Is he right?
Porn is free speech.
>no pornis that some feminist angle? I guess its nice that he treats loli fans equally to everyone else and doesnt discriminate against a minority.
>>79684744post links instead of screenshots, you fucking faggot
He’s right about porn. Small websites can’t handle it. I remember when the plebbitors got mad at Imgur and tried creating an alternative site. They got spammed with CP and then taken down. Just ban all of it until you have a decent moderation team
>>79684750Go away coomer>>79684765More like christian>>79684768Shutup
>>79684774All I'm seeing here is that porn shouldn't be regulated.
>>79684744> No pornBASED BASED BASEDPorn doesn't belong anywhere outside dedicated private sites that require proof of 18+ age to register.
>>79684774what about tumblr? They died the second they banned porn.
>>79684744Coomers are so pathetic. Why do they want everyone to tolerate their degeneracy
>>79684787Social media shouldn't even be legal to use for minors.Figuratively fuck kids. You aren't a human being with a soul until you can buy booze.
>>79684804You're born naked, there's absolutely no reason why you should be made to feel bad about the body you're born with.
>>79684804If you're anti-degeneracy, you're anti-free speech. If you're anti-free speech, why not just use Twitter?
>>79684787fucking hate artists who use twitter to post their pornimpossible to find specific shit unless you just know the artist name or they actually bother to use hashtags
>>79684810If alcohol had no social taboos against underage drinking and no laws associated with it's sale, no kids would ever drink because it wouldn't be seen as taboo and it wouldn't be considered a "rite of passage" to drink as soon as it's legal to celebrate adulthood.
>>79684744No.There's only one 'x' in "doxing".
>>79684826Porn is not speech
>>79684786>All I'm seeing here is that porn shouldn't exist.Fixed. We shouldn’t freely consume what is used for psychological warfare
>>79684844Still a useful milestone regardless.The drinking age being 21 is good anyway, since it fucks up your brain much more in your teens.
>>79684826> If you're anti-degeneracy, you're anti-free speechNo. Public obscenity laws exist. Just like you can't go have sex in the town square, you shouldn't be able to post a video of you having sex in a virtual town square. Relegating porn to private 18+ login-only websites is consistent with the rules on IRL sex.
>>79684844I doubt that, kids enjoy experimenting with altered states of consciousness
>>79684889Right, we should forcibly remove everyone's erogenous body parts at birth so nobody can produce porn.
Gab is more cucked than Twitter but with less censorship, basically.
>>79684884It objectively is, at least in the US.>>79684916The internet is not a town square, retard.
>>79684782>More like christianSeeing as the bible belt fucking MAINLINES porn, I'm still not seeing the sense in it. What better place for it then a social media platform catering nigh-exclusively to angry white males who can't get any?
>>79684744>No PornSo much for Free Speech. There is no difference between Left and Right where it matters.
>>79684744>literally a private company
>>79684765It’s a Christian angle. Instead of hiring 500 experts to determine if something is CP or not you just ban porn.
>>79684929>less censorshipEven Twitter allows porn, though. Gab is just another pathetic safe space pretending to be a Free Speech platform.
ITT bunch of retards who think free speech means only words. Free speech is freedom of expression. That includes coomer crack.
>>79684911even before I was a teenager all I wanted to do with my life was drugs lol.Education is all that matters, age as a limiter is almost entirely arbitrary but its useful most of the time IMO. Lying to kids about drugs and their real effects is by far the biggest factor fueling drug abuse. If everyone knows that politicians and their parents are lying, then they're definitely going to indulge to understand for themselves.
>>79684814You’re born naked and immediately clothed because we have something called a civilisation.
>>79684931> The internet is not a town square, retard.It should be>>79684935Porn is not speech in the same way as an opinion that can be expressed in words. It can and should have additional restrictions as to when and where it can be expressed.
>>79684964Civilization predates clothes.
>>79684916>Relegating porn to private 18+ login-only websites is consistent with the rules on IRL sex.>login onlyAh yes because tracking people's pron habits is by far the most important part right? faggot?
>>79684953Twitter allows porn, doxxing, and -- depending on your ideology -- even threats.
Also, can someone confirm or deny that Gab banned people after Charlottesville or some such event for anti-Jew posts?
>>79684765I fucking hate you coomers. Can't there be A SINGLE website for discussions where no porn is allowed? Just go to the other 6 million websites that allow porn you piece of shit.
>>79684969>It should beIt doesn't fucking matter whether or not you think it should be, it isn't. Real life and online social dynamics are apples and oranges.Making 18+ images not load without signing into an account (and banning people who don't mark 18+ images) is trivial. Gab is only banning porn wholesale because American "conservatives" are technically incompetent mongoloids.
>>79685005That's the whole internet, i can't post porn anywhere, not even here on this board.
>Freeze peech>No pornExcuse me?
>>79684933>bible beltYou mean the nigger belt lmao>angry white males who can't get anySomeone is projecting :)
Gab will never be anything more than a right-wing-Christcuck echo chamber.Doesn't even matter about the fucking porn. The marketing is cringey as fuck.
>>79685027>>>/hm/Go share your disgusting images over there
>>79685005i'd fully respect policies like >>79684744 if you just admitted you care about free speech and only want a right wing hug box to compete with the liberal hug box
>>79685051I'm not gay tho.
>>79684889t. weakminded pleb
>>79685024Or perhaps because they just don't want porn on their site? I find it annoying when people post porn when I'm not trying to watch porn. I would prefer if porn just stayed on its own sites.
>>79685059No, you wouldn't. No it isn't. They're aren't banning left leaning parasites. When they do you'll have a point.
>>79685086>They're aren't banning left leaning parasites.they don't have to because 99.9% of gab is jew fellating neocons, not even most of /pol/ is welcome there.
Seems reasonable, porn is a pain to determine if it is illegal and in which countries. Especially with all these new laws appearing about revenge porn and deepfakes. It is hard to determine if a picture is illegal. Most other expressions of 'free speech' are pretty easy to figure out if they're illegal.
>>79684744should allow drawn and cgi porn
>>79685077Then they need to stop advertising themselves as a site for free speech.They don't need to have a laissez-faire attitude toward porn, but tolerating it to some degree is implied.
>>79684744>We accept all content, except for this content we don't agree withI hate Republitards. They can't stand by>muh conservative valuesfor more than ten minutes without contradicting themselves. The whole party is an embarrassment.
>>79685105>It is hard to determine if a picture is illegal.That's a lame excuse, fully determining whether most original content is legal is hard if you want to get anal about it. A common sense attitude toward porn is not hard to maintain.
>>79685047yup.It's how these things function.When you create a free speech place, it inevitably gets flooded with nazis and other retards because they are the ones getting censored, other people might care about free speech as a concept, but rarely have any actual use of a platform that bases itself solely around it. Even trumpites with all their safe spaces still use Facebook and lefties still go on here despite the /pol/ raid in 2016 changing the website massively
>>79684744based AND redpilled
>>79684750This. Gab is dogshit.
>>79684789Yeah but that’s after it became 50% porn
>>79685183Was that a big post?
>>79684889>We shouldn’t freely consume what is used for psychological warfareIf you don't build some kind of tolerance, it'll knock you out the first time you're (re)exposed to it. One of the major reasons the right was weak in the past was because of prudeness, excommunication of those with a sexual history, and inability to maintain the attention of young people who's hormones are raging. If you literally would just let people look at porn, fuck like rabbits, drop the religious shit, etc. and then say "but fiscal conservatism and guns tho", the ideology would actually get somewhere.
>>79684911>The drinking age being 21 is good anywayThis is your brain on American
>>79684744Completely reasonable As long as you aren't massively autistic
>>79685259yea but it wont work since the site's whole appeal is marketing towards the massively autistic
>>79685296meant to reply to >>79685287
>>79685160It's obviously easier. I can tell if a post is a call to violence or doxxing by it's content. I can't tell from a image if this is now some now-illegal revenge porn unless the contributor decides to make that clear. Or perhaps it is a 17 year old. How would I know? It's more difficult. Determining if it is pirated is hard but that's why you simply delete anything DMCAd regardless of the validity
Andrew Torba is delusional. He is insane if he thinks he's going to attract mainstream conservatives to his site while allowing neo-Nazis to share the platform with them.
>>79684789That's cos it was a porn site. >>79684750Agreed with you at first, but upon further reflection banning porn isn't any type of censorship or anything it avoids legal hassle (the political arguments surrounding porn are largely irrelevant here) and is much fairer than banning some porn but not all.
>>79685372Like they got a chosen lol
>>79684844DESU, all drugs should be legal, but illegal for anyone under 26 to purchase or consume without parent or guardian supervision as the executive functions and other higher level cognitive skills biologically do not finish development until that time. Also should not be allowed to join the military. Just make clones and drones for that. Also abortion should be mandatory for anyone under 26 or over 35.
>>79685396They'll just go back to Twitter, it's not like they are getting banned left and right personally.
>>79684744> no pornTwitter allows up to hardcore porn, check you favorite porn star's account. So, think Twitter wins that one.
The fact even he still needs Twitter says it all really. Gab is a no-starter.
>>79685378They only banned porn because they're repressed christcucks.
>>79685259Basically this. They're stuck as a Christian political movement for the most part and religion is dying out.
>>79685460They may be, it's still the right decision for their site imo and I don't see why they would want/need porn
>>79685483That's mainstream conservatism, if you are talking about the type of conservative that Andrew Torba is, he is just grifting the Christian meme. This guy became a "Christian" in the last year due to politics, not personal conviction.
>>79685276>fatty foods are bad for you but alcohol is not because muh tradishunyuropoor/thirdie cope
>>79684744Actually, would be nice to see what occurs when you regulate globally porn and ban it altogether.Go the way NWO guys... I want to corroborate what happens in such situation.
>>79684750Ok so the meaning of the free speech rule is you can express any opinion that you want and porn is pretty much always used to jack off to not communicate ideas. Like yea technically porn is free speech and if you search hard enough you could find girl masturbating political art but saying gab sucks because it doesn't allow porn is asbergers teir because youre thinking about the literal definition of the rule instead of what the rule is supposed to do
>>79685495Because otherwise they'll look like retarded hypocrites after claiming to be part of the vanguard of free speech.
>>79685522>what the rule is supposed to doEither speech is free or it is not. Period. You need to pick one. You cannot have both.
>>79685423Delusional.People are waking up.
>>79684744>no pornwtf i thought gab was supposed to be good
>>79685005>Can't there be A SINGLE website for discussions where no porn is allowed?unironically go to tumblr
>>79685127sexual acts is not speech, fuck off coomer.
>>79684750Porn is a product of the Jew and it cannot be allowed in the Aryan free world.
>>79685550>>79685565>>79685585You will never be white.
>>79685565Delusional how? Which of the conservative talking heads have stopped using Twitter after Trump got banned?
>>79685530Is porn speech?
>>7968561175 million people voted Trump, as much as it pains you. Even most of the tech illiterates here are starting to see a problem with Twitter having such a stranglehold on the distribution of information and censorship.Gab is a good short term alternative for those people. Long term, the Federation is the best option, even for commies.
>>79685504Grifter or not, he's not the type of person to lead the conservative ideology in the direction it needs to move if it wants to survive. Gotta drop the religious hardliner stuff altogether unless you seriously just have a hard-on for picking corpses.
>>79684750>its another leftist pretending to be a free speech advocate episode
Question: how has Gab been around for like a couple years longer than Parler and Gab doesn't manage to have the same security problems?It's like Gab is building their own browser now or something, while Parler has an Equifax-tier leak.
>>79685600>Porn is a product of the JewSpoken like a true non-white with zero knowledge of Greco-Roman, Nordic, Anglo, Celtic, Aryan, or Indo-Aryan history/religion/tradtion/etc.
>>79685643You didn't answer the question.
>>79684750Who cares, I don't want porn on my social media site. There are already tons of porn sites, go there you obsessed coomers.
>>79685679>Question: how has Gab been around for like a couple years longer than Parler and Gab doesn't manage to have the same security problems?Because Parler was a centralized honeypot meant to catch and catalog rightoids and most rightoids are genuinely sub-100 IQ mouthbreathers who wouldn't think twice about sharing their state ID or SSN to get a shiny new account with a checkmark on it.
>>79684765Porn distracts from actual discussion and rarely if ever has any artistic merit of its own.
>>79685679parler was made like impressively stupidly
>>79685643if you're going by popular/absolute vote count though trump didn't do that well either election. unless youre one of those 'all biden votes were fake' guys
>>79685745>most rightoids are genuinely sub-100 IQ mouthbreathers who wouldn't think twice about sharing their state ID or SSNBut /pol/ was calling it a honeypot harder than yelling at itself to not counterprotest the BLM riots.
Are there any elected officials who use Gab? I can't see Gab becoming a viable alternative for anything if everyone who has skin in the game avoids it because of the implications (white nationalism etc).
>>79685778>not using porn as a means to filter brainlets from the discussionNGMI. Even dogs are capable of being trained to wait with a treat placed on their nose. Removing porn is like both refusing to build herd immunity and take a vaccine.
>>79684750Porn is degeneracy and should be banned.
>>79685809The people who voted for him is not an insignificant number. And he still won the electoral college in 16. You could make some presumption about trump support if we had any realistic voter turn out in America but the irony is that most people would rather complain/be docile than actually fucking participate.
>>79684750>Porn is free speech.Nope
>>79685818Contemplate how retarded the majority of /pol/ is, and realize that most of the American right is much, much dumber than that.
>>79684750So wait, social networks are no longer private forums and now they have to abide by the First Amendment?
>>79684750Its quite literally not.
>>79685736This. Porn workers can have accounts only if they don't post nude photos or link to their shit. Just like a regular person.
>>79685809>if you're going by popular/absolute vote countWhat part of my post made you think it had anything to do with who won the election?My point is 75 million people voted Trump, and that it's easy for most of those people to now see how malicious Twitter is. Stop conflating everything with your boring political shitfighting.
>>79685933Twitter solves this with NSFW restriction. It's a beautiful system. You quite literally can use Twitter completely SFW.
>>79685863Everyone is that dumb: the left thinks calling for unity is going to work as their president-elect is calling a moderate "Goebbels", the right elected a professional wrestler to save them from the establishment, and centrists thought ignoring their government for decades was acceptable.The US is like three sped sleds that hold an overwhelming majority of the populace and while thinking you might've ridden one doesn't mean you don't, thinking you've never ridden one means you do.
>>79685833Gab cannot replace Twitter as a central cuck hub. What it can do is bring in a decent portion of people growing increasingly displeased with Twitter's censorship and authoritarianism, which is growing fast.The truth and the real answer is in the Federation. Decentralization. This is something even lefties can be comfortable using, all the while not cucking themselves to Twitter and Facebook.
>>79685974>centrists thought ignoring their government for decades was acceptable.Considering how inherently retarded and salvageable American politics are, I can't really say they're wrong.
>>79685613Not op, but copied from Wikipedia:Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction. The term "freedom of expression" is sometimes used synonymously but includes any act of seeking, receiving, and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.I would say porn falls squarely under information as images or video and so will fall under free speech, raging literalism aside.
>>79685483>religion is dying outAtheism is the fastest shrinking religion in the world. Atheism is in decline worldwide, with the number of atheists falling from 4.5% of the world's population in 1970 to 2.0% in 2010 and projected to drop to 1.8% by 2020,Real surveys and statistics say atheism is on the decline worldwide. Sorry atheists but atheism is not on the rise nor is it winning. It's still the minority and a declining one at that.The Pew Research Center's statistics show that atheism is expected to continue to decline all the way into 2050 with a continued growth of religion. Other research also shows a huge surge in growth for Christianity in China which is currently the world's most "atheist" nation because of the atheist communist government suppressing religion, the research suggests that China will soon become the world's most Christian nation within 15 years.This is simply history repeating itself: Christianity prospered in Rome back in the ancient era when it was suppressed and it still grew in the militant atheist soviet Russia when it was suppressed there only a century ago with the majority of Russians today now also identifying as Christian. Just goes to show that atheist suppression of religion still doesn't stop religion.http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050/http://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-unaffiliated/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10776023/China-on-course-to-become-worlds-most-Christian-nation-within-15-years.htmlhttp://masterrussian.com/russia/facts.htm
>>79686007>I can't really say they're wrongThat's why you deserved Donald Trump.
>>79685981Yeah good luck with that whole decentralization and scaling thing, these things are decided by revenue and just like Gab has no monetary value the Fediverse has none either once scale is a factor.Twitter will dominate in 4 years, I'll keep your post in mind but in case I'm wrong, but I urge you to do the same.
>>79686095No shit, at least you have to pass a test or something to join the communist party.
>>79686095>religion is growing because authoritarian governments ruling fuckhuge populations force it on themCome on man, think.
Can someone even point out to me what's the point of Twitter other than being spoonfed meme issues by bluechecks, and let me remind you that Trump, the NSA, and the CIA are all bluechecks.
>>79686119>No shit, at least you have to pass a test or something to join the communist party.
>>79686115>Yeah good luck with that whole decentralization and scaling thing, these things are decided by revenue and just like Gab has no monetary value the Fediverse has none either once scale is a factor.You say that, yet here we are seeing hordes upon hordes of people dump Whatsapp for Telegram and Signal. A lot of the Signal hype was generated by Elon Musk alone.Normalfags don't follow money, they follow trends. As long as decentralization trends, it's in with a shot.
>>79686125>because authoritarian governments ruling fuckhuge populations force it on them*collapsed atheistic regimes forcing atheism on their populations
>>79684744>no pornMeh. IMO porn is speech so banning it makes Gab not a free speech platform. I do think it's okay though because it's their rules what to allow/not allow. I also don't care that they don't want porn on there, but I take an issue in them being even against SFW lolis. No lolis no buy. Not that I'd ever want to use (a)social media in the first place, they corrupt your mind much more than porn ever could. You know it's true. Anyone saying "muh porn rots the mind/soul. muh porn addiction. muh think of the children and GOOOOOOD" who still uses social media all day every day are retarded hypocrites. Weed? Alcohol? Tobacco? Porn? How about you fucking get off your smartphone that's glued to your hand 24/7. Get rid of your smartphone, all that app crap, social media. Actually meet and talk to people, have fun, ignore vapid throwaway oneliners by literalwhos on the internet. Fap, have sex, pat a 2D loli on the head. Whatever makes you happy. But get rid of social media and smartphones!
>>79686151Given that most world religions are constantly fighting to establish their own world pseudo-governments, I don't blame them. It's hard to control the situation once you've been infiltrated by religious psychological implements.
>>79685323innocent until proven guilty. assume they are 18+ unless otherwise proven
>>79685715Does he have to?
>>79686146Telegram and Signal are being shilled because of their relatively low moderation. I don't know about Signal too much, but Telegram is introducing advertisement this year and with 500 million users you can be safe that advertisers are not going to allow the platform to operate with zero moderation. And Google and Apple are definitely not going to allow it either if it becomes THE platform for right wing extremism.The problem with what you are saying is that there is no business model for social media that does not depend on ad revenue, so they are all doomed to fail if their policy is to not police their users.
>>79685605>You will never be white.You're talking about yourself shlomo? Cause you can't wish for something that won't happen
>>79686099Nah, there's nothing that makes me want to blow my brains out harder than listening to (or reading) made-for-public-consumption material from mainstream politicians (including Trump).
>>79686305I mean, if the argument that Gab is going to become the conservative Twitter (temporarily or not) you would expect there to be some engagement between the big talking heads on Twitter switching over to Gab. I'm not seeing it, just a bunch of people crying about Twitter..on Twitter.Even Parler had some engagement from these types of people, but mostly retarded boomer MIGAtards who still used Twitter mostly.
>>79685837>refusing to build herd immunity
>>79684814we live in a society
>>79684786>other guy mention how small site gets bombarded with CPThen you proceed to say>All I'm seeing here is that porn shouldn't be regulated.You sound like a pedo retard
>>79684977>Ah yes because tracking people's pron habits is by far the most important part right? faggot?According to google and the nsa. Yes.
>>79686355Wish I was a jew, then I'd be pulling 400k at a fintech firm and nuking iran.
>>79686359Then accept you're not part of the civic process by your own choice, and shut up.
>>79686483>muh civic processLiterally faker than wrestling
>>79684744dude actually is right, Gab will be big
>>79686502>everything sucks>i refuse to do anything
>>79685600>free world>X cannot be allowedlel
>>79686095My theory is religion declined after WW2 as people felt abandonned by God, knowing two countries basically have the power to bring forth the Apocalypse is scary enough to make one lose faith.
>>79686597Yeah, and retard public twitter personalities aren't going to fix shit.
there are already leftist liberal subhumans on reddit, planing to flood it with porn, violance larping and other fedposting .this is the level of the left now. they cannot beat you without playing their little rat game.
>>79686746Gab jannies gotta earn their paychecks.
>>79684744>free speech platform>except for these things I don't likeWhat a joke.
>>79686331The point of my post was to show that it's possible to move even high volumes of normalfags off a platform, as shown by the Whatsapp exodus.
>>79686810if you want your cp porn gore race mixing propaganda, go to the normal services already available.fucking fedposting retard.
>>79685577>discussion>tumblrThey're literally creating a new platform instead of trying to hijack one. What's the problem with you?
>>79686713So you're on equal footing with retard public twitter personalities?
>>79686839thank you for bringing those to attention anon
>>79686898I'm not an attention whore that shitposts under my real name and pretends to be some type of messiah while doing it. I'm just another nobody pissing in the ocean, and that's how it should be for everyone else.
>>79684744If you want to ban cunny so much because you get morally outraged by drawings, you deserve to be censored. After all, you advocate for censorship yourself and the only logical end result is for it to affect you eventually. I have no sympathy for the moralfags who want to censor loli getting censored themselves.
>>79686938well, the morality check on cunny banning doesn't pass universalizability, so you can argue that it isn't moral in first place
>>79686938>If you want to ban cunny so much because you get morally outraged by drawings, you deserve to be censored. After all, you advocate for censorship yourself and the only logical end result is for it to affect you eventually. I have no sympathy for the moralfags who want to censor loli getting censored themselves.
>>79686973>>79686994Why is it that people who want to ban anime and 2D are always the biggest pedophiles in real life? Just look at France or Australia, they absolutely hate 2D and simultaneously support real child pornography being produced by netflix.
the site had barely survived the recent influx of people. if they started regularly serving the pornography appetites of you perverts there would be no left over bandwidth for anything else. you should know this /g/.or maybe you're here for consoomer electronics
>porn is speech>porn is informationno
>>79687000>let me talk out of my ass for a bitMost 'native french' like anime because france is a country of degenerates.The people who would want to ban it are the ones sick of it, and/or muslims.I don't know nor care about australia, they ban violent video games and everything else that offends them,what the fuck do you expect?>Why is it that people who want to ban anime and 2D are always the biggest pedophiles in real life?You're talking about yourself?Go to the cinema for big projections faggot nobody likes to have serious conversations on a place where degenerates spawn randomly.This is why twitter was doomed to fail: manchilds(like you probably are)>inb4 anime websitefuck off and grow up
>>79687000france is actually pretty okay with 2D cunnies
>>79686810You've got a point about porn. However threats and doxxing are literally illegal and even if they weren't they shit up any site they're allowed upon. Its kind of like spam, scamming, or exploits, or malware etc.. if you say "no rules at all!" you're going to have a shit sandwich as soon as the shitty people show up (and with most of these sites like gab, that's most of them). Putting aside the whole "free speech in law vs in spirit, gov't vs private" thing, having some TOS doesn't mean you're lacking the spirit of free speech. Now, for a communications platform it seems a bit odd not to allow porn because Gab's admin is basically some hardcore christian nofapper I get it, but that's the closest issue I can see. It would kind of be like saying "no curse words" - it doesn't really limit the actual content, but the descriptors - yet it doesn't feel right especially for a supposedly open platform. The bigger issue on most of these so called "free speech" sites is the hypocrisy of the ideology. They tend to ban left-leaning people (or just presumed things they find degenerate like lgbt ) quickly regardless of "free speech" Hell, even the most safe-space communities around specifically mention "no fash, no alt-right bullshit, no racism/sexism/transphobia etc" up front. Gab, Parler and other right-heavy sites don't list it but just ban people. I have more respect for fucking stormfront who at least says "yes this is a nazi site, white power, no blacks or gays etc" , but these other sites are just cowardly hypocrites that outright ban or allow posted TOS violations on people perceived to be left leaning despite all their crowing about FREEZE PEACH
>>79687069The leftist governments in power all over the world are trying to ban all sorts of 2D. Take Canada/UK/Australia/Most of EU. They also happen to do nothing about actual children being abused. It's almost as if child rapists use 2D as a scapegoat to deflect from their crimes and fool people into believing that they are doing something. Western media is oversaturated with sexualizing young girls but if the girl isn't real and is an illustration, only then it's a problem according to pedophiles like you.
>>79684744>/g/ - technologyWhy is this shit thread still up?
>>79687069>non argument and jumping straight to ad-hominemanime website fuck off newfag
>>79687142/g/ is the last bastion of strength against the alt-left silicone valley
>>79686056Well maybe gab wants to be a freedom of speech platform and not a freedom of speech platform, as dumb as that sounds it would be a less controversial though still useful service.
>>79687069>inb4 anime websiteanime website
>>79685522Porn communicates sexuality. It's speech.>>79685005lol why the fuck are you on 4chan
>>79687163No, that'd be >>>/x/ or >>>/pol/Whichever you like the most.
>>79687069is indeed anime website thois actually an anime field
>>79686920But you're just as bad.
>>79687241not the anon but one of the benefits is that not as many people get to witness the shitshow
>>79685059Yes, give me my fucking hug box already and quit trying to get Republicans banned from public life.
>>79684744Ah yes, the violent and illegal activity, porn.
>>79687290isn't pol republicans hugbox?
>>79685605Wow you totally fooled us with that verbal karate move.
>>79687163/g/ has and will always be a commie board.
>>79687321/g/ is a cunny board
>>79687321>>79687324can be both, cunnies with a focus on the community
What kind of Christcuck meltdown will Andrew Torba be having when his domain is wiped from DNS zone files?
>>79685372So conservative = neo-nazi rigghhhhtttt
>>79687389well they could be, it's not mutually-exclusive
>>79687108>>79687153>>79687189>>79687209>>79687233go have a child,take care of it, show your child some "CUNNY" when s/he's growing, then virtue signal to me about who's damaging the kids faggot.You're pathetic if you think somehow protecting 2D degeneracy is doing anything good for the culture.It's at best a honeypot and control method to keep pedos in check,but besides that it promotes a lot of actions against kids that are not simply to raise them properly, educate and protect.Maybe realize your need to love something that is prefaced with this non-productive "hobby" is not something that most people receive in the same way.>From the line of reasoning: Let's allow prostitution because that will keep the rates of domestic violence and meat-trafficking at bay, somehow.Not at all creating pipelines that facilitate selling sex and other vices, on top of the fact that it's gonna be a tax-heaven for governments and devalues sexual interaction between people.No faggot, that would imply that people have no self-control and can't make decisions.I'm not in favor of banning your degenerate, pedo-inducing shit actually, but you're a fucking retard if you think that has a place in social platforms which were merely created because your pedo leader Biden bans wrong opinions.Pornography is not equivalent to discussion, you're intellectually dishonest if you think that.You can use it to transmit ideas and arguably have artistic value but you're hijacking people's emotions, not resorting to any rationale.It's a SOCIAL platform, if you want a place for artistic/degenerate shit use pornhub or literally the majority of the entire fucking web destined to jacking off your tiny dick.
>>79687460Didn't read lmao
>>79687460I didn't even read your post. Anime website.
>>79684744>We're a free speech platform >NOOOO NOT THAT SPEECH, THATS OFFENSIVE MIGA cucks strike again.
>>79687460i have two words for you
>>79687479>>79687481I expected nothing less.I hope your genes and your way of thinking dies like the japs you venerate>>79687501i know what you're gonna say degeneate.Why don't you try communicating through 2D pictures?
99% of twitter porn is bestiality, 3DPD whores shilling their e-corner and werediaper artworks (google it).
>>79684744>>79684750A bit just open 2 tabs
>>79687460anon, actual pedophiles would probably be too busy trying to get your daughter to go naked on whatever popular social media kids are using nowadays as opposed to bickering with you using animu pics, and I'd argue that more damage is done in the former
>>79687536Which is exactly why we need a good Christian corner of the internet with only good Christian porn.
>>79687529Anally anguishedbooty botheredderriere devastatedfanny flusteredhind-side humiliatedposterior peeved rectally rectangledtushy tussled
>>79687529Sorry I'm not gonna waste my precious shitposting time reading your schizophrenic political gibberish. :^)
>>79687460>ban prostitutionare we gonna ban guns next because lax control in one state allows resell to other stricter states while also allowing an overall higher transaction volume which creates more room for illegal trades to muddle in?
>>79684750build your own social network
>>79687501>two wordssubs suck?
>>79687671If you are unironically a dubsfag you should commit sudoku.
>>79687678>sudokui'm sorry, but i don't speak nuclear fallout and i have enough dignity to not lower myself to learn it or read subtitles just for big anime tiddies.
>>79684744>Common sense stuffUntil it's not.Nearly every social media site started out the same way with the same lofty ideals. Users will find a way to abuse the shit out of whatever system you originally dream up, and you'll have to adapt and moderate or be litigated into the ground.
>>79687721this anon said the pleasure of coming inside btw
>>79687759Which loli does /g/ like to nakadashi the most?
>>79687191Even we got sfw parts.
>>79684744>replace one censorship with another censorshipNo loli, no register.
>>79687834She's 598 years old btw
I think the core of this argument is whether non-verbal or non-textual visual depictions can be "speech".The answer to this is of course yes. Observe The Creation of Adam from the Sistine Chapel. Are there literal words in this image? No. Just some naked guy touching fingers with an old dude. You can't listen to it. You can't read it. But is it not speech? Does it not communicate the concept of god giving life to Adam or that mankind was created in god's image, among other interpretations? Sure Michelangelo could have just thrown up some text saying "God made Adam and stuff" on the ceiling, but instead he painted a picture that shows not tells, yet communicates all the same.Now i'm not saying that your average porn, hentai, or cunny carries quite the same cultural significance or meaning, but the point is that speech doesn't have to be restrained to words spoken by mouth or written/typed on paper or a computer to be considered as such. Besides, these things can have meaning in their own way, such as with visual novels that contain H-scenes. Even raw porn in aggregate can be communication. It communicates the sexual fantasies and desires of a subcommunity or society during a given period. Going back to the Adam painting, even that could contain an element of sexuality with how he is shown. Mikey was known to have a thing for dudes.
>>79687872well put anon
>>79684774>plebbitors got mad at ImgurWasn't imgur made by a redditor to host images for reddit?
The same people that complain about Twitch thots and only fans whores. Will in the same breath whine about this rule.
Fuck gab, it's full of the kind of retards like >>79687460 that shit up /pol/ and complain about people posting anime images on there, on a website that has been anime-oriented since day 1.>>79687069>>Why is it that people who want to ban anime and 2D are always the biggest pedophiles in real life?>You're talking about yourself?Go to the cinema for big projections faggot nobody likes to have serious conversations on a place where degenerates spawn randomly.This is why twitter was doomed to fail: manchilds(like you probably are)Source: your ass. The biggest anti-anime people are always the actual pedos, like pic related.Also,>>79687460>your pedo leader BidenI can guarantee you that I hate him a lot more than you do. I hate you both because you're both authoritarian pieces of shit that can't stay the fuck out of other people's business.
>>79684750Porn isn't speech, degenerate.
>>79685047so are the ones posting in this tread nothing but those people, it seems like it by the way they type. Like they just stepped right into /g/ wearing a clown mask saying how do you do fellow techies
>>79687142it's being invaded by conservicucks after the mass banning, which is why you've been seeing a shit load of "alternate" site threads, hopefully they all fuck off back to their hugbox soon
>>79688891>Source: your ass. The biggest anti-anime people are always the actual pedos, like pic related.you proved me wrong faggot, i'm literally done.(By the way the fact that you're posting that faggot from twitter proves me right. Actual pedos would never use something like gab/parler because they would get hunted down by bible-thumpers)>>79688891>I hate you both because you're both authoritarian pieces of shit that can't stay the fuck out of other people's business.So because i don't want your nice disgusting pedo shit on my platform i'm authoritarian? What a dumb fuck of a failure you might be.The web is full of your weeb trash, why would you feel the need to post your shit on a platform that's not intended for it?Seems like we struck a nerve.Also in case you're a troglodyte i haven't complained about posting anime on /pol/ nor on any other website that allows it, but you need to project about me to fit your narrative. Go post your most degenerate shit but keep it out of platforms which are intended for discussion, especially political.You might dislike Biden but you surely don't seem to like people ideologically different.Might i also add again that both you and Biden like small underage petite girls?The only difference is that Biden, in his miserable life, actually prefers them real instead of cartoonish.
don't they still ban you for talking about Jews?
>>79684789>site that immediately and arbitrarily bans everyone except degenerates died after banning degeneracy>see, the key to success is degeneracy!
Reminder that Minds is the superior choice for actual free speech. They even have the 'permaweb' option where you post to a blockchain for true censorship-resistance.
>>79684958art is gay
>>79685600True.The Aryan masterrace was corrupted by the Jew by introducing N*groid w*men into atlantis.Before that we were glorious all male most superiour species.
>>79688994>So because i don't want your nice disgusting pedo shit on my platform i'm authoritarian?No, it's because your posts reek of tradcon.
>>79689160>No, it's because your posts reek of tradcon.Which i'm not, but rejecting 2D cartoon degeneracy actually counts as "traditional".This is your brain on american culture & values.Fuck off
>>79689055meh true, but it hasn't been tested for stability yet. It's way nice and more like a replacement for facebook instead of twitter
Imagine making a "free speech platform" and enforcing your beliefs about porn onto it
>>79689055I'd keep away from anything predicated on cryptocurrency. Not necessarily blockchain (without an earnable, usable etc.. currency), but definitely anything involved with crypto is less desirable because it will always have vested interests from others that have nothing to do with your site's focus; people who want to make money by getting crypto, people who get fucked because yesterday it used to only cost cents in order to post a video and now its dollars etc.. its just not a very good thing . Minds is based on ETH I think and that alone is a clusterfuck. Use fediverse and/or distributed tech instead, but keep the fuck away from crypto "powered" anything, because there's too many factors for gaming it, exploiting it, or vested interests in fucking with it in general.
>>79689177>complaining about 2D cartoon degeneracy>posting on 2D cartoon forumexcellent
>>79689497Not every 2D cartoon is degenerate, mr. Direction brain.
>>79685077>he needs a safespace from porn
>>79687163>silicone valleyis this an anti fake tits board
>>79684765if you allow porn on your site it will devolve into a porn site. there's enough porn on other sites, go there for cooming.
>>79689638I wonder where are the onionboys screaming about MUH SCIENZ when it comes down to porn, despite it being scientifically confirmed harmful, literally reducing grey matter over time and porn sites being a platform for sex trafficking.But I guess it's a "different thing" and you should tolerate every single moron out there shitting up your brain with images destroying concept of intimacy they jack off on. I don't mind it being somewhere, I just won't read your shit and won't visit that site, if I wanted to I would typed pornhub of whatever you look for. But somehow porn posters don't like being ignored and try to push it anywhere where this is allowed
>>79689684Coomers will rationalize everything to keep cooming.
>>79687460>sperging out over anime drawingsthis post is proof that threads like >>79684744 should be banned from blue boards, they're always filled with people that shouldn't be here
>>79689677honestly, fake tits are a travesty. As I understand it, they need to be redone every few years so it's not like you suddenly gained tits
>>79685709Why yes, you did speak as if you had no knowledge at all.
>>79684826Nice, what next? Funny is free speech? Murder is free speech? Banned substances are free speech? You retard, porn is not a form of speech.
>>79689760>a bunch of shit that nobody will ever define as speech at all0/10
>>79689684there are numerous ways you can filter this shit, and even if you see it for 1 minute, if your brain is so weak that you break down or something, you may have past trauma
>>79684750Monkey brain, go watch your porn.
>>79689762But porn is free speech somehow. Why not admit that free speech is whatever you want it to be and you just wanna do whatever you want with complete disregard for anyone else? Slimeball.
>>79689775One of the ways to filter this shit is to ban it from your platform and make posters free to post it somewhere else. Makes sense?
>>79689684>literally getting brain damage from seeing genitalia and genitalia manipulationI used to think how girls get mind-broken ahegao-faced 2 pages into the comic is a little silly but now I see that I am wrong.
>>79689818If it's a free speech platform with adults on it they should be able to stomach it and filter it out themselves if they don't like it. like 4chan. You are as much of a pussy as the other side
>>79689831not that anon but do you think it's anti-free speech if moderators delete off-topic posts?
>>79684744The point isn't to make a gab CoC. The point is to get everyone talking about a gab CoC. So far you've succeeded.
>>79685516alcohol is good for you, in small quantities.fermatation helps us digest foods and nutrients we otherwise coludnt use, and alcohol itself is a good perservative/antiseptic to prolong the shelf life of whatever it is.wine and beer shouldnt have a drinking age, but i see the need to restrict hard liquor.>>79685521people have more sex, resulting in higher birthrates, but also more stds and more rape>>79685837banning porn from one small website != banning it from society entirely.>>79687872porn, as "speech" is low quality.same as spam, soijack shitters or "lol u tk him 2 da bar?" incomprehenible crap.on the balance you might want to make the user filter it, but porn, unlike the other examples, uses far more server disk space and sends the admins bandwidth into the stratosphere.>>79685950i would prefer to compare it to wikipedia.wikipedia has a few select videos of human genitals slamming into each other.but they restrict spamming commons with porn, curating only those select examples for purely illustrative purposes.porn, like interprative dance, is not speech.it is information, and is an "expression" but it does not express an idea.at best it only expresses itself.>>79686056speech is information, but information is not speech.repetitive and redundant information, or random information, is noise.in communications engineering/signal processing, you need to filter out noise to make the signal clear.even in the case that you consider porn to be the signal, it strikes me as being unsuited for a "social" site; porn being intrinsically a one-producer-to-many-viewer information flow, rather than many-to-many.few people want to see ugly people fucking, after all.>>79687089i dont understand how "doxxing" is illegal.isnt it always publically available information anyways, just collected and shared by people with an intention of harrasment?shouldnt prexisting laws against harrasment suffice?
>>79689823Unfortunately it works only for males.https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/1874574>>79689859It doesn't work. Half of my life I'm jumping from platform to platform, always preferring obscure one, all-permissive free speech always kills any intelligent life on the platform. With time no one but those people use it, because they are vocal majority and they constantly want attention hijacking any thread, subject, theme there is.People may filter and ignore that shit, or they could go somewhere else where they can have a nice discussion without having to bother at all. This is exactly what they do. With time no one but freaks and morons are left and free speech platform dies.
>>79689831tl;dr porn isnt free speech, I refuse any rationalization you can pull put your ass. I don't have to agree with literally anything you make up.
>>79684925You kikes already do that
>>79689920>constantly want attention hijacking any thread, subject, themeYou mean how you /pol/tards leak out of your cesspool into other boards and flood them with shit nobody but you cares about?
>>79689962so you admit it should be banned? good
>>79684765>is that some feminist angle?nice one, Moshe, but porn is ruining way more men than women.
>>79689965I think every ip address that visited /pol/ should be suspended from posting on other boards at least for a week.
>>79684750Just go to a different website. It isn't like Gab is trying to take down porn sites.
>left says they want free speech>censor and cancel everything>right gets pissy>right say they want free speech>"uhh but yeah in my free world tons of things would be banned for no reason"I hate the human race. Why is everyone so fucked?
>>79687872>Even raw porn in aggregate can be communication. It communicates the sexual fantasies and desires of a subcommunity or society during a given period.Basically any meaning porn is capable of posessing "as speech" is external to the porn in itself, but something people bring with them, before viewing it, and then assign that meaning to it.But that meaning is uninque to them, and will not be shared by sharing the porn.So rather than sharing the porn, it makes more sense for them to share their observations about the the porn.Collecting hours upon hours of people shitting might also be academically or scientifically usefult, but I would similarly deny that that footage has any meaning as speech.I dont like /pol/ moralfaggotry, but for the same reason I dont like seeing sophist arguments advanced, which tendentiously browbeat other people into accepting the false belief that pornography is somehow equivalent to speech, which it plainly isnt.
>>79690021anon, in the latter case, people are saved from brain damage and the jews, can't you see
>>79690037>vague songs or allegory where people see different meanings and interpretations in them based on their own personal experiences and preference>is not speechnice
>>79690048>THEIR censorship = bad>OUR censorship = good
I guess I can understand that as they want to profile as political discussion platform.
>>79690048This is exactly like a leftie saying that censoring the right prevents kids from being brainwashed by nazis, retard.
>>79690087we already have pol and you can post porn on pol and everything goes well there
>>79690093brain damage and the jews are happening and are at large whereas nazi brainwashing isn't really happening though, I would imagine to get nazi brainwashing, you really have to go out of your way and look for it
>>79684744I don't blame him. There are so many pitfalls for that, especially when you are having people try to take you offline.
>>79690021People are retarded and only care about their own self-interest.You've only just realized this?
Consider that:1. All-permissive free speech platform tolerates any point of view and any action (such as sharing porn)2. People standing against free speech leak into it and gain a majority3. People standing against free speech overtake power and rewrite culture of the platform4. Free speech platform is dead now, being killed by its own toleranceWhen you build a playground, you don't expect people here to come and sleep, shit, drink or fuck. It can be free to anyone to play, but if you want to sleep, go to another place. You are free to. Speech is speech, it's opinions and ideas, porn has nothing to do with it.>>79690093Porn is a neutral thing in itself, it has no morals or ideologies. Scientifically (and majority of scientists are left) porn is proved harmful. You will find a lot of lefties agreeing on that point. This is the left who tried to cancel pornhub not so long ago, by the way. This is one of few things right and left can agree on.
>>79684744The next Christian social media website.
>>79690166>Scientifically (and majority of scientists are left) porn is proved harmful.So is alcohol and yet I bet I can post about Bourbon on Gab.
>>79690094yeah, everything goes well and retarded coomer threads/posts lower quality of the board massively
>>79690177It's not like you make people drunk and kill their brain cells over the wire, anon.
>>79690179>/pol/>lower quality of the board
>>79690177oh stop anon, you can absolutely discuss porn on gab, it just isnt porn material sharing platformlike you know, let me share this bbc pic (in completely unrelated political thread), jealous whitey?
>>79690211anon, race is absolutely political
>>79690188Neither can you force people to open NSFW over the wire either. Don't blame others for your lack of self-control.Either way I'm just pointing out the double standard, don't really get the entire concept of Social Media in a world where IRC exists.
>>79690188>>79690234don't you need to jerk off to it for it to have harmful effect?
>>79690079we are talking about porn, not edward tuftes theory of infographs,not music (with literal words)or allegory e.g. universally intellligible memes like fishing hooks = baitporn does not have any obvious, universal meaning, and in terms of the quanity of data suborned to storing it, its more like spam.i dont see why a communications website should be obliged to host billions of terabytes of CERN particle collider research data, if someone decides to spam that at them.a libre speech service is not a gratis warehouse, nor a bottomless, inexhaustible garbage dump.
>>79690244not really. Just seeing a highly manipulated and airbrushed picture can induce unrealistic standards onto you.
>>79690228you can discuss race on gab, just like you can discuss societal implications of interracial porn, just cannot share porn material itself
>>79690250>not music (with literal words)"oh my god yes" and "punish me daddy" are not words?
>>79690244Jerking off to a picture isn't going to burn your brain out. Just like how drinking a glass of water isn't going to drown you.Get some goddamn self-control and stop blaming the world for your problems. Jesus fucking Christ, look up the word moderation in a dictionary.
>>79690254if it's about unrealistic standrards, so do all the ads anon, or fiction works that romanticize anything at all
>>79690277>moderationthats by definition anti-free speech
>>79690281No shit.You're finally starting to see the slippery slope.
>>79690284yeah but people can't be trusted with themsleves, let alone the platform
>>79690284...how terminally online do you have to be to even write this in response to the word "moderation"?
>>79690250if porn has no meaning then why are the bleached and blacked threads on pol
>>79689920welcome to the internet i guess people are always going to derail something porn or not lol
>>79690260well, it wouldn't be off-topic, especially if it's in the form of a thumbnail you have to actualy click open or something
>>79690312its meaning depends on the beholder. due to the nature of /pol/ and its userbase, its not hard to figure out why there are bbc threads on there
>>79690351yee, you are still communicating an idea by doing that though, specific to the land or not, and that's speech
>>79690265it is censorship or hypocritical if a "free speech" website only hosts text, and refuses to host music?>>79690312for the same reason that people used to spam cp and gore at posts they didnt like
>>79690325go check on /pol/ how often it is used on topic lol, guy just doesnt want it to devolve in coomer board that would hurt its image among potential users
>>79684744Why do you guys freak out about the porn, you have a million porn sites to go to
>>79690391noone is freaking out, it is just buch of leftards trying to undermine alternative "nazi" platform
>>79684744porn should be illegal
>>79690449>muh free speech>but porn should be illegalt. mutt
porn being exempted from free speech is no more a violation of your rights than it is for drugs to be exempted from property rights
>>79690694Give me one good reason why porn should be banned. If you can't stop jerking off and you think it's bad for you then that's your problem, not mine
>>79690729not him but it keeps derailing discussions. one picture will entail dozens of cunny and nakadashi posters
>>79690753That should be a 4chan rule then. Banning porn because some autists on 4chan are shitposting is retarded
>>79690785oh you mean a general ban. never mind then, my bad
>>79690729Give me one good reason why heroin should be banned. If you can't stop shooting up and you think it's bad for you then that's your problem, not mine.
>>79690798I agree unironically, decriminalizing drugs and actually helping addicts is better than what we have now. Also>porn = heroin
Link every account to a real life identity and permit to post everything that isn't illegal in the country of residence of the poster or of the company.Then see how many people actually want to post porn with their real identity attached
>>79690941Great idea, you can start by showing us your identity
>>79691050why would I expose myself on a place where nobody else does? if you think you "got me" with your shitty request it just tells me you haven't understood anything about my post
>>79691389Why should ANYONE post their identity on the internet? Just so that you don't see the evil adult content? Get a life, jesus
>>79691495>Just so that you don't see the evil adult content?sounds reasonablel to me
>>79691495>Why should ANYONE post their identity on the internet?because you can. who are you to tell me how the web should work? I would like for a website like the one I have described to exist. You are in no way forced to use it, faggot
>>79691548I thought you meant that it should be enforced everywhere. If it's just one website I wouldn't care.
twitter: you can talk about anything as long as it's not illegal or a few things we don't likegab/parler: you can talk about anything as long as it's not illegal or a few things we don't likewhat is even the difference between them?
>>79691616Twitter isn't being taken off the internet.
>>79691636that's the problem, isn't it?the ones with all the power are not politically neutral
>>79691658>the ones with all the powerwho
>>79691658>violate TOS>get bannedWho would've thought
>>79686429Literally every man is a pedophile
>>79691696only if you go off the common definition of attraction to under 18yo'smen aren't naturally pedophiles in the actual definition of the word (attraction to prepubescent children)this definition confusion benefits those who would shit on people for perfectly natural attraction to young pubescent girls
>>79691734>common definitionin the united states maybe
>>79691747i live in a place where the legal age is 16, but people will still give you looks if you eye up a <18yoi actually have a 16yo gf, jelly, murricans?
>>79684750great way to piss off pol morons is to just say one simple thing and they go apeshit.
Abandon porn and embrace hentai