Why the hell would I get the speaker?
Both are shit and a waste of $500
>>85228241not these models in particular but in general
i could spend, damn near $500 on a woofer *WOOF WOOF* ( barks like a dog )or i could buy a f*ckin alpha DOG 65 in. 4k Chromecast AppleTV HDR TV W/speakers built-in
but unironicallyits like buying a toe warmer vs buying a industrial oven
>>85228258A tv at any price is shit in a few years, speaker tech is as stagnant as it gets. A $500 speaker now is a $500 speaker in 10 or 20 years if its good to begin with.
>>85228179good speakers are always a better investment than good TVs, though i must admit that neither of your options are good in the sense of quality, taste, or price>t. have a $220 pair of old acoustic research 2ways and a pair of heavily marked down dell gaming monitors (msrp $450)
>>85228293The person buying a $500 subwoofer owns a $5000 tv already
if you're going to spend $500 on a bluetooth speaker then you should spend $400 on a 3d printer and $100 on the electronics to fill something designed for your roomit will be better than the $500 bluetooth speaker
>>85228432its a hypothetical situation i dont mean these specifically
>>85228179There are better $500 investments
>>85228179why would you get a $500 TV?
>>85228179It says Marshall