dads and sons editionPrevious: >>3764317Trap shotas: >>3749198 Shota manga/anime: >>3734757 Shota figs/dolls: >>3731038
sadface.jpg>>3765723not into western/comics myself but...think we can have 1 thread with Otty for OP, at least.dont forget to save all the shota you love, bros.
Cute pilgrim and Indian shotas!
>>3765723Cute superboy <3
>>3765750now? did you trust banks and credit card companies to begin with?
>>3765774i wonder what presents he’s hoping to receive
>>3765803You're so cute
>>3765723I wish Connor became John's brother figure if Bendis hadn't aged up John
>>3765819no, but now it's over.>>3765830:3
Cuddles or hardcore sex?
>>3765863boys are for hugs and cuddles.
>>3765863Before playing his game i would've chosen fugs but after playing his game i just want to cuddle and protect him.
>>3765863hardcore sex until we're both so exhausted we cuddle
>>3765863Threesomes with him and Basil.
What's with all these godawful 3DCG pics on Pixiv that are erroneously tagged as shota (and so loli) that look basically like simulated child porn due to looking exactly like kids instead of shotas? Just seeing the thumbnails give me 3rd stage eye cancer (pic unrelated)
>>3765879*(and ALso loli)
>>3765879To nips loli/shota applies to little girls/boys in general, be them 2D, 3D or real. Best you can do is blacklist the 3DCG tag and hope most of the 3D content is hidden.Here's a better version of that pic, btw.
>>3765792>golden ageW-will there be cute shots for all?
>>3765962Damn, wish he'd fuck me.
>>3765879..what did you think "shota" is? lmaoit doesn't have to be a certain style either because western shota clearly exists
>>3765987shota and loli should still look cartoony enough that is doesn't look like an actual child. I don't like or care for cg artworks but don't mind cg it as long as it isn't going to an uncanny valley semirealism route. Like Disney disneyesque or Pixar type stuff. Straight up posting csem with a paint or cartoon filter over an image that's obviously traced off a real body is not shota/loli art anymore
>>3765992The uncanny valley days are long gone, only bad cg artists achieve that nowadays.What do people here think of realistic shotas in vydia? Like Daniel and Chris from LiS2 or Atreus from GoW4, or Hugo and Lucas from A Plague Tale?
>>3765992you can dislike CGI shota, its personal preference..not my type of thing as wellBut to me it's just another medium like how sculpture or watercolour painting is>csemI'm not familiar at all with this term. Its quite sussy you use terms like that.
>>3765992>uncanny valley semirealism>Like Disney disneyesque or Pixar type stufflmao, get a load of this faggot
>>3766000Eh, mostly miss. Atreus was alright in GoW4 but he also looked bad in some shots.Overall, both for shota and pretty much anything else, I prefer stylization over realistic.
Thoughts on this boy from ninja gaiden?
>>3766002>Its quite sussy you use terms like that.It's actually the more official legal term
>>3766012NEED CUTE SHOTA FEET IN MY MOUTH PLZ
>>3766015why are you even looking at documents like that though
>>3766000 (checked)>only bad cg artists achieve that nowadaysToo bad they are the majority on Pixiv and Baraag hue hua hue hua.
>>3766018i think 3d but stylized shotas are underratedalso, vice did a shitty documentary about loli and it's so bad, they closed comments and blocked japan from watching iti blame the whole internet thinking they had to use twitter and making it the most used site everor else zoomers wouldn't even bother to bitch about cartoons
Can yall gime some resource/link/imgs of shotas that look like this early 2000s wallpaper aesthetic plz its like these but male
>>3766013Dick crushing lipsHe surely does funny faces
>>3765992Disneyesque you say?
>>3766000visually i prefer 2d shotas, however i find the experience of pretending to have a cute shote little bro that i have to defend & care for utterly irresistible. only redeeming aspect of LiS2
The OP of the previous thread inspired me to make a standalone kemono (actually kemoshota) thread: >>3766022
Demon sho sketch
Sho demon vent reee
hey shobros, how would you react if you woke up one day and saw that you've inexplicably transformed into the anime shota boi version of yourself
>>3766071In this order:1. Be surprised at the change.2. Masturbate.3. Realize that my old self is essentially dead, with the problems it implies (can't work, can't drive, can't even reach high places).4. Attempt to contact a relative or friend who essentially will be in charge of me until I grow up again.5. Sell my body for quick money?
>>3766071Do I get my hair back
>>3766079 yes and the shotality is permanent
>>3766071id start playing chrono trigger
>>3766074But if you turned into a sho with your brain intact doesn't that mean you just a midget with a babyface? Just claim you a midget and you can still work lol
>>3766088Just say you have a genetic disease that stopped you from getting puberty, but you are fully functional member of society... Like this guyhttps://youtu.be/eSggsDddsCg?t=62
>>3766042This is fine and hot. It's the gross shit you see clogging up the shota tags on pixiv is what I'm not into. The appeal of shos to me is that they're unrealistic and cartoony. Their cuteness really shines with a moe art style. The moment they start looking too much like irl little boys is where I draw the line. Nothing cute about it and it's nsfw content I just start getting bad vibes over the artist's intentions. So yeah I avoid stuff like that
>>3766042Is there more like this?
>>3766095There could be, but I don't have his 3D model
>>3766071I'd be a slut
>>3766104basedif it ever happens, please let me know
Post your Stable Diffusion shotas!
>>3766123>>3766121>>3766120>>3766119>>3766117>AIshit as shotasI see, this the tempation of Christ in the judean desert equivalence
fake shos are gay and bad
>>3766123>those soft bellies and glistening tan skin(ToT)
>>3765723story of our lives.jpg
>>3766071I would molest men in public
>TFW no fluff where the Todoroki family is fucking happy
>>3766216I haven't caught up with MHA in a while. Is he still alive?
>>3766217Touya/Dabi? I'm not sure if we know. Pretty sure endeavor's still alive though.
Weekly Yuni post
>>3766222I want Eri to rewind Dabi into Touya again so he can be with daddy forever :(
>>3766227Okay but consider, she rewinds Bakugou too much and we get the return of baby Bakugou
>>3766123>anon, we're bored >and you said you had a cool new game to show us>pleeeease can you tell us what it is?
>>3766218God I love fatties so much
>>3766218don't look smelly enoughmake more smellier
>>3766280Damn brat.... Seducing an adult with stupid erotic mouth....
>>3766042Silly boy got his mouth full of sticker glue
>>3766218Cute!!! Debushotas need more love :3
>>3766286That's fat old mens' cum, you idiot.
>>3766123what the fuck, is this actually AI generated?
>>3766314yeah just look at the hands, AI cant into fingers
>>3766318Look at the hands? I think the merged arms are a more obvious sign on who did it.
>>3766320wow, didnt even notice that
AI "art" is cancer
>>3766336Say the same in two years>>3766291>fatBig yikes
>>3766381Not gonna matter it's still cancer. There's no soul put into what's essentially Frankensteinining abunch of actual artist's talent together. I prefer my shota art not barfed out from "prompts"
>>3766382I'm afraid most if not all creative works will be replaced by this technology eventually. It's hard to imagine what the future will be like. It's sad, but it seems there's nothing to do but accept that this is how things are going to be and enjoy the creativity that's left until the world adapts. These past few years were probably the best time artists ever had and will ever have.
>>3766391>there's nothing to do but accept that this is how things are going to beno. it isn't how its going to be. human creativity is not going to be replaced. humans can and will make human only art exibits or sites because the big problem ai 'art' causes is one of DISTRIBUTION, not an art quality competition. these ai only scan and mix what other humans have already made, not make something entirely new or imaginative or inspiring. perhaps its the venue (physical or digital) of where art transfers from creator to fans and the individual's ability to monetize their creations is what's being threatened, not individual's talent. an artists that livestream themselves or something like putting their trademark into their scene can make such a verification, but couldn't a computer's mishmash thrown together can be sorted out in the source code? too many art sites are poorly run and either dont upgrade themselves to, or dont care enough to and/or simply don't know how to. i'd think if there's a competently put together site(s) or physical venue(s) for distribution, the organizer would be wise enough to put some sort of source code filters in place to swat down the bots, and make it with a sensible monetization and verification model in place to attract enough human artists would be a great improvement, however, the notion of art itself being challenged of 'who it is for' in the sense that art is to be an exclusive nft product or a public piece to be admired due to the understandable fear of art theft, or the need for art distribution sites to be more discriminative and what that entails is another conversation entirely.
>>3766403But the algorythms keep getting better as they're fed more and more data and after it's done, the original data can even be discarded, so these are machines learning how to draw. Try to imagine the mindset of someone born 200 years in the future where this technology is common. Why would anyone care to draw anymore? Why would anyone be interested in looking at someone draw in the current year? They'd just think they're wasting their time on something useless, wouldn't they? It's not going to be instant but it seems to enjoy the creative process while it still exists. We're in this unique time where the technology is advanced enough that we can instantly share art globally, but not advanced enough that making art is demotivating and ignored.
>>3766408As it stands right now AI drawings are 95% garbage if you want something specific, specially porn, only good AI art is those surrealist kind of paintings.Also it doesn't help AI to get a good rep when people keep spamming it everywhere and even steal works from other people as a base for the AI, without giving proper credit.>Why would anyone care to draw anymore? Why would anyone be interested in looking at someone draw in the current year? They'd just think they're wasting their time on something useless, wouldn't they?It's because of this stupid mindset that AI art is almost universally hated among the artist community, AI is a tool, not a replacement, thinking that way is simply disingenuous and just shows you how poorly you understand how the AI works
>>3766411I'm not saying there aren't valid reasons to hate it. I'm not defending it. I'm just looking at what is going to happen to the creative process as the technology gets better and better.>thinking that way is simply disingenuous and just shows you how poorly you understand how the AI worksI would appreciate it if you told me where I'm wrong in that case.
>>3766412>I would appreciate it if you told me where I'm wrong in that case.Current AI mostly works as a blackbox, you just feed it tons of information in the hope it learns certain patterns and can achieve the same results. This is pretty useful with abstract information were it's difficult for humans to figure out certain connections and patterns, like in the shape of molecules and proteins, very useful in medical and pharmaceutical applications. But with things like art it struggles simply because there are simple things that with some training most humans can perform well, like say drawing fingers, but this "dumb" AI cannot, it usually struggles with nuanced details, like fingers, male genitals, toes, nipples, ears, etc. And that's not even mentioning the problem it has that all AI art looks the same, as if it was made by the same author, it's difficult to obtain a different style unless you give it a base image, cause it just dumbs down all the info it gets and makes an "average" style of all the data it's fed.Unless they start training AI in a more sophisticated way I cannot see it replacing artists in general, that's why I think that it should be used more like a creative tool to help artist get new ideas, or streamline the certain aspects like making shadows and coloring
>>3766408Chupar, matar y disfrutarhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?t=12&v=bi3Mgm82-Oc
>>3766414Sorry I don't speak portuguese
>>3766409Damn cutie is tempting me even in his sleep
>>3766306I want to hold a boy like this ;_;
Post shotas with autism
>>3766500Is this the autistic shota phenotype?
>>3766522They're so cute
>>3766500Florian isn't autistic. He's just young.
>>3766536H-his name is Florian??Ok Someone at Nintendo is a serious pedophile...(and with good taste)
>>3766551>H-his name is Florian??Yes, that's his name in western languages. His original Japanese name is Haruto.>the rest of your postI'm not going to ask what you're talking about. Just stay shut.
>>3766552Oh it's nothing illegal, if that's what you think, just an old reference for people who don't kid themselves saying they only like cartoons
>>3766554>people who don't kid themselves saying they only like cartoonsDon't start this shit please. Real shotas are gross and smell awful
>>3766554And have I mentioned the denial of some folks? >>3766575Unreal
>>3766581>>3766580I love these cute kids
>>3766584I want to spear him on my adult dick
>>3766579>eats his butt
>>3766589i love sig so muchi almost want to buy puyo puyo just for him
>>3766631.Male ballerinas dont wear tutus, thats a female outfit.
>>3766632They were probably the only boys who signed up for ballet, and the school only had girl's outfits. It must have been embarrassing, especially considering there must have been girls staring at them in those tight clothes, especially with that third leg the blond boy has.
>>3766635doesnt matter. wrong thread.that scenario is very unlikely as well. I went to arts school and even there (not dance oriented) they had the supplies.
>>3766636His body is sexy...
>>3766639It's rare that we get good shota art that shows the beauty of a boy's body without a sexual bent to it.
>>3766645Is that the broken mage boy from that one Fire Emblem?
Confort, or beat up for being a sissy?
Thoughts on this lad?
>>3766650neitherI'll do what I'll do irl: ignore and walk away
post legs you would worship
>>3766650Give him a bj so he feels better
>>3766652Let him put me in a guillotine choke to tire out his arms, and just when he thinks he will get the submission I'll pop my head right out. Then I'll let him sink in a triangle to tire out his legs, at the last moment once again I'll pop right out to the audience's astonishment. Now with them bring tired af I'll turn the position around and ground and pound to a decision victory... what were we talking about again?
shotas at the beachgonna go swimming in their undiesgonna have lots of fun
>>3766641>>3766642>>3766644>It's rare that we get good shota art that shows the beauty of a boy's body without a sexual bent to it.It is weird considering the fact we have centuries of beautiful boy art to look back on in various cultures and societies, even entire etymologies with words describing the beauty of male youth. Pic related is a quick sketch of mine. If we were to go back a century ago there would've been little to no controversy by the public in wanting to draw the nude boy figure. Plenty of children's books, illustrations, advertising, and war propaganda made use of the boy in art at the time.
>>3766650Wonder why my husband looks like he’s in that weird Final Fantasy movie
>>3766673Shitty modernity has 'think of the kids!'ed us out of ever being able to appreciate beauty.
>>3766673in modern western culture a pedophile is basically the absolute worst thing you can be. in a culture that prides itself on not discriminating, the few groups left that you’re allowed to hate get a concentrated amount of it. it’ll pass of course, but for our lifetimes it is what it is. be grateful we have the technology and records to see the art of the past
>>3766704Sorry, to clarify this hate of pedophilia brings along a fear of being labeled pedophile and thus desperately avoiding anything that could provide that impression, such as boy art
>>3766575the good shotas are very clean and smell like berry shampoo
>>3766706Eh, shotas are depictions of real boys, what is this new obsession from newer generations of weebs denying this generally accepted fact in the past?Boys in paintings, buys in sculptures, boys in books... Our society is full of history obsessing in the beauty of boys, shota art is no different.
>>3766712maybe it has something to do with the witch hunt mentality that pervades the culturehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUfaQiF7Aq0
>>3766704>it will passLol. Lmao, even. This is literally one of the sole stigmas—in with such company as murder—which will LITERALLY never lose their stigma; nor, perhaps, should they. What is undoubted is the stigma is miles out of all proportion to the severity of the crime, or even the intention alone, and renders someone comparable to Hitler or Mao rather than anything ordinate to the suffering that even the worst excrescences of this nature cause.
>>3766713Sounds about right, for all the "rebellious" youth we have, they seem to be very compliant and fearful
>>3766716yea. They know it doesn't take much to completely destroy their lives these days. of course, this only applies to white males.
>>3766704I can't post any JC Leyendecker, so here's an AI version of one of his many Cupid paintings. >this hate of pedophilia brings along a fear of being labeled pedophile and thus desperately avoiding anything that could provide that impression, such as boy artWhile that is true, I urge everyone to look at what their great grandparents looked at in terms of art and what was considered normal back then. It's safe to say most people don't sexualize cherubim or satyrs that happen to be young boys. If we accept this as true then it should be accepted that there are artists like myself or just regular people out there who enjoy the beauty of the male figure. For many of us it's not a sexual desire, rather, it's the same pleasure women receive when watching videos of cute kittens on the Internet. I don't know who or why people are in this thread right now but I do not assume malicious intent. Just as there is nothing harmful in the naked body itself, I see no harm in viewing, observing, and admiring the naked body. I enjoy drawing the nude boy because it's one of the most beautiful creations I've seen, and it reminds me of my own youth and innocence when I was a child. I felt free and I cherish my experience with other boys. I don't have this freedom now as an adult, so I hold onto these feelings as much as I can through drawing (and now writing).
>>3766729That's fair... On the other hand, have you seen these threads?? The pictures don't strike me as "I just like the beauty" so much as "I want to fuck a shota boy and cuddle with him until we fall asleep"
>>3766706thats boringIf i wanted to taste and smell shampoo I'll drink it out of the bottlegive me pure shota or give me death
>Dear artist, what do you want to focus on?>body : Y>legs : YY>feet : YYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
>>3766731You make a valid point and I won't argue with you on that. I will agree that there is definitely some overlap between shotacons who purely love the beauty and innocent imagery of the boy, while others out there will indeed sexualize it. It's part of the reason I struggle to really call myself any particular label since labels only bring more harm than good. The real issue we need to address and rightfully criticize are those who do not see a grey area and only see one side of this niche. >if you like shota then you must be a [x]-phile!Are there people who post their "out there" fantasies and maybe go overboard with some of the lewd posts? Sure. But I would never call even my worst enemy a pedophile.
>>3766731Eh, I have both kinds of feelings towards shotas. It depends on the context more than anything.For example, your pic has an obvious sexual undertonas: the boy is posing almost naked to be painted and looks uncomfortable because people are seeing his body while they want him to wear something even more revealing than his undies even when in theory his current underwear should be enough to work.For comparison, here's another picture of a boy in underwear. It lacks the sexual undertones of your pic. The boy isn't posing almost naked for anyone, nor anyone (besides people ITT) is interested in seeing him naked. He's just dressing himself after taking a bath like any regular person would do.
>>3766741Nah, that's bullshit.There are plenty of things you can "like", fixating on shotas makes you a pedophile, denying strikes me as delusional.Satyrs and cherubs were often drawn as part of mythology, and never the center of attention of the artist, shota art is.
>>3766741>who love the beauty and innocent imagery of the boy, while others out there will indeed sexualize itits not mutually exclusivelets not get carried away with the discussion though. No need for anyone here to show power level. >3766743ironics are a joke
>>3766743I disagree. You're doing what I was criticizing normalfags of doing. Why are you denying that there are guys out there like myself who enjoy drawing nude boys without evoking eros? You invalidating why I do what I do doesn't help anyone when it comes to normalizing or even talking about the beauty/art of the nude boy. How is someone like myself supposed to start dialogue on making art less taboo if there are anons like you proving ignorant, normalfags right?
>>3766731—and yes, that's a good thing.
>>3766742Liking both doesn't count, I'm talking about people who claim they are mutually exclusive, finding shotas sexually attractive makes you a pedophile, whether or not it is bound to context or drawing styleWhich I believe this Anon is >>3766746Frankly I don't buy it, his argument was old arts featuring boys or boy-like characters like cherubs and satyrs, but he fails to mention that those arts didn't focus on boys so much as mythology in general; unlike shota art, those examples don't exist solely to depict boys, so to me it's clearly not the same, and doubling down on it strikes me as delusional.
What are you silly anons talking about
Shota androids will solve all our problems
>>3766753noAI and matrix-style VR, plugs into your brainall 5 senses
>>3766748His argument is that some people enjoy young nude bodies for non-sexual motives, and while it's difficult to imagine due to how western societies (specially those influenced by anglos) see nudity as something inherently sexual, it's certainly possible and relatively common in other cultures.>finding shotas sexually attractive makes you a pedophileWhile that's true (pedophilia consists on the sexual attraction towards children), you're wrongly assuming that anon and everyone ITT only have sexual interest in shotas/little boys, when there can be a multitude of motives to like them, from finding their appearance "cute" in a non-sexual way, seeing in shotas a memory of their own childhood, thinking their personalities and appearance are cool or funny, or simply liking them as part of a nice picture. It's foolish to put the same tag on everyone, specially in complex topics like sexuality, romantic interests and physical attraction.
>>3766755>His argument is that some people enjoy young nude bodies for non-sexual motivesUsing non-boy-exclusive art as example, AKA not shota art.Are you telling me artists like Otto Lohmuller are not a pedophile then? Because that would most definitely make me question your sanityPeople saying they "love the nude body" without admitting it makes them tingle inside is also questionable when it is solely focused on boys.
>>3766753I love roboshotas
>>3766757>Are you telling me artists like Otto Lohmuller are not a pedophile then? Because that would most definitely make me question your sanityWhile I don't really know about him and his life, judging by his works I think his "love" for young boys existed beyond the mere sexual attraction to their bodies. He may have been a pedo, but his art doesn't reflect the lust he may have felt towards the boys he painted.>People saying they "love the nude body" without admitting it makes them tingle inside is also questionable when it is solely focused on boys.Maybe because it doesn't make them "tingle"? (shota) Art can stuck in more than one way, and the feelings you or me develop at it can be different from how other people feel towards the same piece. It's not a binary thing, it's a complex Venn diagram with all kinds of stuff overlapping and avoiding each other.
I just kind of assumed we were all pdf files (drawn only).
>>3766766I don't really care what other people call me and themselves, I just want to make clear that it's possible to like shota for motives other than "UOH CHILD EROTIC, SEXY BRAT, EROTIC BODY UOHHH".
>>3766768What are you some sort of gay?
>>3766769>>3766770Yes. Eroticism is good, but is not everything.
>>3766775Saying eroticism good referring to boys makes you a pedophile, I rest my case
>>3766779I never denied being one, at least for fictional boys. I lust for their bodies like many here, but I also recognize that not everyone is like me and have their own reasons to enjoy shota art.
>>3766737Yeah, that artist knows what is important
>>3766782So you're vouching for something you believe exists, but you're not and haven't seen, and have no way of confirming the existence of... Ok then...
I want a shota to sit on my face (ToT)
I only know and love male children
>>3766796>Ywn bathe your cute little bro like this
GOD DAMN TO ACTUAL BURNING HELL ALL YOU PEDOSHITS TOUTING THAT SHOTA/LOLI IS INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM CHILDREN. IT'S ALREADY BAD ENOUGH THAT WE'VE GOTTA HEAR THE EXACT SAME FUCKING THING FROM FUCKTARD LIBSHITS.
>>3766821You need to relax bro. Feeling a bit angry today don't we? :)
>>3766821Honey, loli/shota weebs are just pdf files in denial, libtards actually advocate for them; well, except fat, ugly and undesirable dykes and cuckboys who seethe in jealousy because they have never experienced anything good in their lives
>>3766827The harder you seethe, the more evident you just hate yourself for being a pedo, it's ok man, learn to love yourself :)
>>3766827There's nothing wrong with being a pedophile as long as you don't touch real kids. I know it's a hard concept to get your head around but you'll manage someday, I believe in you anon! Get weel soon <3
>>3766743>>3766748>All things must fit in to a category so we can know which things to hate and who to deprive of human rights for the good of a thoroughly rotten society
>>3766779>my caseyou sure take yourself seriously, officer. too bad all tax dollars are welfare made by people with real jobs.
>>3766821you're leaving out the fact that rightoids cry the loudest about everything being >muh trannies and sneedophiles
>>3766859Shut up pedo weeb
>>3766867bart's sell shart and fart
I guess ironic shotacons also exist huh
>>3766874/shrugmaybe they just aren't ready to enter the water yet.>>3766867bart's smelly, stinky farts. In your face!
>>3766831Dafuq? I've never heard someone say that shit before. What?! I never went here before and /cm/ is the most (de)based board. Way moar than /d/.
>>3766748Ancient Greece says hello. Ancient Greece was ....weird about boys. Even some of the gods were. into it. Zeus & Ganymede, etc.
Pls keep the autism in this thread and don't shit up the next one
>>3766715He wasn't talking about child abuse if that wasn't clear to you somehow. In fact, he didn't even mention anything about relationships at all either. Looknig at the safe pictures in this thread is more than enough to get a bad reaction from certain people.>>3766821Nobody said anything about anime art being indistinguishable. I know why you're doing this, but how many tall, adult characters with big breasts are you and that guy on YouTube going to call "loli" before you realize you're missing the point out of fear of some dishonest stranger trying to get a bunch of likes on Twitter?
>>3766673do you have more boy art that you poast somewhere? id love to see more