Pics of guys in top apparel and underwear only (socks or no underwear sfw also fine) (and I really don't see how the other pic I posted is nsfw but alright)
>>3327802Is because of the visible ballThe mods are a bit touchy when there's too much skin color in one picture too even if the image is sfw.It still can be seen as unsafe or porn.
>>3327810Oh i understand now,thanks
>>3327809What is that thing on his legs that's holding his shirt fown called?
Hope this is within the rules
>>3328300Its called shirt suspenders, they keep your shirt nice and tucked in your pants.
Does this count
>>3328361also makes you look like a tranny as soon as you remove your pants
>>3338578Don't just bump. Post some of your favorite pics too friend.
>>3327810Your definition of sfw is odd. The general rule is "could someone at an average job see this on your screen and not be offended". So if there is a clear erotic intent with genitals imprinting, excessive amounts of skin shown, sexual poses or whatever the image is not sfw. Alternatively a dick showing can be sfw if it is in the realm of classic art for example. Obviously these distinctions would require people to have any idea about the outside world which I guess is asked a little too much from the average /hm/ poster.
>>3340152Have us patience anon, we're all autistic in here.
>>3340152Then a bunch of active threads on the board right now are ban worthy if you just look at the shit posted in them, like this one or the muscle thread. Yet here we are. The mods don't care that much why should we? Is like you just wanted to tell someone to go outside that day.
>>3342177The broader definition of NSFW and how NSFW works on this site is different that's all.You shouldn't be browsing 4chan at work anyway so the only rules for the blue boards are just no images showing sex or genitals.