[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

[Advertise on 4chan]


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: image-2-1024x553.png (192 KB, 1024x553)
192 KB
192 KB PNG
MIT: we believe software shouldn't be patented and you should be able to use it however you want.
GPL: we believe software shouldn't be patented and you should be able to use it however you want. IF YOU DON'T FOLLOW OUR RULES WE'LL SUE YOU!
>>
Yes
>>
If MIT is so great why do I rarely see it used these days?
>>
>>84471082
A different kind of frogposting.
>>
>>84471153
Plus ou moins. Mais en mieux.
>>
File: giga kamina.png (320 KB, 457x560)
320 KB
320 KB PNG
>>84470760
Yes.
>>
>>84470760
Though shit bitch, I'm not giving you my work just so you can benefit from it without giving me or any other contributor anything in return. If I'm giving my shit away for free, you're doing it too or you can fuck right off and make your own.
>>
>>84471134
do you even have a job?
the MIT license is by far the most common license I see day to day
>>
>>84471312
You're not actually working for free if you are going to sue someone over using your work
>>
File: 1637893189271.jpg (642 KB, 1212x940)
642 KB
642 KB JPG
>>84470760
cuck license
>>
>>84471082
pour quoi tu sens comme c'est nécessaire de poster ça dans ce fil
>>
>>84471082
>>84471919
nice to see the french continuing their tradition of cowardice
in this case they reply in a foreign language to prevent people from making actual retorts to their retarded arguments
>>
>>84471134
it is definitely the most used license.
>>
>>84470760
libraries in MIT.
complete programs/systems in GPL.
>>
>>84470760
>GPL: we believe software shouldn't be patented and you should be able to use it however you want. IF YOU DON'T FOLLOW OUR RULES WE'LL SUE YOU!
Based. Freedom must be enforced.
>>
>>84471082
speak english bagette
>>
>>84470760
freedom to the developer vs. freedom to the users. If you use MIT or any other cuck license you're a selfish narcissist.
>>
>>84471919
C'est une réponse appropriée, la licence MIT ne met aucune mesure en oeuvre pour agir d'une manière qui colle avec ce qu'elle supporte.
>>
>>84472050
Je ne parle pas anglais sur 4chan.

>>84471943
>ce qu'être américain fait au cerveau d'un fdp
>>
do not respond to the french, the lack of attention will kill them soon enough
>>
>>84472173
>"ne réponds pas au français "
>répond au français et parle du français
t'as perdu à ton propre jeu. crétin.
>>
>>84470760
lmao imagine licensing your shit with MIT or BSD and just allowing people to steal your shit and make money from it. Truly pathetic.
>>
>>84470760
MIT: use our code even for closed source binaries so that people still can get fucked in whatever way you wish
GPL: provide source if you distribute it in any way so that people won't get fucked by you
>>
baka baka me come biblioteca oui frencho
>>
>>84472283
Sticky this reply.
>>
>>84470760
>MIT: whatever, dude
>GPL: we believe software shouldn't be patented and you should be able to use it however you want. IF YOU DON'T FOLLOW OUR RULES YOU'LL PROBABLY GET AWAY WITH IT!
>>
>>84472283
MIT: its free
GPL: NOOOOO YOU CAN'T DO WHATEVER YOU WANT WITH IT WE'LL DRIVE YOU TO POVERTY!!!!
gnu niggers are truly worthless individuals
>>
>>84471371
MITards are butthurt by default
>>
>>84470760
No, a patent is no a lolicense.
>>
>>84472351
MITtrannies should probably invest more time in education. Maybe then they would be able to realize, that any concept of freedom that potentially includes all people cannot be absolute after all.
>its free
thanks, I don't want crap even if it is a gift.
>>
>>84471082
MIT: мы cчитaeм, чтo пpoгpaммнoe oбecпeчeниe нe дoлжнo быть зaпaтeнтoвaнo, и вы дoлжны имeть вoзмoжнocть иcпoльзoвaть eгo, кaк хoтитe.
GPL: мы cчитaeм, чтo пpoгpaммы нe дoлжны быть зaпaтeнтoвaны, и вы дoлжны имeть вoзмoжнocть иcпoльзoвaть их, кaк хoтитe. ECЛИ BЫ HE БУДETE CЛEДOBATЬ HAШИM ПPABИЛAM, MЫ ПOДAДИM HA BAC B CУД!
>>
>>84472406
get this drunk blabber out of here
>>
>>84470760
Preference for GPL over MIT is the best proxy for mental illness that I have seen
>>
>>84470760
MIT: public land, tragedy of the commons
GPL: shared ownership, everyone has a stake in keeping it beautiful
>>
File: 1636836582698.png (344 KB, 750x920)
344 KB
344 KB PNG
>>84470760
>I believe software shouldn't be patented and you should be able to use it however you want. IF YOU DON'T ADHERE TO MY BELIEFS I'L SUE YOU
>>
MIT: our "license" is basically no license at all and we let Microsoft and other non-free software use and abuse our software with no repurcussions
GPL: Free software should remain fucking free, you non-free leeches.
>>
>>84470760
gnu to benefit the community
mit to work for a company for free
>>
>>84473790
Work for the employees like op, working for a company, who are looking for import solutions that fit the strict no gpl company policy instead of doing their fucking jobs*
>>
>>84473686
wow you're right gpl is communism.
>>
>>84470760
I'm a backend dev so I just copy and minimize the code and nobody can tell lmao
>>
>>84474376
>backend
Not a problem, unless it's agpl. Also chink behavior
>>
>>84470760
>MIT: we believe software shouldn't be patented
this is false. MIT has no stance on patents.
>>
>>84470760
well yes they need to keep retards in check
make a public image
>>
>>84474334
>public land
MIT is communism.
>ownership, stakeholders
GPL is a viral intellectual property license, its literally fascism.
>>
>>84471134
t. doesn't code



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.