INTEL'S BACK ON THE MENU BOYS
>>82645116yes, and even if so: At what real TDP? And with what kind of wattage? Nah, there're still more gone than back. Don't wake me again for this kind of shit, plz.
>>82645172tdp and wattage don't matter
>>82645116i mean it is a ks shit, so it'll likely be the best binned shit out there
>>82645116Let me guess it's gonna be 14 nm.
>>82645116I hope it is, I don't want AMD to raise prices again
>>82645116Consoom product then wait for the next products
>>82645116That's nice, but I don't use Cinebench everyday
>>82645116Cool story, bro. Good for people who run Cinebench all day and nothing else.>>82645180They do matter a lot, if not for electricity cost then for noise.
Completely irrelevant when the Apple Silicon M1 already shows results years ahead.
>>8264511610% more performance for 30% higher price and 60% higher energy draw.
Anonymous (6) 07/22/21(Thu)13:43:03 No.82645690file.png (51 KB, 318x208) google yandex iqdb wait51 KB jesus christ intcelaviv cattle is now comparing existent product with literal shitter.com post from literal nobody peak mental illness
>>82645695>Brown Boveri CorporationBased
>>82645711https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oLA4RgOVlXa3_GWkFIcgUCnLzdQbADHkaXSOtN1UxRo/edit#gid=1477841742He is a pretty well known Intel leaker, not our fault you AchMeDs are all boomer chuds.
How many speedholes you think they added now?
>poozen supposably boosting ahead pre-5000 series launch>everybody believes leaks and deniers get attacked>intel potentially huge leaps>gets trolled by peopletypical amd fagboys
>>82645608>They do matter a lot, if not for electricity cost then for noise.and system cost, for 9900k to run at 5ghz you needed a 360mm radiator at least and those are definitely not cheap
>>82645783the absolute fucking state so you are telling me someone has went trough every single of his shitter posts and than what ? what makes leak correct ? being 15% off the point ? 5%? 25%? you have serious mental illness and no spamming buzzwords wont help cure it
>>82645172>>82645608I remember reviewers saying Zen 4 will have higher wattage.So if 12700k have good enough speed and pricing compared to the 5900x, yes I'll consider buying it immediately since Im planning to move to Win 11 soon.What the fuck is PL2 anyway.
Remember when rocket lake QS "leak" was "faster" than Zen3? KEKhttps://www.notebookcheck.net/Short-lived-happiness-for-Zen-3-Intel-Rocket-Lake-S-Core-i9-11900-QS-up-to-7-lead-over-the-Ryzen-7-5800X-and-up-to-33-over-the-Core-i9-10900K-Core-i9-11900-ES2-similar-to-9900K-10700K.512255.0.html
>>82645842you forgot one crucial detail. Everything on /g/ is just a shitpost. Once AMD has higher TDP than Intel all of a sudden Wattage never mattered and basically something about Israel/Jerusalem
>>82645842>I remember reviewers saying Zen 4 will have higher wattage.Wattage allowance in AM5. Like a higher BIOS memory allowance, since it was a large bottleneck for them trying to support all those cpu's they eventually released for AM4.I bet good money on that the Zen4 wont consume any more power as is, but rather, AMD wants to be ready to release a high power version. Either an insane amount of cores, super high clock rate, a mid/high end integrated GPU for once (they've shown they can do it with two generations of consoles) or maybe even to allow for the 3/4 thread per core technology that they have developed the concept for, and only seemed to scrap for AM4 roadmaps as Intel didn't really fight as hardly as they feared - and as most people believed when Zen 1 was released.
>>82645841Jesus Christ, what kind of English is this, rajeet? I know that the majority of AMD users aren't white and not the brightest but damn. Nontheless, yes there are people who look up the credibility from leakers, hence why every newsoutlet is reporting on this. If you for example made the claim, nobody would give a shit.
>>82645842>What the fuck is PL2 anyway.The CPU uses more watts for exactly 56 seconds to perform better.
>>82645897get help mentally ill retard , or go make more excel spread sheets on non existent products and performance of your favorite corporation , ill stay in reality out of shitter posting cum gulping idiots such as yourself btw fastest cpu in the world is amd lel
>>82645843Please delet sir intel 10nm supershitter can still win, trust the leaks.
>>82645116>new cpu beats old cpuWoah
>>82645912Woah, you sure know how to argue lmao. Keep malding tho, he's a well known leaker and you're some irrelevant mutt who's shivering over Alder Lake decimating AMD.
>>82645116Everybody and their mom's talking about MT beating a 5950x but all I'm excited for is the +55% ST gain over my 9900k
>>82645116This is significant as many were speculating that Intel's new Big+Little architecture starting with Alder Lake would perform like shit in x86 environments even with the new scheduler in Win11. Seems like that's either not the case, or the per core performance of the Golden Cove "Big" Cores has been improved so much that it can carry water for the Gracemont Babbycores.If true, then the 24-Core Raptor Lake launch (8 Big + 16 Little) late next year will be bananas.
>>82645975CB is far from the worst-case in scheduling problems anon as it scales unrealistically well with core count increases. Something that's latency sensitive will be far more telling of big.shittle issues on x86. Things like browser performance, emulation, and short bursty loads are a better measure of scheduling efficiency.
>>82645936>maldingyeah man using actual data and comparing actual products in existence instead of obsessing with someones shitter post as it is on quote literal fact truly makes me a shivering mutt in actual realityintels bleeding edge offer barely " competes " ( if you are willing to use 3 times the electricity ) with amds mid range offering so yeah , while in reality amd offers 16 cores 32 threads intel offers 8 cores 16 triple the power consumtiopn and quintaple the vulnerabilities enjoy your fairy world tho
>>82646003What data lmao, nobody gives a shit about you. The leaker who posted it actually has data that's trustable, you're a nobody. Such a wall of text for your incel screeching kek. It is pretty sad how you hard you seethe about AMD getting destroyed, and Intel actually can ship CPUs in volumes unlike TSMC. Also work on your English, are you that French mutt David who posts here?
Don't you guys find ironic that the name is "Intel"
For fucks sake, wasn't already a thread on the same matter? I guess, the OP is attention whore.
>>82646061sorry i am just pointing out that shitter.com post w numbers from a person that is not even their employee about product that does not even exist may be suspicious and of course that in fact , that product , does not exist otuside of your head
>>82645116The only thing I hate about this is having to deal with trash early DDR5 spec and price.I want to go back to Intelaviv, I'm tired of AMD.
>>82645116>latest X cpu beats last years Y cpumore news at 11