>make the perfect monitor>don't add a displayport inputWhat did LG meme by this?
>>78809310> doesn't own a hdmi2.1 graphics cardha
>>78809323You'd have a point if every gpu didn't only have one HDMI port
>She doesn't solder her own displayport connectors
>>78809310Displayport doesn't have enough bandwidth to run the maximum resolution and refresh rate. HDMI is superior now.
>>78809323>using consumer grade shit instead of displayport
>>78809921How is displayport not consumer grade?
>>78809310Why do many monitor makers put the ports on the very back of the monitor?What if we want to mount it on the wall?And why is it so hard to get a 27 inch 120 or 144 hz IPS 4K monitor?
>>78810067Because that is where the PCB is.
>>78809929Because it's only used on gear targeted for enterprise use> Workstation gpus> Dell> HpWhile gaymen shit has drm riddled hdmi
>>78810067people dont need 4k displays before an ampere card comes from the mail
>>78810124Every gaming monitor in the past 5 years has DP as the primary input. Gaming graphics cards have 2 DP outputs and 1 HDMI. You are stupid.
>using a non-RGB subpixel layout display as a monitor>using an OLED as your primary monitor>broken VRR supportngmi
>>78810273How does anyone use oled as pc monitor anyways?Do they just replace it annually?
>>78810273Anyone else noticed that software is abandoning subpixel rendering? Half the programs out there including large parts of Windows 10 UI don't use it anymore. To me it seems like an obvious step back.
>>78809310No point paying displayport royalties when HDMI will do the job.
>>78810332The idea is that all new screens will be 4k, and unless you're quite close to such a screen you actually don't need cleartype and other such crutches.
>>78810286You could probably go a couple of years if you kept brightness reasonably low. You can check rting's test. They did 200 nits which is way too much for desktop use. If you went out of your way with avoiding static ui elements you could go a lot longer. If it was just for media I wouldn't worry at all.>>78810332No. I don't even know what you're talking about and don't use w10. Similar to truetype fuckery but for UI? Got a more specific example?
>>78810575Still a straight downgrade regardless of resolution.>>78810599If you needed another reason not to here's one. Mixed subpixel and non subpixel on the main UI of the file browser. It's an abomination.
>>78810116Ports should be underneath or on the side.
>>78810760Kek, I see.
>>78809310displayport is shit
>>78810273>broken VRR supportAlready been fixed
>>78810307>not having a smaller one as a monitor and a larger one for the couch setup
>>78812991>changing the goalpost
>>78812991>>78813171Or wait, did you mean having a "smaller" 48" CX and a 77" or something?
>>78810776I think what he was trying to say is that there wasn't a large consumer audience for a high refresh rate 4k monitor till recently with the release of graphics cards that could potentially handle 4k resolutions combined with high frame rates
>OLED>for use on desktops with tons of static UIummmm
>>78809310bro is u hairless?
>>78813285Also input lag is abhorrent https://www.tftcentral.co.uk/reviews/lg_cx_oled.htm
>>78809310also, 2080 ti and you can buy a decent table?cmon bro, priorities.
>>78813274Some of us will use 4K anyways with low rates and we want a monitor with some future proofing.
how is brightness, aren't most OLED TV's very restrictive with their total brightness output to reduce burn-in? i remember one of them would constantly clamp the brightness if the screen as a whole got too bright and you can't turn that off.
>>78813310I'm not agreeing with him I was just explaining what he said. I have a 4k 60hz monitor because I like the screen real estate/resolution/color accuracy for editing photographs.
>>78809310LG is a shit brand and I have never owned anything made by them that wasn't a shit product.
isn't G-Sync only supported through DP or did nvidia finally stop being jews?
>>788100671440p at 27 inch is plenty enough
>>78813331More than fine. The 48" cx will do about 150 cd/m2 on a full white field. So as long as you stay below that you will have no issues. More than you would want unless the sun is shining directly at the screen, in which case you're a fucking retard.
>>78812964Nope. It "works" but it looks like shit dependint on the framerate. Won't be fixed.
>>78809310>actually wanting shitsplay ports and their hot plug garbagethe fuck's your problem?
>>78813347No it isn't.
>>78813346They released an update after the C9 came out that let rtx cards do gsync over hdmi on it, but since they arent hdmi 2.1 its limited to 1440p
Already got slight burn in from WoW UI on my CX after about 4 months. Fuck my life, never gonna fall for any /g/ meme ever again.
>>78813549Pics? Im curious how noticeable it is
>>78813561Will take a picture when I get home. It's not noticeable at all in most situations, but on clear colors I can see the slight lines of certain parts of my UI that are burned in. I noticed it when I put a whitish wallpaper on my desktop.
ENJOY THE BURN IN
>OLEDNever pay more than $500 for a monitor anons
>OLEDBurn-in aside, how are the colors? Better than ips and va?
>>78814389Yeah go check an oled tv in a tv shop. You can easily pick out what tv's are oled or lcd by glancing at the screens, the quality difference is huge.Imo 1200-1500 is too much for a monitor though.
>>78809310>make the perfect monitorit's not a CRT
>>78810286>Do they just replace it annually?Screensaver
>>78810273>>using a non-RGB subpixel layout display as a monitorLG OLED TVs use full WRGB, wtf are you talking about. It's literally RGB+W, with 4 subpixels per pixel
>>78810124Do you live in 2013? DisplayPort has been gayming gear for a while, anon.
>>78809310You want it to cost $1000 more?90% of the reason LG can push this thing out at it's current price is because is doesn't have DPDP may be "royalty free" but that doesn't save you from the increased part cost over the more mass produced HDMI
>>78814770100% of the time theres chrome/windows static ui elements on the screengames have fixed ui elementsall pc use results in monitor degradation Like look at xbox/ps5 UI's and the lengths they go to avoid burn in
>>78814389Depends on what you mean. They can all technically do DCI-P3 (although you probably won't find a consumer IPS that does). VA sucks so much for viewing angles that no one uses them professionally. Even if you sit directly in front of it you can't avoid viewing angle related problems.Anything more than P3 is a bit of a meme. I don't know how good HDR support is on PC anyway, so anything more than sRGB may even be a meme depending on usage.But yes, OLED is fine. Better than VA.
>>78814801>VA sucks so much for viewing angles that no one uses them professionally>he doesn't have a Samsung QLED with ultra-wide angle filterNGMI monitor pleb
>>78814825Coule you remind me what other shit that fucks up again? Inb4 nothing, because that isn't true. And it's still worse than OLED and IPS.
>>78814842Contrast ratio. Which drops from native 6000:1 to 4000:1, which is still way better than the 3000:1 garbage on monitors. https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/samsung/q90-q90t-qled
>>78814784Yes and? You literally just told me I'm right? It's WRGB. At no time are all subpixels on. It's not comparable.
>>78814875You're a retarded monkey
>>78814915Lol ok enjoy your optimized fonts lmao fucking braindead moron
>>78814869Dynamic or static?
>>78815111Native is the same as static.
>>78809310They meant that it's not perfect.
>>78810760So that's what this is. Thanks for posting this, I started noticing it and it was driving me crazy, I thought something was wrong with my monitor.
>>78809310Do smart TVs take screenshots or use character recognition of your work and then send it back to HQ for analysis?>>78809737
>>78809737You will never be a she.
>>78813446that sounds awful, my IPS monitor goes up to 360cd/m2 full screen with 430cd/m2 peaks.
>when your solution to burn in is to burn the rest of the screen during off times to mask it. Purposefully reducing panel life.
>>78816156A restaurant near me has a decent sized Trinitron TV going every daytime for over a decade.Except for some brightness and color loss, it still looks good. No burn in/out.
>>78809310Where did you get that mouse pad?, I like it
24" 1080 144hz TN is all you need and more
>>78815364>LG 48OLEDCX>OLEDshiggy diggy
>>78816336Ask me how I know you're unemployed
where are all the 4k, >120hz, >32" monitors?
>>78813331Could be complete internet bullshit but I remember reading that the dimming is because of power draw that differs on what colors are displayed. Yellow is the worst and if the panel tried to display it fullscreen full brightness it would draw more than a kilowatt from the psu.
>>78809310because its a TV you retard, why would they modify their mass production pcbs for the CX line for their cheapest model?
>>78816056>Even my hdr 600 rated can do over 700nits Uhhh oled btfo?
>>78818513Don't use the r-word again. Thanks
Displayport: A shit port for shit people.
hdmi 2.1 is a meme until next gen of cards, maybe even the one after that
>>78809310jesus fuck that's insanely close to your face
>>78819088it just looks like it because it's hugethe DPI is suitable for arm length viewing
>>78819106>how much ammo do I have>let me just look at the corner real fastyea no
>>78809310I can't decide between lg c9/cx and sony 9005Scared as hell for burn ins
>>78813549>still playing wowkill yourself nigger
>>78819804>not playing WoW ClassicKill yourself nigger
>>78809898only because video card manufacturers are too lazy to add it to their cards, DP2.0 has almost twice the bandwidth of hdmi2.1
>>78818586that's just retarded
since when did people seethe about displayport?
>>78820462Probably a zoomer thing. They seethe over anything
>>78821327ur mom seethes when i stop banging her faggot
>>78816056>my IPS monitor goes up to 360cd/m2 full screenYes and? Unless you want to burn your retinas you don't want to be looking at something that bright. The only real purpose of that kind of brightness is to combat direct sunlight, and these aren't phones. And even then, how often are you looking at an almost fully white screen?
>>78810286Been using OLED as my monitor since 2016, I got one of the early LG models then switched to a 2019 LG model for 120Hz. Neither has had any burn in.
>>78820462What do you mean by seething over displayport?
>>78820462when dp1.2 pin 20 issue fried your motherboard or monitor?roll the dice then boom a few months later out of the blue. Fun times.
>>78809310i just picked up a 55 inch CX master race boiii.unfortunately i wont be able to source a new pc until january at the soonest.. running 2 gtx970s atm :/
>>78814799put all my desktop icons in a folder and put the folder on my on taskbar. hide my taskbar, black background. and screen saver.. plus got a 4 year best buy warranty that will swap out for a C3 or C4 4 years from now.
>>78819771c9 only does 60hz but has slightly higher peak brightnesscx does 120hz but is slightly dimmer
>>78824069https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/c9-oled>The LG C9 has a native 120Hz refresh rateRefrain from talking about things you know absolutely nothing about
>>78810124extremely embarrassing post
>>78814302Not even a 3440x1440 curved?
>>78825574Why would you buy such a garbage resolution when 3840x2160 is cheaper?
>>78810067>What if we want to mount it on a wall?If you didn't buy a bargain-bin 768p monitor, you would notice that most of the monitors on the market would have VESA mounting holes and the ports would be pointing straight down instead of sticking out at a 90 degree angle to the panel, making them wall-mountable.
>>78810067Because there is no point of that resolution at that display size at the distance you'd sit from a monitor.Stop being a fucking idiot.
>>78823975Still did good, anon. Enjoy the top tier picture quality and instant response time.
>>78825579because good luck running 144hz on 4k
>>78813347I have a 27" 1440p monitor and honsetly I think 30" would be better for 1440p, everything is just a tad too small imo >inb4 just upscale the UI
>>78826492>inb4 just upscale the UIwhat, are you a tard or something
>>78809310There's no point in having DP on a >40" monitor.
>>78810992>Is probably using a panel made by LG and doesn't even know itKEK
>>78816236My family has a 15yr old 40inch Sony Trinitron. Still running perfectly with about 8hr of usage per day.
i just want more pixel per inchcurrently on a 24" 1440p, it's still not enough for gaymingi want to see sharphoping for a 24" 4k eventually, but i don't think they'll ever make one, so hoping for 27" at leasteven fucking phones have 4k resolution these days, on a 7" or something screen, what is this bullshit?
>>78810124HDMI has never been used for gaymen. Up until about a week ago you couldn't even use HDMI for most gaymen features and it's still not able to deliver 4k 144 or higher.
>>78821906>And even then, how often are you looking at an almost fully white screen?Pretty often, a lot of websites and programs use color schemes that are quite close to the classic "black on white", so with PC usage you can certainly expect to have a lot of white on the screen.>>788290234K 27" monitors are common and have higher DPI than 1440p 24".
>>78813331they all clamp brightness. its known as automatic brightness limit or abl and it can't be turned off
>>78830030>and it's still not able to deliver 4k 144 or higher.It's like you desire to be wrong
>>78809310>perfect monitor>no display port>oled>not 21:9Guess its not the perfect monitor
>>78809310sup bald manchild
>>78816017>Do smart TVs take screenshots or use character recognition of your work and then send it back to HQ for analysis?Only if you connect them to the internet.