I think a handful of anons keep making threads and talking about >Why is there no female slapstick these days!!Pretending it's an issue about "Muh woke writers wont hurt women" or "Muh sexist writers dont give women slapstick parts"I'm positive the fact that you niggers literally DO have slapstick fetishes, considering the shit that gets posted in the threads, it's a no brainer that people who make cartoons (without having that fetish themselves) will avoid it. I want every single person who complains about >Why is there no female slapstickto understand that porn obsessed losers are the reason there is no female slapstickAfter all, it's the same reason crossdressing gags aren't really considered "gags" anymore.
>>137388379I don't know what you said but Lola is hot.
>>137388386Thank you for bumping my thread, i knew that thumbnail would work.
>>137388379>could it be they want gender equality after their gender is constantly the unfair victim of all physical victim on television?>no, they MUST be coomers!You are the only porn addicted bitch here lmao
>>137388414>anon is mad he is called out
>>137388379God I hate women.
Anne got hurt a lot in season 1 of Amphibia.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb2C__CKams
I don't really care about slapstick, but I like psychical comedy a lot. Preferably I would like physical comedy involving cute girls with big bouncy asses. One of the bests that we ever got on TV with that was Minerva Mink but a lot of people loathe that now unfortunately.
>>137388576>proving the point in the OP
>>137388379You write like an animation student obsessing over why uncool animation fans are uncool"Fetishes" by definition are for non-sexual things, if you want to get rid of everything some person on the internet has a fetish for you need to get a grip and also you're gonna fail>After all, it's the same reason crossdressing gags aren't really considered "gags" anymore.No, that's because of gender/sexuality bullshit. Misinfo peddler
>>137388613I don't see how that affects me. I don't get aroused at women getting beaten up.
>>137388379A teeny tiny handful of autists on 4chan is, trust me, a total non-issue.This "problem," if you want to see it as that, is incredibly old. It's two things:1. Have you ever noticed that slapstick comedy against young children, or even just by a big guy against a little guy, is also less common? Just like female slapstick also exists, these exist. But many people see it as "not cool" for the smaller, weaker character or other being to be hurt. This is seen as not funny and crossing a line. This has been true, though to varying degrees, for at least a century and in different countries. Women tend to be seen as weaker and smaller, it's the same thing.2. "Women are not funny" - 4chan will of course agree here. Men tended to make all of the choices. Some didn't think women could be funny, others thought it was NOT APPROPRIATE for women to be funny because it was "vulgar" in the past. Women were wives and mothers only who always had to be serious, nurturing, and pure. Again, 4chan will agree. It was a mix of benevolent and degrading sexism. Women must be held up on a pedestal and never ever hurt in any way, unlike men, who are disposal and can be hurt or killed without care. But women are also much less important, they should not be either seen or heard, but confined to the home.All of these factors play a role to varying degrees over the centuries around the world.What plays absolute zero role: 4chan's fetishes. Literally nobody gives a shit. You're fucking crazy.
>>137390318Woah!
>>137388576SauceThis looks fun
>>137390318RIP, Based Anon
>>137388379>There is no female slapstick because of abuse fetishists How did you come to this conclusion?
>>137390823she cute when grumpy. I'll risk the papercuts, I have to give her a hug.
>>137390898Be careful not to crumple her further.
>>137390920I'll only crumple her if she's cool with it, so no worries. If she can posses bodies, I can cut her out a new body from paper, so it's all good.
I'm going to slap your stick
>>137391861That's kinda hot.
>>137388386fpbp
>>137388379>Why is there no female slapstickthere is, and it is hilarious
>tfw no obsessive gf
>porn obsessed losers are the reason there is no female slapstick>it's a no brainer that people who make cartoons (without having that fetish themselves) will avoid itall animators are fetishists. they literally work everyday with the human body and stretches it in all possible ways. that is their job.so yes, the ONLY reason are writers/producers thinking it's inappropriate, because they think as adults about what the adults like (You) will say, instead of thinking as damn children because it's damn children who will watch the damn thing.but take one producer who let animators do their fucking job and you get the most successful animated series in the world that actual children actually watch.
>>137393923family guy?
>>137394095you wish, Seth.
>>137393923I'd blame at least a minuscule part of it on trying to compromise with the more rabid fantards, like it went with Foster's: >Writers try to make a funny story that is both centered around show's designated redhead waifu AND pushes her to the limits with what she thinks is a freeloading human trying to pass for an imaginary friend >waifufags become royally assblasted to the point of sending death threats to writers, all because said writers dared to 'abuse' their gf>One of the lead writers has to calm down the masses by claiming that the offending episode isn't canon >From this point onward, Frankie became basically a dull prop
>>137388576How did she turn around?!
>>137395178She turned herself inside out.
>>137388379did you really need to make an entire thread on this? everyone knows '''why isnt there female slapstick'' are just ryone threads in disguise so jannies dont delete the thread
>>137395525
>>137388379I want to slap lola around with my giant, heavy cock and knock the stars out of her until she's seeing birds.
>>137388386LTS Lola is not just the only gold incarnation of Lola, she's also the hottest one
>>137390670original Bubblegum Crisis, final episode of 1st series.
>>137396537Too bad the show itself is unbelievably cringe.
>>137396723how? Most people are begging for it to be revived due to rediscovering that isn't cringe humor, it's peak humor, people just hated because MY CHILDHOOD in modern times.The newest series after LTS are truly boring, so much that can you see clips of it being shilled in millions in every social media like LTS are since 2020? Nope
>>137396563Thank you!
>>137396537You just say that because she was your first and you're an egitistical idiot who can't get over that bias.The reality is that EVERY Lola is flawed and all of them have some degree of wasted potential (except Baby Lola but most don't even consider that a true Looney Tunes show).
>>137397008You have no self-awareness.And your English is awful.
>>137388379Why do only the girl Loony Tunes wear clothes
>>137388379OP, literally anything a woman does will give someone a fetish. If there was a cartoon that had a 4 minute scene of a woman eating a stick of celery, it would give someone a celery stick eating fetish.
>>137396723The show is kino, you're just too stupid to realize it
>>137397008kek trueWabbit was boring and Looney Tunes Cartoons looks like shitWe had it so good back then with LTS bros...We should've appreciated it more
>>137397453If only you knew how ironic this post is.
>>137397008>>137397891Idiots, back when TLTS came out it was being compared to classic Looney Tunes. What you feel right now is how people older than you felt back then, retards.You also fail to consider that TLTS didn't start out as good as it got later. For example, those early musical segments were either mediocre or awful- the only exception being Daffy The Wizard- and so were the 3D Road Runner shorts.
>>137398130The real irony is lost on you, imbecile.
>>137388379You are completely wrong on the slapstick thing. First, like >>137390187 said, that fetish is so obscure among cartoon fans that creators don't give even the tiniest shit about it. Second, female slapstick happens more in shows for girls or with prominent female characters- like My Little Pony or TUFF Puppy-- you don't see it simply because you don't watch those shows.Though you are kinda right on the crossdressing bit. It's still done but they now have to be considerate of the perverts that watch/fund the show.
>>137390823>>137390920>>137394970Early in the show's run I thought Teri would become a close friend to Gumball and a prominent character, maybe even a secondary love interest (as it was a trend at the time). Anyone else?
>>137388379>Muh woke writers wont hurt womeni mean its kind of true for good reason. its funny to see males get hurt. its not funny to see women and girls hurt.
>>137398985>maybe even a secondary love interestThere are only, like, three romantic relationships within Gumball's class. Everything beyond those three was an affair that started and ended within the confines of a single episode, like it was with "The Matchmaker".
>>137388379A retarded argument to make because it doesn't matter what the context is the second you add an even vaguely women shaped object to any scene somebody somewhere is gonna find some way to somehow fetishize it.You can't even tit toe around this by removing women from your work altogether that same guy will just end up putting them back in himself.
>>137399405>Pic Needs more obliterated rainforests, otherwise I cannot get hard.
>>137388426Cope
>>137400400this, and the girl needs to look way richer
>>137388397>implying that bumping a minute later even counts>implying that "sage" doesn't existFucking newfags.
>>137390318Why did you post that?And why did you only post one?
>>137388379God I love goofy toony girls
>>137401425
>>137401445
>>137401464
>>137401481
>>137401521And here's something extra.
>>137390945That is a good question. What exactly makes Teri?
