[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fa/ - Fashion

[Advertise on 4chan]


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Well?
>>
File: Sieppaa.png (1.1 MB, 744x742)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB PNG
>>
>>16487691
scum gang 4ever
>>
>>16487651
>no panty lines
Nice.
>>
>>16487651
>tax the rich dress probably costing thousands
I fucking hate champagne socialists.
>>
>>16487916
>socialism means you can't wear dresses and attend expensive parties with other elites and celebrities
I fucking hate this board
>>
>>16487986
not him and while i agree that you dont have to live under a bridge to advocate for socialism, performative activism is lame no matter who's doing it.
>>
>>16487916
The rich means the billionaire exploiting labour, not the actor with only millions.
>>
>>16488013
>performative activism is lame no matter who's doing it.
This is what pisses me off about it, not that she is a socialist, i am a socialist myself, but she is doing it just to show how virtuous she is, it's pathetic.
>>
>>16488019
does it include the politician exploiting taxpayers?
>>
This is so weird; I thought this was /fa/ not /pol/
>>
>>16488023
adding to this, actual socialists would be doing everything they can to organize and fight for the working class, not prancing around virtue signalling in dresses while mixing with the very people she supposedly opposes.
>>
>>16487728
Wtf steve jobs
>>
>>16487916
Do you legitimately think that dress cost that much? It doesn't look that great.

>>16488013
>if poor people criticize the rich they're just jealous, and if rich people criticize the rich they're just hypocritical performers
>>
>>16488045
>Tickets to attend the Met Gala costed on average $30,000 and tables at the event were $275,000.

Do not advocate for poor people when partaking in such capitalist crass money soaked events. It's like claiming to be for vegan rights and then going to a meat eating party. They do not go together.

especially not during a pandemic when people have lost everything. Donate all that money. Help people who lost their business. Help those who had unexpected hospital bills. Put this shit off until another year, everyone else had to put their life on hold.

Oh and wear a fucking mask if you're telling others to and the people waiting and serving on you, have to.

Cant believe morons can still support her fucking behavior and defend it. Holy shit, you're scum.
>>
File: 1631659424422.png (303 KB, 582x582)
303 KB
303 KB PNG
>>16488045
i didn't imply any of that in my post. i just said it's lame.
>>
>>16488054
exactly
>>
>>16488045
you reek of hasan viewer
>>
>>16488054
>$30,000 and tables at the event were $275,000
I don't know how much healthcale costs in america, but i assume that would cover a lot of peoples bills rather than going to a rich people party to virtue signal.
>>
>>16488096
Expensive as fuck, but it would save a lot of lives. It's one thing going to this and being rich, and whatever. It's another when you spend years grifting that you are for the people, attend said event, and then try and make a political statement towards the very people you have chosen to be around and basically party with.

People like her do love the poor. They love to use them, to make money from them. To gain fame from. Are there so many people thinking wow, my life has been improved since she was in politics and that she made some great decision or changes. Or does she just tweet bullshit all day that her fans re-tweet and make her more famous, and in turn, she laps up the wealth that comes along with that.

She has no principles. That means she can easily be bought.
>>
>>16488106
pretty much bong on there mate.
>>
>>16488141
bang* lol
>>
>>16488035
another socialism anon here, i hate AOC simply for her virtue signalling and because she's a woman
>>
>>16488045
>if rich people criticize the rich while enjoying all the trappings of wealth and a lifestyle only possible due to the socioeconomic stratification they're supposedly at war with they're just hypocritical performers

Yes, true.
>>
>>16488035
Its a new era boomer.
>>
>>16488045
Its a one of a kind dress specially made for her for this event. It is literally priceless.
>>
>>16487986
do you not see how contradictory it is to hold those beliefs while also participating in elite society that only exists because of explotation of workers?
>>
no masks to be seen either
rules for thee, but not for me
>>
>>16488385
this is the worst part
she can make a reasonable argument for being there whatever
but compelling only the help to be masked is fucked
>>
>>16488043
>>16487728
damn. Ligma is a helluva disease.
>>
>>16488054
>>16488358
Someone being themselves rich doesn't make their criticism of rich people, as a class, untrue.
>>
>>16488386
try again but in english
>>
>>16488399
are you esl? his post was clear. the help = the staff. the people working there, wait staff and others. compelling = forcing to.
they forced only the staff to wear masks while none of the celebrities were wearing masks except grimes.
>>
>>16487986
Damn socialists really don't get that them being massive consumerists hurts them optically. Just have some fucking principles. Make me sick.
>>
>>16488045
I literally read that bottom quote on twitter. Bro stop being a faggot and open your eyes.
>>
>>16488398
>
You are doing a little more than partaking by buying a 10+thousand dollar dress and going to an event thats tickets are 30 000$. With FUCKING SERVANTS TO LIFT YOUR DRESS.

Interesting how socialists have no problem with this, but white working class trump supporters are fair game.
>>
Saint Anthony donated all his wealth to the Church and ventured off into the desert to live in a cave.
This mexican bitch probably reaches out to mega-corps for free shit, lmfao.
>>
>>16488054
lol. Meat Eating Party.
>>
>>16487651
chickfila is racist, sexist, homophobic, tastes good, christian and closed on sundays amen so obviously the bag

also kanye never mentions aoc in his music but he talks about cfa on jesus is king so
>>
>>16488398
Its literally hypocrisy
>>
>>16488398
Actions speak louder than words. She's just another consumerist using slogan for narcissism.

Don't protect her. Big yikes.
>>
>>16487651
Not gonna lie, despite her awful woke politics, I would absolutely fuck AOC.
>>
>>16488370
>new era boomer.
explain please young man, thank you.
>>
>>16488567
consumerism can exist exist in socialist societies, things would still be produced, what she did was just tasteless and hypocritical, and a massive amount of money wasted what could of gone to genuinely help people rather than virtue signal.
>>
>>16487986
>>socialism means you can't wear dresses and attend expensive parties with other elites and celebrities
>I fucking hate this board
I think the issue is the preformative activism.
>>
File: jeremycorbyn.jpg (1.78 MB, 1974x2887)
1.78 MB
1.78 MB JPG
>>16487986
Socialism means you wouldn't attend these events in the first place and partake in them, essentially condoning a bunch of rich rootless cosmopolitans strutting around in million dollar clothes drinking champagne while just a few blocks away you'll find a street full of homeless people like anywhere in America

American leftists really need to practice what they preach, or better yet, stop declaring themself socialist when they're about as far left as Tony Blaire

What did John Lennon, not exactly a paragon of values himself, do to protest the British governments involvement in the Vietnam war and Nigerian civil war? Hand in his MBE, as he didn't want to accept an award from a government he detested.

So why do modern mutt-"leftists" think that accepting an invitation to "The worst people in the world get-together 2021" is okay just because she wore a quirky dress while waffling down caviar, as the Cara Delevigne clique chuckle at her and think "aww she thinks she's making a difference"

Pic related, how leftism dresses and while he wasn't perfect he was universes beyond what twitter checkbox woman has or will ever do
>>
>>16489271
I prefered jezza's 80's look desu, suit jacket, jumper, some trousers like corduroys, simple but looks decent.
>>
File: jezza.jpg (61 KB, 982x726)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
>>16489271
>>16489281
>>
Lmao you guys are a bunch of retards talking about how expensive it is. It's a fundraising event she didn't pay for her own ticket or her outfit. This was a stunt to get attention and look at you all seething.
>>
>>16487986
this is some high quality bait here.
>>
>>16489180
So who can criticize the rich??
>>
>>16487651
I know nobody cares, but I made this same exact connection yesterday.
AOC is a dumb bitch but I'd be lying if I said she didn't make me horny
>>
>>16487651
Any good AOC panty shots?
>>
>>16488045
>Do you legitimately think that dress cost that much?
as in cost to produce? of course not. wont stop some fag charged 10K for it
>>
>>16489879
You think she bought it?
>>
File: 1631653000880.png (874 KB, 621x1007)
874 KB
874 KB PNG
>>16487651
>>
>>16489737
Its not that she cant criticize the rich, its that shes being a hypocrite wearing tax the rich on an expensive dress, in an event full of rich people, while she enjoys partying with them
and taking pictures with them. It just blatantly shows how she loves the people she supposedly hates.
>>
>>16489912
Nice, if you could somehow add that stupid tiktok bernie girl who also said tax the rich and then bought a 2 million dollar house to flex on everyone that would be great.
>>
>>16489940
She doesn't hate them, she just wants them to be taxed more aggressively. That's a problem with the system, not the participants.
>>
Rich doesn't mean $50 million. It means billionaires.
>>
>>16490012
>Rich doesn't mean $50 million

Lol.

Rich doesn't mean 50 billion. It means trillionaires.

>meanwhile in the real world
>millions living paycheck by paycheck
>>
>>16490006
the lowest-income 60% of Americans are net beneficiaries, receiving more in social insurance benefits and means-tested transfer payments than they pay in taxes, i.e they pay no tax. The top 5% pay 60% of all taxes combined. It's a very progressive system as it is.
>>
>>16490018
With these privileged idiots it never applies to them. They always find a loophole, just like the people they criticize.
>>
File: dog-confused.gif (221 KB, 220x220)
221 KB
221 KB GIF
>>16490006
>Rich doesn't mean $50 million
Wat
>>
>>16490026
Not progressive enough, not aggressive enough.
>>
>>16487651
You can't beat chic fil a bro

>>16487691
That pussy eater shirt is so fucking fire
>>
>>16489912
Who's the chick with the milkers.
>>
>>16489912
She's not pretty and I don't like Hispanic skin tones but that back is looking p sexy
>>
>>16490145
>things can never improve

kys
>>
>>16487986
It literally means so. Fuck off socdem, you're not a socialist.
>>
>>16490006
Can't you understand that these pseudo-protests are already devised by capitalism to co-opt any kind of anti-capitalist discourse?
This is a prime example of the bourgeoisie spitting in your face, mocking the ideals and the struggle of real socialists. However, you're soon to accept that the bourgeoisie that is responsible for the preservation of the current system is, somehow, detached from the system as a whole.
"Tax the rich" is an empty slogan, such as "trans rights" or "fuck the patriarchy". They mean to represent 'rebellions' devised by capitalism and only operative within the boundaries of it.
>>
>>16490266
you can fuck right off with your demotivational bullshit.
>>
>>16490266
>They mean to represent 'rebellions' devised by capitalism and only operative within the boundaries of it.
Ding ding ding correct answer
>Can't you understand that these pseudo-protests are already devised by capitalism to co-opt any kind of anti-capitalist discourse?
and again
>This is a prime example of the bourgeoisie spitting in your face, mocking the ideals and the struggle of real socialists.
It's an hat trick.
>>
>>16490145
you don't get it, we don't have a taxing problem, we have a spending problem
>>
>>16489303
It made people see her for the vapid champagne socialists she is? Bravo
>>
>>16487986
the problem is she says tax the rich at a place where a plate costs more than months rent for most.worst of all she doesnt really mean it, she has been nothing but parade social policies, but never fighting to deliver. ilhan omar has more balls
>>
File: sjoiwislpdr11.jpg (122 KB, 1242x964)
122 KB
122 KB JPG
>>16490186
AOC
>>
>>16487691
So it's pussy eater nigga 69
or pussy nigga eater 69?
>>
>>16490531
I think he meant the one to her right who has her milkers showing. not sure who she is though.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.