Grand Seiko WINS edition.Guides and Info:> Poorfag guide: https://m.imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE> List of space watches: https://pastebin.com/Te6PNzxr> /wt/ Pasta: https://pastebin.com/GBLwAm0fShould I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn"Suggest a watch for me."> Your budget> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand-wound, quartz> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd-time zone> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet> Wrist size or desired watch sizeold https://boards.4channel.org/fa/thread/17172255#top
>Grand BasedkoShit OP picture Delete this please.
>>17173084Yeah Seiko is pretty b-b-b-based
>>17173077When did they start making spring drive chronos? I'm intrigued.
Grand Seiko will never get the recognition they deserve. Sad.
>want to buy a watch>its made out of some dude's garage in detroitill pass.
the seiko worm is still gnawing its way through your brain
>>17173119Seiko is based
ITS OVER THE WATCH MARKET IS OVERITS OVERTHE BUBBLE HAS BURSTITS OVEROVERBURSTTHE BUBBLE HAS BURSTITS OVERTHE BIGGEST JOKE IS HOW SOME OF THESE MORONS TOOK A BULLSHIT DOGSHIT BRAND LIKE GERRARD PERIGEAUX AND TURNED IT INTO A STATUS SYMBOLTHE MARKET IS OVEROVEROVEROVER ROVERROLL OVER FATSO *CLAPS HANDS*ITS OVERALL THAT FREE GOVERNMENT MONEYYOU SHOULDNT HAVE SPENT IT ON FANCY CARSFANCY WATCHESAND CRYPTO CRAP
>>17173077fuck off jannie
>>17173134>His chastity cage isn't swiss made and two-toneMy AD puts me in a swiss made stainless steel finely brushed cage. It says sissy made on it.One session a week with me and the missus puts me higher on the list!
>>17173137Your bank account is below 5 digits lmao
Why do Rolex owners look exactly the same as Invicta owners?
>>17173148A genuine Rolex that isn't older than 10 years has never been posted in this thread.
>>17169869Jealous of the red, here's mine.
Suggest a watch for me> Up to 1000€> Any type is good as long as it's not sport > Movement either hand wound or automatic. Maybe quartz of really good> I would like it to have roman numerals, definitely chronograph, and a dial that's red, blue or green. Most important part is that it is a good movement.> Milanese mesh band preferred, but any is fine as I can always change it.> Any size is good.
Real question that matters for /wt/: We have the watch tiers chart. What are the watch magazine or watch blog tiers?
>I'll take a quartz watch
>>17173176>date window at 4:30That is the opposite of nice. The rest of the watch looks good though.
>>17173175T. Guy who's never bought a second hand watch or a watch from outside a """"boutique"""""
>>17173180nigga.. who cares
>>17173188post what you think is a good chronograph for that price so I can laugh at you
>>17173160This is the best i can dohttps://www.jomashop.com/mido-watch-m024-427-36-061-00.htmlIf you can compromise on the chrono i can get you a pretty spiffy looking german made hand winderhttps://www.limes-watches.com/klassik/finesse/327/pharo-finesse-h.-s.-lsOr a day date automatic take on the same design for a bit overhttps://www.limes-watches.com/klassik/daydate/322/pharo-daydate-s.-ls
>>17173192You laugh at everything in this thread that isn't a Rolex retard larper.
>>17173077Thoughts on the Sinn 903? Please discuss, citing specific examples.Some background for those who don't know:Helmut Sinn was a german fighter pilot between 1939-1945He bought the patents, parts, and tooling related to the original Breitling Navitimer in 1979 when that company went bankrupt thanks to the quartz crisisThe company has continuously improved the old design with tons of cool shit like desiccant inside the movement to keep ambient moisture at bay and the extra crown to rotate the slide rule bezel to improve water resistance.
>>17173199Why don’t you post a good mechanical chronograph under a thousand euros then and prove me wrong?
>>17173203This is legit every Rolex STEMlord in this thread lmao.
>>17173160Breitling Professional Aerospace - yes it's quartz, no you shouldn't care since it's still a certified chronometer and has 4 digits of accuracy which no mechanical shitter can match. Oh and it's also Titanium, making it lighter and stronger than any steel watch.
>>17173198Thanks for the recommendations anon, I'm not in love with the first one, but the two lime ones look quite interesting, shame about them is that they have a white dial, and though it is quite nice looking, I just really want one in a more popping color, but I'll take a look at the rest of the Limes catalogue, I didn't know this brand. Many thanks again.
This has been the worst thread of the entire week and it is still at 1/10th of its capacity.Great job you idiot poorfags and larpers.Why are you such an unjustifiable cluster of wet turds?
>>17173212It's distusgin. I'm tired of poorfags in my thread. I grew up in rural France and own a rolex and own more land than any of these FREAK
>>17173210Really attractive material and mechanism , sounds quite good. Sadly I'm not in love with the choice of the mix between a digital and tradicional display, but thank you for the recommendation anon.
>>17173212The entire thread is Poorfags and Larpers. It always has been. No one in the thread is rich and you're a retard if you believe otherwise.
>>17173214The digital is necessary because again, only one ridiculously overpriced Zenith mechanical watch can display to the 1/100 of a second, and that's entirely necessary for a professional pilots watch like this. And btw it's also a perpetual calendar
>>17173077What would be a good watch for an investment banker in a low ranking position which is not tacky and relatively original?
>>17173225ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX IF YOU CANT AFFORD ONE THEN FUCK OFF BUY A ROLEX HAHAHAHAHAHAH
>LIMITED EDITION>10007 PIECESlol
>>17173225Basic steel Reverso
>>17173219Larping is the only reason to wear a watch today
Thoughts on Felix's Grand Seiko?
>>17173241>>17173242money coulda woulda SHOULD gone to ROLEX HAHAHAHA
>>17173235What the fuck?Really a 007 seconds counterweight?Jesus that looks like shitIf you gave me that watch for free i would be embarrassed to wear it
18cm wrist herewould a 18.5cm (case inclusive) strap be too tight for me?
The best color, by the way.
>>17173258depends on the kind of strap
>>17173258Yes you want more than 0.5cm of strap poking out past the buckle - if that number is even inclusive of the buckle. That being said, why not just buy a different strap if you find it doesn't fit?
Spring drive is gonna be in every luxury watch in a couple years
>>17168089Having trouble sizing, either seems too tight or too loose. There aren't half links either and the only one micro-adjustment hole on the clasp. Just going to wear it a little loose for now
>>17173261Does it match the color of your panties or nappy? uwu
>>17173261shave your hands woman
>>17173293bonus lume pic. Photography skills nonexistent
>>17173274Id rather have the hi beat desu but the 80 hours one instead of the older one in his watch
>>17173293Looks good anon>>17173297Nice, i like that lume color
>>17173297IMM GONNA LOOOOMMMM
>>17173274He's right, the dial is gorgeous.
>this whole thread and grand seikos sisters
Rolex>high quality materials>better durability>works foreverGS>cheap materials>poor durability>lmao quartz
>>17173309Did you not see the cute Rolex sissy above? owo..
Is this used Omega Speedmaster 3523.30.00 worth $1200-1400?
>>17173335not in that condition nigga
>>17173340I like busy dials>>17173337
>>17173340That's not a 24 hours dial, but a second time zone. See the minute hand also?
>>17173335>worth $1200-1400Yes, and a good buy, actually.
how bad of a purchase is this? i know i can get a pepsi around the same price but i prefer this design more.
>>17173348Does this appraisal look legit? I realize warranty date is close to up
cheapest solid gold men's watch? auto, quartz, any size, any manufacturer
>>17173352Buy what you like, desu.
>>171733564200 is too high
>>17173357If you have to ask what the cheapest of something is, you're not going to be able to afford it.Besides, 14, 18, 24k?
>>17173352>explorer IIprobably THE most boring rolex ever made. don't do it. 100% definitely get a pepsi instead.
>>17173367i could live with 18k. i'd assume a 24k would just be a big ball of scratches within a day
>>17173364Thats what I thought which is why I'm suspicious of the actual $1400 offer
>>17173372hmm, a solid gold invicta, very nice, very ni... waiiiiittt
switzerland is a shithole
why is it cheaper than the steel one?
>>17173383looks like literal feces
>>17173385thats what the nurse said when you were being born
>>17173210And it's also three times the price.
>>17173386i came out of the womb wearing that rolex so ye
>>17173357I'd guess something like a vintage Rolex Day-Date Ref. 18038, 18k gold, prices seem like 16k-18k. The links on the bracelet can get a little janky and loose.
>>17173389Are you layeranons son?Pic relatedI guess he lost his watch
what do you recomend for a guy with a thin wrist? something cheap....
>>17173392Are you fucking stupid? You can buy a vintage solid gold watch from some prequartz crisis swiss manufacturer for the weight of the gold.
>>17173400too ugly. is there any other option.
>>17173405F91W is based but what's your budget?
I'm looking to buy a watch for my mother's birthday, she had a stroke several years ago and struggles with things that have too much visual noise/clutter.Can anyone recommend a women's analog watch for under $200 that has pretty much nothing on the dial except (arabic) numerals?
Would you rather have a "George Daniels" wristwatch or a "R. W. Smith" wristwatch? Given that George Daniels himself only made 2 wristwatches in his life, assume that whichever one you get will have been made by Roger Smith.
>>17173424What style do you like? I like my seiko 5 that I got for $70 new and a bulkier citizen for $80 used
>buy diving watch>dont go diving??
>>17173435rolexfags dont even take their watch outside because they're scared of muh mugging
>>17173430Just go to the mall and get something pretty. There's nothing enthusiast about women's watches.
>>17173434all we do here is berate and belittle eachother while secretly seething into our casios. keep it on topic please anon.
>>17173376Maybe is what the watch is worth, vs what the insurance company will refund (and he fucked them)?
>>17173391ZelosZe loslos ZeLoszeLoser
>>17173447Have you ever been there? It smells like shit, looks like shit, garbage food.
>>17173393I laughed hard, my friend. Good thing it occured to me to check the thread before going to bed. Have a nice rest.
>>17173443Looking at their website I can't find a single watch with arabic numerals, but thanks for the suggestion anyway.
>>17173393this dude looks so much like hannibal lechter it's intimidating.
>buy gmt watch>have no use for gmtthis is fine right?
>>17173469nobody uses any of their watch complications
>>17173472i use the hour and minute and seconds complications
>>17173472I use the rotating bezel on my timex since I work in PST but im EST
>>17173441That's why I'm not jumping on it but I don't know how to verify these things
>>17173474i cant even see the time on some of my watches because the hands are the same colour as the dial. it takes like 2 minutes to tell the time. no fucks given. it's jewellery i have an excuse for wearing.
>>17173481found your watch
Best watches similar to the citizen bullhead?
>>17173482yeah liek dis. my fave watch is a gold plated rotary skeleton. brass movement and gold hands, chaotic as hell skeleton dial, almost impossible to tell the damn time. but i luvs it.
bros the box
>>17173485post it, doesnt have to be yours i just love absurd designs
>>17173488sorry anon it's upstairs and im downstairs all snuggled up in bed. i'll post it later in the thread if i remember, sorry bruh
>>17173488not him but..
>>17173491nah worse than that>>17173490>>17173488cant find mine online, there are a lot of 'les originales' rotaries apparently. this pic isnt too far off mine though
>>17173493>hey bro what's the time?>look at watch>i dunno brostupid
>>17173488>i just love absurd designsNot precisely "design", but behold:
>quartz seiko datejust homage with a fluted bezelwhat a monstrosity, i like it
>>17173495>Sure thing, it's gear o'clock
don't know if want. i think every time i looked at it i'd think 'goatse with teeth'https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/325218188763
>>17173523Looks like a rabid beaver
>>17173523Seiko Monster second gen homage
Hello, i am looking for cheapest good illuminator-like watch with no exotic options but being water resistant, quatz obviously, i want it either in gold finish or grey/black, but no silver tones,
>50mm lug to lug>i can recommend this to anyone with a wrist of at least 15cmtim mosso bros care to explain?
You're given complete control over Omega. What do you change?
>>17173556discontinue the speedmaster
>>17173556Discontinue the brand.
>>17173556nothing at all, they're perfect.
>>17173556There's just too much work, modern Omega is a complete mess... But overall>discontinue every modern-looking monstrosities they've released recently>go back to smaller, slimer, vintage inspired designs, re-release the classic Constellation as the flagship of the brand>bring back the old logo, ditch the cringe red color>tapered metal bracelets for the sports models>no fauxtina bullshit>stop the James Bond collaboration>stop running after Rolex>fire the entire marketing team>go to national television and apologize for the Moonswatch, the shitty brand ambassadors, the terrible limited editions and every decision that has turned Omega into a joke of a brand>stop pandering to the american market, turn into a more humble and classy heritage brand>ditch the co-axial escapement meme>leave Swatch, ditch ETA, work on a full in-house movement and be 100% transparent about the manufacturing process>go to national television again and burn every Seamaster 300, Aqua Terra, Constellationtl;dr : I bring back the Omega from the 60s.
>>17173601Also I ask every mutt celebrities that have been paid to wear Omega to give back the money. I then donate this money to right wing parties.
>>17173604oh man, is this why /wt/ dislikes omegod? stop being such seething spastics, those seamasters are exquisite, the sneedmaster is pretty tasty too
>>17173352Buy what you like. Unless you're flipping it, what does it matter what people itt think?
>>17173352if i were you i'd buy one of these first to test it out...https://www.paganidesignwatch.com/pagani-design-pd-1682it is so boring and bland, honesly i just keep mine on display now as a kind of... shitty ornament. i never wear it
>>17173614No, Omega is ugly and cheap. I could care less about their moral grandstanding.
>>17173614I hate modern Omega because it has no respect whatsoever for its glorious past. The Speedmaster has been turned into the cringiest watch ever thanks to their terrible marketing team. The Seamaster Heritage shares no design features with the original. The CK 859 is a disgusting modern/vintage hybrid with an inflated case...1950s-1970s Omegas were possibly the best watches you could buy. Classic designs, super reliable movements, some nice innovations. Unironically better than Rolex on many accounts.Then the quartz crisis hit them hard and they had to sell their ass to these fucking kikes from Swatch Group who keep sabotaging the brand's heritage (just like the did with Longines) and turning everything into a joke.Omega retarded fanboys believe many people hate Omega because MUH ROLEX VS OMEGA bullshit. They have literally the mindset of manchildren who think this is some sort of Nintendo vs Sega consolewar or whatever. The fact is people hate Omega because it has been turned into a passive aggressive brand running after every trends, copying other brands shamelessly and being run by marketing faggots instead of actual watchmakers.How can anyone feel proud to wear a brand run by a family of these subhuman kike rats is beyond me... Have some self-elsteem for fuck's sake.
>>17173352>i know i can get a pepsi around the same priceno you cant
>>17173657like 5 and 6, hate all the others tbdesu
>>1717365710/10 dry pussy collection, you really excel at this
>>17173663do you like rolex and omega>>17173671don't care i already have a fiancée :-DDD
>>17173601That's actually pretty based desu
literally winning the lottery jackpot might not pay for this collection. regardless, it is my dream to own these. deal with it.>>17173672>do you like rolex and omegayeah sometimes bruh
>>17173686I respect your gaudiness, but I don't understand how that Seamaster fits into this list.
>>17173692i've always had a thing for the seamaster, i can't really explain it either, i just... really like it. like how some people are attracted to sarah jessica parker. makes no sense to me that someone would want to fuck a horse, but some people just do.
>>17173252based nip culture enjoyer
>>17173686kinda not the list i expectedi'd wear that patek on an elastic nylon loop, probably orange or blue
>>17173686Unbelievably shit taste, like I'm 50% sure you're just trolling with that load of shit, that Hublot alone justifies stringing you up from a telegraph pole
>>17173344I can't put to word how much better it looks with a sloped bezel and a flat crystal. Bubble crystals ruin the looks of most divers, Rolex included.
>>17173345No running seconds then?
>>17173698>WAHHH I'M AN ANGRY 14YO AND EVERYONE MUST BE MADE AWARE OF ITdo your parents even let you own nice watches? i don't care what you like, i like those, poof
>>17173484Red Star has their Bullhead which is a homage to the Seiko Bullhead. Has ST-19 mechanical chrono movement in it.
If I take my watch to an AD will they resize the bracelet for me? Could do with removing a link but don't want to scratch the bracelet.
>>17173726it's so easy though bruh. push links or screws?
Is one of these Maurice LaCroix worth 1300€? Is it a good buy? Movement is VALJOUX 7750
>>17173672>don't care i already have a fiancée :-DDDuntil she meets a black chad with a ROLEX
>>17173726Yeah they will, maybe you'll have to pay a few bucks but they usually do it for free.
>>17173731>irrelevant brand>ugly design>shit movement>1300€anon...
What are you wearing today, /wt/? Pic related for me.
>>17173604I thought Rolex was the nigger's choice of watch?
>>17173697that looks sick
is that a Rolex?
>>17173731Do not buy this
>>17173131I bought ammo. It certainly hasn't depreciated.
>>17173770you put blacks in your ads to pander to liberal whites, not to blacks
post watches, any watches
i kind of like these probably too small though
>>17173077>full linkholy shit these threads really are filled with clueless boomers
I like expanding watch straps.
Citizen NJ0100-46L or Seiko 5 sports for my next shitter.I already have an skx007 so I'm leaning towards citizen because for the price it looks really good(can't upload a pic because of these gay ip rangebans sry)
What are my chances of getting fucked up when buying these military pilots omega ww2? Owner says it's unserviced but working.
>>17173601Seiko fucked the Swiss so hard >>17173916That dial and hands look way too good to be 70 years old. I have no idea about these things tho
just ordered these, under 50 quid for all 4 including shipping from china, lol
>>17173916If you have to aks on this shithole of a thread then you are minimum a year worth of research away from not getting fucked on your purchse, 80% of vintage sellers are fucking you.
>>17173916You shouldn’t buy a vintage watch if you have no idea what you’re doing.
>>17173764>Maurice Lacroix>Irrelevant? What? >Bad movement>Movement that has been used since the 70s because of its reliability????????>>17173849Care to elaborate ?
>>17173871Huh I guess you're right friend
>>17173765Protester MX, luv me Citizen. Nice looking watch btw
>>17174065oh wow that's properly ugly isn't it
>>17173765>>17174086Good day fellow Citizen chads
>>17174089It is indeed.
>>17173210It’s so light that a amateur jeweler thought mine was fake. I took it into a breitling dealer and he authenticated it and said they’re not supposed to be heavy. Nice watch
>>17174132This picture just screams mental illness.
>>17174121Is that dial matte? Looks really nice with the sunlight, cool watch.
>>17173450Xelos Ze losLos zeLos zetas motherfucker you better show some respect
>>17173261I'm not even a fag, but I think pink dials look cool.
>>17174141i kind of agree, but i wouldn't wear one, because i'm not a faggot
Thoughts on Invicta?
Gotta go guys, it's already half past μμ
>>17174157The pro diver is unbeatable at its price point.
>>17173176Nothing compared to my rolex
>>17174164μμ, 0, 2, 13, 4, 0, 6, 0, 8, 0, 10, 0retard dial
>>17173102It’s the “Seiko” in the name.
>>17174139Yeah, with a mottled texture, only really noticeable in direct light
>>17174201Nah, it will be between Omega and Rolex tiers in 5-10 years.
>>17174217People have been saying that for years and it still hasn't happened.
>>17174217for GS to even be in the same discussion as Rolex and Omega they'll need to make a decent looking diver and chronograph first that isn't 45mm
>>17174089>>17174182But it's a Rolex
Smartwatch on right arm, automatic timepiece on left = gigachad/gigastacy move
>>17174255Very nice watch, but I'm personally not a fan of the strap, are the holes functional or just style?
>>17173115lol it's like the crow meme
>>17174255not bad tbqdesu
It's a Hirsch Rallye, not sure I like the look but throwback to vintage chronos. Not many straps with subtle red that matches.
>>17173115my invicta eclipses this. it's an absolute fucking monster. i've lost pics though and not sure i can be bothered to take more>looks farther afield in folders
tissot prx, 550 dollarydoos y/n?any suggestions of what you think would be better in that price range?
>>17174277oh, found it
>>17173152is this the quartz GMT? Looks good too.
Go anywhere, do anything watchWear it in good healthStrap monsterHaute HorlogerieChuffed to bitsDesk diverState of the collectionKermitCookie monsterStainless steel stunnerWrist checkGetting the call
>>17174285Check your wrist size. PRX is large. But there is a new small one.
>>17173770If you mean rappers not just black people in general, rappers all love AP
>>17173604>Imagine being angry and miserable all the time, even about watches
>>17174164Not bad, what's the price?
>>17174264What function could they possibly serve?
>>17174288How big is it? The largest they make is a 70mm Sea Hunter
>>17174264rallye straplook it up, you might appreciate it more when you know
>>17174310can't remember desu, it's not 70mm though, that's lunacy
>>17174297Nice Audemars Trashcan
>>17174323That's too μμuch!
>like a watch>$1500 for a fucking tissotwhat a rip off
>>17174295theres a 35mm available also undecided between gold and silver. might have to actually go out and have a look.
training to be a rescue diver atm.
>>17174333real divers don't need a date complication
>>17174338real divers don’t need a dive watch.
Real divers don't need water
For some reason, I dont hate this watch.
>pepsi>coke>sprite>rootbeer>starbucks>batman>batgirl>bat person>hulk>kermit>cermit>panda>inverse panda>willard>sumo>turtle>samurai>paul newman>steve mcqueen>arnie>Swiss Made>Heritage>Crafstmanship>Swiss Made>Character>Heirloom>Sweeping>Daily Driver>Japn Mvmt>Beater>100M+ WR>Conversation starter>Gift to hypothetical grandchildren>German engineering>Panda>Automobile Racing>Dirty Dozen
>>17174285If you are talking about the quartz go for it. See if you can find a store to try them on the 40mm wears a bit large and you might prefer the 35 if you want a look closer to the original. The automatic is overpriced and too thick
>>17174288Invictas are future classics. First they'll go entirely out of fashion and many mechanical ones will get discarded as getting them repaired won't be economical but a few decades later they will be regarded as the most iconic watches of the first quarter of the 21st century. They'll be highly collectable, especially amongst a new generation of SEA watch collectors, with the most obscene and morbidly oversized limited edition models fetching exorbitant prices. Unironically the best long term investment pieces in the market.
>>17174330What model? very good chance you can find it for much cheaper from a grey market dealer like jomashop unless it's very new or old and collectable
>>17174364It's kind based, but it's going to cost at least $4,000 isint it?
quartz watchmakers and mechanical watchmakers should be separate, movements are a key part of brand identity
Fauxtina is never acceptable.
>>17174378tissot prx powermatic 80 steel & 18k gold
>>17174364>Full Steel, 36.50 mm, Fuck me this is actually goodLooks like its 14mm thick but i could let that slide
>>17174377This guy is a retarded weeb who is too much of a pussy to wear anything worth over $30 outside of his apartment. Dont care
>>17174376i like the way you're thinking, anon. invicta is undeniably very unique and has some mad designs. i think they're in for something special too
>>17174384Eh, a bit cheaper but not enough to go grey market, its too new, maybe in a yearhttps://www.jomashop.com/tissot-prx-automatic-brown-dial-mens-watch-t931-407-41-291-00.html
>>17174376Tommy Big Time is going to be rich.
>>17174391Thanks, yeah I'll wait. I love fluted bezels but mostly everything is just a Rolex homage/invicta tier
rep panerai are better than gen
NEW THREAD>>17166600>>17166600>>17166600>>17166600NEW THREAD
>>17174422Only among the older, discontinued Unitas-powered ones. (although the quality of the reps' lume and their water resistance is much worse compared to gen.)All the "in-house" Panerai reps give themselves away the second you look at the movements.
>>17174431This thread is still 20 posts away from the bump limit, you mouthbreather.
>>17174431early+not going to that thread+lmao
>ad wont let me buy a rolex without spending 10k on junk jewelryScam hobby
>>17174153AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGAGALLABAGALAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA PURUPUPUPUUUUUUUUUUU HABALGAHABALAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
WHY IS THERE 2 FUCKING THREADS
>>17174508Some unhinged OP made the other thread 50 posts early last week and has been trying to rescuscitate it ever since. Report it as dupe, stay in this thread til bump limit, and we will make a new thread appropriately within the 4chan rules.
>>17174515I see.What a faggot.
Can we kill this thread now and make a new one so the faggot OP from the other thread spergs out?
>>17174537The other option is to simply post about watches and eventually the sperg will go away.
>>17174540I don't think people who post in these threads care about watches
>>17174550I, for one, do care about watches. Specifically, the fact that I own a Rolex and 99% of the other anons are brain-shatteringly angry about that fact.
>>17174550these generals are proper garbage, we should just let them end desu
>>17174555You just spammed the other thread over yachts, doesn't seem you care about watches.
>>17174560I didn't spam anything, chief. I'm not in the other thread. It's an antique.
>>17174560For example, this guy is so brain-shattered he assumes that "Anonymous" is a single user.
>>17174572Still hasn't hit the bump limit, you cocksucker.
>>17174598It has now. Thank me in the next thread.
>>17174572got removed, lol ur an idiot
>>17174436you were saying?
got this today
>>17175700the entire collection, also have the f91w