First for Shartier
Any good watch for a middle aged woman?>$200 max>Large diameter/face so she can see the time clearly>Metal
>parked outside the AD’s house again
Bought a 47mm nav B but not sure ive dun goofed now ive seen the actual size of it, ill get a photo soon to convince me to keep or flip and get the 44mm.
I enjoy Steely Dan, Sissy Femdom, Young Thug, Mark Knopfler, Painting and naturally beautiful women; Suggest a watch for me. A Telegram mistress made me wrap my private parts in tape at this very moment.
>>17639223Is my wrist big enough to pull it off or should I try find a 44mm?
>>17639232Any Casio, Seiko or Grand Seiko, because they are shitters
>>17639237I think it’s ok desu. The fairies here will tell you it’s a dinner plate but you should wear it a few weeks and then see how you feel.
Jesus Christ thank god the weekend’s here.
For me, personally, it's the Khaki Murph
>>17639247Thanks man. Ill give it some more wrist time before making a call.
>>17639208The other day I showed a girl my new Monta SkyQuest, she said nothing and she just laughed. Why are women like this? What did I do wrong?
>>17639215a 35mm Timex easy read with indiglo light would probably do the job:https://www.timex.com/search?q=Easy+reader+35mm+band&lang=en_US
>>17639260I fucked ur mum in the spd
>>17639285Sexy handWould give handjob
>>17639281is this a joke?
>>17639286Embarrassing, I'm going to assume it's shit
>>17639232>young thug nigger musicIced out rep
this fucker never needs a new battery and drifts 2 seconds a month
>>17639289why would it be? Should I return the watch?
>>17639300Whats this a png? Nice png my dude. Glad you posted a png that has big dick energy.
>>17639237Based and fliegerpilled
>>17639297I dunno what this mean but thanks
>>17639285Damn man you make me not want a 36 mil. Looks like a lady’s watch on a hairy troon arm.
>>17639285You're a beautiful hairy lady. :-*
What’s the absolute best six slot watch box for less than $250 or so? Not adverse to fakes or Ali express, want good quality but don’t want to break the bank.
>>17639285Is that a 36? Damn looks small af...
Are Cartier watches just meme fashion watches, or do they have some technical niceness? I wasn't a big fan of the square design, but saw a Santos with leather strap and it's really grown on me. The only problem is that it seems like the square dial is bad at actually telling time with and that's a huge turnoff.
>>17639406Idk, but im obsessed with the Santos and it's going to be my next watch because its soooooo fuckign ssexyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA IM COOOOOMING
>>17639294nigger it's a fucking small chip that displays dots on a small screen why the fuck would you ought to replace the battery oft
>>17639208You didn't post the link to the last thread.>>17637052Poorfag guide: https://imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprEShould I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn"Suggest a watch for me."> Your budget> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet> Wrist size or desired watch size
>>17639406it's the watch I'm currently aiming for. not the large in your pic tho, I want the medium. either that or an OP 41 but I guess my chances for that one are less than zero.
>>17639421Same boat, Medium Santos and a OP or an Explorer, but leaning towards the Santos because it's easier to get kek
>>17639422holy shit are you me??? I also want the explorer with a Nato strap but like I've said, with Rolex you either wait 5 years or you don't get one.
>>17639422whats great with the Cartier is that its really versatile.The Explorer is a great casual/daily watch but I don't think I would wear it with a suit. The Santos on the other hand would fit well either way.
>>17639281it looks like your watch opens up and there's shitty gum inside it, that's why she laughed - her little brother used to have one like that
>>17639406>The only problem is that it seems like the square dial is bad at actually telling time with and that's a huge turnoff.huh? do you really have trouble telling the time? perhaps consider a digital watch?
Is Junghans the only mall brand making appealing watches?
>>17639453>valjouxCome on man step it up
How big should a watch look on your wrist?
>>17639480As long as you don't have an omnitrix lookin ass boutta transform into aliens, you'll be fine
what watch would she wear?
>>17639281It's a Rolex ripoff now, I don't understand why they ruined a perfectly good design.
>have had my rawlecks for a few months now >no regerts
>>17639494Sell me on the polerouter; one was posted last thread. What's so special about these amongst all the other vintage stuff from this great, but long dead, name?
>>17639516probably one of the fatego seikos because shes an egotistical cunt
>>17639524Basically it was featured on popular internet watch websites. Then it went from a random vintage $50 shitter to a $2500+ grail.
>>17639208What do you guys think of vintage jeweled indicators? I recently moved from 3d printers to machine shop production and after I got Industry standard mitutoyo and bestest noga Started picking up these vintage ones, I made a fixture to turn down an acrylic crystal for this old bitch but it’s a pain because depth of cut and cut speed needs to be slow as shit or I get chatter on the plasticIt’s just a rear plunge test that’s going to live on my reference table year round
Been rocking this lately and loving the vibes
>>17639524Idk, just look at it.
>>17639406>Are Cartier watches just meme fashion watches, or do they have some technical niceness?https://en.worldtempus.com/article/cartier-the-manufacture-in-la-chaux-de-fonds-8111.html
>>17639285Nice watch. You shouldn't drink, it's bad for you
Two-tone is based and I'm tired of pretending it's not
What are you wearing today?
thoughts on this thing?
>>17639285I can get this (in 41), new, for 6000 EUR as my first watch. Should I pull the trigger? I don't wanna start with an entry-level watch and then slippery slope my way into a collection - I'd rather just jump in the pool.
This looks pretty good for a Mido
>>17639537How do you hold your phone?
Got this one second hand for a good price imo. Thought on mesh bracelet for this watch ? Any other ideas ?
>>17639688it's nice like that yeah
>>17639322>>17639337>>17639371Can't tell if this is a joke.
Recommend me a watch that will impress brown women.
>>17639705"Recommend me (x)" as a request for people to tell you to what to buy is improper English. Getting better at speaking English may help to attract brown women who want to learn how to speak English.
>>17639688could try shark mesh, might suit it a bit more, but I like mesh in general so I like how this one looks too
>>17639719Mesh is gay and so is any bracelet that doesn't use proper end links.
>>17639721ur dad gay
Are automatic watches really worth it?Don't get me wrong, I love the beauty of them, I appreciate the craftsmanship and delicate intricacies that make them work.But... I'm kind of disappointed in them?I thought they were great until I got one and now I find myself wearing my Casio Gshock more than my automatic.I don't wear my watches much during the week as I work in dirty environment with grease and oils, but after a long day at work I am finding it to be a real bother to put the watch on just to wind it up, as I don't think this has a manual wind up.So, what's a decent quality Quartz watch, for general casual wear?Looking at a Tissot PRX, but open to suggestions.
>>17639745Yeah it's not for poor retarded Mexicans.
Anyone own a GPS or Radio Sync watch? I like the idea of never having to be concerned with battery or being concerned with adjusting time ever again. Not sure why the Seiko Astrons are so much more expensive than the Oceanus watches though.
>A lot of people on this sub aren't ready to hear that GS watches are legitimately better than Rolexes in terms of craftsmanship. The automatic/quartz combo movement was literally invented by GS. They also have a sleeker fit in my opinion, most posts on this sub look like a bulky watch on the wrist of a 15 year old.How true is this statement or is it the ultimate cope the rolexlets
>>17639745The key is to get a beater automatic and wear it all the time even in the dirt so it keeps a wind and becomes like a companion to you. I don't know what kind of dirt or grime you work with but a well built watch made of steel with sapphire and a screw down crown on a nylon or rubber strap should be able to handle most things with a wipe down after.
>>17639771Spring drive is just rechargeable(like solar) quartz with extra steps. Depending on how you look at it it's either a worse quartz movement (more expensive and more shit to break) or a worse automatic(less tolerant of temperatures, can only be serviced by the manufacturer, will inevitably wear out the battery or capacitor and brick, apparently can't be smaller than 39mm?)
>>17639532vintage industrial stuff is cool as fuck, do you have a pic of the movement?
>be Louis Vuitton CEO>wear the ugliest watcheswhat did he mean by this?
>>17639771>GS watches are legitimately better than Rolexes in terms of craftsmanshipThis is true. In addition, more things are done by hand in the GS manufacturing process compared to Rolex.>The automatic/quartz combo movement was literally invented by GSAlso true, it's called the Spring Drive movement.But Rolex does have the superior brand and heritage, tbqh.
>ugliest fookin watch>50k retail>they actually buy it
>>17639802Was the purpose of taking this photo to show off the watch or did he just want to buck break people of his own accord?>In charge of the company that made this watch specifically for VIP customersKinda cheating to give yourself one of the esteemed limited run watches only for celebrities and influencers, isn't it?
>>17639771It's true, but if you have to tell yourself that to want to buy a GS you are way better off buying a rolex. if a watch doesn't speak to you on an emotional level you're buying a cope watch and your satisfaction will entirely hinge on what some idiot online said about your wrist fedoraremember that watches are for confidence and rolex is popular for a reason, they "just werk" because the rolex marque is reassuring and time tested, you will not need to seek approval from the internet because "people just know"
>>17639771Why are GSfags so obsessed with Rolex? And why are they trying so hard to push their beloved brand to compete with Rolex? It's like a throwing a pug puppy in a pitbull fight.
>>17639830It's probably people in Japan and Weebs elsewhere cope posting over Swiss supremacy.
>>17639830it's the marketing department trying to compensate for the fact that it has "seiko" in the name and it's a problem for their brand identity to be automatically compared to mainline seikothey could pick any watch brand but what other watch brand would you pick if you wanted to change the subject from mainline seiko?
>>17639830who need a power dial
>>17639237No. Huge gaps under lugs.
>>17639237No it's not big enough, you look like a fucking child wearing his dad's watch. Wear something appropriate for your wrist to look less like a clown.
>>17639830It's not GSfags, it's trollfags who want to artificially stoke discord. Watches are a mostly matter of taste, different people have different tastes. And yet people seem adamant on comparing them in a myriad of ways and get npcs triggered into responding. Me, i just like nice watches. Simple as.
>>17639859Honest thoughts on pic rel
>>17639840I don't think GS is even trying to compete with Rolex. It's the weebs and e-celeb faggots who keep comparing the two. I'm pretty sure GS is embarrassed by that.IMO GS's main competitor is Omega. >same pricepoint>large and thick cases>sports watches trying really hard to differentiate from Rolex
>>17639862I personally prefer the 'old' Santos, this one is ok too, but to each his own.
>>17639866>I'm pretty sure GS is embarrassed by that.Yeah, if anything they look up to Swiss brands, they unashamedly asked the Swiss for advice when building their new studio. All watchmakers are colleagues at the end of the day.
>>17639866you're delusional if you think all those "grassroots" discussions about products are not heavily steered by paid professionals
>>17639771Even Tudor is better than Rolex. Rolex watches are simply overrated, they are good however.
>>17639866Omega is a much more favourable matchup for GS because Omegas are ugly slab-sided shithouse dogs just like them.
>>17639856Did dadwatch just try to reappropriate his meme incorrectly?
>>17639883Name a Tudor that is better than its equivalent Rolex.
Patekisters, Rolexbros, AudePiggies, I don't feel so good...
>>17639862If you're going to femfag it up, really femfag it up and get a tank
>>17639906Are we sure he's wearing the same watch? it looks like it's wider than it is long, the opposite of the picture to the right.
>>17639902What website is that?
>>17639899Not him, but if the BBPro wasn't 32mm thick I'd prefer it over the Explorer 2.
>>17639958>too thick>not in white
>>17639411>nigger it's a fucking small chip that displays dots on a small screen why the fuck would you ought to replace the battery oft
>>17639426I think Rolexes go very well with suits or sports coats.Not these shitty business suits that office dwellers wear these days. I'm talking about tweed, flannel or linen/linenmix.
>>17639495That looks great. Digital watches can never be too big because they just end up looking like a tech device or tool. Analog is what looks bad because it's a classic design that can never extend beyond your wrist.
>>17639708That's proper english you retard kek
>>17639994Chads don't need citations.
>>17639899Probably an unpopular opinion but I’d take one of the new Rangers over an Explorer 1.
>>17639958But it is, so it's not better.
>>17639984No, it really isn't. It's not>Recommend me a productIt's>Recommend a product for me
>>17639697My feeling are a little hurt. :(
>>17640004Expect to stay unpopular.
>>17639697>>17640008Holy fuck, are all watchfags this insecure or is this a side effect of HRT?
>>17639991This is how you look
>>17640005It's not better but it's not worse.Both are unwearable for different reasons.
Sup family. Been a spell.
>>17640018Too big for you. Should have bought the 36mm.
>>17640018Nice fit. Don't believe those faggy numales like >>17640019that wishes everybody looks girly like them.
>>17640016Explorer ii is perfectly wearable if you get a 5 digit reference
>>17640029Did you also buy a watch too big for your wrist since you're so defensive?
>>17640029Just to be clear, when I say this anon's Datejust is too big, it's not an opinion but a fact. He clearly has medium sized wrists but because he fell for the 41mm meme he looks like a kid who borrowed his dad's watch (the fact he's hairless doesn't help).The Datejust is supposed to be dainty and elegant. It's Rolex' interpretation of a dress watch.
>>17640018holy hockey puck anon
>>17639902no no no
>>17640046>it's not an opinion but a fact>looks like a kid who borrowed his dad's watchWaaaaaaahhhh Waaaaaaahhhh Facts!!Dad's watch.Jesus, you are so insecure. LMAO
>>17639973sure but you need the right attitude to pull it off too but you're right tho.
>>17640014I love that watch. Only gigachads can pull it off.
>>17639219>put me on the waitlist or else you'll end up on mine, badda bing badda boom!
TrueWatches for CHADS start at +40mm
>>17640014What size is that?
>>17640001How come Stallone gets a different color gold daydate for every day of the week?
>>17640092That's normally how women like to accesorize themselves.
>>17640019Slightly. I agree. On the waiting list for the Explorer I 36mm.
>>17640016What makes explorer 2 unwearable?
>>17640116Roelx is the wisest choice.
>>17640126Cope and seethe if you must but your ultra luxury watches are not going to be recognized except by watch autists and richfags
>>17640129Tbqh I'd rather chat with autists and richfags rather than some random poors or retards.
>>17640121Pretty sure that guy already owns a few.
Looking to get a seiko 5 snk 805 with this blue lume. Do they actually exist? is there a special ref number or is it just weird white balance in the picture?
Can anyone confirm what this is?
>>17640092He's a huge Rolex fan. What's cool about him is how he can switch from gaudy diamond incrusted Day-Dates to vintage Daytona and GMT Master. Apparently he only wears Rolex know.Chad.
>>17640156His favorite is this old Daytona. Beauty.
cop or not?>inb4 not a watchthis seems like the best thread to ask still
>>17640156Are there any other celebrities with based taste? I learned today that Jake Gyllenhaal is a Cartier Santos guy.
>>17640155looks like a Seagull
>>17640155A twink seriously contemplating running out of this date. Must be picking up red flags.
>>17640155Breitling Top Time Deus.Too big for him.
>>17640164That's the greatest professional cyclist alive right now, 2x Tour de France winner
>>17640161Well he's a Cartier ambassador, not sure he's actually into the brand.Ryan Gosling is into vintage Rolex and Omega.
>>17640160>cop or not?Are those original? If yes, cope, but they're going to be quite expensive.If they are fake, buy something better made and honest, probably for a lesser price.Also, keep ik mind if you're going to pair them with a watch, they should all be the same color metal.
>>17640169Gosling has impeccable taste. The money to buy new but the taste to wear vintage
>>17640169I wouldn't think you'd agree to be a brand ambassador for a watch company you didn't like and wear it everywhere. Omega will apparently take anybody, he could have easily gotten in there if he wanted to for example.
>>17640173Isn't vintage just as expensive anyway?
>>17640174Makes me think of Beckham or Lady Gaga wearing their Tudors. You know they wish they could wear the Rolexes out and about
>>17640169Big deal, my Manhasset is just as good.
>be Brad Pitt>Breitling ambassador>actually wears Rolex and Patekkek based
>>17640173He wears it all the time. Probably got it from his father or something. Too bad he's a Tag Heuer ambassador now.
>>17640161>Are there any other celebrities with based taste?Based A. Lange & Söhne enjoyer.
>>17640161I've read online that Ben Affleck is really into watches but hides his powerlevel pretty well.>>17640181many such cases (Daniel Craig comes to mind)
Anyone like to read literature that hails from the same hellhole your shitty watch was produced in?
>>17640185Fuck, I thought Clint had better taste than this.
>>17640187>I've read online that Ben Affleck is really into watches but hides his powerlevel pretty well.Yeah wearing shit like Franck Muller really does hide his powerlevel.
>>17640188Walt Whitman is from Long Island.
>>17640193Not really. If anything it shows how broad his collection must be. There are a number of brands that there's just no way you'd ever buy if you weren't really into watches.
>>17640090I think it's 42
>>17640193kek yeah that's what makes it plausible, I assume that watch at least has some sentimental value
>>17640194Long island watches are not produced in long island. Read the little red book
>>17640198There's like 5 brands you would ever buy if you weren't into watches (and additional others that you'd buy because you don't know any better)
>>17640202If a watch can be called swiss made because it was "designed" by a swiss engineer, Marc can call his watches Long Island made.
>>17640181Brad Pitt wearing a Vacheron 222 (the only good Vacheron).
>$3800 for a plain tudor FUCK Tudor
>>17640215I wish tudor still gave the option for mercedes hands.
>>17640215When they'll ask $6k for it in 3 years you'll hate yourself for not buying it at $3800 when you had the chance.
>>17639531>Basically it was featured on popular internet watch websites.welp that destroys everythingsuch sites are cancer
>>17640218I already have a Rolex, I could excuse the price if it had a date on it.
>>17640218Why would you ever pay $6k for this when an Explorer or Datejust is $7k?
>>17639771That's true, sort of.>sleeker fitNope. GS struggles mightily with keeping watches thin and some pretty bizarre design choices, along with some laughably awful bracelets. Their divers and chronos are unironically some of the ugliest luxury watches I've ever seen. I really like some of their manual wind dress watches.
>>17640224This is $4k if you can find one (used of course, old model) and is a Rolex, with two-tone
>>17640228looks pretty good ttytt (to tell you the truth)
>>17640229ong fr (on god, for real)
>>17640228Is it that low because it's 2 tone? Is the 2 tone tax real?
>>17640224Because it has gold on it and buying a steel Rolex at retail is hard.
>>17640231Yeah, the blue one goes for around 5k-6k depending on condition and size. They're usually 34mm but wear like a 36 due to large case size
>>17639434Not your blog, faggot.
>>17640233You can buy a used Explorer, pre engraved rehaut for around $5k, pay $200 to get it serviced by a Rolex a.d and call it a day.
any divers/racing chronographs that are <=38cm?
>>17640244I'd buy a Rolex over a Tudor any day, butA/ you're comparing used vs newB/ you're also comparing steel vs steel+gold
>>17640169isn't a cocktail time with leather a better fit here?
>>17640228Ugliest looking piece I've seen.
>>17640250New Tudors don't really matter much the service cost is so cheap and they depreciate so fast you might as well buy used
>>17640187>it;s me>pick up
>>17640190Seethe and get clapped, faggot
>>17640257It has a Rolex logo so it's automatically above any Tudor
>>17640259Again, I'm not saying you're wrong.I'm saying some people don't want to buy used watches and/or want gold on their watch.
>>17640247Go to chrono24Select "women's watches"Lurk around
>>17640046But you aren’t negotiating there tomorrow lol. Or ever. This is stupid, fantasy marketing
>>17640185Based angriest man ever.
>NOOO don't get your watch polished to look like new it's ruining the PATINA!nothing more cringe
>>17640273>nothing more cringeGrand S O Y K O in general is more cringe, but I get your point.
>>17640275There are people out there who don't get their rusty scratched up grand seiko serviced LOOl
>>17640270Yes anon, ads in the 60s weren't as subtle as ads now.
>>17640269what did they do to that site? I can't find sort by size
>>17640282white boi jealous as hell lolololol
>>17640286Use the app. It's better designed.
Rolex is a scam for people who hate Trump.
>>17640215Nice dresskx homage>>17640275>muh zaratsu folded 10k times steel >muh pond muck dial>muh unserviceable spring driveTbh people who buy high end seiko are just as annoying as omega larpers and rolex cucks, just in a different way
Can someone help me get money please, I'm extremely desperate at this point.
>>17640303If i was to give money to someone it would NOT be someone in the watch thread because i damn well know they're gonna spend it on a fucking watch
>>17640303Tell me which watch you want to buy and post your BTC wallet address.If I like your watch... well who knows, maybe you'll have some nice surprise.
>>17640312Is this open for everybody?
>>17640312I don't want to buy a watch, I just want to live dude...And I have no idea what a BTC wallet address is.
>>17640314It's an anonymous board anon.
>>17640315then why are you here bro
>>17640315How else are we supposed to give you mone?
>>17640312post a watch you like
>>17640315>I JUST WANT TO LIVE DEATH for begging boy!
>>17640328You think you can trick me like that anon?
>>17640321I don't want your money I just want help to get money. You know like everyone else has where they set them up with a job and shit. I'm all alone in the world and I don't know what to do anymore.
>>17640303How much you need dawg
>>17640298>mfw the "zaratsu" polishing technic isn't even japaneseWhoever buy Gay Sexko is a total moron
>>17640312can I please have the Milo Manara X Vacheron sexwatch?
>>17640340Speaking of Seiko not working with traditional techniques and materials, I wonder if they'll ever try making a watch with tamahagane steel with pattern welding fold patterns.
>>17640275>>17640298>>17640340>be me, well educated gentleman with amazing taste>don't really care for Grand Seiko>notice that /wt/ hate Grand Seiko>also know that /wt/ has terrible taste in watchesYou fuckers will make me buy a Grand Seiko.
>>17640343Fuck man, I would be if I wasn’t paying for useless eaters. It’s literally hand to mouth in this country.
>>17640116He could have walked out and go to a dinner with a patek, but chosed not to sad!
>>17640334I don't want your money. I'm curious if I should be insecure or not.
>>17640149weird white balance
>>17640356That's because he has better taste. Unless extremely complicated, pateks are a meme.
>>17640372Would that beefsteak taste better with a patek or a lange on your wrist though
>>17640377With a Lange 100%
Most Patek look absolutely horrendous.Most ALS look beautiful.I'd still get one of the few cool Patek over any ALS though.
>>17640268>don't want to buy usedWhy
>>17640390is this real? this looks like a $100 watchI guess you have to see it in person?
I'm not that anon, but i'll chime in anyway, and i'll be honest. I'd love to have a spring drive (sbga111), but being a bit of a poorfag i honestly wouldn't be able to afford to service it. What i could however afford to service and would take good care of is this slightly knackered but completely original (with bracelet, which is rare) 61GS.
>>17640409Except it doesn't, it says Patek on the dial retard.
>>17640390imagine having to explain to someone you spent 5 figures on this watch instead of a Rolex.
I don't think I've enjoyed a single post in this entire thread
>>17640428i can post some cropped diaper porn if it'd help
Clearly A. Lange & Söhne is the winner here, as their watches besides being beautiful like >>17640390 said, doesn't look cheap like 100 bucks watch, like >>17640409 pointed out.
>>17640409The Patek World Time is possibly the most beautiful watch ever made.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToEXdN4ze_k
>>17640410The movement is spotless though ;)
>>17640428What about now?
>>17640434>random nonsense shitholes on the dial (london? really? putting any euroshit country on your wrist?) >knife edge bezel on a dress watch >awful mechanism for switching time zones >$5 aliexpress strap Yeah it's poopy
>>17640435Why isn't there any anglage, perlage or mirror polishing? Not even blued screws?Are shitters really that crapply made?
>>17640438>This is the Americunt mind
>>17640443french "people" be like >sacrebleau my median wage is $12,000 a year! that's enough for one rawlecks!
>>17640446>it's been months since some French anon ripped him a second asshole and he's still seething about it
>>17640247Under 38cm? Yes, literally everything.
Think I could get away with a 42mm flieger or should I stick to 39mm? 7” wrist. Looking at the Laco Kempten or the Leizpig.
Hope you guys are having a great weekend.
>>17639524Never got it, then I put one on my wrist and was in love. This was a few years ago amd I can't afford it now, but I'll get one eventually. It's slim, a nice size, well made and aesthetically very pleasing.
>>17639852This is a fair call. If I went 44mm should I get another manual wind or go for the automatic? I like the display case back on the manual wind, but it would be cool to have an auto
>>17640521Found a pic.
Recently picked up an edifice, any recommendations for a new strap? 22mm
>>17640160Do people still wear cufflinks?I feel like I would like to try, but I can't recall anyone having cufflinks in my immediate circle.
>>17640435btw i left the btc address in the pic if anyone is feeling generous
Can you guys id Hamilton's watch? I love white watches
I have this Polerouter Jet that I think is pretty nice. Still need to get my hands on the classic one.
>>17640498Steel case and then I'll buy it
>>17640212Literally perfect watch. I would buy a fake one if there were any
>>17640558Did he donate it to the homeless guy he's huggin afterwards?Watch ist just another IWC ceramic literal dinner plate.
>>17640559Nice linen dial, always love to see those.
>>17640335Where do you live?
>>17640507Pagani designs looking watch
>>17640434>The Patek World Time is possibly the most beautiful watch ever madethe plain case, and the busy dial with the cities written in what looks like a pre-installed windows font looks so cheapdoes patek actually employ any designers or are they all engineers/watchmakers? this watch looks like the equivalent of the UI you see on unpolished programs made by programmers
>>17640558IWC big pilot perpetual calendar in an unreleased colorway
>>17640558Looks like a nigger watch for niggers
>>17640582It's white and a dinner plate so even if it wasn't worn by one it is a nigger watch
>>17640558IWC White ceramic watchBreaddy cool imho
>>17640562>I would buy a fake one if there were anyThank God there isn't >>17640566>>17640584>dinner plateThe nigglet came back
>>17640587Pay your own internet bill and stop stealing your neighbor's, Tyrone.
I strongly believe that this is the best watch ever made. If I had it I would have no desire to ever get any other watch.But why do I have to be a wristlet.
>>17640593I have one but why do I still want an explorer ii or gmt master?
>>17640593The ed white is 39mm isn't it? Should be fairly easy to pull off even with a smaller wrist.
>>17639434ELLOOOOOO AND WELCOME
>>17640558nigger o'clock. dude this thing is such trash. bubba walace in a land F-15 jet.
>>17640574HEY WHAT TIME IS IT?DUNNO, 31 DAYS, MAYBE THURSDAY MAYBE 40, IWC NOV I THINK. ITS POINTING NORTH SO MAYBE IT'S 11 O'CLOCK
>>17640587warranty's expired fren.
>>17640612LMAO YOU RETARD
>>17640614did it ever depart towards outer worlds? it would be nice to know that, perhaps a subtle ingraving to the same.
>>17640616** checks iphone for time **ahem, *tugs on collar* >looks at computer screen. >YES. I have a YOU** devlish smile -- w-w-w-w-ould he read my post ??!?*posts shit.
>>17640435the japanese care more about engineering than appearance
>>17640623meant to reply to this fag: >>17640441
>>17640623Good thing based swiss and germans care about both engineering AND finishing. They understand luxury and class.
>>17640637the only holes in their products are in their cheese.
>>17640507Are there any affordable watches that have this kind of deep stripes dials?
Shill me a nice watch under $1500
>>17640681Get a hamilton if you must in that price range. I sold all my watches under 1500 except for a g shock and hamilton at this point. Khaki auto or mechanical, jazzmaster if you want something dressier. Avoid powermatic 80 like the plague
NEW THREAD WHEN??????
>>17640689>hamiltonI was looking at getting a Laco Kempten for $1,130. Can't find it used. Just wasn't sure if there is anything else I should consider first. I like enthusiast-category watches around $1k and Rolex. Not much inbetween that interests me.
>>17640484When it comes to pulling off a watch, distance between lugs and their shape makes a much bigger difference than the diameter of the dial.
>>17640699I recommend the 36mm Glycine Airman re-edition: https://www.gnomonwatches.com/products/airman-36-no1-blue-purist-ltd-ed-1000pcs-ref-gl0371https://www.gnomonwatches.com/products/airman-no-1-cream-gmt-36-ref-gl0372I also recommend this fun shitter for the summer:https://www.jomashop.com/tissot-sailing-touch-perpetual-alarm-world-time-chronograph-quartz-analog-digital-blue-dial-mens-watch-t056-420-27-041-01.html
>>17640709no I don't recommend the second link I recommend the Purist version: https://www.gnomonwatches.com/products/airman-no-1-cream-purist-36-ref-gl0373
Just give it to me straight, how big of a cope is a Tudor Black Bay? I want to upgrade my current watch (Seiko 5) but I want to get a piece that will also get me laid. Would a Black Bay be enough or do I have to start looking at secondhand Rollies/APs? I'm not rich.
>>17640717Get a Cartier tank, ladies love a big tank
>>17640717It's only a cope if you don't like the watch.For example, say you like the new BB54. Fine, buy it. It's a great watch. BUT, if you're just buying the Black Bay to "hold you over" until you can afford a Submariner or get offered one by your AD, THAT's when you're coping.
>>17640711>both oosOwari da...
>>17640709>>17640711Eww. I'm getting the Laco.
NEW THREAD WHEN??????NEW THREAD WHEN??????NEW THREAD WHEN??????
new thread when
NEW THREAD >>17640770NEW THREAD >>17640770NEW THREAD >>17640770NEW THREAD >>17640770NEW THREAD >>17640770NEW THREAD >>17640770
>>17639302Thanks I guess. I know nothing about png. Just couldn't find a good pic so pulled it from seiko site.
>>17640215gaudy used-car-salesman tier
>>17639911since he's moving his arm when the photo was being took maybe it's being stretched
>>17640149no they blasted the watch with some kind of UV torch to get it like that. remember reading a post on seddit about it. dropped mine once. and the rotor makes a sad noise.