https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-wow-patch-performance,38586.html>Indeed patch 8.1, Tides of Vengeance, has substantially improved performance for those gaming at 1080p, particularly on Ryzen processors. AMD reports that you can see anywhere up to a 35% improvement in frame rates at 1080p at lvl10 image quality settings, when using DX12 in the latest patch.
>>69757610>Video games>Especially WoW in 2019>>>/v/ and stay there
>>69757610>wow amdjeets never cease to amaze
>>69757610>muh fine wine>game literally dies>then adds better amd supportLmao
>Multi-core doesn't matter!>Productivity doesn't matter!>Price/performance doesn't matter!>Performance per watt doesn't matter!>Power usage doesn't matter!>Temperatures don't matter!>Soldered dies don't matter!>Stutters don't matter!>Streaming doesn't matter!>Data centers don't matter!>Locked CPUs don't matter!>OEMs don't matter!>Hyperscalers don't matter!>Upgradeability doesn't matter!>Anti-competitive business practices don't matter!>Locked platform features don't matter!>Synthetic loads don't matter!>PCI-e lanes don't matter!>Burnt pins don't matter!>Heat doesn't matter!>1771w cooler doesn't matter!>Server space doesn't matter!>ECC support doesn't matter!>Free RAID doesn't matter!>NVMe RAID doesn't matter!>StoreMI doesn't matter!>IPC doesn't matter!>7nm doesn't matter!>HEDT doesn't matter!>Stock coolers don't matter!>Security doesn't matter!>Games don't ALWAYS matter!>Enterprise doesn't matter!>Hyperthreading doesn't matter!>VMware doesn't matter!>MySQL doesn't matter!>Unix doesn't matter!>Linux doesn't matter!>Waffer yields don't matter!>Benchmarks after full patches don't matter!>Asian markets don't matter!>Own fabrics don't matter!>Chipset lithography doesn't matter!>Cray doesn't matter!>Cisco doesn't matter!>HPE doesn't matter!>AZURE doesn't matter!>5nm doesn't matter!>TDP doesn't matter!>10nm doesn't matter!>Cache doesn't matter!>IGPU doesn't matter!>PCI-Express 4.0 doesn't matter!>*NEW* Amazon sales don't matter!>*NEW* Prime95 AVX doesn't matter!>*NEW* Custom Foundry Business doesn't matter!>*NEW* Performance doesn't matter!
what a great graph!
>>69757846BASED AND REDPILLED AMD PULVERIZING SHITEL STUTTERFIRE GARBAGE
>>69757610>wowAs much as I like AMD, this is pretty much irrelevant.Worked with a few current content private servers and they are 90% Brazilian/Indian players with a few Russians selling hacked gold for cheaper than the in game stores and live isn't much better.
>g-games don't matter>i bought a consumer cpu instead of a workstation cpu for productivityyikes
>>6975761035% of zero still zero lmao
>>69757758>Getting 180 fps instead of 165 fps in GTAV (2013) is all that matters.
>>6975796735 * 0 is 35 you brainlet
>>69758012Isn't there like issues with the game engine once you go above 160 FPS as discovered by Wendell? I'm glad the piece of garbage PC port is getting out of tests suites now being the outdated piece of crap it is and yes, it was a shit port in hindsight but being passable as a PC port wasn't a high bar back when it was released. The thing that really bothered me was all the idiots praised it way too much for something it wasn't.
>>69758075>35 * 0 is 35 you brainletDEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPER
>>69757610Why the fuck does this matter when everyone plays cata, lich king and tbc? I didn't even know blizzard still has servers up.
>>69758736shame only BC and 1.12 were good, on the upside, the emulators for them have gotten pretty top tier and the scripting's pretty simple
>>69758772I agree, but I really like how cata gave more race/class combos. Like, why weren't undead allowed to be hunters when there were skeleton archers in Warcraft and the leader of forsaken is basically a ranger? Race/class restrictions (other than obvious, like undead not being paladins) never made sense to me.
>>69758075I sincerely hope you're only pretending
>>69758097I'm being hyperbolic since Intel's gaymen gains are like when you're over 120 fps... and even then it's for older games that look like N64 ports.
>>69758254Graphs like these always make me chuckle
>>69759047I wonder if this will work on Classic since it uses the Legion engine and not the current one.
>>69759535It won't really matter with Classic, since the environments will be hugely less demanding. Even in the current game in the old world, framerates are much higher than in the new areas, because there's not so much fucking shit scattered everywhere. With vanilla there'll be even less.
more useful than RTX
I'm sure I'm on /v/, but the address bar keeps saying /g/. What could be causing this?
>>69760980>oy vey's in green
>>69757610>2019>WoWWhat's next? 50% performance improvement in Duke Nuken 3D?
>>69761090>insulting Duke Nukem 3D in any wayPleb
>>69760959You're right. What about raids though? Since those are 40 man.
>>69759535I'm building a PC to play Classic. Do you think a rx 580 and a R5 2600 will be enough for 1440p?
>>69760980The VII is a legitimate value with this.
>>69757846>1Testing done by AMD performance labs January 4, 2019 on the following system. PC manufacturers may vary configurations yielding different results. Results may vary based on driver versions used. >Test configuration: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS Socket AM4 motherboard + Ryzen 5 2500X, 2x8GB DDR4-3200, GeForce GTX 1080 (driver 398.82), Windows 10 x64 Pro (RS4), Samsung 850 SSD. >In World of Warcraft: Battle for Azeroth at 1080p resolution with the settings Level “10,” the Ryzen 5 2500X achieved 43.2 FPS before the update patch, and 58.1 FPS after Patch 8.1 resulting in a performance increase of up to 35%. >The Ryzen 7 2700X achieved 42.7 FPS before the update patch, and 58.2 FPS after Patch 8.1 resulting in a performance increase of up to 36%.https://community.amd.com/community/gaming/blog/2019/02/08/ryzen-processors-are-now-optimized-for-both-alliance-and-horde-in-world-of-warcraft
>>69757610Too bad DX12 is nearly unusable for me on my R9 380. Even disregarding lower fps i get a feeling that it actually runs slower not in a sense of lower fps, but like playing on not full speed emulator where game is actually become slower.
>>69761108You're damn right baby, running Duke on Poozen is an insult to the King
>>69761177>58.2 FPSWe did it bros, we reached just under 60 FPS in a 15 year old game.
>release products like ryzen and vega with SHIT launch support/drivers while Nvidia and Intel release their stuff with good performance and support>finally catch up years later by fixing stuff and breaking other things>MUH FINEWINE
>>69761980Modern wow shares next to no code with 15 y/o wow
>>69761980You do realize the game engine was significantly changed when it comes to graphics with every new expansion? It's basically a 1 year old game.
>>69757610>still can't hit 60fps on a 15 year old gameThe absolute state
>Pre-patch, AMD recorded an average frame rate of 43.2 fps with a Ryzen 5 2500X, and 42.7 fps with the Ryzen 7 2700X, those figures increasing up to 58.1 fps, and 58.2 fps respectively after the patch. The test system included 16GB of DDR4 3200 MT/s, a GeForce GTX 1080, and a Samsung 850 Evo SSD, all running off of a Windows 10 x64 bit install.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S47mkFPcBJE
>>69762132>Significantly changed>It's basically one year oldlmfao you actually think the skeleton crew at blizzard that is stuck maintaining that dying game actually rewrites lots of stuff every expansion? It ran on 1 core for over a decade of multicore CPUs being available and it still looks a decade old in graphics quality today.If you actually think WoW is anything even close to a modern game tech wise you're delusional, it's even more old and busted than Bethesda's shit.
>>69762132You don't actually believe this, right?
>>69762199>17 man>small room>not in actual fightShiggy.
>>69762199>15 year old game>58 fps on a gtx 1080wat
>>69762199i remember doing this on mythic. that room was always laggy as fuck
>wowAMD is 20 years late