Which one is more configurable?
>>83388662Awesome is almost certainly more configurable. Or at least more configurable without wanting to slit your wrists. Id rather fuck with lua configs than fvwm's nightmare scripting any day.
>>83388662AwesomeWM probably, but fvwm is funnier
that looks awful
>>83388662e16 had the most badass themes.
>>83388662i found OpenBox to be my "zen" in GNU/Linux window managershttp://openbox.org/wiki/Main_Page
>>83388987fvwm is one of the oldest, i think only twm is older
I suggest fvwm3.
>>83388662That looks so COOL!
>>83391537This, but for me, it's DWM.https://dwm.suckless.org/
>>83390843based, I still make themes for it
you retards really wanna fight against all established standards, expected app behaviors, decades of UX research, and upstream defaults just so your desktop can look like some hollywood hackerman shit
>>83394534>established standards>expected app behaviors>decades of UX research>upstream defaultstell that to gnome, microsoft, apple, google, mozilla and webdevs in general. They're the one redesigning everything every two releases.
>>83394534I just want to put window titlebars on the sides since that's a more optimal use of space for modern 16:9 aspect ratio monitors.