Now with more smugness.Previous: >>3630469
>>3635272Did you play it in English? If so, how did you get it?
>>3635272>shota VN out there, are there anymore?Seconding this pls share more
>>3635291Gotta love the cancer shotas. Poor little guys.
>>3635875Truth, like the jizz-shos in Code Black. Actually mad eme feel a little hesitant about fapping lol
>>3635936kek, glad that stigma is going away. Just think of all the bois that would still be alive if they weren't relentlessly harassed for even the hint of being gay.
>>3635697wild and silly
why do so many anime boys not have nipples? boy nipples are fucking hot and i love them
>>3635936I imagine some were better than others in hiding the peeking
>>3636045their torsos in the sum of their parts are hot AF, and bois can get away with showing them off during the summer. Best time of year.>>3635697This is correct
>>3636049>This is correctWild and SillyCute and FunnyWild and Sillyfigure it out
gay boys giving in to homosexual urges!
>>3636026>that would still be aliveHuh?Why would they be dead?
>>3635936That reminds me of a story about my high school swim team my friend was on, they all had to stay in a two bedroom hotel on away tournaments. I asked him if it was weird but he would always tell me it was "chill". Yeah... 12 dudes to one room, and two beds, can only imagine what went on in there.
>>3635936>>3636127Take your fantasies to >>>/b/.
>>3636130Not a fantasy lol
>>3636126>Why would they be dead?sudoku
>>3636268Do you have a link to the full image?
>>3636276been trying to get it, but no luck so far.
>>3636277Pity; do post it here, or the link at least, if you ever manage to get it.
>>3636279Those two in the front are sluts, you can tell.
>>3636281Really? They look indifferent to me. The two bunny eared ones look like they'd be sluts, but just because bunny ears. The one ins the back looks like the true slut.
>>3636310True, good read. The 2 in front are in love.
>>3636327Tatamaru is a pretty good shota vtuber.
>>3636421You are doing God's work, shotanon
>>3636421Thank you anon! I did not know of this site!
>>3636534I'm not him, but usually you have to pay to get access to that stuff, so that back-door is really useful.
>>3636542I like shota backdoor c:
What makes shotas so hot?
>>3637589Human beauty is an objective expression, which means the fullest objectification of will at the highest grade at which it is knowable, which is the Idea of man in general, completely expressed in the sensible form. But however much the objective side of the beautiful appears here, the subjective side still always accompanies it. And just because no object of perception transports us so quickly into pure æsthetic contemplation as the most beautiful human countenance and form, the sight of which we are instantly filled with unspeakable satisfaction, and raised above ourselves and all that troubles us; this is only possible because this most distinct and purest knowledge of the will raises us most easily and quickly to the state of pure knowing, a state in which our personality, our will, with its constant pain, disappears, so long as the pure æsthetic pleasure lasts. Therefore it is that Goethe says: “No evil can touch him who looks on human beauty; he feels himself at one with himself and with the world.”
>>3637592So what you're saying is that the human form, since it is the basis for our perception of beauty (sexually and romantically), is always going to be the ultimate beauty?
>>3637594When we say that a thing is 'beautiful', we are asserting that it is an object of our æsthetic contemplation, and this has a double meaning; on the one hand it means that the sight of the beautiful thing makes us 'objective', that is to say, that in contemplating it we are no longer conscious of ourselves as individuals, but we know ourselves purely as will-less subjects of knowledge; and on the other hand it means that we recognise in the beautiful object, not the particular thing, but an Idea...
>>3637599That sounds more like Plato/Socrates
>>3637600Therefore if, for example, I contemplate a tree æsthetically, (i.e. with artistic eyes) and thus recognise, not the tree, but its Idea, it becomes at once of no consequence whether it is this tree or its predecessor tree which flourished a thousand years ago, nor does it matter whether the observer is this individual or any other individual that lived anywhere and at any time; the particular thing and the knowing individual are abolished... and there remains nothing but the Idea and the pure subject...
>>3637602Hey man... I just wanted to know why I get horny for shotas, not german philosopher chit chat
>>3637602>>3637609He's just repeating Schopenhauer's views of aesthetics. I recall he did it in the past too, so presumably he's a long-time lurker of the thread. Quite fitting too, Schopenhauer, as well as Goethe who the anon also quoted, both endorsed Paederasty. Schopenhauer on the grounds that it was a desire the primarily affected old men (sorry /cm/!), and thus was a sexual outlet, enabling them to be kept away from women, preventing their inferior aged genes from proliferating; and Goethe because... he liked it.All idealists have an easy way to create aesthetic theories; since all particular things must be simply an approximation to the ideal thing corporeal or not, we can judge a particular thing's aesthetic value by how closely it approximates that ideal thing. Few idealists however, and this would go for the ancients too, would consider the aesthetic beauty of pre-pubescents as higher then adolescents. The supposed reason why teenage boys were beautiful is that they combined feminine beauty, lithe, supple and soft, with the masculine, muscle, toned bodies and ability—these things boys lack.
>>3637653Never head of Paederasty before but a quick goog seach and now I'm left wondering if im a ped just cause I like shota
>>3637653schopenhauer is not an idealist, since he makes room for the thing in itselfthe will is not mind-dependent, only the phenomenon is mind-dependent
>>3637655The historic practice of men having sex with teenage boys is usually referred to as Paederasty; Paedophilia focused on boys in particular, is a far rarer, though existent, practice. Generally this is because teenage boys are more available and willing than pre-pubescents. Ask yourself: 'do I prefer teenage boys, or little girls?' If you prefer the teenagers you are most likely just a turbo-homosexual, if the girls, a paedo. >>3637658The will is the thing-in-itself, a thing outside of space/time causality and as such incapable of having any properties, or their then arising phenomena, predicated of it a priori. Just because Schopenhauer decided to fill Kant's thing-in-itself with his own preferred metaphysical thing, does not mean he wasn't a Kantian, a german IDEALIST; Kant himself, whilst admitting the impossibility of knowing what was in the thing-in-itself, still chose to PRESUME that there was something there, thus allowing him to believe in God, souls, ethics, and, that which this conversation is about, aesthetic qualities that rely on a mind to judge them. The will is all, both the objectified object, a representation, and the subject, the animating agency of the 'divided' will.
>>3637673kant wasnt an idealistan idealist would say that everything is mind-dependent, but the presence of the thing in itself necessitates an existence that is independent of the mind
>>3637673also, kant argued that mental representations couldnt occur without a cause for the representations (ie a thing in itself)he didnt just 'choose' to believe in the thing in itself, he gave a very good explanation and reason for its existence
sorry for derailing the thread
>>3637680this wouldnt happen if you just silently posted images
>>3637676>>3637677Kant was the founder of 'German idealism', so it'd be a brave statement to say he wasn't an idealist. Kant was a subjective idealist, rather than a transcendental one; thus following in the empirical vein of idealism, exemplified by Berkeley, rather than the transcendental one of Plato. Both are idealism. This is a key point. The difference is that Kant's subjective idealism is a product of the ability for the human mind, conditioned by space/time as it is, to be able to see the 'ideal forms' of things –that human beings are capable of– , where they can't see anything beyond what they can know. Both are forms of idealism; thus why the later German idealists, Fichte, Schelling and most famously Hegel, all turned the subjective critical Kantian idealism into a transcendental one; Schopenhauer did this too, but to a lesser extent. He believed that phenomena has to have a noumena to arise from, yet he said that we couldn't know what the noumena, the thing-in-itself, was; he chose, as Schopenhauer did, to place in the thing-in-itself, that is, the thing outside of space/time, the usual attributes that Christians generally do—soul, God etc.
>>3637673Then I'm just a turbo homo lol. Shota Supremacy!!
>>3637682this is from kant's prolegomena to any future metaphysics"Idealism consists in the assertion, that there are none but thinking beings, all other things, which we think are perceived in intuition, being nothing but representations in the thinking beings, to which no object external to them corresponds in fact. Whereas I say, that things as objects of our senses existing outside us are given, but we know nothing of what they may be in themselves, knowing only their appearances, i.e., the representations which they cause in us by affecting our senses. Consequently I grant by all means that there are bodies without us, that is, things which, though quite unknown to us as to what they are in themselves, we yet know by the representations which their influence on our sensibility procures us, and which we call bodies, a term signifying merely the appearance of the thing which is unknown to us, but not therefore less actual. Can this be termed idealism? It is the very contrary."
>>3637684Yes, as I said, he follows Berkeley's form of idealism rather than Plato's. You're arguing semantics rather than actual points. In his Critique of pure reason he also adds that he hopes in the future that the use of the word 'idea' shall be changed back to the way it was originally to be used I.E. in its Platonic sense of 'the ideal' rather than for just any thought that comes into the mind. This is linguistics, not philosophy. Regardless of the terms one wishes to use to describe different strands of thought, Kant is to all, regarded by all and spoken of by all, as an idealist. The confusion here is arising from mere words. Locke began phenomenalist epistemology by saying that we could only know a thing insofar as we can know the ideas that empirically examining the thing can reveal to us. Berkeley countered by saying: 'if we can only know things by the ideas that they conjure in us, how can we be sure that they are not ideas themselves?' This is an empirical, nominalist form of idealism. Kant fused this, and Hume's advances on Lockean phenomonalism into his subjective criticalist idealism. By stating that we can't know anything other than ideas conditioned by ourselves, by space/time.
>>3637685so even after you reading a quote where kant literally flat out says he isn't an idealist, and then explains why he isn't one, you still think he's an idealist?an idealist would not argue for the existence of the thing in itselfthe thing in itself is the point of kant's entire philosophy
>>3637686You're ignoring my point and arguing about semantics because you can see that I'm right but can't acknowledge it. There's nothing more to say but to those who might be reading to google 'German idealism' and see who's portrait comes up. Kant used the word 'idea' in a way that we don't in common use.
>>3637690kant very clearly explains many times why he isnt an idealist, and i think he's rightberkeley didnt argue for the existence of things in themselves, neither did locke, and neither did the german idealists
>>3637695Berkeley said that all things were ideas, and that when not being observed by other finite spirits they were observed and conserved by the infinite spirit, God. Locke believed that we could merely by viewing a thing know its primary qualities—that is, its actual dimensions, shape and so on—whilst we had to turn to phenomenalist analysis to understand its powers and characteristics. The German IDEALISTS, as you've acknowledged, turned the thing-in-itself into a transcendental idea; Schopenhauer kept it, and said that the will was the thing-in-itself, a thing outside of space/time and as such capable of being only known by the empirical phenomena that arise and can then be observed.
>>3637699According to all known laws of aviation, there is no way a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are too small to get its fat little body off the ground. The bee, of course, flies anyway because bees don't care what humans think is impossible. Yellow, black. Yellow, black. Yellow, black. Yellow, black. Ooh, black and yellow! Let's shake it up a little. Barry! Breakfast is ready! Ooming! Hang on a second. Hello? - Barry? - Adam? - Oan you believe this is happening? - I can't. I'll pick you up. Looking sharp. Use the stairs. Your father paid good money for those. Sorry. I'm excited. Here's the graduate. We're very proud of you, son. A perfect report card, all B's. Very proud. Ma! I got a thing going here. - You got lint on your fuzz. - Ow! That's me! - Wave to us! We'll be in row 118,000. - Bye! Barry, I told you, stop flying in the house! - Hey, Adam. - Hey, Barry. - Is that fuzz gel? - A little. Special day, graduation. Never thought I'd make it. Three days grade school, three days high school. Those were awkward. Three days college. I'm glad I took a day and hitchhiked around the hive. You did come back different. - Hi, Barry. - Artie, growing a mustache? Looks good. - Hear about Frankie? - Yeah. - You going to the funeral? - No, I'm not going. Everybody knows, sting someone, you die. Don't waste it on a squirrel. Such a hothead. I guess he could have just gotten out of the way. I love this incorporating an amusement park into our day. That's why we don't need vacations. Boy, quite a bit of pomp... under the circumstances. - Well, Adam, today we are men. - We are! - Bee-men. - Amen! Hallelujah! Students, faculty, distinguished bees, please welcome Dean Buzzwell. Welcome, New Hive Oity graduating class of... ...9:15. That concludes our ceremonies. And begins your career at Honex Industries! Will we pick ourjob today? I heard it's just orientation. Heads up! Here we go.
>>3637699none of that disproves what ive saidthe defining feature of the german idealists, like fichte and hegel, is that they removed the idea of the thing in itself
>>3637704Keep your hands and antennas inside the tram at all times. Wonder what it'll be like? A little scary. Welcome to Honex, a division of Honesco and a part of the Hexagon Group. This is it! Wow. Wow. We know that you, as a bee, have worked your whole life to get to the point where you can work for your whole life. Honey begins when our valiant Pollen Jocks bring the nectar to The Hive. Our top-secret formula is automatically color-corrected, scent-adjusted and bubble-contoured into this soothing sweet syrup with its distinctive golden glow you know as... Honey! That girl was hot. She's my cousin! She is? Yes, we're all cousins. Right. You're right. At Honex, we constantly strive to improve every aspect of bee existence. These bees are stress-testing a new helmet technology. What do you think he makes? Not enough. Here we have our latest advancement, the Krelman. What does that do? Catches that little strand of honey that hangs after you pour it. Saves us millions. Can anyone work on the Krelman? Of course. Most bee jobs are small ones. But bees know that every small job, if it's done well, means a lot. But choose carefully because you'll stay in the job you pick for the rest of your life. The same job the rest of your life? I didn't know that. What's the difference? You'll be happy to know that bees, as a species, haven't had one day off in 27 million years. So you'll just work us to death? We'll sure try. Wow! That blew my mind! "What's the difference?" How can you say that? One job forever? That's an insane choice to have to make. I'm relieved. Now we only have to make one decision in life. But, Adam, how could they never have told us that? Why would you question anything? We're bees. We're the most perfectly functioning society on Earth. You ever think maybe things work a little too well here? Like what? Give me one example. I don't know. But you know what I'm talking about. Please clear the gate. Royal Nectar Force on approach. Wait a second.
>>3637704Kant was the founder of German idealism. You can remove Fichte or Hegel, from it, yet you can't remove Kant, or it won't be what we refer to as German idealism. Fichte and Hegel removed the thing-in-itself by turning all into spirit. Hegel by fusing the subject of Kant with the object of everything else, all being spirit; Fichte by saying that all WAS spirit, and that the principle of all existence was individualisation. Yet, this individualisation too was based on all being spirit. This is why Fichte tried to convince Kant to give up subjective idealism, and to follow him in making it transcendental.
>>3637706Check it out. Hey, those are Pollen Jocks! Wow. I've never seen them this close. They know what it's like outside The Hive. Yeah, but some don't come back. Hey, Jocks! Hi, Jocks! You guys did great! You're monsters! You're sky freaks! I love it! I love it! I wonder where they were. I don't know. Their day's not planned. Outside The Hive, flying who knows where, doing who knows what. You can't just decide to be a Pollen Jock. You have to be bred for that. Right. Look. That's more pollen than you and I will see in a lifetime. It's just a status symbol. Bees make too much of it. Perhaps. Unless you're wearing it and the ladies see you wearing it. Those ladies? Aren't they our cousins too? Distant. Distant. Look at these two. Couple of Hive Harrys.Let's have fun with them. It must be dangerous being a Pollen Jock. Yeah. Once a bear pinned me against a mushroom! He had a paw on my throat, and with the other, he was slapping me! Oh, my! I never thought I'd knock him out. What were you doing during this? Trying to alert the authorities. I can autograph that. A little gusty out there today, wasn't it, comrades? Yeah. Gusty. We're hitting a sunflower patch six miles from here tomorrow. Six miles, huh? Barry! A puddle jump for us, but maybe you're not up for it. Maybe I am. You are not! We're going 0900 at J-Gate. What do you think, buzzy-boy? Are you bee enough? I might be. It all depends on what 0900 means. Hey, Honex! Dad, you surprised me. You decide what you're interested in? Well, there's a lot of choices. But you only get one. Do you ever get bored doing the same job every day? Son, let me tell you about stirring. You grab that stick, and you just move it around, and you stir it around. You get yourself into a rhythm. It's a beautiful thing. You know, Dad, the more I think about it, maybe the honey field just isn't right for me. You were thinking of what, making balloon animals? That's a bad job for a guy with a stinger.
This isthe most important Kant quote to remember!
it's not gay if they're both catboys
>>3637718thank god, someone finally posted something good
>>3637722Cats have barbed penises. It's already awful for male on female. Barbed penis in the butt? That's just horrific.
>>3637778They use cat onaholes instead
>>3637592>>3637599>>3637602>>3637653>>3637673>>3637682>>3637676>>3637677>>3637684>>3637685>>3637686>>3637690>>3637695>>3637699>>3637702>>3637704>>3637705>>3637706>>3637711shut the fuck up
>>3637796Keep the philosophizing on /lit/
>>3637798Well, send it to jannies, see if they mind?
>>3637801I don't really care, you're just an annoying little fucker.
What are your favorite kinds of shota, philosophy anons?
>>3637823"he cute"No more is necessary.
>>3637823Shota boy smell
>>3637815>I really don't care so let me care enough to tell you how much I don't careI'm not even one of the anons that was chatting, but kys
>>3637880It's not that hard to understand, little pissant.
>>3637947Janet, your son's not sure he wants to go into honey! Barry, you are so funny sometimes. I'm not trying to be funny. You're not funny! You're going into honey. Our son, the stirrer! You're gonna be a stirrer? No one's listening to me! Wait till you see the sticks I have. I could say anything right now. I'm gonna get an ant tattoo! Let's open some honey and celebrate! Maybe I'll pierce my thorax. Shave my antennae. Shack up with a grasshopper. Get a gold tooth and call everybody "dawg"! I'm so proud. We're starting work today! Today's the day. Come on! All the good jobs will be gone. Yeah, right. Pollen counting, stunt bee, pouring, stirrer, front desk, hair removal... Is it still available? Hang on. Two left! One of them's yours! Congratulations! Step to the side. What'd you get? Picking crud out. Stellar! Wow! Couple of newbies? Yes, sir! Our first day! We are ready! Make your choice. You want to go first? No, you go. Oh, my. What's available? Restroom attendant's open, not for the reason you think. Any chance of getting the Krelman? Sure, you're on. I'm sorry, the Krelman just closed out. Wax monkey's always open. The Krelman opened up again. What happened? A bee died. Makes an opening. See? He's dead. Another dead one. Deady. Deadified. Two more dead. Dead from the neck up. Dead from the neck down. That's life! Oh, this is so hard! Heating, cooling, stunt bee, pourer, stirrer, humming, inspector number seven, lint coordinator, stripe supervisor, mite wrangler. Barry, what do you think I should... Barry? Barry! All right, we've got the sunflower patch in quadrant nine... What happened to you? Where are you? I'm going out. Out? Out where? Out there. Oh, no! I have to, before I go to work for the rest of my life. You're gonna die! You're crazy! Hello? Another call coming in. If anyone's feeling brave, there's a Korean deli on 83rd that gets their roses today. Hey, guys. Look at that. Isn't that the kid we saw yesterday?
>>3637958take your own life
he likes you a lot and wants you to like him too, anon
gay boys doing gay stuff! to each other!
The world desperately needs mass depopulation.
>>3638040tf did I just watch... Anyway, here's something lighter, a classichttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EPl8zAsq8A
>>3638040I like the cute hamster cars better than whatever that was. At least it had a happy ending
>>3638141>the pedo get the rope>sad endinganon, hide your powerlevel
>>3638147Eww, a w*man
>>3638040i wanna fuck those goats
>>3638249As opposed to pedo and straight?Yikes
>>3638250Why did you just change the gay to straight lol? How about straight and not pedo, its not that hard.
>>3638251Idk, why did you just care to mention gay? You know women frequent these boards specially often right?
>>3638159that's a real cutie
>>3638156I meant the goats and boy got a happy ending. Still a weird ass animation though
why is no one talking about this guyciel is a classic
>>3638277He deserves a thread just for him imo
>>3637823im no philosophy anon but i just want a shota who will hang out with me and play videogames and kiss me and jerk off while kissing
>>3638040Is that undertale?
>>3638538no, this is
gay boys gaying up """straight""" boys!
>>3635179What is the shota version of “uuuooooohhh ”?
will you play his game?
>>3638549Moar Kris pls
>>3638593idk what game is it
>>3638599why are you so useless anon?
>>3638601but my mummy says im useful
>>3638598Kris may be a g*rl, so no
>>3638656he might also be a goat
these gay boys are meant for each other!
>>3638670Never played that game, are they canonically gay, or just cute friends?
>>3638667Well, if there's something worse than a loli-lover is a full-on furry so
>>3638591It's still uoooohhhh unless you're a milf then it's ara ara
>>3638656Is a boy dressed as a pussy officially a bussy? ^^
>>3638673I haven't played it either, but I think the black haired one kills the blonde haired one.
>>3638673They are just cute friends, no homo action going on in the game
>>3638258Broaden your horizons
gay boys trying to kiss their straight friends!
>>3638785Gay boys with straight boys is super hot, send more!
>>3638670They're just cute friends, but the blond one is very heavily implied to be gay and romantically attracted to the dark-haired one. Meanwhile the dark-haired one is straight and doesn't ever return the blond boy's advances. However, there are some cute pictures of them holding hands as kids and being unusually close so everyone ships them anywayAlso I never see any Laphicet/Malak Number Two art, which is a shame. I just finished Tales of Berseria and it's one long game full of adorable shota fanservice. The summer outfit DLC has him wearing precious little as well, well worth the money
>>3638673Oops meant to reply to this post
>>3638788The summer outfit DLC. The clothes are 11/10, his standard hair is better than his summer hair though. Luckily you can mix and match
>>3638546>>3638547>>3638549>>3638550>>3638598>>3638667kris, get the banana
Tales doesn't do cute shotas as well as it used to imo, I also miss the "affection system"
>>3637688tribal shota, let´s go
>>3639914Me on the left!
Post Halloween shotas
I want a shota boywife so fucking much...
link is twink
>>3640118Twink ain't shota though