MJ editionRequest Template:>Location>Budget>Open or closed>Over-ear or on-ear>Intended use>Other requirementsFAQ:>Do I need an amplifier?No.>Do I need a DAC?No.>$150, closed, over ear, just music and maybe videos/movies I guess.DT 770 or HD 280 Pro>Measurementshttps://diyaudioheaven.wordpress.com/https://headphonedatabase.com/oratoryhttps://www.reddit.com/r/oratory1990/wiki/index/list_of_presets>ReviewsAll reviews are worthless, the only opinion that matters is your own.>Recommended informationhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5016825/https://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2012/04/what-we-hear.htmlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIQ9IXSUzuMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiZqYnd5g8MPrevious thread: >>86907969
Any good headphone yet?
>DACs are snake oil>AMPs are snake oil95% of the time100% true
You need... more?
>>86936668I need subbass.
Reminder to call out tinkerers on being fucking retards
>>86936595i use logitech headphone its very audbile audible so good
Yeah it's based.
>>86936609OLLO S4X and HD560S (focal clear killers)
>>86936936graphs don't lie. This graph exists proving that the Focal Clear has an amazing FR, and since there is one graph it is irrefutable evidence that it is good. And no other graphs anyone posts can be taken seriously.
>>86936936why keyboard look nuclear
>>86936949continual reminder that the Focal Clears have shockingly low distortion.If only all headphones had this low distortion! Especially such low distortion in the bass, wow!
if my 6XX's ever die, then I'll probably side-grade to 560s, I'm unsure of whether or not I'd like the extra treble they have though because I quite like the warmth of the 650s.
A top 5 headphone of ALL time! and WAY better than the Clear MG. Imagine if someone conflated the Clear and the MG as if they were the same headphone. Boy that would be embarrassing!
>>86936991Everyone agrees.. everyone with sense, taste, and intelligence, that is lol. Focal Clears are S tier and even though they are expensive, you get what you pay for!!
>>86936953nuclear? lol. It's a Keychron Q1 with stock keycaps. Drop Holy Panda switches. Pretty good combo. I wish my Matt3o keycaps fit on the 75% but some of the keys just don't fit. I've been keeping an eye out for a retrofit set of keys to make them fit into the Q1 but, alas, I've yet to see them.
>>86937034is it logitech
i'm a poorfag, how can i turn a focal elegia into open back?
Z Reviews may be the most insufferable reviewer on youtube fucking worthless channel, jesus fuck. I haven't watched him in like 2 years, I just tried to watch one video and couldn't make it more than 2 minutes
>>86936949>above 6k treble insanityDogshit
>>86937133By selling it and buying open back
>>86937067It's a Keychron Q1.>>86937234>FR drops off a fucking cliff at 2kDogshit
>>86937252Good luck eq'ing that focal pos bruh
>>86937277Good thing that the Clear MG is not the same thing as the Clear! Wow glad we already resolved that ITT with this post here:>>86936991
>>86936668Sorry, mate. I'm not an afghan veteran
>>86937157ngl Zeos is literally the only audio youtuber I watch. Nobody else is worth paying attention to. DMS/Josh are boring as fuck. The old boomer is a pretty based schizo but his tastes are so extreme they are incapable of actually informing my purchasing decisions.
>>86937294To this, jesus fucking christ, the Clears are a hot mess
>>86937306>the Focal Clear is a Hifiman Sundara in disguiseinteresting pivot in the plot we have here. Let's see where this goes.
>>86937306Oh shit wrong one, sundara actually BTFO clears too
>>86937316You made a grave mistake, sir. I already posted a FR graph of the Focal Clear and since, by your own admission, graphs don't lie then that means we have to accept the results of the first FR graph posted ITT here>>86936949
>>86937234>useless DIY rig>>86937294>useless DIY rigI wonder why you're afraid of posting real measurements of this headphone.
>>86937344no fucking way LMAO
>>86937339 worse than >>86937234
>>86937305Josh seems like he's just a completely clueless bandwagoner, DMS is annoying.The only one I ever liked was that Metal571 guy but he stopped making videos because he hated it.
>>86936989extra treble doesn't stop a headphone from feeling warm. The redpill to warmth is bumped mid frequencies ~1k and treble that falls slightly short of a target curve. That plus the accurate bass on the 560s will make them feel as deep as the 650 in all likelihood.
Focal Clear status: destroyed
Take a look at a white man's measurements
>>86937416>mocks the focal clear's 6k response>the pajeet knock off matches that response exactly, while fucking up everything else along the waywhat did he mean by this?
>>86937472Here have real measurements https://olloaudio.com/pages/measurements you can go ahead and toss your fuckal clears
>>86936945I need closed back equivalents
>He bought more than 1 headphone in the HD 600 familyCongratulations, you memed yourself. They're all basically the same headphones. 98% alike with differences people probably couldn't tell apart in blind tests.
>>86936595>$150, closed, over ear, just music and maybe videos/movies I guess. this but at 50$ range?
>>86938607does it have to be closed?
>>86937248i don't have the elegia yet but i would be buying openbox from adorama for 349that much money can't buy me the elexi also am already using a dt880 600ohm and i don't think there is anything around that price range that's considered to be a significant step up from it
What's the best "generalist" headphone I can get? I need a headphone for just chilling or working in my PC, nothing really very specific. Over Ear is the only requirement, I don't care too much about open or close
>>86936989thats not a sidegrade buddy. thats a downgrade
>>86937234what a shame since these are very neutral until the drop.
>>86938686yikes, maybe try second handtheres some acceptable closed back headphones at that price, but nothing really greatshure srh 440audio technica m20xmonoprice dj
>>86939134>39134>>86938437(You)>>86939134Shan't be purchasing your no name brand
How do you guys feel about these? Been eyeing them for a long time now.
Best openback below $60?
>>86939698It's either that HD560S or DCA stealth, everything else is hot garbage. Hifiman has some ok stuff in the higher range.
The best headphone but not looking like I take advise for /hpg/?
>>86939418gracias anon.too bad I have to order them online since the local store in my country only sells mainstream brands. Speaking of mainstream brands, I see quite a bit of shilling for mh721 and they do sell this one. if i may ask, how does it compare between the listed three?
>>86940194Precide ERGO 2
>>86940362>Precide ERGO 2
I regret buying the Clear MG.
>LocationYuropoor>Budget$400>Open or closedClosed>Over-ear or on-earOver-ear>Intended useSurviving loud server rooms and colleagues>Other requirementsNot sound dogshitQC45 / Bose 700 / WH-1000XM4 / WH-1000XM5?
>>86940254pretty good, microphone is decent tooim going to buy some more budget headphones to test
>>86940463>Surviving loud server rooms and colleagueswfh
>>86940463just get a hd 300 pro
>>86940536she has a big head
DT 770 Pro with 32 or 80 Ohm for a Hiby R2 and Google Pixel 4a 5G as a source?
>>86936668What color should I choose?
>>86937506>here look the measurements for the headphones we are sellinglollmao
>>86939792genuinely not bad. But 7506 are better for the price range.
>>86940436should have gotten the original Clears. They're selling for new on headphones dot com for cheaper than the MG.
>>86940732the dt770 are closed, so even the quieter 80ohms will be loud enough with any source and sound slightly betterget the 80ohms
>>86937482Oratory > ASRbtw his target curve is also 1000x better than harman dogshit
Hd 650 outlet for 219€ worth it or not? I have tygr 300r but they sound muffled af, using it on a fiio k5 ess
If I put holes through my dt 770's cup will they turn into dt 990?
>>86936595>>Locationusa>>Budgeti just want a cheap pair 50 or under>>Open or closedclosed>>Over-ear or on-earover>>Intended useat my desktop. music stuff. nothing big>>Other requirementi had these 20 dollar pair of ijoy headphones they are nice but the hinges break easily because they are so cheap. something similar would be nice, just more durable. also bluetooth is a must
>>86941186Just admit you purchased overpriced garbage that cant compete with 150$ headphones.
>>86941846but the focal clears look better here? So no I won't admit it.560s are the fucking king of the sub-$500 market, though.
>>86942465>the focals look betterMeds
>>86936595>Locationuk>Budget£150>Open or closedclosed>Over-ear or on-earover ear>Intended uselistening to edm, bassline and d&b>Other requirementswide frequency range, good bass
>>86936668Just like all Koss products, absolute shit-tier build quality.Fell apart in a year.And since I'm not an Amerifag, I can't get a warranty replacement.Koss = 1 year of good audio
>>86940058Koss KSC75For $75 you can get Philips SHP9500
Can anyone recommend a decent aftermarket HD 600 cable that isn't so long? By decent I mean I just don't want it to break my shit, I don't really care how it alters the sound signature or whatever else.
>>86936595I have no point of reference when it comes to these things but I wanna use em for the audiotechnica meme50s. I JUST NEED OTHER PEOPLE TO TELL ME IT'S OKAY AND THAT IT'LL BE A GOOD PURCHASE Or if i can get some general ideas in what to get. it can be for my desktop or for travel
>>86942998dt770 ohms>>86943367Cables don't alter the sound of headphones. Just get whatever looks nicer to you, has the right length and is within your budget. I keep seeing north americans shilling for hart audio and periapt when it comes to cables, maybe look for those.
>>86943440Worth a shot. Trouble I keep running into is that every cord I look at will have decent enough reviews but eventually the "the prongs are the wrong width and damaged the plugs" or similar complaints come up and I get a little wary. I'm willing to pay a tard tax for peace of mind.
>>86936595I have the same headphone as Christina Grimmie but it is as dead as her now.
why are headphones so shoddily madei had to resolder a fucking wire in my new k702s a couple of months after purchasemy other pair, mdr-7506s lasted 7 fucking years and even then it was the actual driver that gave out, and i had a choice between legit and counterfeit parts to replace it with, gorillion years after the model was introduced
>YOUShould try the HE400seYou're welcome
>>86942993Focal Clear>literal perfect response from 1k to bass, with a smooth roll-off from 40hz downwards>treble peaks match target response with perfection; average downward trend matches target curve shape but averages lower, preventing sibilance and giving the signature "clarity" sound that the Focal Clear is known for. >preposterously low distortion>total tonality is a perfect response of bass and mids with smooth, pleasant, but present treble and no distortion of any kind>according to your source, a top 5 headphone of ALL TIME.560s>bloated bass which gives a veil or muffling to the true mids>1k-4k is pretty good but the treble beyond that peaks from 4-9k which will make every cymbal crash, every chime, and every high pitched female voice screech over the rest of the sound, probably causing literal pain>after 10k the FR jumps off the charts as it skyrockets, causing sibilance on TOP OF the already over peaked treblein the end, this is a pretty unappealing u-shaped headphone that people pretend is an HD600 with bass. In reality it's worth every penny of it's $150 pricetag and not a dollar more.
>>86943373an expensive PMP will not make your piece of shit M50s sound any better; sorry.
>>86943702I'd never heard of this girl or what happened; jesus christ.
I liked it better when we talked about stax and not the 2 same dudes talking about the 2 same headphones
>>86944647STAX might be my next purchase, although im running out of desk for equipment. No idea where i would put them
>>86944661In the past
Bros how do I know what the right endgame is gonna be for me if there's nowhere near me to audition things.
>>86939792I quite like them, but they have a pretty big problem of the hinge snapping.Had two pairs (one was a warranty replacement), both snapped in under 2 years.Ended up filling the hinge part with glue and reinforcement.
decent wireless headphones under 50$? My limit is 100 but i dont wanna spend too much if I accidentally lose it
>>86946045Wtf I love sennheiser now.
What are some good headsets? I'm thinking about buying the Jabra Evolve2 75.
>>86936595why are negroids so ugly?
which headphones can cure my chronic tinnitus?
>>86945667Nice, time to dust off me drill
>>86944372based. this i why i always laugh when some clueless motherfucker calls the HD560s the sub 500$ king. i say they are 150 bucks for a reason.
>>86944372>focal clear>better FRMeds and learn to read graphs >>86941846
I finally have the free time to go through with my stupid mod project.tl;dr>have defective AD700X>have aliexpress "Denon" drivers>have soldering ironThe only thing is that I'm really shit at soldering and soldering to drivers is not exactly beginner friendly (small pads, stay too long and you burn the voice coil which is a dead driver)Any practical tip before I fuck shit up?Other than that it seems like an easy mod, the driver fit near perfectly in the enclosure and there's no messy glued shit in there so it's nice to deal with, and if you fuck the headband cable you can turn it dualsided very easily.
>>86936668yeah, I need one to not break every 2 months
>>86936668Unfortunately shit, one started buzzing after a few months, bought another one, did the same, and broke too.
>Netherlands (or online if it's really worth it)>maximum 50 bucks>in-ear earbuds like pic related>Music>must have a mic>must have a wire, no wireless bsI'd rather buy something at Cex or something, so recommend things that are easy to find (if not, online is fine).
>>86947746verkeerde draadje vriend, maar tin t2 plusgewoon kopen op aliexpress, tweedehands oortjes zijn goor
>>86947746CCA CRA is the big semi current /iemg/ meme, I have a pair and it's rather good for the $15 I paid for it, better than the VK4 and they were on amazon last I checked.If you don't mind higher wait time but potentially more / better choice the chink sites will have you covered.
>>86947756thank you frenI don't speak dutch unfortunately, but could you please name me some ubiquitous shops in the nl which sell headphones?>>86947800they are on amazon. I'm making a list of all the most shilled models online then I'll post it here so you guys can decide for me since I'm no audiophile and I would just go for the best looking ones... thank you
if I want over-ear wireless headphones, is there anything worth buying in the £150 range or should I just pay the extra money for WH-1000XM4s?
>>86947987You should pay even extra-er for thx panda or beyer amiron. Even apples are better.
Any dac/amp with optical or RCA in that you guys can recommend? Something like the Fiio D03K but maybe with an amp as well.
>LocationUK>Budget£200>Open or closedNo idea what the difference is>Over-ear or on-earOver-ear>Intended useListening to music, casual use>Other requirementsWould prefer wireless if possible
>>86947931bol.com and megekko sometimes have good deals
>>86947625Add some fresh solder (or flux if you have it) to help the old solder flow better. This should allow you to get the soldering done quickly enough to not damage anything.Pre-tin the pads on the little PCB on the new drivers, as well as the headphone wiring. Touch the two together, touch the soldering iron (with a bit of solder on the tip) to that, and they'll fuse right together.
>>86948780i'm using a soundblasterx g6 but i wouldn't use the word 'recommend'i just can't find a better optionit has line and optical i/oi'm using an rca to 3.5mm adapter to digitize physical media, and it works wellhowever the driver isn't the best and the microusb port is not very impressive
Thoughts on bone conduction earphones? I haven't been treating my ears well, so they seem like a less harmful option for me. I find that I wake up with a little bit of tinnitus after a night of headphone use.
>>86949515they are not less harmful than traditional drivers, all they do is transform your head into the drivers insteadfocus on preventing further damage, buy hearing protection and listen at low volume
>>86947176You've yet to explain why the bloated bass and shrieking treble of the 560s are desirable over the smooth, creamy, and clear Focals. maybe if i was on meds I would agree but since i am mentally healthy, I can appreciate a headphone with a proper FR.
>>86948780K9 Pro ESS
>>86949925take your meds schizo
>>86949980but you are the insane person. You want bloated bass and piercing treble with sibilance.You are also poor and won't spend more than $200 on something better than what you already have. You are projecting your mental illness onto me along with your poor decision making skills, pretending that I am a fool for buying something expensive when the truth is that I am a lot better at making decisions than you because you are poor and I am not.
>>86950079take your lithium madam
Got a pair of Focal Clear OGs for $750 shipping this week. Did I do good? What am I in for?
>>86950090an overpriced placebo product
>>86948780refer to faq
>>86950090You did fucking great.You are in for a top 5 headphone of all time, and much better than the successor: the MGs>>86936991They have amazingly low distortion, so every part of the frequency response is "Clear.">>86936968They have a very, very even FR response from the lowest bass all the way up through the highest treble. There is no bloat in the bass, no high pitched shrieking treble; just smooth clarity from top to bottom of the FR graph.>>86936968You are also getting a headphone that is regarded as one of the best by people who have listened to more expensive gear than anyone else ITT. People who have listened to nearly every high-end headphone in production today claim this is among the best.>>86937006
>>86950165mess up my FR reference. See>>86936949for the one true FR measurement of this Headphone.
>>86950134Didn't see any in the FAQ?
>>86936945>focal ANYTHING killerslmao
>>86936595who else has their personnel end game here?
>mfw speakerchads take a flat FR as a given
>>86950946No, unless you have a proper room or put the DSP correction effort, you should take a roller coaster of a FR as a given for speakers. With headphones you take the room completely out of the picture and you can even sort of work with universal EQ presets.
>>86950946>>86951003Not only is bass response completely mangled by the room but you have several Q 10-30 resonances thrown in for good measure. Room even affects bass distortion which was surprising to me. Also if the speakers have bad off-axis response EQ can't fix that.>>86951003With headphones you take rollercoaster treble as a given, presets are useless above 5k.
>>86951180you cant even hear bass distortion, retard
>>86950079The most retarded argument ever pushed by buyer's remorse copium sniffers, why would I spend 1k+ on headphones just because they are ~5% better than sub 200$ ones??>"muh cleaner fr"Use eq you dumb faggot
Only IEMs graph cleanly
If you look in the archives, the opinion of the 560S has changed dramatically in the past 3 weeks, why?
>>86951364There aren't many people here, so one can easily just recommend the same headphone for everyone (the DT990 guy is another example). Though at least it's a solid headphone recommendation (like the DT990), relatively cheap, usually comfortable, decent all around, replaceable cable and durable.
>>86951364theres just a single schizo shilling against them
>>86946891let the poorfags cope, anon. its all they have
Guys. I have an old Sennheiser HD558. Its not bad I think, but I want something newer and better I guess at a higher price range. I don't know what to get It needs to be comfy for 12 hours a day, good for being an all rounder gaming, music, movies.price around 215 usd or more if its better. Idk if closed is better though. Thinking about the BeyerDynamics 700 pro.
>>86951364>>86951436yes, but the whole opinion started with one schizo shilling FOR them too. if you go all the way back to the archives of when the 560s first released you'll see one faggot that heavily shilled it for like 8 threads straight
So far I have returned Koss Pro4SKoss UR40SHP9500X2HRATH M40ATH AVC400Superlux 668bSo far I kept -Koss PortaProKoss PortaPro wirelessThinking about trying the DT770, any thoughts?
>>86951555i shill it, its a nice catchall
>>86951586Who let's you just return stuff like that?
>>86951695right of withdrawal
>>86951180>With headphones you take rollercoaster treble as a givenOnly the measurements of it, the headphone itself doesn't need to have bad treble FR at all and it's not like they are tuned solely on measurements (someone has to listen to it as well).
>>86951781usa is a third world country
should i finally get airpods
>>86936595I need old school headphones like these. Keep breaking this nu-shit
>>86951930are pros worth the extra $70
>>86949290Finally fucking doneHad some fuck ups including dropping the iron on the back of the driver punching a hole in the paper ring (dunno where you'd even get a replacement), and figuring out how to deal with the wiring on the cable side was a bit dumb.The result is fucking great though despite the unbalance from the hole.
>Sundaras $200 local pickupX2HR bros I might have to leave you...
>>86951964Well, you live and you learn. Glad to hear it sounds good.I've got some D9200 drivers on order myself, along with the foam rings to put them in my D5200 properly.
fucking cheap plastic shit. CREAK CREAK CREAK. cant even fucking breathe
>>86952159Gypsyheiser? or HiFiChink?
>>86936668These are incredible. Sound better than some of my more premium expensive headphones. Recently got yaxi earpads for them and they now sound and feel much better.Have them for over around year, no problems so far regarding build quality, I've been using them every day while jogging.
what would happen if i get a cheap closed back and drill holes in the cups? will it turn into an open back?
>>86937306i find the sundaras quite bassy (especially compared to my X2s they replaced)
>>86952211yes but it will also be too bassy
>>86951754Not only you're still getting the rollercoaster, but it's different from the measurements as well. Oh and pad condition gives you another rollercoaster over time so not even EQ by ear can save you.
>>86936879>pajeet Hello sirs
>>86952248>different acoustic properties change sound???
>>86952287>hardware has a shelf life??????????????
>>86952215Did you find it worth the upgrade? >>86951985 here
>>86952231i suppose it would just act more like bass ports, wouldnt it
>>86936628Buy actual HiFi equipment not chink electronics
>>86936816Bought a pair of these - they arrived today. Good isolation so ideal for use on the train (what I want them for).They SUCK compared to HD58X.
>>86952312pros:more subbass (X2 basically has none)more detailtreble not as peakycons:no where near the level of soundstage the X2 offers.not as comfortable.stock cable is impressively badonce i got used to them and replaced the cable it was just the soundstage, but the improved detail and much faster drivers were worth that tradeoff to me and they're my only headphones now.
>>86936628you're probably running 50ohm headphones off a phone
>>86952340yes, unless you want to spend hours tuning it
worth upgrading to entry level audiophile (e.g. dt 770) if I have something like Sennheiser G4me one ?I understand beyerdynamics are nice and everything, but is the quality really that different ?I never tried them and I keep hearing people say they are very "bright", and that it might sounds bad especially someone coming from SennheiserJust wondering if the gamer shit is even that bad compared to "real" headsets
>>86952387>Just wondering if the gamer shit is even that bad compared to "real" headsetsit really is, but i doubt the dt 770 will be hugely better
>>86952387a 770 is probably going to be on the same level.spend 2-300 if you're going to upgrade from what you've got.then look at hd600s/xx and sundaras
>>86952410correct but terrible recommendations
>>86952401I'm just wondering because I did get a mdr7506 along the way and the quality was nice but obviously i'm just plugging str8 into pc so I couldn't hit the Ohms required to power it fully and it sounds pretty quiet. So I would most likely need a dac if I want better headsets.>>86952410what is the "upgrade" when you get more expensive headphoens, im just wondering because like i just mentioned i do have the 7506 and everyone kept telling me it was the standard for audio mixing or whatever and when i tried them I couldn't really hear a big difference from my gaymer headset
>>86952428there's nothing better than the sundara at that price point. don't @ me>>86952434studio stuff doesn't sound good because it's meant to be flat.
>>86952434not possible, the 7506s are very sensitivesomething else must be wrong
>>86952457both hd 6xx and sundara are shitty memesthey are bad
>>86952471absolute bollocks.so i can laugh harder, what would you recommend?
>>86952510what would yoi recommend fr? im the one who said based
>>86952522depends on your needs
>>86952359Interesting... I'll probably stick with the X2's for now. Thanks!
I just picked up a pair of used SPH9600s for ~50 bucks.Think they're comfy, like the build and weight of them. Think they have good separation and presence but their not as clear as I want them.The bass is a bit muddy sometimes, but really fun listening times.
>>86952603yes they have too much high bass
>>86952539My needs? Dont be a turbotard. The open closed debate is a meme, i dont care whos listening to my music i wanna listen to music as if it was live
>>86952643alright, i recommend the harakiri
>>86952647sorry im not a faggot
I've tried the Sony ANC headphones and they are dogshit dragged through the mud with zero separation and no detail whatsoeverSo when they announced the new XM5 I decided to look at what people say and everyone is like "we all know Sony makes the best sounding ANC headphones" or some shit.Are people deaf?
>>86952676youre a big guy
>>86952731consumers just dont know any better
Ok so I tried my mdr7506s on again and I think i hear a much better quality then my gaming headset, now that I really listened to some music.Are the 7506s worth upgrading from ? I'm not really an audiophile just want a nice natural soundAlso have a question, how do you guys swap between headphones and speakers, like physically having to go behind it is a pain, how do you guys set it up so you don't have to do that, have it plugged in to an amp/dac whatever, or what ?I bought a splitter but i feel like it cuts the power and the headphones are quitter from it
>>86952731ANC headphones are a convenience thing first and foremost and the average sucker just loves convenience.
>>86952387>>86952410>>86952434>>86952478>>86952522>>86952643>dt 770>dt 880>hd560s>he400seThat's it.
>>86953144The only good one there is 560S
>>86952731bought my galaxy buds pro for convenience.love the battery life and charge time, the charge case, the ANC/normal/outside noise options are super handy but the sound quality is a bit weak for the price.didn't get them for that though. have my sundaras at home.
>>86948827Probably AKG K371-BT which would be well within budget.They are closed-back (sound does not leak at cost of performance related loses) and can be used via wired or wireless.Good for your intended use but performance won't be special (like the Sennheiser HD 600 or many of the open-back Beyer headphones).
>>86953283those are shit
>>86953462For you and made the point on performance too. Anon wants wireless within £200 budget so there it is.
>>86953497he prefer wireless, he doesnt exclusively wirelessso tell him honestly, all wireless headphones suck
>LocationPoland>Budget50 bucks>in ear>wireAny headphones like pic rel?
>>86953673I have those right now but my cat ate my cable and right earphone is fucked up.
>>86953462>>86953615>>86952751>>86952736>>86952647>>86952510>>86952471ur shitting up the thread. al u do is call headphones shit and barely give input. this >>86953673was ur first suggestion*claps*
>>86953726why delete post
>>86953194Didn't ask for troon opinion
/hpg/Redpill me on the 1000xm5
>>86953737>>86954123doing it again?
give me the rundown on the sony m1stt. cd9000st user
>>86951212because they're not 5% better; they're close to 20% better, and 50% better in the areas that are extremely difficult to get right (treble and bass). There are $500 headphones that match or exceed the Clears in some areas but not all. That's why you pay $1000 for them: no compromises.
>>86951436>>86951555It's the one schizo who is shilling for it and against any other more expensive phone. He is a literally mentally insane person who finds literal insane arguments against any headphone that isn't the 560s or the Ollo S4X. He will post fake charts showing how good they are and ignore any postive remarks for any other headphone.I'm trying my best to combat him because I know how retarded casuals coming into threads take autistic schizos seriously. So I have a couple of handy images that prove him wrong in every conceviable way.No, the 560s does not sound better than the Focal Clears. No, the Ollo S4X/R does not have a better response than the HD600. No, the Clear and the Clear MG are not the same headphone. Yes, you are an autistic cunt who should be lobotomized.
>>86953144Hifi Edition XS is an upgrade from he400se and Sundaras.
>>86954298keep your cd9000st. You are looking at a sidegrade, at best.
For me? It’s Stax
Is it normal to feel pain/ear-popping when wearing "bright" headphones like the mdr7506s' ?I just put them on after years of not listening on them and I feel like I'm on an airplane
>>86954513whats a japanese upgrade
>>86951586>Returning sub-$100 headphonesJeezus I never returned the HD800s I bought because lazyDo yourself a flavor and save $100 to buyHE400se
Why is there a cult around Chinese IEMs? What can an IEM for 50 bucks do that an average, over the ear headphones cannot?
>>86954924Yes, headphones with bright and harsh treble spikes like the HD560s do cause literal pain.
Queston1:What's the cheapest possible headphones with kz ate/zircon level sound quality? (No need for more) that can be easily drivenTalking how cheap can u go without it being shitQueston2:Dt770pro 16,32 or 80ohm for driving no amp pc?
>>86956018honestly, /iemg/ has devolved more and more as iems is a competitive market relative to headphones. isolation is really the best thing that iems have going for them while having a variety of pricings and tunings to feed the bonefire of /iemg/
>>86956848Moondrop Chu are quite good, and 32 ohm should work just fine.
>>86956848if you're going to stoop that low than any koss headphone works80 depending but 32 to be safe as it doesn't matter when the difference isn't that large
>>86954643A tonality and B techs; CHU killer
Why do people keep saying mdr7506 are indestructible or have good build quality ?Not even mentioning the earpads - the wires gets loose so easily and it creeks so bad after only a couple of years of use
>>86956848>for driving no amplowest ohms possible
kz ate and zircon rocks sound like ass
Has anybody here tried this cable? No reviews but other cables from this company seem ok. https://www.amazon.com/NewFantasia-Balanced-Compatible-Hifiman-Headphone/dp/B09SFSCLQ4/
>>86954924That sucks, dude. I discovered I have a similar problem when I tried some 'bright' headphones. Now I have to go back to my measly M40x for my plebian ears.
is $200 good price for second hand hd600 ?
>>86946537He's right you nigger
>>86957542Depends how "second hand" it is. If it's in great/like-new condition then yes. If they're giving you new replacement earpads then definitely yes.
>>86957754looks like this, seller said he used it for a month before.I don't even have an amp to go with it but i just heard its a nice set of cans so I think I want to bite
>>86957796didn't know there are niggaz that are into headphones. do you just like, listen to yung trappa X on your beats studios, or?
>>86957806yeah I'd honestly go for it. Looks good.
>>86957043sounds and looks some chinky stuff, europe and cant get meme shit anymore>>86957155at that point why not go with the 16's? unless the drivers are different and change profile of the headphone all sold out currently thoughIdeally closed ones but might just buy porta pros or some shit, so tired of IEMs falling out of ear constantly>>86957221I hear people say differnet ohms have differnet profiles in sound though idk>>86957235had some midrange sennheisers before but this sound level is np for me, as long as the iems dont pop out and bass completely dissapears which is the annoying parti dont even think it sounds bad
>>86951964>dunno where you'd even get a replacementhttps://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005003631225375.htmlAnd https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005003563260394.htmlTook me quite a while to find those, not 100% sure they're what I need but for 20 bucks it'll be worth giving it a try.Now onto waiting for more dead AD500X/700X/900X to pop up on ebay and friends.
I tried scanning the Sennheiser box to verify code but it just redirects to the page without option to input my product code. Did they get rid of that page ? Do I have to contact support ?
>>86958681aside from replacing ? try super glue. get velour pads in the future
>>86956018$20 chinese IEM can do this.
>>86954924no, thats not normal and entirely psychogenictry relaxing, you seem stressed
>>86958603neat, ill bookmark these
>>86956848ksc7580 Ω, the tonality of the others are broken250 Ω runs fine from a pc too, just pick whichever you think sounds best (mid bass vs sub bass)
>>86955346cd900st with stock pads are pretty much the best japanese headphones ever madethere gimmick sidegrade stuff like stax and fostex, but nothing objectively better
>>86956018because iems go in a hole, and trannies like to stuff holes
>>86958681needle and thread
What is the goto review website?I'm wondering if the new Sony wh-1000xm5 sound decent or not. >inb4 muh wireless is trash
>>86959691It's snoy so it's a mudcannon but since it's wireless it's ALSO going to have channel imbalance. Don't even have to wait for reviews to know that.
>>86959691>All reviews are worthless, the only opinion that matters is your own.go to a store, try them outthere is no other way to find out if you like them
>>86959974>sound good>treble mountain
Are the Sennheiser HD 450 BT any good?My brother travels a lot for work and he asked for a recommendation for something cheap and noise canceling, and the the aux adapter is a good plus.
>>86960411It's not good for MSRP but if you can get it for 60 bucks or so it's decent enough for an ANC + BT headphone.
>>86960437Refurbished from Senn is like $80.I think a friend has one or similar, which will help him decide.
>>86958785That's impressive. Too bad standard-style in-ears cause me pain. Unironically, thank God for Apple Airpods.
my HD280pros have just had a regrettable accident and need to be replaced so>LocationUK, but happy to order international>Budget£100/$125>Open or closedClosed>Over-ear or on-earOver Ear>Intended useenjoying music, vidja>Other requirementsI have a bigass head
>>86961245So I'm not the only one?In ear IEMs are such a drag, one of the main reasons I switched to headphones desu, but airpods pro were unironically comfy af
>>86960411Senn BT stuff is pretty overpriced at MSRPI got the 450 BTs for $90 on a sale, stock pads are garbage, a third party pad is borderline necessaryI got momentum 3's for half off refurbishedI'd day for those prices they're pretty damm good, but I wouldn't have payed full price.Also both are bass heavy
>>86962472dt 770 80 ohms
>>86936595>Request Template:>Location: eastern eu>Budget: 150 euro preferred 50euro>Open or closed: closed>Over-ear or on-ear:over ear>Intended use: noice canceling. Using them over my Huawei cm33>Other requirements good passive noice isolation, active noice isolation is bonus but not required, wireless preferred, full black design, optional magnetic attached cushions
>>86962909Magnetic/replaceable cushions not required
Closed backs with really good isolation?>budget £300
Can anything be done about creaky/squeaky Sennheisers? Would WD-40 work?
>Locationbc, canada>BudgetI'd like to not spend $400 but yknow inflation being what it is..? >Open or closedearbuds>Over-ear or on-earin-ear>Intended useHave a hearing disability, require them near 24/7 for all functions but also youtube/discord/movies/gaming.>Other requirementsIdeally a very long threaded cable, apx. 190cm or like.. I think 6ft in freedom units?
Is there a microphone general?
>>86956018>What can an IEM for 50 bucks do that an average, over the ear headphones cannot?fit in your pocket
>LocationUS>BudgetUnder 200>Over-ear or on-earOver-ear>Other requirementsIt has to have detachable cable, and bluetooth would be highly appreciated but not entirely necessary
>>86936595>Request Template:>LocationMurica>Budget$100 - hopefully not asking too much but I know it will limit my options>Open or closedClosed>Over-ear or on-earDon't care>Intended useMixing music, I want to avoid buying studio monitors, they're 5 times more expensive.I want something that I can just plug in to the 3.5mm jack on my computer and be decent enough to mix, although I know that's probably not the ideal way.
>>86964479mdr 7506 hd 280
>>86964334no but i am the smartest person on this board, you can ask me anything
>>86963672hd 300 pro
new thread: >>86965146