Gbit? My connection is more than 1 gigabit.
>>
>>88784932
You likely have to use your ISP's modem but can replace your router with TP-Link Archer A7/C7 running OpenWRT (there is a chance you might need to clone MAC address from your ISP's router).
Then start digging into wiki and adding useful packages. Like DNS adblocking, guest wifi over VPN, WireGuard VPN for remote access to your network.
>>
>>88784932
Start by acquiring a Network+ book and read through that.

Most people buy a modem, a firewall/wired router and a separate wireless AP. This keeps your setup pretty modular so if you move on to fiber for example you don't have to throw away your whole config, just the modem.

PFsense is good for firewall, OpenWRT for router/WAP hardware and modems are still very closed source so anything with a decent chipset and good reviews should work.

If you have fiber your ISP will provide an ONT, if it has wireless built in you will want to disable that, and you won't need to buy a cable modem.
>>
>>88743984
>Given secondhand mATX AMD A6 computer
>Chuck a few NICs in it and OpenWRT x86 target on it
>OpenWRT doesn't recognise the embedded RealTek NIC nor the Intel I210-T NIC
>Has no problem with the Intel I350 NIC
>Kmods for all of them are in the image including dependencies
Make it fucking stop.
>>
>>88785595
check PCIe settings in UEFI
>>
>>88743984
I need to replace my RT-AC68U, I've had tomato on it this entire time but I think the hardware is starting to finally go- getting a lot of random resets and throughput nosedives when I have more than two devices on it simultaneously.

suggestions? trying to keep the budget around $80 max
>>
>>88787460
I had the same one and a few months ago I replaced it with >>88761169 after the switch decided to shit the bed and started broadcasting garbage.
>>
>>88784519
It's Broadcom shit. Not going to run right without blob drivers.
>>
>>88744330
That's mikrotik. It can be an ap for ~100 devices. It is more than capable of handling any fucking soho use case
>>
>>88776346
No, you're better off getting an ASUS, TP-Link or D-Link router. Don't get xiaomeme, their OpenWRT support is not only shit they're also shit devices that tend to fail.
>>
where the fuck is router and home server general? why not just combine the two ?
>>
>>88790893
TP-link 1750 sounds like a solid choice, seems like a few makers have the same name like archer? This might be a good budget alternative to my shit setup now. I like the built-in VPN and I’ll def flash if I get it. Does it support adguard DNS over tls? I am not seeing that and I’m phone fagging on a weak signal
>>
>>88790893
I missed that this is ac and not ax, does it REALLY matter?
>>
>>88744145
>>88744288
can these non-free closed-source proprietary botnets run OpenWRT?
>>
>>88792782
Yeah TP-Link AC1750 is exactly the OP's Archer A7/C7.

https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/services/dns/adguard-home says:
>Minimum of 50MB free RAM.
Mine has 47MB free.
>Minimum of 100MB free disk/flash space (see flash/storage requirements).
You'd need to add a flash drive in the USB port. The router has 8MB flash total.
>Higher performance routers i.e. dual-core with higher processor clock speeds are recommended.
Archer A7/C7 is single core so this might be the limiting factor.
>>
File: 1633023478799.jpg (200 KB, 1000x1000)
200 KB
200 KB JPG
>>88792782
Archer C7 is getting old, though it's a decent router.

Your best best is to avoid Lantiq SoCs as they won't get supported and newer TP-Links have them, do a quick search for "openwrt "name of the router" before you buy anything.

https://openwrt.org/toh/views/toh_available_16128

>>88792819
I was looking at a chink brand named Cudy a few days to get something cheap like the AX1800, might be up your alley, it's only missing an USB port.

You can't wrong with Asus, Mikrotik, D-Link etc routers typically but do check the "Unsupported Functions" column in the table above.
>>
>>88792948
>Archer C7 is getting old, though it's a decent router.
WireGuard can't saturate more than 50Mbps for me so I'd really be in the market for something more powerful. But I haven't found anything better than the King under $150.
>>
>>88792948
Hey that Cudy looks pretty slick, and exactly what I’m loooking for. I’m researching it now. OoenWRT support seems solid and this might get me down the road. Appreciate the recommendation
>>
>>88743984
ITT people who use routers as more than just wifi access points.
Why?
>>
https://openwrt.org/toh/linksys/e8450

This is probably what I'd buy today if I didn't have my current D-Link.
>>
File: capture.png (123 KB, 1284x440)
123 KB
123 KB PNG
Does anyone here have knowledge on how to connect an OpenWRT router directly to an ONT?

I managed to get it working easily with an old Fritzbox I had lying around (though it only has 100M ports) IPv4 and IPv6 worked right away, apparently just putting everything on automatic/dhcp, but I can't seem to replicate it on OpenWRT. I get no signal.
>>
>>88759681
>ENTERPRISE QUALITY
>good
>>
>>88793612
I only use it as a wifi access point but I'm getting sick of it not working properly and having to reset it every week
>>
>>88793122
mt7621 routers are around $50-80. Basically 3x faster for double the price.
>>
>>88793612
Because it's there and it's always on anyway, so why wouldn't you?
>>
>>88794845
Can it route 10gbps traffic?
>>
>>88792948
mfgr website isn’t clear- do i just add more of these cudy boxes to do mesh? It’s credibly a cheap solution if so
>>
>>88743984
I got one of these and then never did anything with it because you need to install a different OS for it to do anything cool :(
>>
>>88796306



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.