Minimum accessories, inconspicuous prints, simple main-pieces, basic hairstyles, solids, no crazy make-up, only 1 petticoat, nothing too fancy, no glitter or glamour etc
We already have a casual lolita thread why do you need another
>>10169876Nice inapplicable buzzword
>>10169879fishing for (you)s = bait
>>10169880That’s not what I was doing, I was asking why we need to make multiples of the same threads that aren’t even at bump limit. We already have the catalog shat up with feels threads and dumb ass one off questions that newfags ask. But go off I guess. Must be pretty miserable seeing everything in a negative light.
>>10169882these coords don't belong in the casual lolita thread, they're just normal lolita coords. i'm sure you've seen people argue about it dozens of times that's why you thought it would be good bait to shit up a thread
>>10169871there's a difference between toned down coordinates and casual ones. is this >>10169866casual to you?
>>10169880If you know it's bait stop taking it>>10169874
>>10169884Scrape the sand out of your cunt any time now, I’m sure it’ll improve your mood.>>10169886It’s casual enough. Having a lot of lace doesn’t suddenly make it not casual.
>>10169868This would be. so much better if she used white instead of ivory
>>10169901the other thread literally says "don't post normal toned down coords" this is a thread for normal toned down coords
>>10169932And countless CoF threads have started with “don’t argue”, but does that do anything?
>>10169934That's a little different because it's trying to dictate text as opposed to the types of photos. This is an image board meant for discussion. Its uncensored so arguments that spawned from discussions are bound to happen but if someone is doing a photo dump it's pretty easy to follow guidelines.
>>10170038It’s abritrary, not against any rules, and not an inforceable thing.
>>10170040>>10170044Shut up holy shit. You of all people need to not be talking when you post too fast like this. Just gotta post don't ya?Anyway let's talk about on topic things like toned down coords.
>>10170071Who shat in your tea? Or are you normally this big of a cunt?
>>10169884what dress is that?
>>10170075naryt but you're the one who entered this thread just to whine. we want to see toned down coords, please be quiet
>>10170079News flash, you can’t moderate other peoples posts unless you’re a mod. Are you one? No? Then why do you think you have authority over others?
>>10170084says the person trying to show enough authority to end an entire thread. stop baiting for reports by saying dumb shit like that
>>10170090>baiting for reportsMan you are just full on mentally retarded aren’t you?
>>10169882>Must be pretty miserable seeing everything in a negative light.ask yourself, holy crap lol.
>>10170071what dress is this?
>>10170075HEY LOOK IM CONTRIBUTING TO THE THREADWHAT ARE YOU DOING??
>>10170100getting mad at this thread!!!111oof i am not a fan of the color balance in this one
Maybe if you idiots would stop responding the thread could be on topic. Not that hard.
>>10170092Not them but it made sense to me
>>10170109stop talking to it, just report it like it wants you to. they themselves said they're unwilling to listen to rules so arguing is useless
>>10170104Pffft so much easier said than done
>>10170115This coord has been posted in two separate inspo threads, but different pics of it and neither is the pic that was on CoF recently. It's v cute but this is starting to smell like self post...
>>10170111Please take your own advice instead of trying to boss me aroundI'm on your side but you can't even tell because you are so clearly fucked in the head
>>10170115im so tired of this print>>10170121two different people told you to stop, i'm not the same person. bizarre that trying to keep a thread on topic is "fucked in the head" to you but hey be my guest and keep going if you want
>>10170119I'm just going through the lolitafashion hashtag on igI don't know any of these girls nor do I follow them
>>10170124Damn I dropped my imageAny wayYou are in fact dense but please keep goingI needed the laugh
>>10170127is that a rilakkuma itabag?
>>10170134Looks like it
>>10170130why are you arguing with now and why? you're laughing because the OP said to stay on topic?
>>10170134It doesn't look rilakkuma shaped so I'm not sure
>>10170127thanks for the warning now I know not to post any time soon
>>10170137i'd love to see the details on it. what's her IG name?
>>10170140>headcanon: the posters who say 'i'm not posting' are the same ones shitting up the thread just so they can shit the thread up morechange my mind.
>>10170160here you go. im >>10170140 and here are my fave tone down coords
>>10170160It’s impossible to change the mind of the mentally ill with logic
>>10170140Oh so that's why you tried to shit up the thread. Skin not thicc enough huh?
>>10170140You could still post and not use the hashtag but it's pretty obvious you're full of shit.
>>10170166People who are cognitively challenged tend to not recognize jokes and humor. Sorry, anon.>>10170164Thanks for contributing three images, at least one of which is very clearly from social media.
32ki is my absolute favorite for toned down. These days I think especially in classic lolita that a normal coordinate is 'toned down' in everyone else's eyes, but I'll try my best.
>>10170139>>10170137Looks like there's tamagotchis in it.
All for this thread, more please!
>>10170119I posted it in the fave coord thread but I like that one much better than the one posted here. I don't even like holy lantern desu but that picture is just my taste.
>>10170366Ooh which bag is that?I have a mighty need
>>10170115How? This girl looks skinnier than me, and the jsk fits her so nicely. Meanwhile, I'm swimming in this fatty-chan tier dress that is 2 sizes too big on me. Is it my lack of boobs? Did AP fucked the shirring?
>>10170627I need her.
>>10170625Maybe she's tall and you're short
>>10170625I have it in ivory in the zipper jsk cut, and its only fitting if you have a good bust placement for it. The top part of the bust sticks out for boobs to be placed there.
>>10170636The model or the dress?
>>10170625Did you buy used? It's possible the previous owner stretched the shirring.
>>10170278Is this even Lolita anymore? Looks pretty vintage style. Only thing would be the length of the skirt being not quite long enough
>>10171769She’s wearing almost entirely Innocent World. Every time I read this “is this even lolita” comment on totally normal and polished classic coords I die a little inside.
>>10171769The capitalization of Lolita suggests newfag or fetishist who thinks lolita fashion = trying to look like a little girl.
>>10171769I agree that most of her outfits don't even read as lolita. And whatever she uses on her face to shoop it always makes her teeth look brown.
>>10171797Brown teeth, that one’s new. Take your vendetta somewhere else.
>>10171801I think the problem is that not that many recent adoptees/fans of the fashion are even aware of what classic brands like MM look like, beyond maybe popular pieces like Whyteleafe and Antoinette Fleur. And a lot don’t actually wear lolita, especially not on a daily basis, so they have no interest in the comfort/general presentability of a coord.
>>10171801It kinds looks like she put her makeup on with Meitu in the full length photo.
>>10171797I don't think you know what classic lolita normally looks like so keep your opinions to yourself
>>10170291I love this! So cute.
>>10171694can anyone ID this dress?
>>10171838It’s tagged as Emily Temple Cute, not sure what dress.
>>10169904does anyone know if that's an actually vivienne westwood beret or it's just a brooch?
Are there any ig lolitas who post these kinds of looks frequently?
>>10171916Recklessrave posts almost every day and wears toned down lolita.
>>10171923I like her classic coords, but I have to admit I am slightly alarmed by the endlessness of her wardrobe.
>>10171926Anyone who wears classic more regularly? I’m looking for toned down classic inspo beyond FR.
>>10171801No its not. Check the archives, it's been argued about before.
>>10171926Im more alarmed by her glasses
>>10172161Who tf cares, this is a thread about toned-down coords not toned-brown teeth.
>>10172177Yeah, they’re not flattering. I thought for the longest time that she was a crossdresser. But I do like many of her coords and she seems like a nice, genuine person.
>>10172206What do you mean by delulu?I feel like most coords you see on ig are toned down. People post their daily outfits there more than they do on cof, which could give you an artificially exaggerated idea of what lolita looks like.
>>10171926is that an unfortunate wig or did she just get really absurdly cut bangs which extend past her forehead? it looks like a bowl cut.
>>10171771I didn't say she wasn't wearing Lolita brands.... But there is something about the combination and the shape of petti that just gives off cute vintage vibes rather than Lolita to me. I'm not fully sure what the difference is... But come on, you have to admit the incredibly plain perfectly a-line low-poof skirt is not terribly lolita.In the end they are just words though. Categories were made for man, not man for categories.
>>10172178>Gets proven wrong"Who cares anyway?" Nice deflection, bitter hag
>>10172415I feel like it’s the same shape as they do in their stock photos so it’s worn the way the brand meant for it to be worn. I don’t see an issue with that. If you’re used to bells and whistles sure it may not read lolita to you, but this is just as much lolita as anything else out there.
>>10172415Nayrt but I definitely feel like this sort of comment has become more common as vintage/retro fashion has exploded back into the mainstream. Back in the day this silhouette was odd to see aside from the diehard vintage fashion enthusiast, but since vintage fashion, second hand etc has become mainstream rather than a collector's thing there has been more overlap between lolita and "vintage" because there's more of the latter visible.
>>10172423Bitter hag? You’re the one obsessively searching for flaws on someone more attractive and popular than you, lol.Also, in what universe is something not lolita because it’s solid and a-line?
>>10172650This is my aesthetic holy shit
>>10171926I really just want to shake her and give her a little bit of a makeover - new glasses, for one thing, and even if she doesn't want to do anything with her hair she could definitely get a more flattering haircut. The other person that makes me feel like this is amy whatsherface from back in the livejournal days.
>>10172513You're responding to more than one anon and that anon is baiting.
>>10171932Tokkigo wears other styles but probably posts toned down classic most often.
>>10172652This is a really cute coord and she looks good otherwise but damn do I hate when girls do that wristcuff on the ankle thing. Especially with these tights and shoes it breaks up the entire line of the leg which could have been so elegant.
>>10173028Those are ankle socks
>>10170284whos this? she's so pretty.
>>10173106Oh my bad, didn't see that before and it didn't really occur to me it could be ankle socks as she's wearing a warm-looking coat.
>>10173271Looks like a spring coat to me
>>10172153not feeling the hiking boots, but other boots would make this perfect. The ribbon around her waist is so precious.
>>10172265fuck, what dress is this? aside from the color it's literally perfect.
>>10169896>coat covering dress>no accessories, plain black tights and bootsYou cant even tell this is lolita
>>10173028If you aren’t looking at these photos close enough to be able to tell that those are socks then you aren’t really looking at these photos in enough detail to make any valid critiques, Anon.
>>10170194Not everyone wants to be posted on a /cgl/ with all the disgusting crossover it gets with other boards.
>>10173368That is the dress
>>10173368It's an IW OP
>>10169868Isn't this the OP she modeled in OnS 3?
>>10173156Likely you LOL
>>10172161I wanna see it for myself (the discussion), so pls give me some tags to search. I too agree that it doesn't really look lolita, it is something a vintage girl would wear, but I am not the one to judge. I am not baiting, I swear to god.
>>10173460I think that anon was talking about the brown teeth thing, but the lolita-or-normie-vintage thing has been discussed a lot too. I think your best bet is to just search for "Fanny", "Fanny Rosie" or "vintage" in the archives.
>>10173466Well I still really like vintage, and I love this thread and am getting a lot of inspo from it. I just don't want to pull from vintage so much that I go up to a Meetup basically not wearing Lolita thinking I'm wearing Lolita. I still really like her outfits, im just sure I'd feel out of place at, say, a tea party
>>10173468Ok, so don’t? Live your life man. You don’t need to be a fanny clone.
>>10171772Our autocorrect. My phone capitalizes the word all the God damn time
itt: people who don't know what classic lolita is
>>10173457So uh, can you answer the question or nah?