Last Thread>>16349053FORUMS:http://www.forums.filmnoirbuff.comhttps://askandyaboutclothes.com/viewforum.php?id=13https://www.styleforum.net/forums/classic-menswear.5/forumhttps://www.reddit.com/r/NavyBlazerhttp://thecurriculum.net/forumBLOGS:American:http://www.ivy-style.com/https://oxfordclothbuttondown.comhttps://www.saltwaternewengland.com/http://www.dressdecoded.com/http://sartorialtalks.com/en/http://www.fivepointfox.com/European:http://thelandlessgentry.blogspot.com/http://tweedlandthegentlemansclub.blogspot.com/https://bespokeunit.com/http://www.manolo.se/http://claseleganciaydistincion.blogspot.comNot being updated anymore:http://www.mreero.comhttp://anaffordablewardrobe.blogspot.comhttp://alexandergrant.blogspot.comhttps://inner-city-style.blogspot.comhttp://thetrad.blogspot.comhttp://maxminimus.blogspot.comhttp://theivyleaguelook.blogspot.comhttp://reggiedarling.blogspot.com/?m=1https://www.thetweedpig.comREADS/BOOKS/ALBUMS:https://pastebin.com/JUHD4Hwuhttps://pastebin.com/SMMg3tK9Quick guide to prep: https://www.mreero.com/journal/how-to-dress-like-a-prepGentleman's Gazzete info on /TIP/: https://pastebin.com/QrNDDG60The Preppy Handbook: https://issuu.com/fiyero109/docs/tophNautical clothing guide: https://epochs.co/features/epochs-guide-to-nautical-clothing?p=nauticalpostBoat shoe lacing guide: https://blog.sperry.com/stories/style/lacing-guide/Waxing Barbours: https://www.saltwaternewengland.com/2019/09/waxing-barbour.html80s Inspo compilation: http://www.ivy-style.com/heres-to-a-preptastic-year-the-1982-prep-for-all-seasons-calendar.htmlInspo albums: https://imgur.com/a/SRKjs, https://imgur.com/a/eEw6B and https://imgur.com/a/XZuwAWhere to find clothing:Spier and MackeyPolo Ralph LaurenAldenMr PorterBrooks brothersJ pressO’ConnellsInverAllenJamiesons ShetlandBarbourSperryLL BeanNauticaOrvisRancourtEastland ShoeQuoddyRussell moccasin coOak Street BootmakersYuketenBill's Khakis
ID on those trousers?
Does Siegfried count?
whats my best bang for buck in the UK if im looking for a raspberry OCBD summer shirt, with shell buttons and at least some shoulder pleating?
>>16373187Why's the fiver red?
To the anon who asked about extra width in shirts: recently I said that +2" is slim, +3" is normal and +4" is wide/loose.Now that I made a shirt I have to add that this additional width applies to half the chest measurement, soIn your case it would be +4/+6/+8". This still means, that +10" is a really loose fit.
anyone got any advice on brooks brothers shirts? i got one that came with shell buttons, but do their cheaper lines like their red fleece lines come with plastic ones?
Is this trad prep or ivy?
>>16373342not what you're looking for but my advice would be to avoid Brooks Brothers. Also, if you're going to pay that much for shirts then buy them from somewhere like J Press or O'Connells
>>16371861I feel like having a fat hog in your pants isn't very /tip/. A true tippy penis should be long and thin. Elegant and refined.
>>16373390brooks brothers are pretty decent in the UK in terms of ebay availability, to the point where they compete with lands end in terms of sale price.
>>16373561Why are there so many new ones on eBay?
>>16371861>Well dressed man>Obvious dick printPatrician's fetish, time to go seduce a local professor.
>>16373673no clue desu. took a peek at lands end and wound up buying a peach coloured sail rigger oxford from them. at £14 ill have it just as a beater shirt even if i dont like it much.
Total beginner hereWhat do I need to look for in a ocbd shirt?How do I know I'm buying a quality shirt and not trash?
>>16373709fit, fabric quality, comfort first and foremost. you wont wanna wear a shirt if it restricts you too much.quality wise, collar length is the first thing to look for. the first place shit shirts will cheap out is on the collar and you want one long enough to have a nice loop at the top so you can wear it with a tie if you want. second place to look at is the length, cheap shirts will be shorter than is ideal and will threaten to become untucked. third place is the armpit, too large a gap for your arm will make the shirt fit like shit, move like shit on you, and look like shit.you dont need to spend a lot for a decent OCBD. lands end have frequent sales and i just bought a peach coloured one for £14. dont expect a canvassed collar or shell buttons or anything amazing, but for the money theyre not bad starter shirts.
How to get an ocbd that fits?I'm a medium size, but have 17inch neck and 42 chest?Never had a nice shirt I could do the neck button up
why is it i can't find any shirts with collar that will actually stay up? it's either tiny little shitty hell knows what not covering your neck at all or high as hell retard-tier bsdm shit.
>>16373905Buy a shirt that fits and have the tummy taken in
>>16373342They're shit except for black fleece>>16373561>>16373700>>16373732Fat faggot who dresses like shit. stop recommending poorfag garbage.>>16373709OCBD Must Haves: (by priority)Proper length Big collar rollUnlined collarPattern matchingMust iron fabricExtras:MOP buttons (usually comes with shirts around $100)Side gussetsSplit yokeHang loop
>>16374379fuck man proper cloth has all those except the collar has a soft lining and more spread than point, I wish I could just send them collar measurements for the shape I want to copyeverything else is either past my budget or won’t fit well because of weird athletic pencil neck proportions
>>16374445dont care retard
>>16373245Lets you know when it's time to drink
Any decent stretchy OCBDs? I work an office job that often requires weird bending, stretching, and reaching
>>16373386It's a pug
>>16374780I apologize for any miscommunication. I meant just the style that the french bulldog is wearing. Thank you for your help
>>16374840Not b8, but I dont exactly frequent this board either. What's wrong with stretchy clothes? Pic related, some very stretchy pants I just picked up. Very comfortable.
>>16374853go back to r/eddit
>>16374379get a tripcode already so i can filter your autism please>>16374853stretch fabrics wear worse.
>>16374853stop being fat
>>16375247Leave the board instead?
Would you buy these machine washable loafers to kick around in?
I don't need to take dress shoes and a shirt with me to a tailor if I just want a jacket and trousers adjusted, right?
>>16375882yes you do
>>16374129Is your caring what is doing it wrong. Skip the trying and pay to get them washed and iron. Hugo Boss is a great choice for standing up collars, just take better care of them.
70/30 wool/poly or cotton/poly for a sock? I've never tried wool but the wicking seems like a meme and cotton has to keep your feet cooler I would assume.
>>16376078i spent £20 a pair on 40/30 merino/poly socks for work and now i dont want a single pair of cotton socks in my wardrobe>>16375417no>>16375306no homolust in /tip/ pls
>>16376096which socks? do they wear fast or unusable in the summer?
>>16375247>He thinks it's one person
>>16374517While this is a neat idea the watch is awful.You'd rather not wear a watch than wear that.
>>16371861Anyone ordered shirts from Spier and Mackay? Go for premium (Essentials, white oxford) or custom fit? Don't know their quality. Should I just go for J Press?t. tallfag
>>16376259teko merino hiker socks
>>16377072>>16376259and no, i walk 15 miles a day in the humid british summer wearing them so youll be fine.
Is this a good fit or do I need to tailor it??I feel like the sleeves and the belly area are a bit too baggy
>>16377933Iron your shirt.
>>16371861Does anyone here have historical reference on which watches, in general style or specific make or model, would have been worn with the original Ivy League style of the 1950s? How about during its revival as the preppy style of the 1980s? Ivy League fashion was largely established by veterans going to school on the GI Bill, so I would imagine a lot of crossover between the relatively small men's watches in the 1930s-1940s (pic related is WWII soldiers synchronizing their watches) and Ivy League watches in the 1950s.
>>16377999Should I tailor it as well?
>>16378122If you want to. Do you plan on wearing it tucked in?
>>16377933cant save the fact that its an ugly color, the collar is shit, and that youre overweight
>>16377933Looks amazing king>>16378122No it's perfect
>>16377933>belly area a bit too baggyIs that the shirt or are you just fat? You can only dress around a soft, lazy physique so much.
>>16377999>>16378133>>16378431>>16378466Shut the fuck up and get out of my thread bullies.
>>16378496Constructive criticism isn't bullying, especially when critical opinions are explicitly requested.
>>16378555Can't argue with trips. Carry on
>>16378577Posting a fit in this general?
>>16377007I have a few oxfords from Spier(both regular and lightweight) as well as a shirt from J. Press, though it's broadcloth so I can't give a fair comparison. I quite like Spier, especially for the money. The fabric is nice albeit a little stiff and the collar roll is great. If you get a shirt with stripes they do a great job matching them up across panels. My only gripe is the buttons are tough to do and undo, they should either make the buttonholes a little larger or use thinner buttons. With a full range of fits, neck sizes, and sleeve lengths I don't think you'll need custom unless you have particularly unusual proportions. As for J. Press, the buttons are perfectly smooth and the construction might be a little better but most of the extra cost is the US manufacturing which may or may not matter to you. So up to you if you want a US made Ivy classic or what might be the best bang for your buck.
>>16378604Spier's my go-to beater oxford, wish they'd restock their uni stripe shirts already
As someone new to all this shit, are there pants that can look at least semi-formal and still be used for manual labor? Looking for an alternative to jeans.
>>16379505Products like this exist:https://www.duluthtrading.com/mens-duluthflex-fire-hose-relaxed-fit-foreman-pants-45704.htmlI own a pair and they're not quite as "relaxed fit" as I'd like but they're still fairly okay thanks to the 3% spandex in the otherwise cotton fabric--I can do an ass-to-grass squat in them with no problem (pic related), they're just tight and tend to bunch up more at the crotch than I find acceptable. They don't look out of place with a nice shirt and navy sportcoat, nor do they look out of place with some of the more casual shirts and utilitarian coats I wear. I'll probably try some other pants by some other manufacturers before I buy another pair of these, but there's a spectrum of tradeoffs between utilitarian construction with rugged fabrics and fashionable construction with fine fabrics and I haven't quite decided exactly where on that spectrum my next pants should be. For manual labor, have a solid leather belt that matches your well-maintained boots, tuck in your button-up or polo shirt, and wear a decent pair of fairly uncomplicated (i.e., avoid too many things like hammer loops, cargo pockets, and abrasion panels unless they make sense for the work you do) brown or khaki pants from Carhartt or Dickies or whatever other work brand you like and anyone who wanders onto the work site will think you're in charge of something. If you get wet a lot I might suggest going to a webbing or other synthetic belt in a similar color to your boots instead of leather as leather belts stretch a lot when wet and can get permanently ruined that way. Pay attention to how the guys who go between the office and the field (e.g. the foreman and superintendent) dress themselves and take your cues from that, keeping in mind that your clothes are going to take more of a beating than theirs and should be adjusted accordingly.
>>16379505What kind of work are you doing?>>16379692>have a solid leather belt that matches your well-maintained boots, tuck in your button-up or polo shirt, and wear a decent pair of fairly uncomplicated brown or khaki pantsPic related. Ivy League fashion was established in the 1950s so dress in the spirit of an engineer or architect from the 1950s.
>>16379505>>16379692I second this line of inquiry. I've been trying to find something like this, /tip/ appropriate pants that are suitable or work/hiking/ect. Kuhl makes pants that kinda work for this, but I'd prefer to find some that aren't 100% synthetic or cotton.
Start my first semester of grad school at an Ivy next monthHow should I dress?
>>16380201>Kuhl makes pants that kinda work for thisWhich ones are you considering? I was looking at their The Law pants (pic related) but I think the external zipper pocket and riveted slash pockets kind of ruins the design for /tip/. Slax looks promising but, having never tried the fit of their products, I'm hesitant to order something with the "klassic fit" of Slax instead of the "full fit" of The Law.
>>16380206Wear a tiny hat. https://archive.md/OTTHL
>>16379505Filson, literally any high rise heavy cotton chino
>>16380201>some that aren't 100% synthetic or cottonFor work pants, what's left?
>>16380299Wool thick enough for work pants would be cold weather attire.
Anyone have some good wallet recs? I'm tired of the bulk of a trifold I've had for years. I still use cash over plastic, so something that's good for that but with an effort given to make it thin.
>>16380229I forget the name but I saw some that were minimal enough to work.>>16380294Ideally a wool synthetic blend. There are plenty of companies making wool-nylon blend clothes now, and it used it used to be a popular material for flannels before they got generally cheaper. It's odd noone makes good work/hike/casual pants from it currently.
>>16380416I'll admit that the "hiking" I do is really just leisurely strolls through nature for which I usually wear OG107 fatigue pants, but I have had this bookmarked for a while now https://www.gostwear.com/bill-merino-wool-hunting-outdoor-pants-p-807.html?osCsid=O4tAS7XRwzf-OaLoVNzVA1
>>16380403I use one small binder clip for cards and another for cash.
>>16377933>that short baby collarSleeves are too long and the shirt is too short for my liking.
>>16378604Best bang for buck ocbds i've ever bought are luxire. Otherwise I buy Drakes and Shirtonomy.
>>16377933Can you button the top button? The shirt neck looks a little small, but that could just be the way it photographed.
/tip/ still dead jajahttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tMBo2bA2L_w
>>16380729Looks more >>>/fa/sleaze than /tip/ but that's not always a bad thing. Are the excessively long belt and sloppy pant cuffs a deliberate choice?>https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tMBo2bA2L_wnice
>>16380768yes and yes.
>>16380781I like the tucked belt tail, it looks deliberate and is somewhat evocative of a medieval/Romanesque belt.
>>16380793good pic. i like the look as well, its a simple style choice to appear preppier that isnt in your face like GTH trousers or using a tie for a belt
>>16380824>using a tie for a beltIs that a thing now? I can see that working in some very limited contexts, but only in some very limited contexts.
>>16380873its never been a thing in mainstay culture, looks too peacockish
Is Burberry a black person brand?
>>16377933You can not tailor it. Shoulders are too wide, sleeves to wide, length too short.Just return it and choose some other brand.
>>16381915top row looks alright the bottom row looks like complete clowns
>>16371861i have a couple linen suits and a couple polyester/spandex slacks. colors aside are there any fabric mixing rules? I can't find shit online about it.
>>16371861Where do you get nice leather belts with buckles that are attached with Chicago screws (ideal) or snaps (acceptable) instead of being sewn on (unacceptable)?
a lot of ivy fits at the Olympic opening ceremony earlier, Bermuda was my favorite
>>16382803>checkered sunglassesnot bad
>>16382836>Tfw the new gossip girl looks like shit The old one actually went hard
Can any tailor bros help me out?I have a pair of cheap khaki pants I've never worn that I was gonna throw out because they're too big but I got to thinking and I've decided that I want to try to turn them into a pair of tapered pleated pants. I can't find any sources online on how to turn regular pants into pleated pants. Can someone point me in the right direction and give me some tips?
>>16383637forgot pic, I want to make them something like this but more tapered
>>16383637>taperedeww. just see a tailor retard. and stop r/eddit posting
>>16375866those are moccasins
>>16380729shirt too small and get rid of those running shoes
>>16383646Not /tip/>>16383673Anon is clearly wearing CPs how new are you? And whats wrong with his shirt
>>16383673>shirt too smallI think it's more that he's small and has a shirt that fits. Relative to his body size the shirt looks about right to me.
>>16382384Hanks leather goods
thread still dead...https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_eSq9IkmtgA>>16383673troll tier advice lol>>16383737not enough drape
>>16383868Do you take your own pictures or does a friend?>https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_eSq9IkmtgATakes me right back to the early/mid 2010s.
>>16384181one man gig, i just take vids and save pics from that
>>16384250Using your phone or an actual camera? If a phone, are you propping it up on a wall or object or did you get some sort of dedicated tripod or stand? If the latter, any recommendations? If I had a phone tripod I'd post more fits but I haven't bothered to research which ones were worth getting. >i just take vidsAre you just doing poses the whole time or what?
>>16384270phone, propped up against something. a tripod would make taking photos much easier, id be able to take in my apartment instead. i dont really try to do poses, other than getting the whole outfit in the shot and not obscuring any of it.
Barbour Ashby at 167 shipped. Cop or not? I don't really "NEED" a jacket but I could probably use one. In navy or olive.
>>16385270both colors are kino, fall is right around the corner. cop
>>16385276Alrighty. If evens I get olive if odds I get navy. I think I'm leaning towards olive though because there's other jackets I can get in a navy while olive feels fitting for a coat like this.
>>16385307I think olive would look nicer desu
>>16385307>>163853232nd olive hah
>>16385323>>16385328Good news is I talked myself into olive. Cheers.
>>16374853SYNTHETIC FABRIC UNTERMENSCHEN LEAVE MY THREAD REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>16371861Is this /tip/?
>>16377933Lose weight fatty
>>16378431>>16378466>>16386951Is he fat or does the shirt just hang in an unflattering fashion?
>>16371861What do you think about cut-away collars?
>>16385270Ashby is the one with the weird sleeves and slim fit, no? Would rather go with the traditional jacket. The price is good, though.
>>16387047out of fashion, too formal, can only be worn with a ugly giant tie knot
>>16387047Spread collar hegemony in general has been some weird fashion trend from around the 2000s. Probably because they are the easiest to manufacture.Personally, I would rather go trad with a long, english style collar or all-in with an extreme(er) cutaway to use with bow ties.
>>16387047disappointing. a big beefy ocbd collar is really hard to top>>16387075kek imagine if people ITT actually owned bowties... id be surprised if most anons had more then 10 ties
>>16371861The male inspo album link is down.
>>16387047I accidentally purchased a shirt with such a collar and I hated it so much that I bought matching fabric and made a normal collar for it.
>>16387063>can only be worn with a ugly giant tie knotThat's no good, I only know how to tie a bowtie and pic related.>>16387075>an extreme(er) cutawayThat one looks pretty extreme to me, doesn't seem like there'd be much point of going any further unless you're going for some kind of detachable collar look. >>16387286>disappointing. a big beefy ocbd collar is really hard to topIt's become the standard for a reason, I suppose.>kek imagine if people ITT actually owned bowties... I own a few. The two that I wear most often are one that my brother gave to me and one that belonged to a family friend before he passed. >id be surprised if most anons had more then 10 tiesI've got a bunch but mainly only wear a few. >>16388002Nice, post pics if you have them.
Should I? https://kieljamespatrick.com/products/kennedy-for-president?variant=32637320429661
>>16388332Go for it, but if you're fat, weak, or otherwise out of shape by 1960 standards you have to make it one of your workout sweatshirts. Also, be prepared for conversations about who killed him (CIA and Mossad with jewish mob connections) and why (curbing clandestine and unconstitutional CIA wars, stopping the Israeli nuclear weapons program, and threatening American financial aid to Israel).
>>16388332KJPenis>>16388350Good advice>>16386891Looks good>>16383868Are those wallabies?
>>16388355>Looks goodThanks. I had someone hold a camera the other day so I could check my form for some parkour wall climbs and descents and figured I'd post some screencaps to help the thread.
wtc mid- to high-rise chinos in Britain?Also.. contributan
>>16388480comfy-looking fall/winter fit
think I'll dump some pics I've collectedAny answers to >>16388480 would be most appreciatedFuck this captcha
>>16388504RIP Rugby I cri ervytiem ;_:
I'm a bit newer to /fa/ and I figured I may as well ask here:What are some stores that sell high quality traditional clothing? Properly made, with the right fabrics and techniques, not modern knockoffs made vaguely to look like trad clothing.I don't mind either, more high class styles, even stuff older than the 1950s, or more simple workers clothes like linen shirts.
>>16388901lmao why does every tourist ask to be spoonfed. read the OP retard
>>16388901My go to brand is Ralph Lauren. Other brands you may want to consider are are Tommy Hilfiger, Fred Perry, Mike Davis, Lacoste, Gant, Abercrombie and Fitch and Sacoor. This is my experience as a young "preppy" not larping in Europe, in the US you may want to look into brands that aren't really very well known over here like the ones in the OP.
>>16388980Lot of garbage brands in your list. Almost every one has sold out and produces chink shit now
>>16388521>linen shirt unbuttoned twice>heavy hunting tweed>wool trousers>wool slippersdafuq
>>16388535I want to live in a world where everyone looks like this. Those jeans still suck though.
>>16389420yeah wasn't my best image>>16389472I don't. Wouldn't appreciate it. Plebs are a necessary evil
>>16389480>wasn't my best imageNor was it your worst, reportfag.
>>16389420very clearly is seersucker and suede
>>16389480>Plebs are a necessary evilsmol bren
where can I get some good all season over the calf socks for suits?
>>16390332Less cringe than reporting posts that hurt your feefees you delicate soijack. Fuck off back to plebbit.
>>16389519You sound miserable my dear chap. Being ivy/prep isn't just in the clothes; it's in the demeanour: a cheerful breeziness and whimsicality that accompanies the clothes. You don't seem to be that sort of person. Perhaps you should consider adopting another style?
>>16390348>Less cringe than reporting posts that hurt your feefeesWhere did you get this idea? I didn't report any posts fella. That's pathetic>verification not requiredsweet
>>16390170there has been and will always be an underclass
>>16381915>>16382032None of them look right.
>>16390361>>16390359r/eddit, bet you dress like shit too
>>16390359>ivy/prep isn't just in the clothes; it's in the demeanour: a cheerful breeziness and whimsicality that accompanies the clothesYeah, that's definitely what I think of when I think of the WWII veterans attending Ivy League schools on the GI Bill during the height of the Cold War who established Ivy League fashion.
Is there some color matching guide for shirts, chinos, shoes and outerwearIm kinda dumb and trying to dress semi formal for work
>>16390817Look through the archive at inspo, stupid fag
Is black shoes + brown pants an improper combination?
>>16391251I think it can work but I don't know if there are any rules or conventions to the contrary.
Bros cop or not are these prep I kind of think they are
>>16388480Ede & Ravenscroft have really nice high rise trousers including chinos, but the fit of their stuff is generally very classic, which means the trouser legs are on the wider side
>>16388480Also that's a nice jumper, where did you cop?
>>16391811thanks for the suggestion anon.. I'll check them out. As for the Shetland.. it's not mine.. just from an image I saved - but Jamieson's of Scotland and O'Connells will no doubt do one that's very similar
>>16391813https://oconnellsclothing.com/oconnells-scottish-shetland-wool-sweater-pumice-a221-putty-eotr.htmlhere's one that's pretty much the same
>>16391813also check out Dick's of Edinburgh for top-quality Shetlandshttps://dicks-edinburgh.co.uk/collections/mens-knitwear?page=1>>16391763No. You've got to draw the line somewhere and those look retarded
Seeing black models doesn't make me want to spend thousands of dollars on a coat
>>16392030Same here, and I'm sure we're not alone in this.Even if people don't consciously recognize it.. they will get a feeling that the piece of clothing is ugly and not buy it.Every company that's doing this nonsense is shooting themselves in the foot
>>16391251Yes it's a basic rule, you don't combine black with brown...however, most people have brown hair, and most people wear black, so this rule is retarded in my opinion since it's obviously not that bad of a combination deserving a "rule" forbidding it
>>16392030>>163920341. Cucinelli designs tailoring to be worn with jeans. Anything other than the knitwear isn't /tip/2. You couldn't afford it anyways
>>16392030how do these companies get away with charging so much? looks like stuff you could find at tj maxx
>>16391251u should do what makes u happy anon, but i'd say it's more improper than black pants + brown shoes which can look okay
>>16392157>black pants + brown shoesThat combo is a lot tougher to pull off, I think just due to the formality of black pants.
good mtm stores for ocbds which ship to uk? i have an athletic shape so RTW doesn't fit well
>>16392030Backs are not meant to be wearing fine clothing. They are meant to wear baggy clothes and big gold chains that they bought from some kike.
>>16390822inspo has a wide range i want just the type i said
>>16390598"The Ivy League look" was already well established by it's first golden era of the 20s and 30s. What comes to mind for most people would be the second golden age of the 50s and early 60s, which say ivy style become increasingly casual but also gain mainstream appeal with Americans. This is to say, kids who are college aged during the height of the cold war would be baby boomers born after WW2.
>>16388525Guy in front right actually looks baller. Second place to the guy standing up in back.
>>16392725the funniest part is that they all look like shit
>>16392030racism isn't /tip/
>>16386891>>16388388>>16391416whats the deal here? Is this some parkour fashion shoot? Its zoolander tier.
>>16392910Very ironic taking into account how you like the prime candidate to get jacked by blacks using the train
>>16392910where are your chinos and loafers from please?
>>16392910You're entitled to your personal proclivities but your statement is factually incorrect.
>>16393062how so? Not being sarcastic - I'm curious
>>16393011please don't project your irrational insecurities onto others>>16393041MiUSA LL Bean and Alden
>>16393078In short, the social norms regarding race relations are radically different today versus the eras from which /tip/ harkens. Pretending otherwise is pure revisionism.
>>16392990Your answer is in one of the posts you quoted. They're stills from a video that was taken so I could assess my movement for training purposes.
>>16391416and >>16392910Mog everyone itt because they're the only ones posting fits
>>16393124>LL Bean chinosnice, I copped a pair recently, almost second guessed myself, but your fit confirms my intuition they are g2g
>>16393124oh and unfortunately, acknowledging the vastly greater relative proclivity of blacks to commit assault is VERY rational. It's not our fault you're too brainwashed to look at data.And racism is VERY /tip/.Your fit's good though.
>>16393288the current LL Bean merch doesn't hold a candle to their older merch.
>>16392910>racism isn't /tip/Since when? Racism is a part of categorisation function of the brain. There is no place for people with categorisation dysfunction in TIP.