[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



LOL
>>
Johnny Hive would never approve of this.
>>
Why can't I buy a smartphone without the camera.
>>
Wait before you judge. Cause the photos of these could be the best photos ever taken by a phone, ever.
>>
>>71355104
>best photos ever taken by a phone, ever.
So, just like every year when the new flagship comes out?
>>
>>71355104
LOL
>>
>>71355064
why the fuck is it three and not four?
>>
File: 36286.png (101 KB, 512x512)
101 KB
101 KB PNG
APPLE IPHONES NOW HAVE THE HAMACHI LOGO ON THEM
>>
We need another camera that can filter out women's clothes, sort of like how we can make transparent clothes in photoshop.

now thats innovation, take notes.
>>
>>71355104
Costs three times as much as a Canon DSLR, takes ten times crappier photos. It's a bargain.
>>
>>71355164
>expecting normies to buy a separate device for pictures
60% of them can't even find their phone & keys when it's time to leave.
>>
>>71355140
based boomer
>>
>>71355164
an entry level one with a kit lens sure
>>
>>71355064
That camera AND the notch
Apple is laughing stock at this point
Trump will have to pull a national security emergency to save them from the chinks
>>
>>71355064
oftbtfo
>>
>>71355104
Samsung Galaxy A9 has 4 rear cameras and average image quality.
>>
>>71355104
>Cause the photos of these could be the best photos ever taken by a phone, ever.
so still shitty overprocessed garbage?
>>
File: slmfao_8kukpmtqcy.gif (1.17 MB, 310x211)
1.17 MB
1.17 MB GIF
>>71355140
>Literally a bowling ball design
>"Hamachi" brand
Fuck off capitalistic nigger.
>>
>>71355164
This, I have a DSLR with bluetooth and a crappy 2012 smartphone
No smartphone on earth will take photos as good on at least the next 10 years
and I can promptly post them on normie media because of connection
>>
>>71355064
Want
>>
>>71355348
Anyone with a dedicated photo device in this day and age is my friend not matter the size, what're you using?
>>
>>71355164
Also 10x lighter.
>>
>>71355396
Nikon D5600 w/ Sigma17-50mm/Nikkor35mm/ Nikkor70-300mm
>>
>>71355404
Also 100x gayer
>>
>>71355295
You should think twice, before posting.
>>
>>71355412
Pretty based, I used the 35mm dx on my d7100 a few years ago, now I own a d810 and replaced it with the 45mm tamron, oh and I ended up breaking a 20mm af-d a while ago which hurts.
What 70-300mm? the crop one or FF one? because the FF is an underrated gem that'd been overlooked because it has the stigma of being a kit lens.
>>
>>71355449
no
>>
>>71355481
Fullframe lens are expensive on the shithole of a country where I live in :/
>now I own a d810
Neat
>>
>>71355120
well, yeah? What do you think progress is?
>>
File: 1548688794703.gif (1.68 MB, 366x275)
1.68 MB
1.68 MB GIF
>>71355104
Yeah, but you still fugly.
>>
>>71355164
>Canon
How is your IG of flower and leaf pics coming along?
>>
>>71355125
Because we can only perceive 3 dimensional space.
>>
>>71355628
It's a fun camera but it doesn't have any modern features like wifi, bluetooth(it doesn't even have infrared) and good video but it makes up for it in the sensor, compatibility to older and newer professional equipment and the autofocus being the same as the d4, it just takes photos and that's it, that's why I like it.
I always buy my shit used off ebay or locally, I wouldn't be able to own all this shit otherwise.
Rich old people in my country are really fast to sell their lenses and bodies for the latest gear because it will somehow make them take better photos, I'm sure you can find some of them as well, they're everywhere.
I also almost got fucked when getting the d810 because it was completely broken but I turned the situation into my favor and got one in mint condition for way cheaper so I was kinda lucky.
>>
File: Big_pol2.jpg (183 KB, 1680x936)
183 KB
183 KB JPG
>>71355698
Are they buying Canons? I thought they were buying this garbage, pic related.
>>
>>71355698
>not showcasing the beautiful contrasty bokeh of your $3000 L glass that would make hipster girls cream their pants in a 200km radius
what are you? gay?
>>
>>71355746
we're all in a simulation retard, we're just ones and zeroes. there's no real dimensions on a computer program.
>>
>>71355140
Log me in
>>
File: itoddlerphone.jpg (71 KB, 711x704)
71 KB
71 KB JPG
do you goys think there is any technical reason why they can't do it like this?
it's not like they need the space for a headphone jack?
>>
>>71355064
why don't they just bite the bullet and make the whole phones a single micron thicker
these stupid fucking bits that jut out for the camera lenses are fucking retarded, keep the phone from lying flat, and scratch up surfaces/get broken
>>
>>71355140
lack of port forwarding knowledge has come flooding back
>>
>>71357313
Better question is why don't they just take 3 pictures with one camera and use algorithms to improve quality in software. Hell they could even make dedicated hardware to do it to make it faster... oh wait Pixel already has this.
>>
why do the 3 lenses look the same?
>>
File: iPhone-X-notch.jpg (83 KB, 1200x700)
83 KB
83 KB JPG
will they still have the fat notch?
>>
>>71357313
With all three cameras being equidistant from each other, the dsp involved in manipulating or determining a common focal point is much simpler. Held parallel to the subject of the photo, all three lenses will have roughly the same focal point and (if capable) vary focus slightly to bring different planes of an object into focus. Doing this from a linear parallel perspective would lead to strange focal aberrations that would need to be accounted for with more complex code.
Also, design/manufacturing cost is more than halved when both phone models use the same camera suite. Producing separate suites for the phones would require different digital signal processing algorithms and a separate production line as well as separate characterization and QA.
>>
>>71357822
So Apple actually once prioritized function over aesthetics? Unbelievable.
>>
>>71355423
and probably 20x thinner, the most important metric
>>
>>71355104
It'll go great with my world's fastest moped
>>
>>71355104
Picture quality will still be below the P30 pro.
>>
>>71355064
>flash isn't in the middle of the triple camera
Yeah, nah, this is some chink clone.

>>71357793
It looks cute, leave it alone.
>>
>>71355104
I hope the pixels are even deeper this year
>>
File: fixed.jpg (35 KB, 312x611)
35 KB
35 KB JPG
>>
>>71355229
basedesab
andna
redpilledellipder
>>
>An iPhone with a sticker over the cameras
Good shit
>>
>>71358618
did you have a stroke
>>
>>71355100
Because then how else will they spy on you and everything around you?
>>
File: 1555230627251.png (735 KB, 1266x926)
735 KB
735 KB PNG
>>
>>71357822
Basically this. Anyone who disagrees is a brainlet hating on something that's very well optimized for functioning instead of just looks.
>>
File: 1560158927357.jpg (59 KB, 711x704)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
>>71355064
fixed
>>
>>71358692
The device needs to be 1mm thinner than last year's model, and if we negate the efficiency improvements with less battery capacity the goys will still have a reason to upgrade at the end of their two year contracts. Get good anon.
>>
>>71355104
The Pureview 808 would like to talk to you
>>
>>71358724
https://www.dxomark.com/nokia-808-retested-new-dxomark-mobile-protocol/

LMAO
>>
>>71358752
Yes?
So basically
>New cameras do a better job at low light
>808 stil holds up at regular lighting
>>
>>71355140
That's a name I haven't heard in a long time.
>>
>>71355076
Would be too niche. Not worth producing.
>>
>>71355661
Diversity and inclusion.
>>
Anyone who owns Apple products should be murdered. Prove me wrong.
>>
>>71359162
I like the left
>>
>>71355064
top kek it looks like a shitty chink knockoff
>>
>>71358554
>Implying Apple would ever get rid of the status symbol logo
>>
>>71355196
still takes much better photos
>>
>>71357873
of course they did, but the design looks like shit, they deserve to get mocked for this and the notch, maybe the black one will look better irl
>>
File: huwawe cant triforce.jpg (73 KB, 711x704)
73 KB
73 KB JPG
>>71355064
FIXD mi frend
>>
>>71357822
>design/manufacturing cost is more than halved when both phone models use the same camera suite
doesn't matter since Apturd phones are overpriced to oblivion all the time.
>>
File: iPhone11.jpg (161 KB, 711x704)
161 KB
161 KB JPG
>>71355064
heres the updated design thou
>>
Why can't they make the camera lenses look invisible? Maybe make the whole rear camera display area an OLED and have your main cameras hidden in display until it's time to take photos. That would be innovashun.
>>
>>71355145
>Getting aroused by nudity
Animal tier
>Not having your own woman to arouse you
Incel tier
>>
>>71355100
just buy one and unplug the camera
>>
File: iphone lel.png (161 KB, 321x634)
161 KB
161 KB PNG
>>71355064
r8
>>
is such a thing possible?
>>
File: iphonecamera.png (208 KB, 315x634)
208 KB
208 KB PNG
>>71355064
>>
File: MOAR.jpg (101 KB, 711x704)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
>>71358692
>>
File: Untitled-1.jpg (42 KB, 378x704)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
>>
>>71361536
>incels on the g board
ohh gee say it isn't so!
>>71355064
All to prepare us for the aliens that will be coming here soon.
>>
>>71357685
How do I port forward
>>
>>71362248
KEK
>>
>>71355104
>implying applelfags value function over form
>>
>>71362069
Nice. That will look perfectly well with my new MacBook Pro.
>>
>>71358692
>no bloat means the phone rests on the camera glass when you put it down, leaving marks and scraches over time
>cracking the glass panel means cracking your camera glass as well
You're a retard, anon.
>>
>>71361433
Hahaha, very subtle.
>>
other manufacturers can figure it out without making it look all retarded. this one has the cameras all centered so it's easier to aim.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXhxkQWD8T4
>>
File: NVwTUohZkJOX1Hii.jpg (36 KB, 592x444)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
>>71357313
Looks like notch module is in the way and it makes it easier to connect to the motherboard without reducing battery space.
>>
>>71363508
Just design your phone better so the back glass can be easily replaced.
Also, it's tempered glass so it shouldn't scratch easily and doesn't. Very slight scratches will have no perceivable impact on the photos.
>>
>>71363630
/g/tards manage to scratch their phones, a lot of people here use screen protectors
>>
>>71355229
B A S E D
A
S
E
D
>>
>>71355104
>the races run by these slugs could be the fastest races run by a slug, ever
oh wow
>>
>>71355100
just buy one and crack the camera
>>
>>71355164
reminder the elder god tier photographer's setup is a really good smartphone camera that you bring everywhere and a >20k dslr for photo sessions.

if you are buying compact cameras or cheap dslrs you are doing it wrong
>>
File: Opabinia_BW2.jpg (102 KB, 800x600)
102 KB
102 KB JPG
Since everyone copies apple we're about to hit the cambrian era of phone cameras. This should be interesting.
>>
>>71364584
>/g/, the board with people so poor they convert chest freezers into fridges to try and spill less heat than a regular fridge
>buying a >20k dslr
there are actual pro photographers who have way less than 20k worth of gear
also mirrorless cameras are a thing although i personally think they're overhyped
>>
>>71355064
It's a fucking fidget spinner
>>
>>71357313
>goys
>>
>>71364657
>everyone copies apple
this is somewhat a myth, apple uses similar components as everyone else, they didn't invent them, that's why everyone can "copy" them so easily, everyone can have a display with rounded corners etc
>>
expected someone to triforce the camera setup... dissapointed.
>>
File: SAM_0638-min.jpg (3.48 MB, 3840x2160)
3.48 MB
3.48 MB JPG
>>71355164
I could get pictures like this on a point and shoot ten years ago that cost a couple hundred dollars. Phones have barely caught up. It's not the resolution that's the problem, it's the awful stabilization. A proper camera can take a quick picture and it'll come out perfect 10/10 times, on a phone you've always got to watch the autofocus.
>>
>>71362066
__ ____ ____?
>>
>>71364809
I know its hard for zoomers to understand history, but the modern phone OS like the desktop OS is entirely thanks to apple. Even bad ideas like the notch are copied.
>>
File: 1543018108002.jpg (49 KB, 640x640)
49 KB
49 KB JPG
I don't care if a phone has 3 or 4 cameras, as long as it's in the configuration that lets me get case like pic related. If I only knew what phone this is.
>>
>>71365363
lmao, absolutely based.
>>
>>71365363
see >>71358643
>>
File: N800_frontside1.jpg (508 KB, 1884x1063)
508 KB
508 KB JPG
>>71365292
lol? iOS wasn't particularly innovative except for the app store
>>
>>71365578
Damn I knew it was going to be some chink malware phone, but it's still so tempting
>>
>>71364584
I can't mount my phone camera to my telescope and bypass the shitty optics included on the phone. because phone cameras are shite
>>
WHY THE FUCK THIS BOARD CARE SO MUCH ABOUT CAMERA ON PHONE THAN /p/?
>WHY THE FUCK THIS BOARD CARE SO MUCH ABOUT CAMERA ON PHONE THAN /p/?
WHY THE FUCK THIS BOARD CARE SO MUCH ABOUT CAMERA ON PHONE THAN /p/?
>WHY THE FUCK THIS BOARD CARE SO MUCH ABOUT CAMERA ON PHONE THAN /p/?
WHY THE FUCK THIS BOARD CARE SO MUCH ABOUT CAMERA ON PHONE THAN /p/?
>WHY THE FUCK THIS BOARD CARE SO MUCH ABOUT CAMERA ON PHONE THAN /p/?
WHY THE FUCK THIS BOARD CARE SO MUCH ABOUT CAMERA ON PHONE THAN /p/?
>WHY THE FUCK THIS BOARD CARE SO MUCH ABOUT CAMERA ON PHONE THAN /p/?
WHY THE FUCK THIS BOARD CARE SO MUCH ABOUT CAMERA ON PHONE THAN /p/?
>WHY THE FUCK THIS BOARD CARE SO MUCH ABOUT CAMERA ON PHONE THAN /p/?
>>
>>71365704
Symbian was fucking dogshit to use.
>>
File: hd_picard_3498673.jpg (73 KB, 1187x903)
73 KB
73 KB JPG
Disgusting.

Giving me lotusboob flashbacks.
>>
>>71366369
nokia n800 runs maemo
>>
>>71355145
how do you make sure it can only filter out womens clothes
>>
>>71355229
based
>>
>>71366069
/p/ anons have real cameras
/g/ is for jerking off to the latest consumer tech gadgets
>>
File: 1-3.jpg (232 KB, 834x1200)
232 KB
232 KB JPG
>>71355064
>>
>>71359162
>>71358752
show fur
>>
>>71362306
GUYS WTF IS AN PORT FORWARDS I JUST WAMT TO PLAY MINECRAFT WITH MY FRIENDS HALP NOT GOOD WOTG COMPUYER
>>
>>71368656
really made me think
>>
File: lotus seeds.jpg (34 KB, 711x704)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
>>71355064
>>
when will apple add a device that can capture smell?
>>
They might as well put 12-20 LEDs there as well so they can claim "The best smartphone flashlight..." too.
>>
>>71366069
/p/ here
Phone cameras are rightly ridiculed on /p/ because we all realize if they where as good as a DSLR or mirrorless camera companies would be selling them.
Also there is no replacement for high quality glass lenses physics makes it impossible.
>>
>>71355196
You could buy a second hand 2005-10 nikon camera and it would take way better pictures.
>>
>>71364425
>food analogy
>>
>>71355239
multiple cameras have nothing to do with image quality brainlet. it's so that the phone can take photos in a range of environments decently instead of being good at just one
>>
File: 1516444017830.jpg (55 KB, 854x480)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>71369769
AAAAAAAAAH TRIPOPHOBIA
>>
>>71355064
Its 3 circles based on rumor photoshopped onto the back of a XS and XS Max. What are you all talking about?
>>
>>71360662
>implying you can look at an image for more than .5 of a second
>>
File: 1556277667441.png (475 KB, 886x670)
475 KB
475 KB PNG
>>71355064
>apple design is bunch of trypto-fetishists
lmao Steve Jobs is rolling is his fucking grave
>>
>>71362248
lmfao took me a second
>>
>>71368750
this but kind of unironically
>>
>>71357716
Dont they already do that with hdr photos?
>>
>>71355229
based
>>
>>71366069
because they own actual cameras
phone cameras are fine for people who don't care about quality aka most people, and if they do and buy a phone because they want to take high quality photos then they're most likely retarded.
>>
>>71366069
why art thou so triggered rakesh?
>>
>>71368656
I regret looking at the source.
>>
>>71366069
>/p/
literally who?
>>
>>71369933
but the best camera is the one you have
>>
>>71373404
-with you
>>
>>71370268
>eating slugs
Amerifats leave
>>
I've never been in a situation where I would think "I wish I had more than one camera in the back of my phone". Phone cameras are practical because they travel with you everywhere but they have been more than good enough for years. They are just for quickly snapping a pic of something, for any professional use there are actual cameras.
>>
>>71373336
>Tags: bondage, tentacles, anthology, pregnant, gag, scat, guro, bdsm, ryona, snuff, diaper, amputee, parasite, vomit
Should have listened to you.
>>
>>71373433
spontaneous pics mainly apply to creepshots, if you happen to meet a celebrity, or if you witness a terror attack or something like that. the odds of coming across something worth taking pictures of by coincidence are pretty low, especially if you don't spend a lot of time socializing like a normie. if you have the intent to take pictures you may as well carry some proper gear with you. in some situations you need high-end gear just to be able to take the picture at all with acceptable quality.
>>
>>71355449
fuck off
>>
>>71361997
considering that the chink companies have cameras under displays, i cant see why not
>>
>>71365988
all cameras that fit into your pocket are shite. but the best camera is the one you have with you.
>>
>>71355104
Who gives a shit? If you wanna take good pictures you use a fucking camera, not a phone. Dipshit
>>
>>71355295
have you ever seen a bowling ball?
>>
>>71373516
based and gézapilled
>>
>>71355064
I will never understand this obsession with phone cameras. If you want a photo with professional quality just get a real camera
>>
>>71368656
Hahahha, trully a classic. You'll bait a newfag or two.
>>
>>71355194
>boomer
>hamachi
This meme is retarded
>>
File: predator.png (80 KB, 180x270)
80 KB
80 KB PNG
>>71355064
>hey dude take a photo
>>
>>71357716
>he said, months before the Pixel 4 (with triple cameras) arrived
>>
>>71357793
Face ID needs depth to work. There's an IR cam on one side and another IR cam on another. Then the RGB cam next to the IR cam on the right, near the earpiece.
So there are three cameras in the notch overall.
>>
File: mope.jpg (85 KB, 800x533)
85 KB
85 KB JPG
>>71357910
OUT THE WAY NIGGER
>>
>>71373466
>I've never been in a situation where I would think "I wish I had more than one camera in the back of my phone".
That's not the point. Nobody has ever thought that. The point of having more lenses is just having better photo quality overall. Zoom in further with less degradation. Zoom out further to fit more stuff within a frame. Better AR experience because of the depth sensing.
The lenses aren't really for you to choose between at will. They just make the experience better overall.
>>
>>71355064

that dead fagget - whats his name again, eh fuck it - would turn in his grave lol
>>
>>71355229
basedesab
>>
>>71355229
DELET
>>
>>71355064
why don't they just put one giant camera lens?
>>
>>71355064
LOL
>>
>>71355100
just buy one and eat the camera
>>
>>71355100
just buy one and hot glue the camera
>>
File: rx100.jpg (45 KB, 810x456)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
>>71364584
>if you are buying compact cameras or cheap dslrs you are doing it wrong
I beg to differ
>>
File: f4df6a2b2aa92ab.gif (37 KB, 1000x1000)
37 KB
37 KB GIF
>>71380176
I assume that would make the camera bulge even larger.
>>
>>71355229
BasedesaB
>>
The new back charger looks cool though.
>>
>>71355164
>half the size or smaller
>literally hundreds of other things it had to do besides take pictures
>more expensive and not as good
no shit?
>>
>>71380763
the camera is a big selling point these days for why people shell out $1000 for another new phone even though they complain about a professional-grade monitor stand that will last much longer
>>
>>71355140
That's logmeins logo dipshit, hamachi had a different logo you fucking zoomer
>>
>>71358723
You're fired anon, you should know by now that the new product needs to be both bigger AND smaller than last year's model
>>
>>71380604
rx100 series is the only half decent one but even then the IQ improvement from a $1k iv over XS or P30 can't really be justified. not to mention you'll have to bring two devices for slightly better IQ.
>>
>>71380909
t. boomer
>>
>>71382549
t. retard
>>
>>71362069
>>
>>71355104
>Cause the photos of these could be the best photos ever taken by a phone, ever.
As long as you're in a perfectly lit studio since Apple is sub garbage tier in low light.
>>
>>71355064
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sQMSno11ho4
Fucking retarts, googles will be much worse
>>
>>71355104
Inferior to film.
>>
File: IMG_6825.jpg (64 KB, 792x522)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
/g/ BTFO
>>
>>71355100
Just buy one and tape the camera
>>
>>71383172
The sun is brighter than any studio light anon......
>>
man fapple needs to stop playing and release an updated version of the SE.
>>
>>71355064
haha
>>
>>71355064
LOL
>>
>>71355064
This social experiment went way too far, at this point they don't know how to come out with the line 'it was just a prank brah' and are trying to sell literally shit© in a desperate attempt to stop it. Too late to abort the apple hysteria
>>
File: 1545507658318.gif (279 KB, 540x540)
279 KB
279 KB GIF
>>
>>71365704
From an HCI perspective, iOS was pretty much revolutionary. The other phone OSes at the time were all pretty crappy. To say otherwise is analogous to old Unix nerds wondering why people can't figure out how to do all their work on a character-based Unix system cranking out Perl or using sed and awk; and instead choose to use a "toy" operating system with a "gooey."

I mucked with Windows CE, PalmOS, and some of the other mobile OSes during the early 2000s. After using the first iPhone for just 2 or 3 minutes, I knew it was Game Over for everybody else.
>>
File: 1557253410045.jpg (30 KB, 512x511)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
>>71355064
this is kinda cute
>>
>>71355295
wow that roastie is lucky she didn't get decapitated or cut in half
>>
>>71385376
>>
File: ispinner.gif (394 KB, 711x704)
394 KB
394 KB GIF
>>71385376
>>
>>71357822
Fuck off this is consumer technology
>>/sci/
>>
>>71373516
>>71368656
I'll check this out. Just to make sure it's really this bad, so I wouldn't check it out by accident...
>>
>>71355064
no joke, i think there should be another camera on the opposite end of the card for 3D photograph and enhanced depth perception for AR
>>
>>71355100
Just buy one without the camera
>>
>>71355100
just buy a camera without the phone
>>
>>71359505
oh no, please no
>>
>>71355179
Truth
>>
>>71355100
install gentoo



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.