[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Home]
Board
Settings Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.



File: NgBdlEE.jpg (138 KB, 930x797)
138 KB
138 KB JPG
How long before Intel's performance is as bad as this motherfucking piece of shit?
>>
>>70965469
FX 8350 TRADES BLOWS WITH 3570K AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEwwX7VEhDk
>>
>>70965538
That's pretty based, the 3570K cost more than the 8350 and if you wanted to change the multiplier because intel are a bunch of semetic assholes, you'd need to but a Z77 motherboard.
>>
At least it's not a botnet
>>
File: 1529718205079.jpg (77 KB, 690x720)
77 KB
77 KB JPG
>>70965538
>>
>>70966203
based
>>
>>70966152
One of these days when everything's pozzed, FX CPUs will be all that's left becuse it's the most powerful non botnet x86 chip we can get that isn't made by IBM and expensive.
>>
>>70966703
Are all FX cpu's botnet free from AMD's PSP?
>>
>>70966988
Yes. From excavator APUs all the way up to the 9590.
>>
>>70965538
So basically, after a fuckload of security patches for Intel's CPUs (that were totally not development shortcuts to get better performance at the expense of security, we swear guise!), even fucking Bulldozer is on par with the 3570K.
Intel leveraged an entire decade of "dominance" over having insecure CPUs that weren't secure, and they likely knew this too. Scummiest company in the medium. At least Nvidia dominates the GPU space while being competent, even if evil. Intel is just a clusterfuck.
>>
>>70967019
Okay that's nice to hear
>>
I'm not a gaymer so my FX4300 is still enough for me.
>>
I still have an fx8350 laying around doing nothing
seems I might have a use for it again
>>
>>70967557
>FX4300
Shit Anon, if you put an 8350 in you'd be good for even longer if your needs arent much greater than shitposting and watching videos.
>>
File: 1542837269452.gif (279 KB, 540x540)
279 KB
279 KB GIF
>>70965538
Intodlers BTFO!
>>
>>70965469
Isn't it already at that point. All their shortcuts ended up being security risks
>>
>>70969670
We may be at this point, you've got guys out here suggesting disabling fucking hyperthreading just to stay secure, that's your performance advantage over an old Bulldozer/Piledriver CPU right there.
>>
>>70965469
>tfw a cut down server chip is dominating an expensive 3570k of old
>>
>>70969621
Based.
>>
I'd imagine that Sandy vag / Ivy bridge are probably already there, with all patches applied, etc.. That isn't including disabling HT, which can reportedly result in a loss of performance up to around 40%. I bet the FX 8350 outperforms the 2600K at stock clocks at this point.
>>
>>70970975
The 8350 has always outperformed the 2600k at stock clocks at least on cinebench R15, its single core is just ass, a biased benchmark like cpuz and aida64 show it way ahead for some reason
>>
>>70965538
oh my



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.