AI won't replace actual humans for the next few decades because they lack the capacity for improvisation and problem solving that a person would have. You don't see anyone scrambling to replace lawyers because a soulless machine can't appeal to a judge and jury, same goes for most other professions that require a degree of flexibility for someone to make a creer out of them to begin with.In other words, STOP BEING A PANSY ASS BITCH AND GO STUDY RIGHT NOW, FAGGOT.
>>964645The truth is people using AI will replace people not using AI
>>964645>can't appeal to a judge and jury>he thinks ai will not replace courts
>>964645>You don't see anyone scrambling to replace lawyersYou have been living under a rockhttps://ailawyer.pro/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/11/16/chatgpt-lawyer-fired-ai/
>>964645What the fuck am I looking at OP, a venusian liver
>>964645You do realise court is like 10 maybe 5 percent of lawyers work right? Most of it is processing documents and data, and guess what AI is pretty good at?
>>965696Not that.
>>965137>one guy using ai will replace a thousand Indians using aiIs more like it
