[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vr / vrpg / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / asp / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / wsr / x] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/diy/ - Do It Yourself

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • There are 18 posters in this thread.

05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
06/20/16New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
[Hide] [Show All]


New board: /vrpg/ - Video Games/RPG



Has anyone every thought to make an open source hardware power tool brand? I'm getting tired of all these proprietary battery systems
>>
EU is probably thinking about it
>>
>>1877620
Few of them are actually proprietary. The only issue is that they're all designed with different mounts so different brands don't fit each other, but if you actually hook up the wires, most of the tools work just fine with most brands' batteries.
>>
>>1877623
>The only issue is that they're all designed with different mounts so different brands don't fit each other,

that means they're proprietary. you can hook your drill up to a kite in an electric storm too. doesn't make that a battery for it
>>
>>1877620
>open source hardware power tool brand
and how do you make money for designing and testing it? or do you expect some just to toss away thousands just to make hardware that none of the serious manufacturers ll ever make?
>>1877624
proprietary is when your tool uses diferent battery types/voltage or ic that prevents using other batteries, as for power tools almost all of them are dumb and 18/20 V and noone stops you from 3dprinting universal batterypack case with changable mounts
>>
>>1877624
If two competing "open source" battery systems existed and their slot designs weren't compatible, it wouldn't suddenly make them proprietary. Proprietary is when your battery's microcontroller uses a locked down code to communicate with the tool, and the tool only accepts batteries that have the chip. The tool literally doesn't work with any other power source if it doesn't have the microcontroller without bypassing the entire control system.
When the only thing preventing you from using a battery with a tool is a piece of plastic getting in the way, and you can't get around that, you only have yourself to blame.
>>
>>1877628
>and how do you make money for designing and testing it? or do you expect some just to toss away thousands just to make hardware that none of the serious manufacturers ll ever make?
The same way arduino, raspberry pi, openbuilds make money?

>>1877652
Will milwaukee power tools that use high demand or high output batteries have the same performance if I use batteries from other brands?
>>
>>1877653
arduino, raspberry pi, openbuilds are toys that are unsuitable for serious project, overpriced for their capabilities and focused on poeple that have no knowledge in corresponding field, with exception of pi4. Why would anyone ever buy a drill that costs more and is inferior to commercial alternatives? hurdur opensauce is not an answer and "right to repair" is not the same
>>
>>1877653
>Will milwaukee power tools that use high demand or high output batteries have the same performance if I use batteries from other brands?
Depends on the battery. By rule of thumb, more individual batteries = more better, so among manufacturers that have roughly the same quality standard (DeWalt, Makita, maybe Ryobi), the same amount of batteries will perform roughly the same, a 6Ah battery should be just as good from any other brand. But Milwaukee has their 12Ah batteries that have I think 20 cells, Makita's biggest 18V batteries still only have 10 cells, so the single Makita 6Ah will definitely be weaker than the Milwaukee 12Ah. If you put two of them in parallel, it'd probably be about the same.
If you buy some cheapo shit like Parkside, or chink aftermarket batteries, they're always going to perform worse than the equivalent big brand batteries.
>>
>>1877669
>are toys that are unsuitable for serious project, overpriced for their capabilities and focused on poeple that have no knowledge in corresponding field,
sounds like a good business model... hmm
>>
>>1877653
>The same way arduino, raspberry pi, openbuilds make money?
How do you expect to pay for the manufacturing? How are you going to produce sufficient volume such that you actually, you know, make money?
ideas, especially dumb ones, aren't enough to make money.
Why don't you just make adapters for the battery packs? If you have 2 neurons you can measure them, make the drawings, and 3D print them. After a few tests you just buy the same contacts and you can make any battery packs you want.
pro-tip: still more expensive than buying from someone who's already mass produced them.
>>
>>1877620
Do you really expect people to spend the time to assemble a power drill from open source documentation?
>>
>>1877620
they make adapters to mix and match different brand tools and batteries.
>>
>>1877652
Aspie tier damage control
>>
>Be an autistic retard
>Design really high quality "open sores" hardware
>Chinese factories instantly copy your product and produce millions of units
>They sell them for $20 each when you have to sell them for $500 just to break even
>American corporations steal your idea and patent it
>They sue you for illegally possessing their intellectual property
>You go out of business and spiral into debt
>You become an hero
Very based and delectably redpilled
>>
>>1879846
>>American corporations steal your idea and patent it
That's not how that works but you're right aside from that
>>
>>1879872
Meh, you create a trademark relating to the standard, allow people to use the standard itself royalty free, but charge a fixed cost to use the specific trademark of the standard on the packaging or marketing material.

That's the real way to make money from an open standard. Nobody can "steal your idea" and then patent it when you release it openly in the first place(look up prior art).
>>
>>1879874
>Nobody can "steal your idea" and then patent it when you release it openly in the first place(look up prior art).
That's what I meant
Nonetheless, you're correct about the trademark being the way to make money
>>
>>1879872
That's how it has worked multiple times in the past. Since unlike civilized countries, the US do not (or at least did not in the past) check whether something is already patented in another country, there have often been cases of people fraudulently patenting stuff in the US to force the true inventors to pay them royalties if they wanted to sell on the american market.
>>
>>1879846
The chinks have already made passes at designing original Makita-compatible tools. Frankly I'd be happy if they started producing such tools just to give people more choices, but the problem with chinks is that they're gonna start (have in fact already started) making knockoffs of their own knockoff that are inferior, so again you have to hunt down sellers with the right stuff if you want the barely-okay tool instead of the total garbage tool.
>>
>>1878878
This

If you really have a problem, get somebody to 3D print a bunch of DeWalt or Makita knockoff cases that have pic related inside for button top 18650s.

All of the major brands are so close in specs and price and have all of the tools a /diy/er would want. Just pick a brand and stick with it. And then think how shitty it would be if the tool companies all agreed on one battery pack design so you had to buy all new tools to fit the new batteries.
>>
>>1879877
>fraudulently patenting stuff in the US
How is it fraud if that's exactly how the system is intended to work?
>>
>>1880047
This happens a lot, just google “patent trolls”. They patent tons of random shit they will never actually invent (and probably designs already in production that aren’t patented) and then go after the companies making the stuff. Most of the time the companies just settle to get the people to go away because it’s not worth wasting the time and money in court fighting with the trolls.
>>
why do i need an opensource drill?
>>
>>1880057
you're missed the point completely. This is about intl. trade.
>>
>>1877622
>EU
who's that?
>>
>>1880342
the only megacorp that cares about people at least a little bit
>>
File: celma.png (150 KB, 4743x3206)
150 KB
150 KB PNG
>>1877620

In Poland, as we were commies, every tool handbook/manual had detailed blueprints and often also a bill of materials, so you could take apart the tool safely yourself and replace the broken part.
This used to be somewhat open-source.

Now with market economy all companies deteriorated to either single-use tools or pay-us-bazillion-for-repair model.
I don't think what you want will ever happen, because it's against raising money, and that's the only thing that counts now.

(pic taken from a drill manual: http://celma.com.pl/wp-content/uploads/IO_PRCrS_FEN_09_07_2015.pdf)
>>
>>1880342
European Union



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.