[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/an/ - Animals & Nature

[Advertise on 4chan]


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1620159037698.jpg (59 KB, 540x719)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
This could actually be true since modern birds are descendants of dinosaurs
>>
>>3785855
You gonna make the paleospergs seethe
>>
>>3785855
Low quality bait
>>
>>3785855
The square cube law and the needs of thermoregulation in large endotherms would flip shit on a creature with a meter+of insulative integument.
>>
File: E0kFtEQWYAEuhpW.jpg (146 KB, 960x1280)
146 KB
146 KB JPG
>>
>>3785862
no this thread will get 300 replies
>>
File: duality of ⁄an ⁄.png (40 KB, 519x305)
40 KB
40 KB PNG
>>
File: EvkgDI8WgAEZfJU.jpg (378 KB, 960x1280)
378 KB
378 KB JPG
>>3785958
handsome
>>
>>3785958
beautiful eyes t b h
>>
File: armoured scales.jpg (141 KB, 675x900)
141 KB
141 KB JPG
>>3786012
We have Sciuromimus, Dilong and, more importantly, Yutyrannus as proof that tyrannosauroids were phylogenetically primarily feathered. If tyrannosaurids/eutyrannosaurs had no homologous to feather filaments then they lost them secondarily due to gigantothermy.
>>
>>3788040
Possible, but until we can find evidence of feathers in even small NA tyrranosaurs, it's arguably better evidence that the current Chinese-tyrannosauroid-centric evolutionary tree for the North American Tyrranosaurs might be invalid.
>>
>>3786012
>>3788040
PS: we also have evidence for quill nobs as basally as Coelophysis, which is almost as basal as it gets for confident theropod placement standards (anything more basal than that tends to constantly swift between theropod, sauropodomorph, herrerasaur and non-dinosaur all the time, especially now that consensus tends to finally favour the Ornithoscelida hypothesis).
>>
>>3788050
>it's arguably better evidence that the current Chinese-tyrannosauroid-centric evolutionary tree for the North American Tyrranosaurs might be invalid
That's highly unlikely though given that tyrannosauroid sister taxa are constantly interchangable between NA and EA of late Cretaceous. Zhuchengtyrannus and Tarbosaurus are more closely related to T-rex than all other North American eutyrannosaurs were, alioramins were Asian and persistently found to be closer to tyrannosaurines than the American albertosaurines were, and the Mongolian Timurlengia/Alectrosaurus/Xiongguanlong-grade tyrannosauroids are often found in a position betweens the American Dryptosaurus and Appalachiosaurus.

Not trying to say this means that derived late cretaceous tyrannosauroids were feathered, just that the geographic distinction between current continents doesn't mean shit for the late Cretaceous.



Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.