Can we all agree on this?
>>17538679I am monitoring this thread
>>17538694I freakes out for a moment because I thought that was a picture of me.I look identical to this man, wtf.
Crucifix necklace and watch every time. I'm straight
>>17538704no u dont
>>17538679wrong 3 is best number
>>17538679I agree, but would add that most of the time even two is pushing it.
>>17538679Wrist-watches don't really count as a fashion "accessory: in a basic sense" because they could be considered a "necessary - practical device", performing a necessary function for the wearer and most people. Unless you are wearing luxury wristwatch in platinum or gold (with precious gemstones), most people also wouldn't include wristwatch in the jewellery category.
>>17538679I agree for sure
>>17540934get help Minimalist scum
>>17538679You should actually only wear one - a watch, and not a dogshit Orient.
>>17542488who would leave house without wearing wristwatch...
>spending $1k on a watch barely gets you in the door>spending $1k on a bracelet/necklace gets you 14k gold and diamondssomeone essplain dis shiet
>>17543985>14k goldplate or hollow filled >diamondslab-grown artificial Answer
>>17543985The engineering on a watch is much more complicated
>>17538679You've got the triangle upside down. The three points are: pocket square, nipple piercing, and cock ring.
>>17543985 im perfectly content with my 40$ bezos watch that tells time better than a rolex bc its quartz and not some shitty mechanical magic that gets taken off track if I walk slightly too brisklyQuartz >>>>>>>>
>>17543990You can get solid gold 14k necklaces under 1k as long as they’re not too thick. I’m looking at a 4mm figaro chain for $850
>>17538679>they forgot bout rings
>>17543938Anyone with a phone